TruthBurn: Dr. Steven Jones Compares WTC to Burning Man Thermite Residue. October 2007. Part of history. 9/11 controlled demolition inside operation pretext for war - http://911truthburn.blogspot.com/2007...
2009 The Year of Prof Jones. 9/11 controlled demolition inside op. I think we can declare the year 2009 a Year of Prof Steven Jones, and his - together Prof Harrit and others - his mighty definitive 2009 Nanothermite WTC Evidence study, as for what 9/11 Truth is concerned. Single one most definitive most important act of the 9/11 Movement history.... - http://911unitedweinvestigate....
I think we can declare the year 2009 a Year of Prof Steven Jones, and his - together Prof Harrit and others - his mighty definitive 2009 Nanothermite WTC Evidence study, as for what 9/11 Truth is concerned. Single one most definitive most important act of the 9/11 Movement history. And yes, let's mention Ms Janette MacKinlay and her pivotal providential role! The history, the big history of the nation, is being written, right now, by big, awesome, fearless Patriots standing for the Truth, for their country, for our common principles and our common conscience. They never will be forgotten. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Professor Jones! .... you blew us all away, apart, into pieces, into higher orbit, with your definitive study! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How can we...
more...
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
How can we survive such a jolt? :] Cheers ! The Victory is ours! The Victory is that of Truth and Justice. ... At least in America. Forever.
- pb:
Crazy occupation wars of aggression - Afghanistan: 30,000 troops, $30 billion a year. Over the past 8 years, roughly $1 trillion cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was essentially charged to the national credit card... And 9/11 is a controlled demolition pretext for wars, per irrefutable scientific evidence. Iraq, 2.5 million civilians dead. - http://money.cnn.com/2009...
Two major stories on 9/11 truth printed today in the Sydney Morning Herald. My letter to Editor. Madam, Sir, let me comment on your 2 recent articles in your newspaper, Sydney Morning Herald, by Rick Feneley, at http://www.smh.com.au/world.... In my view, articles severely distort facts... - http://www.911blogger.com/node...
Madam, Sir, let me comment on your 2 recent articles in your newspaper, Sydney Morning Herald, by Rick Feneley, at http://www.smh.com.au/world.... In my view, articles severely distort facts of their topic, the 9/11 attacks in New York. 1. Article does not mention at all a recent visit and presentations in Australia, New Zealand and Japan by the leading scientist Richard Gage, http://AE911Truth.org, and a group of 9/11 researchers. http://theHardEvidence.com 2. Article distorts or omits the fact that 9/11 attacks are a controlled demolition inside operation, per irrefutable scientific evidence, and per common sense too. sites collection at http://krunchd.com/911, http://stj911.org for one. 3. Article fails to mention the research work and results of leading Australian 9/11 researchers, at http://911oz.com, namely John Bursill and Hereward Fenton, if I'm not mistaken. Why? Thank you, Sincerely, Petr Buben
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
Danish scientist Niels Harrit, nano-thermite explosive found in the 9/11 WTC dust . Masterpiece controlled demolition. It is crystal clear that 3 towers of WTC were demolished. 9/11 is an inside job false flag operation.
Per irrefutable scientific evidence. No doubt about that. Danish TV2 interview - http://www.youtube.com/watch...
9/11 Inside Job 8 year anniversary. American Reichstag Fire, Controlled Demolition 9/11 Truth Movement is bigger and better than ever with film festivals, books, videos and websites to communicate scientific evidence to counter the lies of Nazis USA's war profiteer machine. - http://www.indybay.org/newsite...
Robert Scheer: A 9/11 Reality Check. ~9/11 controlled demolition in official media - practically a nonsense, nothingsaying article, missing the point completely - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-...
Hold Cheney Accountable For 9/11 Stand Down. #911#wtc "On the morning of 9-11-01 a Military Aide informs the Vice President in the White House Bunker that an unauthorized aircraft is just ten miles out from the Pentagon, and asks, sir, "do the orders (stand down orders) still stand?", and Richard B. Cheney whips his neck around and replies, "of... - http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node...
..replies, "of course the orders still stand-have you heard anything to the contrary?", and then, in just moments, the Pentagon gets hit, and the World Trade Center Towers also got hit earlier that morning as well."
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
Game Over for 9-11 Cover-Up. Super-Thermite Demolished Twin Towers WTC. The most significant events of the 9/11 Truth movement. Paper written by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University and eight others. For 9-11 truth seekers, this is a historic moment; we have crossed the divide. - http://wacla.org/2009...
For those involved in the official cover-up, on the other hand, things will only get worse. The evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is like the writing on the wall; for the criminals of 9-11 and their supporters the writing is quite clear. It says: Game Over.
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic ~Good progress. At least they mention there is something else than official story. In fact, there is the truth - 9/11 is a controlled demolition. Who did what, and when? Polygraph questioning should tell us. We need independent investigation. - http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode...
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode... .....http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com ---- Wed Aug 19, 2009, 9:39am - Official Version or Cover-Up Conspiracy? The Truth Behind 9/11 Put to the Test in New National Geographic Channel Program ==On Monday, August 31, 2009==, National Geographic Channel's 9/11: Science and Conspiracy conducts a forensic investigation to test tenets of some of the most common conspiracy theories.... Now we hear from a group of theorists, dubbed the "9/11 Truth Movement," who believe the official version is inconsistent... More news about: National Geographic Channel
- pb:
People that believe that 911 was an inside job are cut from the same cloth as those that believe Obama wasn't born in the US. Grade A Loons.
- Mattb4rd
@Richard ..bye. .. just get to know the facts
- pb:
it'l be interesting to see, which official propaganda media will first "break the news" .. i contacted Matt Drudge, and HuffingtonPost .. they wont touch it ... http://drudgereport.com - http://huffpost.com .... :] .... too much truth at the moment :]
- pb:
What? Did you make up any facts since I looked into it years ago? You should bring then to the WTC site this September, and tell the firemen. I'm sure they'll be fascinated with what you have to say.
- Richard Walker
I do not make up facts. Nobody does ..ehm ....... But yes, this very important year of 2009, some new, irrefutable conclusive scientific evidence, of the presence of explosive nanothermite in the pyroclastic dust of imploded pulverized towers, was found .... just for the folks who it is not enough just to look at how towers fell into their footprints, with the speed close to free fall,...
more...
- pb:
NOPE: "Conspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers.
- Richard Walker
Science: Some truthers claimdust that some New Yorkers found after the attack shares the components of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes.
- Richard Walker
EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center."
- Richard Walker
Richard, not that "some truthers claim.." - scientists found, conclusively, that high military explosive nano-thermite, non-existent in the nature, but manufactured, for example Lawrence Livermore Labs, was present in great quantities in the pyroclastic dust ...1.can you accept this? http://friendfeed.com/rockcre... ......
more...
- pb:
the real scientists claim that nano-thermite, highly advanced manufactured explosive, wasn't the only explosive to bring down towers in classic controlled demolition ... have you seen the last video from China? - the controlled demolition? - http://911irrefutableevidence....
- pb:
I have read all citations, propaganda, and facts i need ... plus, do you realize that 1. both buildings fell in the same manner? on the same day? 2. they pulverized, exploding and imploding 3. they fell into their own footprints ..4.buildings remained standing after the planes impacts - because the were specifically designed to do so ... 5. have you seen tv footage?? do you believe even...
more...
- pb:
WTC was not a controlled demolition. It wasn't a "classic controlled demolition" at all. Have you ever seen what goes into a controlled demo? It requires a hell of a lot of work, the stripping out of several ground floors, the drilling into support beams and wiring up of explosives so they can go off in a programmed sequence. Also, since when have you seen a controlled demolition that...
more...
- alphaxion
The WTC came down as a result of gallons of aviation fuel igniting fires across the whole building. Those fires weakened the support beams, allowing them to bend. The weight of the building above the initial impact area (the area with the greatest damage and hottest fires) caused the supports to break, creating a cascading collapse from the top down. Every controlled demolition I have...
more...
- alphaxion
By the way, the "explosions" that were heard would have been compressive as the top of the building fell onto the floors below it. Not every boom is generated by an explosive charge ;) I recommend you do some research into controlled demolitions before you try to claim this was one
- alphaxion
Doing some research myself and there have been top down demos... but they tend to be small buildings that have been completely gutted. Quite different to a 110 story building that hasn't been prepped. I do have some questions for you - how could the work to plant the alleged explosives have been done un-noticed and how could they have even functioned after a plane slammed into them?...
more...
- alphaxion
Resisting the urge to LOL at something that isn't really funny at all.
- Derrick
No, beersage, BUT MRS KUTCHER IS!!!1!! yay. not.
- Richard Walker
@ Matt .. yes, real facts - 9/11 controlled demolition
- pb:
@Alph .. it was a controlled demolition. 1. the buildings, both of them, at the same day, and at the same way, even though hit differently by planes, disappeared, pulverized, after imploding into pyroclastic clouds of dust. nothing remained of them. ----here is a video of controlled demolition - have you seen it? http://911irrefutableevidence....
- pb:
2. they disappeared with the speed of close to free fall - IT IS NOT POSSIBLE for 110 floors buildings to fall - pulverize unto themselves, into their footprints .. logically, physical laws ,common sense - ABSOLUTELY impossible - unless they were demolished ..... 10 floors per second pulverized .. CAN you image building just falling??
- pb:
3. "heck of a load of work to set explosive devices" - yes. you are right .. plausible ways of explanation exist - Bush brother Marvin, hand of security firm for WTC, ..numerous building power-downs, repairs ... it is completely possible to explain, how over 10 tons of explosives were installed . - have you seen a video?.. for more explanation, we need investigation ..3B TALK ABOUT building WTC-7 ..would you ??? .. nanothermite was probably applied on the walls/beams as paint .its the high tech darn stuff
- pb:
nano-thermite will not detonate on fire, or impact ... see, it is very sophisticated, military secret top stuff ..we can hardly imagine what can be done ... its has been found in the pyroclastic dust, and it is irrefutable scientific evidence ...... did you even need it, after watching, how towers fell ??? ... and yes, wireless it probably was .... VIDEO - compare controlled demolition...
more...
- pb:
the nanothermite might not have been destroyed, but of the wiring and the detonators? not to mention how they could get it in with no-one noticing? You carefully skip over these questions. And you can't use the weekend where 1 of the towers (not the other) was evac'd because there simply isn't enough time for the setup. They didn't fall at freefall as they took longer to fully fall....
more...
- alphaxion
and I'd say you need to watch the video again. Pretty impressive that they managed to preplan where the planes were gonna slam into so that it actually falls on the level of impact!
- alphaxion
WTC7... you mean the building that had a massive 10 story gouge out of it from the antenna of the WTC? the one that suffered fires and rubble collision? Sorry, *someone* would have noticed the work needed for such an operation, it's a miracle that any of the equipment survived the impacts to even detonate. The video footage doesn't support the supposition and the only evidence I have...
more...
- alphaxion
Does anyone else notice these people are generally ONE TRICK PONIES... They remind me of Jehovah's Proselytizers shoving a copy of The WaTCh tower at you. Especially with the names of the websites and their sad attempts at re-framing science and "objective reality." I have a few Jehovah's Proselytizers and 9/11 doubters amongst my family and work colleagues.
- Richard Walker
it is entirely possible for a building to go down in the manner of the WTC when you have had a massive plane slam into it, slicing thru a number of support beams, spewing thousands of gallons of aviation fuel into it and keeping a sustained fire on multiple floors. They were never built to withstand such an event because they are impossible to protect against. The only thing that is...
more...
- alphaxion
ok ... i have gone through this before, so for me it is almost a loss of time ... but i will go ahead and answer - refute every your claim as inexact, uninformed and/or absolutely impossible ... it is very clear to anybody who watched the towers fall into pulverizing, that official version is PURE NONSENSE, flat impossible. per common sense, and per science .. well .. il be right back with it .... il be spending time explaining that things do not fall up ... :/
- pb:
you think it impossible that 2 planes could do that and instead think it possible that tonnes of explosives (that need to not be noticed by sniffer dogs, staff and maintenance guys for months at a time!) and the required wiring jobs and prep work could be done a couple of days at a time by a crew small enough to not get noticed? Never mind survive long enough in those conditions to...
more...
- alphaxion
do you accept that nanothermite was found all over the place? then it was explosives what did it ..and it DOES look like it was explosives controlled demolition ..JUST look at it .. it explodes, implodes, pulverizes ....vanishes into a small pile of cut up metal, molten metal, burning for many weeks ! === yes it is possible to get over 10 tons of nanothermite into WTC. have you seen...
more...
- pb:
it was nanothermite, probably in the form of wall paint, and also other explosives ... see http://911blogger.com, http://stj911.org, http://journalof911studies.com .. those are scientists, impartial .. plus http://ae911truth.org ... what else should i tell you? :] ...... yes, they started it from the middle ..so what? it's the technology ... WTC-7 - was not seriously damaged by antenna...
more...
- pb:
YES. WTC was specifically designed to withstand the impact of airliners - and IT DID !! have you seen that towers remained standing?? ...now, office fire, nor airplane fuel, DOESN'T burn as hot as to melt a steel!! it can weaken it, yes, but then you would have irregular collapse, fall over, of the whole building !! do you realize what massive fiction idiocy was created by official...
more...
- pb:
.. and let me ask you, if it came out that republicans, as a matter of policy, decided to do Reichstag fire, to rally the nationalistic parts of a nation for war, by doing 9/11 controlled demolition - would you agree? do you know what Reichstag fire is? Hitler burned down his parliament, so that he could go to war ... institute police state regime ..
- pb:
@ Richard - one trick pony is a dummy that looks at pictures and footage of WTC 9/11 and doesn't understand that it is a controlled demolition .. a false flag operation ... self inflicted wound ... but maybe, many, being brainwashed into nationalistic war pride, do not want to believe ... it will be a tough piece to swallow for obedient population ..that this is what never elected government did to them .... sorry .. please, face the truth
- pb:
if you talking to me, then keep your personal attacks to yourself ..i am not interested in stupid talk
- pb:
none of the buildings fell at freefall - watch the video yourself and count.. wtc7 takes 13 seconds at least. Also 10 story gash in the front and fires + falling debris is certainly enough http://debunk911myths.org/topics.... Plus you're still ignoring my question, how could the wiring and detonators survive impact and 50+ minutes of uncontrolled fires? No, WTC...
more...
- alphaxion
you're falling into the "melt steel" trap. You don't have to turn steel to molten goop.. you need to heat it enough to weaken the molecular bonds - which investigators found! The fires were certainly hot enough to weaken the steel enough for the weight of the building to crumple them. Considering that you saw molten aluminium pouring out of the building.
- alphaxion
did you not look at your own video? that was 3 charges at the bottom, middle and top. It started to fall from the bottom. Are you seriously comparing an unfinished, bare bones building with 3 bundles of charges that falls from the bottom to the WTC's that begin to fall from the point of impact without any signiture explosion outwards? Those are TOTALLY different. I can see you're never going to view this with a logical and critical mind, merely a paranoid one.
- alphaxion
http://wacla.org/2009... ... yes i have seen videos .. they look exactly the same - controlled demolition ...there is NO other way, just to tell you privately ..... it doesn't matter where it starts falling - it depends on where you set off charges .......
- pb:
melted steel - the real trap is, that it was found at the bottom on ground after the pulverization implosion .. and there is no way office fire or kerosine /airplane fuel/ burn near by far as hot as to melt steel ... ..yes, you are right, office fire is enough to weaken the steel, and it'l will give way - in this case we would have seen fallover, wildly irregular, folding, crumping, big...
more...
- pb:
i have answered your question, not ignored it - nanothermite will not set off on fires, it has different properties, and it was rigged differently - so it survived the initial impacts, and office fires, after some fuel burned outside , the rest inside ... yes WTC was designed to withstand the impact of airliners, and IF you noticed, both towers withstood - they haven't moved 1 inch ....until charges were set off, dust from explosions started to come out
- pb:
WTC-7 fell in 6.6 sec, in a classic controlled demolition manner. speed of almost free fall ... utterly impossible, other than controlled demolition
- pb:
Then I suggest you watch the videos quite a few times. They don't look anything alike. There's no explosions before the WTC's collapsed, there's just the dust the moment it starts to fall - and the dust does not react as if an explosive charge had set off. By the way, how about answering how the wiring and detonators could survive impact and the fires, they still require the same...
more...
- alphaxion
Well, Petr, at least you've chosen the most recent, harmful, objectionable and outrageous conspiracy theory to adopt. Illuminati and Bilderberg are so old hat. And don't try to make this a partisan issue, both left and right wings have 9/11 conspiracy theorists. Alex Jones is an equal opportunity conspiracy profiteer.
- Richard Walker
@Richard.. the conspiracy is the official version of 9/11 attacks. 9/11 is a controlled demolition, inside job, Reichstag fire to rally nation for war, to pull a country into a never ending war. it is very profitable. /// Bilderberg? people have a right to associate, to discuss policies - it is up to American public to elect the best representatives /// partisan ? - it was Republican,...
more...
- pb:
Whatever dude. It's a free country - until they kill you in a controlled demolition, that is. Were you a nut back in the Czech republic or did you develop it here? Forget it - I don't care. I hope you find a more objective reality soon.
- Richard Walker
@Alph.. no, they were not hit in the same manner - different angles, different height, different width of each building. BIG difference. but towers remained standing after impacts. ... i DID answer your question about gears - it is nanothermite, new high tech, it does NOT get set off by fires ...... do YOU now accept scientific evidence there is nanotermite in the dust of WTC ? .......
more...
- pb:
I'm not talking about the explosive, I'm talking about the equipment required to transmit the signal and detonate it. That stuff would have been damaged in the impact and fires causing no explosion. Never mind how much effort it would take to install that stuff and keep it secret (not to mention keeping the hundreds of people needed to do it quiet). Just look at the videos of them...
more...
- alphaxion
1.yes, "the gear" - the detonation equipment. of course we all know "black boxes" of airplanes. they do survive crashes. you know what i mean? the electronic equipment CAN survive airplane crash. ... HOW did they do this, how, who, what exactly did, is unknown, at least publicly, and we need an investigation to find out what happened. ...before perhaps there will be another "attack"...
more...
- pb:
3. large part of fuel burned off in huge fireballs outside of buildings. no - no "extensive, sustained, uncontrolled" fires .. have you seen the buildings? yes ..there were smoldering more or less, office fires - black smoke a telltale it is not too hot a fire, on several floors, people standing around ... from this temperature, partly cut support beams, steel, might have weakened and...
more...
- pb:
did you not watch the vid of wtc 7 I showed you where the building took longer than 6 seconds and fell apart in 2 stages? No, the majority of the air fuel wasn't burned off in the fireball as there were plenty of reports and footage that corroborates fires on many floors - there was a strong smell of kerosine in the basement! the fuel flooded the whole way down the building. I'm gonna...
more...
- alphaxion
9/11: WTC-2 vs. Demolition comparison. 9/11 is a Controlled demolition. Per common sense, per irrefutable scientific evidence. - http://wacla.org/2009...
from Chris - i recovered your post - "All really bad events do not require a grand, Machiavellian conspiracy as an explanation. While it may seem that way to you, hugely significant events do not require proportionately significant causes. A small child can burn down a large neighborhood playing with matches -- it doesn't take an army. Likewise, a handful of motivated people with bad intentions can take out large buildings -- it doesn't take a secret government cabal"
- pb:
Cause of destruction of WTC discovered - nanothermite, controlled demolition. Over 10 tons found near the WTC site. Peer-reviewed paper of Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen is causing shockwaves around the world. - http://www.newschief.com/article...
Congressman Barney Frank Dismisses Scientific Report About Explosive Residue of Nanothermite in 9/11 WTC Dust. Controlled Demolition. - http://www.911blogger.com/node...
9/11 WTC Controlled demolition, gallery, pics. Cut steal, missing "pancaked floors", missing core beams. Nanothermite explosive found in the pyroclastic cloud dust. Buildings pulverized, imploded, both the same way, with the speed close to free fall. Impossible. We need polygraph questioning of officials involved. Who knew what, when. Who did what? - http://911.yweb.sk/galleri...
Steven E. Jones - 9/11, irrefutable, conclusive scientific evidence. Nanothermite. First world public lecture, Sacramento, Ca, April 3rd, 2009. - http://world911truth.org/steven-...
Botched Building Demolition Reinforces WTC 7 Lie. New laws of physics after 9/11 - set a few office fires, and the building falls down. Or, implodes and pulverizes with the speed very close to free fall. - http://www.infowars.com/botched...
Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the WTC 9/11 Destruction. Conclusive evidence of explosive nanothermite in the dust. Controlled demolition. - http://911research.wtc7.net/essays...
Scientists Discover Both Residues And Unignited Fragments Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics In Debris From the Twin Towers
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel. 9/11, the official explanation is utter nonsense - http://firefightersfor911truth.org/
The official explanation of the events of that day are not only insufficient, they are fantastic and cannot bear rational examination. We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire, fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel. We are asked to believe that the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, that responded to sixty-eight emergencies in the year prior to 9-11 in less than twenty minutes allowed aircraft to wander about for up to an hour and a half. We are asked to believe that the steel and titanium components of an aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon “evaporated”. There is much, much more if anyone cares to look into it. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires, it came down in a classic crimp...
more...
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
Maybe the most important day in American history. Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment; 67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7″. Latest developments. - http://lezgetreal.com/...
"I need a real investigation of 9/11. Some people will scream at me for even suggesting it, I don’t care. I need to know why those buildings came down the way they did, into dust that is embedded into hundreds of forgotten rescue workers, and thousands more survivors. I need to know because the story we’ve been given doesn’t add up, and because that story has become the basis of so much American policy that directly effects all of our lives.... If there was ever an event that deserved an independent, and thorough investigation, isn’t it 9/11?"
- pb:
from Bookmarklet
pb: it is my contention that without lie detector questioning of the highest officials involved, we may never known what, how it happened on that fateful tragic day. ..who knew, and what. .. for now, we cannot say.
- pb: