Sign in or Create an account
Adam Posey's Comments - View full feed
delicious
Adam Posey bookmarked a page on delicious
Tuesday at 5:13 am - Link
This academic year students have access to better research note-taking and knowledge management tools than they ever have before Before - Adam Posey
delicious
Adam Posey bookmarked a page on delicious
August 31 at 8:54 pm - Link
We hand print and sell small run, limited edition, high-quality t-shirts that sell from $1 to $100. - Adam Posey
Twitter
Alex Iskold posted a message on Twitter
delicious
Adam Posey bookmarked a page on delicious
June 12 at 8:31 pm - Link
So now we see that actually, a woman’s headache is rather a good reason for having sex, not against it. - Adam Posey
delicious
Adam Posey bookmarked a page on delicious
June 12 at 8:31 pm - Link
So now we see that actually, a woman’s headache is rather a good reason for having sex, not against it. - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
June 11 at 1:54 pm - Link
"I think it's part of the evolution of the web. With a greater amount of information, and a static amount of time, not considering that the things we do with the net are increasing (how many of us REALLY watch TV anymore?) we're having to find ways to make the things we want to do fit into the time constraints we have. This is why RSS readers exist, why start pages exist, why we've flocked to devices like iPhones to keep us connected as much as possible. We're taking as much information as we can, and putting it in one place, and adapting the technology to properly filter that information. It's why we use sites like socialthing, friendfeed, etc. to take information from all over the place and bring it into one place. The supply of information is increasing, so this has become our way to condense and filter it. As for early adopters using 'single feature' sites, I think the real question isn't if mass-audience will use them, but how to deliver them. I suspect that, originally, we'll see..." - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
June 10 at 12:29 pm - Link
"I think, much like legos, you'll get some pre-defined sets for less enthusiastic people who just want to have a good experience. but ultimately, what we're seeing is single feature sites and tools because the enthusiasts have become accustomed to mashing up everything. So, when we get a new mapping application, we just want it to do that and do it very well so we can use that functionality on another site, and so on and so forth. We're gonna be building our own experiences, or getting sets built for us. The enthusiastic among us will flock to places that give us more freedom and control to construct exactly experience we want in a way that mirrors our idea of what the web should behave like. I suspect the mass-market will be about pre-assembled packs of applications delivered to you in a well packaged fashion." - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
June 6 at 11:32 am - Link
"I hate to draw an analogy of web applications being 'toys' but I think this fits. We're gonna see the same kind of 'innovation' we see in the action figure dept. at wal-mart. Endless cookie-cutter molds of pre-defined experiences and ideas. The end result: less creativity, more copying, more 'add one feature to an existing product and release it'. There are very few remarkable innovations happening in action figures right now, and it turns out that people are having a lot more fun with 'build it yourself' experiences like Lego which is still going strong. So, if I'm gonna predict the web in a few years, I'm thinking of it like lego blocks. Every page, every song, every graphic, every person, will be a block. And we can pull those blocks together to build our own experience. I doubt that the killer web2.0 application is actually going to be a website, I suspect it will be a browser application that's smart enough to put these experiences together and simply change the way we interact..." - Adam Posey
Google Reader
Louis Gray shared an item on Google Reader
May 23 at 7:40 am - Link
i wish it was resign in public :) - silpol
It's disgusting how pumped I am everytime Steve Jobs takes the stage, and I don't even own a Mac! (Only have an iPod) It must be that look of his ;-) - Bartek Gniado
This "new iPhone OS" is kind of misleading. I don't think they'll really overhaul the OS very much (they certainly can't change the underlying structure because of the SDK). It's possible they might make tweaks to the interface but I doubt they'll be much major change. - Brandon Titus
Ha - I havent been touched by Apple - yet. No Mac, no phone, no Ipod - viki saigal
I'm with Brandon, isn't the iPhone already running OS X? The SDK release just finally opens it up to developers. I agree with new MacBook Pros and possible Mac Pros. Isn't Apple due to update their displays? Did they ever release an HD display? What about a blueray option? I would not care much about it, but I bet there are others that do. Since this is a developer's conference, does anyone expect a peak at what Leopard's successor will look like or will all the dev revolve around the iPhone? - Michael Pardee
new macbooks would be nice, yup… - What the dormouse said
I'm actually holding off on buying a MacBook Pro until a new model appears. - Akiva Moskovitz
I can't wait to see what he rolls out - Adam Posey
the MacBook Touch. - kosmar via fftogo
Akiva, they actually updated it without a formal announcement. They all have the new Penryn chips and the new Touchpad now and aside from putting an aluminum case on the MacBook to match the Pros, I doubt we'll see anything new. - Cyndy
Cyndy, that's good to know. All I had heard was about the new multi-touch Touchpad. I doubt a new case will make a difference to me. - Akiva Moskovitz
iPhone will get a better camera/video camera - Varun Mahajan
Twitter
Robert Scoble posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
Morton Fox posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
Loic Le Meur posted a message on Twitter
Google Reader
Adam Posey shared an item on Google Reader
May 21 at 6:43 am - Link
OMG that is SO fucking cool. I cannot wait - Adam Posey
Twitter
Leo Laporte posted a message on Twitter
FriendFeed
Elliott posted a link
Google Confirms Plans To Put Display Ads On Google.com - Silicon Alley Insider
May 9 at 8:02 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"We've argued that a full load of display ads on Google.com could add $3-$4 billion in annual revenue." Holy Cow. - Elliott
This is sad. One of the differentiators of Google is its advertising. Now they just are going for the profits. Sigh. - Robert Scoble
Like they're not making enough money. What they're doing is working. Why change? - David Risley
do no evil, indeed. - Chris Hollander
worst...idea...ever. - Morgan via twhirl
they have sooo many other avenues to produce income. why that? they need to be more creative. - Josh via twhirl
I wonder how they put them on iGoogle. Honestly, though, a couple half banners surrounding the logo wouldn't really bother me. Everyone's got the right to earn a few billion more. :) - felix
Scoble - don't you hate it when a site gets loaded down with ads? Even after the person said they wouldn't run them? - Dave Hodson
If the display ads from google are every bit as intelligent as the link ads, they'll be fine. I'm disappointed by how this will likely effect the page load times on Google (which are the primary reason I use Google over Yahoo or MSN anyway) - Adam Posey
lets see how this *pushing envelope* ends up... I guess this is classical case of big company taken over by mediocrity step by step, described so many times that it should be recognized without effort - silpol
i wont believe this until i see it. - Chris Farrugia
Isn't this the same as with Wordpress ads (only for Internet Explorer?). Power-users probably never see the Google homepage. - Meryn Stol
Really bad idea. - terry radford
I guess it was only a matter of time... As long as it's unobtrusive in terms of pageload &&,|| client-side processing I'm fine with it. Could probably add rule(s) to ipfw... - RandaL Hicks
the display ads might be put on Google image search which is all about images anyway, not main .com text homepage - Kevin Gough
If Google manages to get advertisers to clean up their act and create ads that don't slow down/break web pages, then everyone wins. If they let the same ads run on Google that run everywhere else, then Google loses bigtime. - Jason Wehmhoener
Personally, I think the article is trying to stir up unfounded attention. It talks about display ads in general raking in cash for Google, but then the quote from the Google rep talks about ads in image search only. If that's the case, what is the big deal? - Jason Dettbarn
Agree w @Jason and add that people had the same sort of reaction when text ads were introduced. It's not like you're going to wake up one day and it's going to look like the old TW Pathfinder site. - Erik Dafforn
I'm not sure how I feel about this...I mean, if Google can display ads that are in fact relevant to me, then I might be interested. I also think that while this idea does suck - it is important to remember what Google is...a public company that has to make profit. Sometimes I have a hard time understanding where all their money comes from....(i.e. who clicks on all those ads anyway?) - Elliott
I also agree with @Jason. The reference to Google.com is like saying "Google.com properties" - (i.e. Image Search). - Elliott
Is Google trying to be the next Yahoo!? Do not like. - darnell
Flickr
Benjamin Golub published a photo on Flickr
Wear It Proud
May 2 at 1:16 pm - Link
How does one get one of those snazzy tees? - Raoul Pop
I want one! I need stickers, though, more than tee's. - Robert Scoble
I would also really like one... Free promotion, I'm the social networking geek around town. ;) - Adam Posey
I wouldn't mind paying for it. I wear M if it's pre-shrunk cotton, or L if it'll shrink in the wash. But where do I go to order it? - Raoul Pop
I want a TShirt and Stickers for my laptop! :-) ok Bret cough `em up! - Susan Beebe
I'd totally wear one of those! - Bryan Villarin
ohhh I want a shirt!!! :) - (jeff)isageek
cool swag!!! - Anthony Farrior
The last time I wore my FriendFeed shirt, people asked me if I worked there. They *didn't* ask me “what is FriendFeed?” - Amit Patel
http://www.cafepress.com/frien... <-- wish there were zip hoodies. I'm all about the zip up hoody (as you can tell in this photo). - Benjamin Golub
+1 for stickers! Preferably something the exact height of a Vista sticker so I can hide it. :D - Cyvros/fyc
Thanks Ben! The ringer tees look great. And who knows, I may spring for the bib as well. :-D - Raoul Pop
So, Amit, _do_ you work at friendfeed? - Clare Dibble
Clare: in one sense, I do, but in another sense, I don't. Is that mysterious enough for you? - Amit Patel
Ahh...Amit, the man of mystery. - April Buchheit
Google Reader
Bryan Haskins shared an item on Google Reader
April 30 at 1:59 pm - Link
I has an invite to this Bryan. If you'd like one I'll see if I have some to share. - via FriendFeedMachine - Adam Posey
Twitter
Kevin Fox posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
Jason Calacanis posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
Robert Scoble posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
michael arrington posted a message on Twitter
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 25 at 1:20 pm - Link
"I don't think so Fraser. Mostly because music, etc. is becoming so fragmented into countless niches that you'd probably have greater success being seen as 'obscure', 'on the edge', etc. People would feel like they've discovered something special before anyone else, and would probably become fervent fans for it (the kind that do things like spend $350 on tickets to your shows)." - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 25 at 1:16 pm - Link
"I have to disagree, Alex. Actually, when it comes to smartlinks I don't think either is valuable enough. The absolute standing shows popularity, but as any good hard look at the iTunes top 10 list will tell you, popularity and quality do not necessarily go hand in hand. However, I think that showing 'momentum' in a way that provokes interaction with the smartlink would let me find the quality in it." - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 25 at 11:35 am - Link
"As an interesting experiment, I'd like to see what happens if we strip away the absolutes and leave only the trends. Hiding the hard data but saying "This is clearly becoming more (or less) popular than it's competitors". How would the mechanics of marketing music change if top 10 lists were to be replaced with the "Top 10 movers" or "fastest risers". Would this change how people view the data? I'd like to say that I think it would change how people look for the data. I think they would start at the bottom of the list and work their way up. Rather than starting at the top hits and working their way down. People could feel like they helped 'discover' music by pushing it to the top. To directly relate it to your product. What would happen if I hovered over a smartlink and instead of seeing an emphasized hard number about it's popularity I simply saw that the link was becoming increasingly popular. What If instead of seeing that no one had clicked the link, I was made to feel that I..." - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 22 at 5:20 pm - Link
"Plaxo, its great that you're using Disqus for this. Now, all you need is a way to let developers add support for their site to Plaxo automatically. Perhaps a Stream-format is necessary now, with all these aggregators etc. around?" - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 21 at 7:05 pm - Link
"It was metaphorically speaking. :)" - Adam Posey
Disqus
Adam Posey commented on a blog post on Disqus
April 21 at 6:04 pm - Link
"I support this. The web NEEDS more standards. IF only I had friends who could implement this, I'd force it down their throats." - Adam Posey
Twitter
Eric Rice posted a message on Twitter
Twitter
michael arrington posted a message on Twitter