Alek

"Yet the urinals remove the tongue and brighten the original icon, making the already androgynous Jagger mouth appeal quite womanly. Oh oh oh wait, so they do admit it's mick jagger's lips, but apparently the tongue has been removed so that makes it more womanly? Really, I thought both men and women had tongues... Who woulda thunk it. I didn't know removing a tongue (for practical reasons in this case) makes a mouth more womanly... Fascinating... Oh, and the hue? Which genius decided at which degree of hue it's no longer mick jagger, and all of a sudden an insult to all women on planet earth "due to hue variation"? So, if they just darken it back by a few degrees on the rgb scale, then it's no longer protest-worthy... Gotcha..." - Alek

"Wait, I don't get it. How is pissing in Mick Jagger's mouth "discrimination against women"? Are women feeling excluded or?" - Alek

"Women love to blame men for their own insecurities, and especially as an excuse to not look at their own personality flaws. One anecdotal example that captures this perfectly. A female friend of mine was dating a male friend of mine. She was controlling, nagging and she called him like a 100 times a day to check up on him. She interviewed him and CIA and FBI style interrogations on him daily. When he couldn't take it anymore, he quit the relationship. SHE however... concluded that he had dumped her for her "nose"... and then went on to get nose surgery, coz men dump her for nose. UTTER BS!!! I hate all this sexism direct at men, where men are made to be super-duper shallow, and men victims of men's shallowness. Stop blaming us for your insecurities." - Alek

"They changed the foxes genetically. That's not nurture. They literally bred it out of them, genetically. Nurture is when two specimens of equal genetics behave differently. The experiment you refer to had the foxes change genetics over time." - Alek

"notice the HUGE increase in rape that began then) There hasn't been a "huge increase in rape", there's only been an increase in "rape stats", because feminists merely expanded the definition. Read Christina Hoff Sommer's piece on the latest CDC expansion, where merely "asking too often" for sex is now also "rape". Feminists did the following: -Not verbally asking for sex is rape (Miss so and so, may I have penetrative sex with you) -Asking for sex is now ALSO rape In other words, feminists have just redefined ALL heterosexual sex as rape. They finally succeeded." - Alek

">>>to even out the birth control playing field (that has favored men for so long) WTF?!? Huh? If this was an attempt at sarcasm, it was a massive fail." - Alek

"Are you trying to tell that because I am not a heterosexual male, I am incapable of making an unwanted pass at someone? What I am saying is that you will never experience how women treat the errors of heterosexual men. You can only experience how women are treated for making blunders or unwanted moves. If you want a good overview, you can see the book self-made man by a lesbian author who decided to live a year as a man. She was shocked and almost driven suicidal when she tried to date as a man. She couldn't believe how unforgiving and vicious women were to her (when she was a man)... And she did the exact same approach she used to do as a lesbian. That right there is proof that people aren't "born" knowing what the right way for men to make moves is. She had to learn it once she become a man, and the process almost drove her suicidal with how unfairly she was treated by women. Again, this was a woman who when in her "previous life" a lesbian woman had no problems meeting women. She..." - Alek

"double" - Alek

"But see, a lot of these vicious debates in gender-spheres happen because of vague-language like this. What you call "clinical" is absolutely necessary if dialogue is to be constructive. Contrary to feminist-dogma, men and women understand and communicate differently. So a lot of men misread the harassment complaints as someone having said "Never ever flirt with women" And the men are like "WTF? you now want to outlaw flirting!?!?!" The other side then shout back "what you damn idiot, we never told you not to flirt, we said not to harass!!!!" and then all communication goes apeshit. "because it feels like such a natural process," That's because you haven't been a heterosexual male. This is one of the privileges you enjoy when you're not a het male. When things go right, you get to feel it was natural and "it just happened". What you don't realize is that the man pro-actively made it happen and probably consciously acquired that skill to make those steps that you take for granted...." - Alek

"You seem like a good, balanced person judging by your comments, so I was trying to consider what you might have meant, and where I might be misunderstanding something. Perhaps you meant "groping" or "sexual touching" or "lingering touch" not "any touch whatsoever"? That would make more sense to me. As most of successful human mating begins with extremely short and fleeting initial touches as a testing gesture. - The woman does a very fleeting half-a-second touch of the man - He doesn't seem to be taken aback - So she let's her hand linger a bit longer the next time, maybe a second longer - If he seems to like it, she increases the intensity and duration etc, etc... (none of this is ever said to be preceeded by verbally asking for permission, by either man or women, in any of the sexual orientations) And there tends to be a gradual increase in duration and intensity of the touching, if the receiver seems to be fine with each increasing level. I'm guessing when you said "touching..." - Alek

"I was reading your comments on the good men project where you said: "For me a creep is a guy who either touches me without my consent or makes sexually inappropriate remarks about me or my body." Can you please explain to me how people should go from being strangers to being a couple or lovers? And how specifically does a person "consent" to being touched for the first time? Does the person say "Ok, I have deemed you attractive and a possible mate, so you may proceed to the stage where you may touch me for the first time"? I'm not being sarcastic. I am asking a genuine question. I'm pretty certain most relationships are formed with one of the persons being one to perform a touch first. All the flirting guides I have read, as well as all the scientific guides describe the human mating process, one where one of the two individuals performs a test by performing a touch, or hinting at something sexual, and seeing how the other person performs. In fact, that's part of "assessing consent"...." - Alek

"You obivously read socialist propaganda. I've been to the USA and I work for a US business (I'm in Makedonija, working for a US business, you sound Macedonian too btw). If you are from Makedonija, how ******** gullible are you? Have you ever seen the waiting lists in drzavna bolnica?!?!?!? That's what so-called "free healthcare" is. You die before you get it. "free healthcare" is a LIE. You never get it. They put you on waiting lists that are so long, that you die before you ever get your so called phantom free healthcare. Ask the people in drzavna how much money it takes to get over the waiting list. It's actually MORE expensive than in the USA." - Alek

"Why one of your family members being informed in a given area can be used as evidence to your own knowledge on the same subject I do not know... It means I have had personal access to one of the leading experts on the subject as my personal mentor. I'm a sociologist myself, so you can't pass this "qualifications" crap on me. I bet I'm far more qualified than you are. You just don't want to accept not everyone is part of your religion. Yes, I know you were, hence MY refering to it as…. an analogy. I said it was pathetic that that was the best you could come up with, I understood it, just didn’t understand how you could grossly over-simplify something losing any applicability to the real world and still consider it valid. The only reason you didn't like my analogy is because it doesn't fit your religion. It's simple. The following apply to both the financial and mating markets... A) People are born with different traits and abilities B) The demand for different traits, talents and..." - Alek

"Are you trying to imply that girls are less capable than boys? You sexist!!! If you actually studied suicide (and I have, there was an entire course I had to take on the sociology of suicide to become a sociologist)... ... you will actually learn that "attempted" suicides are for the most part cries for attention and of a narcissistic nature. In other words, people who actually do seriously want to kill themselves rarely fail. So the more accurate way to say it would be "a lot more girls try to get attention using faked suicide attempts". Btw, if you don't accept this leading theory in sociology (that most 'attempts' are cries for attention) then what is your alternative explanation? Do you think girls DO want to actually do it, but are less capable than boys. You sexist!! How dare you say girls are less capable than boys ;)" - Alek

""Firstly, your basic understanding of the impact of financial equality on society is out of touch." Out of touch = codespeak for 'you don't have the same values as me'. These are values you ****, and you can't impose them using feelings, and manipulative languaging. One of my family members actually wrote the leading university textbook on wealth distribution in this part of the world. I am well versed in commie bulls*it. """So pathetic that your first thought/best analogy when considering equality is a person's height...""" I was giving you something called an analogy ******* - so that we can escape the economical market for a second and we can look at the overall CONCEPT. I am giving you an analogy in the mating/sexual market. In the sexual market, the currency is dates, hookups and offspring (the equivalent of wealth). The point is that people are unequal. YOU WILL HAVE VERY different results in dating and hooking up than I will, SIMPLY BECAUSE you are taller. This is called an..." - Alek

"I agree. With iOS5 apple has solved most of the "biggies" to where Jailbreaking isn't required to make the phone usable. Sure, there's a few neat and cool tricks here and there that Jailbreak allows, but none that are a must-have. All the must-haves have been implemented in iOS5 (or at least most)." - Alek

"We've been hearing this for a 100 years - but women are still nowhere to woman up. Women have been propped up, encouraged and pushed into science, told how strong they are (while boys were reprimanded and demonized)... But nothing's changed. All the leading innovators are still men. Aside institionalized penis-envy relievement, what are you trying to accomplish? Increase boy suicides even further? Currently boys commit 400-1000% more suicides than girls, and this has been rising steadily for many decades. A huge part of the trend is society continually bashing, mocking and demonizing boys. You and your campaign have blood on your hands. I hope you feel great..." - Alek

""This ad shouts what studies suggest--that female leaders can be more empathetic and inspirational." And your point would be? I don't need empathy from my SEO, that's why my mom and sister are for." - Alek

"I'm one of those people who are "at fault" for why FPS games are like this. I'm a casual gamer, and don't want my FPS-es to be super-challenging and stressful. I get enough of that in my business and life. I turn to games for stress-relief. I want my FPS to be like an interactive movie almost." - Alek

"""I agree, Utopia doesn't exist, but striving for Utopian ideals is a far better use of societal time & energy """ No it's not. It has been disproven TIME AND TIME again. Anyone who has ever directed energy towards utopian ideals has always fuked up the society they were trying to utopize. EVERY SINGLE CASE - without exception. """ 'it will never work, lets uphold an unequal, unjust, failing structure because we're incapable of anything better.'"" Nice commie reframe and word-twisting :) unequal => Unequal is good, it's how evolution works, we're all different and unequal. You're probably taller than me (I'm a short guy). IS IT FAIR that you're taller than me and for you getting a date is much easier than me, a short guy? What you gonna do, institute leg-cutting for tall people to make everyone equally tall? EVEN IF you give EVERYONE the exact same resources, pay, job, and house - people will STILL live radically different lives and have different outcomes. EVEN IF YOU BANNED the..." - Alek

"Agree. Also, the guy below (nexrad) says " if anything it should have been higher since most people playing wont be playing for SP" How is that an excuse? Since when are reviews based on estimating who will be playing the game? A lot of games that are scored 3 and 4 are actually underground hits with a niche of people who like them. The review should be based on the average gamer's likelihood of enjoying the game, not on estimating how fans would like it." - Alek

"Under six hours of campaign? I ain't paying no 60 bucks for 6 hours of game... I wish there were offline-only versions of games for those of us who don't play online. I can see how this game would be worth 60$ to those who do online, but for those of us that just do single-player, it makes no sense." - Alek

"These people are just annoying. They just know they "dislike something" but can't point their finger at anything in particular except vague, generalized concepts. It's like shouting "I want things to be better", "things are crap", "I want things to change". Well yeah that all sounds nice, but do you have any specific suggestions, ideas and a plan? Or you just wanna whine?" - Alek

"Everyone needs to watch this twice. The first time I watched it I wasn't impressed, I was like "Yeah, it's pretty obvious what's real, and what's game graphics". But then I watched it a second time and noticed I had a missed a ton of game-scenes on the first viewing. That's pretty amazing." - Alek

"A lot of lies and misinformation in this one. For example, the one with mortality rate - exceptionally deceptive. What they don't tell you is that the USA has the toughest definition of what to write down as a birth (and then subsequent death). In some countries they don't even count the baby as having been born unless it survives 48 hours past birth." - Alek

"HAHAH! That was great!" - Alek

"And how exactly do you know they were "lying helpless on the ground"? The view is entirely obstructed by the counter. From what I read they kept getting up and lunging at him. For all he knew they might have had knives." - Alek

"What you don't see on the video (because the counter obstructs the view) is that they kept getting up and lunging towards him. Some people have falsely assumed that he was hitting two motionless women lying on the floor curled up. But apparently that's not the case. They kept getting up and lunging at him. For all he knows they might have been trying to stab him with a knife." - Alek

"@ds No ds, you're doing a typical bait and switch called "you're missing the point". This is a trick that people use when confronted with the inaccuracy of their statement. You made the blunder of justifying the slaughtering of men by saying that men send men to slaughter. By that logic why didn't cleopatra, Catherine the great or Margaret thatcher send women to slaughter? Are you saying that if one of these female leaders sent women to be slaughtered that it would mean the lost women's lives are Non-important?!? I'm using your asinine logic after all. It doesn't matter who sends men to be slaughtered, as male and female leaders have an equal disregard for male lives. We are considered cannon fodder." - Alek

"Typical commie wuss. Any challenging information, and it's automatically threatening to your commie psyche, and in fact, constitutes the other to be a "jerk". "I've worked in Germany and Spain" Yes, passing through europe makes you an expert on europe. I'm sure if you watch enough porn you'll become a urologist too." - Alek