I agree with the judge, especially since I KNOW the definition of "sexual harassment". The definition of sexual harassment is "unwanted sexual advances". What's the problem with this? EVERY SINGLE advance in history had a chance of being unwanted. That's how the system is rigged against men. We're expect to roll the dice, approach a woman, ask her out, flirt with her, make advances and SEE if she's interested. How do you know if its unwanted BEFORE you ask the woman out? Answer: You don't. You don't posess telepathy skills. You think I'm making or exaggerating this stuff? That's how the people who invented sexual harassment define it. Its not repeated advances, its not advances despite repeated refusal etc... Its just ANY unwanted advance. That's how they come up with the huge numbers (100%) etc... They count ANY TIME ANYONE HAS EVER approached anyone where the other party wasn't interested. Of course its 100%! The scam they do then is mention example of REAL harassment (a boss...
- Alek
"Again... Its just ANY unwanted advance. That's how they come up with the huge numbers (100%) etc... They count ANY TIME ANYONE HAS EVER approached anyone where the other party wasn't interested. Of course its 100%! In fact, its 100% of the world's population if you use that definition! The scam they do then is mention example of REAL harassment (a boss forcing you to sleep with him), what they don't tell you is that the example is EXTREMELY rare. They use the percentage from the definition no one agrees with (the one that makes 100% of the world's population harassers), and then they do a bait and switch and mention examples of things no sane person endorses (bosses forcing people to sleep with them). Men are getting sick and tired of being treated like walking sperm donors, and then being bashed and demonized left and right. You FORCE us to do all the work in mating, and then you demonize us when we do it badly. I propose a complete boycott of mating. No man approach no woman,..."
- Alek
"I agree with the judge, especially since I KNOW the definition of "sexual harassment". The definition of sexual harassment is "unwanted sexual advances". What's the problem with this? EVERY SINGLE advance in history had a chance of being unwanted. That's how the system is rigged against men. We're expect to roll the dice, approach a woman, ask her out, flirt with her, make advances and SEE if she's interested. How do you know if its unwanted BEFORE you ask the woman out? Answer: You don't. You don't posess telepathy skills. You think I'm making or exaggerating this stuff? That's how the people who invented sexual harassment define it. Its not repeated advances, its not advances despite repeated refusal etc... Its just ANY unwanted advance. Should we refer to ads in the newspaper as commercial harassment? In fact, most ads offer stuff I'm not interested in. p.s. Ever notice how all these organizations NEVER EVER say anything about empowering women to approach men? They catastrophize,..."
- Alek
"I don't agree with everything, but I agree its obvious their parents positive bias transferred to the kids. Its not exactly a scientific study where all factors are accounted for. Kids can tell when you want them to say something positive. Its one thing to have them sitting there, while you're playing the song and looking at them with needy eyes that say (you like it right, huh, you like it right!?)."
- Alek
"I don't remember radios playing beatles tunes for a week, or even hearing about this dude's death. You must have that type of radio on preset."
- Alek
"I don't INFER anything. NOT ONE single part of my post justifies anything anyone did. I however did not only infer but BLATANTLY pointed out there were TWO VIOLENT IDIOTS in the story and only ONE of them got punished. Do you understand what I am saying now? I am saying there were 2 idiots, and only one was singled out simply for possessing a penis."
- Alek
"Do you know the FULL story? She almost gouged his eyes before he lost his cool. The unsung song today is the myth of women as defenseless angels. Over 50% of all DV is initiated by women (throwing dishes, knifes, cellphones, hitting a man in the balls etc...). I agree that a real adult would simply walk away (they were in a car, and she was beating on him endlessly), he could have pulled over and left. No one is justifying on him retaliating. He shouldn simply be the adult, and walk away, but let's not pretend men are demons who go around beating women unprovoked. THE POINT of this story, is that there are TWO IDIOTS in this story, and the man is always the one who gets the punishment, even though there's two equal idiots in the story."
- Alek
"Why is everyone forgetting this was a case of two idiots beating the crap out of one another? He was bruised before he even lifted a finger. I'm sick and tired of every case of 2 idiots fighting ending up with the man being a "beater" and the woman a victim. Let's call it like it is... 2 idiots. Defenseless? Do you know the full story? We live in a society where men are always at fault for everything and demonized. F that."
- Alek
"Death to political correctness. The worst part about PC is that it just shifts "badness" from certain groups to others. White men are always shown as stupid, dumb, illiterate, overweight bozos who are clumsy and just drink beer all the time. Why? Because they're the only group you can still make fun of without going to PC jail."
- Alek
"Really? Are you saying the entire court/judicial system is corrupted? Are you saying they pronounced him innocent even though he wasn't? Here's the thing, his accomplishments were revolutionary, plentiful and amazing. His faults were few and far inbetween and were either rumours or unproven accusations."
- Alek
"I would SO love for you to win the lottary... ...And then have your neighbor decide to take your money by trying to grab your money by wanting to frame you as a pedophile. And the more you tried to prove you're not, the more people would call you on. And eventually you'd overdose on medications from all the stress of being falsely accused for something, just so people could leech off of your wealth... And then after you died, we'd have people calling you a "pedophile" even though you were never found one... But we're still gonna repeat "paedophile", just so... You get the point."
- Alek
"BECAUSE, we live in a democracy, and in a democracy we live by the RULE "Innocent until proven guilty" His many contributions are PROVEN, unrepeatable and revolutionary. His "faults" are few, unproven rumours or accusations. RIP - MJ..."
- Alek
"They might go against libertarianism, I am not saying libertarianism is the ideal approach. What I am saying however is these actions are not liberal. The ideas you mentioned, I don't disagree with them being put in place by the goverment, I just am saying they're not a "liberal" thing to do. They're a socialist thing to do. Again, I have nothing against socialists. I just wish they called themselves socialist, and no "liberals". I'm kind of a dictionary nazi like that :)"
- Alek
"EvilDoer: Yeah perhaps. I don't have much knowledge of the libertarian party. I just find the word "libertarian" more useful than "liberal" You make a good point, I agree. Unfortunately truly liberal people don't have anywhere to turn, because none of the options are REALLY liberal."
- Alek
"That's the point. Real liberals would believe in a small government. The people that label themselves liberal, are anything but, they're actually socialist conservatives. Both "conservative" and "liberal" are misnomers. What they really are is leftist and rightist..."
- Alek
"I think the best video on the subject is the one they did here (fox news, i know i know, but its good)... its about "liberals" bashing women. http://www.youtube.com/watch... ===> feminist defends bashing of women... As long as a woman is pretty, young and not a feminist, then she is "fair-game", and can be bashed-away by liberals. You know, I think the word "liberal" is a misnomer here. A lot of these people are not actually liberal, they just hide behind the word. But I guess that's why we have libertarianism today, because the word "liberal" has been completely damaged by people who are anything but liberal. Libertarians are the true liberals (in the positive sense)."
- Alek
"Sure, that's why a lot of authors try and self-publish ebooks online. Ironically enough, when they do that, they tend to charge prices like 20-30-50$ per ebook. Middlemen can be a good thing because the allow for economy of volume, they actually get prices down, not up."
- Alek
"Why is he getting dugg down? He's right. The prison system is an entity of its own. And a big part of is privatized, they actually need people put in jail for something... anything. So obviously, if pot is legalized, they lose a lot."
- Alek
"Yeah, people are taking it too seriously. Letterman is not political commentary, its a show based on making fun of everything. You're not supposed to get your information from it, and no one expects to. Its called humour people, get over it."
- Alek
"When in doubt, research (hint, google is your friend). (prostitution) Even within the USA different more liberal states and counties are looking passing laws at making prostitution legal. San Francisco has looked into legalization a few times. Las Vegas is no longer the only place where its legal. Quietly but surely prostitution is getting legalized. (marijuana) Slowly but surely pot-friendly parties are cropping all over the world, and attempts at legalizing pot are happenings en masse."
- Alek
"Quaxxon, actually, if people opened up a dictionary, things would go in reverse. Currently people are calling stuff they like socialist. Like sweden for example. If you actually looked into an encyclopedia (wikipedia will do), north korea IS socialist, and no, sweden isn't. I'm sorry. Those are the facts."
- Alek
"Great point, well said. The govermental stance is obviously extreme and pretty much bogus... Pot isn't dangerous. But neither is ice cream. I still wouldn't claim its impossible to get bad sides from eating ice-cream. To say marijuana can't have negative effects... ever. Is equally ridiculous... because ANY substance you can use, consume or take, can be abused. Then again, this is why pot should be legal. Let the people decide how much is just right for them."
- Alek