"0 A.D. Pre Alpha 3 finally brings multiplayer support so you can now play 0 A.D. with your friends. They don't even have to use Linux since 0 A.D. also runs on Windows and Mac OSX."
- ĎÚβĨŐÚŚ Dod
from Bookmarklet
I found this one a bit of a shock: "When Nature gave respondents a list and asked them to choose the five criteria that they thought should be used to evaluate researchers, the most frequently chosen was "Publication in high-impact journals""
- Pedro Beltrao
from Bookmarklet
Nature has a bunch of news + editorial on metrics ... I guess that it is not a coincidence that the new impact factors are about to be released. I am guessing this week or next week.
- Pedro Beltrao
@Pedro: what were the five criteria on the list? Questionnaires can be very bad... "1. Publication on high-impact list; 2. Nobel prize; 3. Number of papers; 4. (s)he blogs; 5. is well-known." ?
- Egon Willighagen
OK, three other actual options were: “Grants earned”, “Training and mentoring students” and “Number of citations on published research”. So, put the conclusion on the context of: *there were very few metrics on article impact to choose from* ... Based on these four options, I find the outcome not surprising, nor informative, and at least very much towards the hypothesis that journal...
more...
- Egon Willighagen
I wonder what social scientists educated in these matters would have to say about if results based on such questions should belong on a high impact journal.
- Egon Willighagen
I wonder who the 37 repliers are who are 'quite or very satisfied' with the current metric system... are those scientists? The results PDF also shows that the list of options was not 5, but quite a few more. People were required to select their top 5. 92/150 selected high-impact journal. So, 58 did *not* put it in their top 5.
- Egon Willighagen
One interesting option for our community: "Blogging, writing for lay press". Does not really show any feeling for what the field is about, does it?
- Egon Willighagen
@Pedro.... sorry for the ranting. I'm a post-doc in need of a job, as you might know, in a field where you can forget publishing in Nature or Science, or anything 'high ranking'... Did you know I have a few papers is the highest ranked cheminformatics journal? Who cares. It's not Nature or Science.
- Egon Willighagen
The write up actually linked, as much more informative than the results of the questionnaire.
- Egon Willighagen
"do you think your department places enough emphasis on" ... so what if your department places no emphasis on JIF and you're ok with that? I mean, based on the answers available, the question should be, "how much emphasis should be placed on..."
- Christina Pikas
@Christina... and no option for "Way too much emphasis...".
- Egon Willighagen
Given the costs incurred by any peer review system, economizing on them and giving the funds out on a more transparently random basis (with certain minimum requirements, of course) probably is a good idea (with some sort of post-assessment influencing eligibility for the next rounds). Is anyone aware of a major funding system where parts of the funds are being allocated in a non peer-reviewed fashion?
- Daniel Mietchen
Woah! This happened a lot sooner than I would have expected. And my impression is that Canadian peer review is held in generally higher esteem than a lot of other places.
- Cameron Neylon
They could just put more money into the universities and institutes, with a stipulation that it be used to fund research by PIs, as part of their standard funding.
- Bob O'Hara
Whatever the cost of preparation, some of it is worthwhile, though, even if the grant is not funded. Reading, planning, thinking. So that should probably be accounted for in this kind of model. That said, I of course would love to be funded without writing. If you are a billionaire reading this, I promise I will spend your money on fantastic projects!
- Steve Koch
Made contact with the authors and now have full text to read. They made the suggestion I should repeat the analysis for the UK...
- Cameron Neylon
+1 Steve. I find the grant-writing process excellent for focussing diffuse ideas into one central research plan. But if Bill Gates dropped his wallet in my office, then...
- Matthew Todd
I planted this idea in an NSF program director last year who seemed to really like such a concept. Not sure what happened to the idea at NSF after that... see also: http://bjoern.brembs.net/comment...
- Björn Brembs
Cameron - A similar analysis for the UK would be very useful, in my opinion. Seems like the kind of thing that might potentially be of interest to somewhere like Nature...
- Michael Nielsen
I'm confused by this para: "There are conflicts between the grant system and the patent system. Science thrives on open discourse, as each scientist’s ideas inspire new ideas for others. This is what scientific conferences are mostly about. When scientific ideas become more intellectual property than public good, mouths become closed, and scientific advancement slows. As the...
more...
- Ruchira S. Datta
Ruchira - I think the argument basically runs like this: Baseline grant funding would mean initial grants weren't awarded on the basis of publication record, which would free young scientists from worrying about being scooped (something they shouldn't be worrying about anyways, but they do) and they could engage more freely in open discourse, particularly with larger and more...
more...
- Mr. Gunn
Mr. Gunn, that's less confusing, thanks. Maybe that's what they meant.
- Ruchira S. Datta
Almost every human protein has segments that can form amyloids, the sticky aggregates known for their role in disease. Yet cells have evolved some elaborate defences. Tags: proteins molecular biology Posted by: cgd-sar
- Charles Daney
"Pathway Genomics, a San Diego company, has announced that beginning Friday, shoppers at most of Walgreens' 7,500 stores across the U.S. can buy an over-the-counter genetic test . The test would scan their genes for the possibility that they'll develop such conditions as Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer or diabetes. Pathway Genomics, a San Diego company, has announced that beginning Friday, shoppers at most of Walgreens' 7,500 stores across the U.S. can buy an over-the-counter genetic test . The test would scan their genes for the possibility that they'll develop such conditions as Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer or diabetes. Pathway Genomics also says the test can be used to forecast what genetic disorders future children might have, and weigh the likelihood that they'll become obese or go blind."
- Ruchira S. Datta
I think that with the current state of knowledge it's way too early to be selling tests like this.
- Ruchira S. Datta
But perhaps I'm making too many assumptions. 23andMe makes sense to me--maybe I'm just assuming Pathway Genomics will have less lengthy disclaimers or greater hype about what exactly you could know.
- Ruchira S. Datta
Unsurprisingly, bioethics.net is critical of the DTC genetic testing. DR STEPHEN MURPHY THE GENE SHERPA (can we call him the Kent Anderson of genomics?) must be typing away as fast as he can this very minute.
- Mr. Gunn
from Bookmarklet
"the Kent Anderson of genomics" -- bwahahahahahaha!
- Bill Hooker
PLoS ONE guidelines on requirements for sharing data and software. VERY useful for new Academic Editors, or authors! - http://www.plosone.org/static...
E.g., an issue for us, using LabVIEW: "Dependency on commercial software such as Mathmatica and Matlab does not preclude a paper from consideration, although complete Open Source solutions are preferred."
- Steve Koch
acceptible archives: "SourceForge, Bioinformatics.Org, Open Bioinformatics Foundation (O|B|F), Google Code, BerliOS Developer, Savannah, and the Codehaus." Just guessing that soruceforge or google code will be best for us. Google Code probably doesn't host labview, but I know sourceforge does, so that will probably be the one.
- Steve Koch
Guessing it's just outdated or an oversight. I could figure out how to suggest the addition. Do you think it's possible to keep a list like that current?
- Steve Koch
Probably not an my guess is if you use those today it's probably ok. Would be good to add though
- Deepak Singh
from iPhone
I posted your suggestions to a thread on the editorial discussion board and linked to this thread. I think the note may reach the correct people who can make the change. Thanks for the suggestion!
- Steve Koch
Agreed, it is a pretty good policy, but it uses "should" a lot instead of "must." Admittedly, they say that publishing the paper a "is contingent on" data availability. Nice and strong. BUT this could be fulfilled by authors agreeing to emailing their sequences to people who email them a request rather than putting them in Genbank (for example), and then where would we be? PLoS should...
more...
- Heather Piwowar
Is there a good OS alternative to Labview?
- Mr. Gunn
Not that I know of, Mr. Gunn. I wish it were, but on the other hand, National Instruments is a respectable company and I think LabVIEW provides a lot of their profit margin. They've done a lot to efficiently enable my science over the years. Larry is working on learning python, and I've been wrestling with the issue of whether to move away from LabVIEW. I think python and other OS...
more...
- Steve Koch
A colleague here has a brother-in-law who's fairly high up in management at NI. It's been on my to do list to contact him to see if we can work with NI to somehow compromise on openness. I think I'll initiate that this weekend. Basically that we'd like to keep working with LabVIEW, but need to be more open. A first step is how do we allow referees to assess our software if they don't have LabVIEW licenses? I bet we can work out a deal to get 10 license codes to provide referees, or something like that.
- Steve Koch
@Heather, I agree it would be better stronger. I've heard that the statement is being revised and will be updated soon. I think part of the "should" instead of "must" is a recognition that PLoS ONE spans all of science, and different sub-fields have different norms. Instead of trying to make everyone agree, I think they give control to the Academic Editors in those fields, along with external reviewers, to enforce the norms. At least that's my understanding from my limited experience and discussions.
- Steve Koch
Steve, great! Glad it is being revised. Agreed that different subfields have different norms, but I think it can be stronger anyway. Nature's is, others too. I think you can use strong language while respecting subfield diversity, for example by applying strong language to the "Data for which public repositories have been established and are in general use" situation.
- Heather Piwowar
Heather, I excerpted some of your advice on the same thread I did Deepak's above. The thread I think is on a private PLoS ONE message board, but we have the ear of the new executive editor, Damian Pattinson. Maybe he's on friendfeed or will join and see this thread? Thanks for your input!
- Steve Koch
Steve, if he's not on FriendFeed it would be great to suggest that to him. I just signed on as an AE with P.ONE too, but I'm insanely busy for this month so won't be participating in message boards etc. (E.g. right now am at work on a beautiful sunny Saturday...)
- Bill Hooker
Steve, just had an idea here that perhaps LabVIEW could put out a executable so that people could run the code, they just couldn't write new code or modify it. Many languages already do this, if I'm not mistaken. It's kinda like Adobe Reader vs. Acrobat. I wonder what your contact at LabVIEW would say about that?
- Mr. Gunn
Yes, indeed we can make executables, and even with nice installers. That's definitely something we will do regardless of any other outcomes. An issue, though, is that the image processing library we use (NI Vision / Imaq Vision) requires an end-user license that costs like $100. Hopefully the contact at LabVIEW will at least give us a solution by providing a license code for free evaluation or something.
- Steve Koch
It's still a good idea. Any referee or user who knows LabVIEW, though, will want to look at the source code, I bet. I suppose we could provide screen shots, but that's a bit lame. I also asked the contact whether it'd be OK to provide virtual machines (as Deepak suggested at ScienceOnline2010), and we'll see what he says (if I even get a response).
- Steve Koch
Yeah, something like a code interpreter which allows the recipient to step through code and follow processes was what I was thinking.
- Mr. Gunn
Hi all- I am indeed on Friendfeed (although confess I'm fairly new to it and am still learning the ins and outs...). I'm quite surprised to hear that other journals have stricter data sharing policies than we do- I agree we should be leading the way in this area. It's probably worth pointing out that we are very active in ensuring that people adhere to our policies, but agree that our...
more...
- Damian
Damian, I think it is more that PLoS ONE being so general it is very difficult to set a global data policy. More specific journals can have much more specific criteria. However I think the general concept of changing "should" to "must" with a strong statement from the editorial board/staff that we expect a continuous improvement over time would be a good thing.
- Cameron Neylon
The LabVIEW Player used to provide this capacity (run VIs and view block diagram), but at < http://zone.ni.com/devzone... >, NI says that this has been discontinued.
- Richard C Yeh
Jannifer - Eating your own dogfood. (When a company uses the products that it makes.) "On Saturday morning, Google confirmed that it was testing a new concept in mobile phones, writing in a blog post that it was “dogfooding” the devices, an expression that comes from the idea that companies should eat their own dog food, or use their own products." -- Source, NYT.
- Mark Davidson
On second thought... Raphael, what does it mean to dogfood the blog? Use Wave instead of Blogspot for their blog?
- Mark Davidson
that's what I thought he meant by it. Besides isn't Blogger/Blogspot Google now anyway? that sort of counts, no?
- ɐ ɯıʞ sıɹɥɔ
Mark - Oh ok, I see what you mean now. Maybe that's what he meant by dogfood the blog... ?
- Jannifer @wordsforliving
All of Google's blogs are on Blogspot, and yes, they own it.
- Mark Davidson
from BuddyFeed
I love the phrase "president of physics."
- Chris Granade
"I mean, what's more likely -- that I have uncovered fundamental flaws in this field that no one in it has ever thought about, or that I need to read a little more? Hint: it's the one that involves less work."
- John Dupuis
trying to figure things out is the right instinct
- Mike Chelen
"From 1992 to September 2003, pharmaceutical companies tied up the federal courts with 494 patent suits. That's more than the number filed in the computer hardware, aerospace, defense, and chemical industries combined. Those legal expenses are part of a giant, hidden "drug tax"--a tax that has to be paid by someone. And that someone, as you'll see below, is you. You don't get the tab all at once, of course. It shows up in higher drug costs, higher tuition bills, higher taxes--and tragically, fewer medical miracles. So how did we get to this sorry place? It was one piece of federal legislation that you've probably never heard of--a 1980 tweak to the U.S. patent and trademark law known as the Bayh-Dole Act. That single law, named for its sponsors, Senators Birch Bayh and Bob Dole, in essence transferred the title of all discoveries made with the help of federal research grants to the universities and small businesses where they were made. "
- Michael Nielsen
Highly recommended to anyone with an interest in open science.
- Michael Nielsen