0.75 (926/1226) - still relatively new here
- mikepk
I only see my stats for the last week (17/14 = 1.21) Please tell me your 670 number is for more than just a week!
- Brian Johns
1.44 (566/391) for brianjohns (after week tally you should see a comma then 'all time' count - I can see it on your page)
- Micah Wittman
OK, sorry. I'm a total dumbass. I stopped reading after the weekly totals...
- Brian Johns
3.74, which seems way off of everybody else's. I wonder what that says. I comment a lot more than I like.
- Cyrus Lendvay
FFers use FF with their own strategy or simply default tendencies. The ratio is an interesting snapshot of behaviour. Thanks for joining in everyone, hope more keep flowing in.
- Micah Wittman
from twhirl
0.66 - I tend to 'like' things without needing to comment further, I guess, and I notice I usually like the things upon which I comment. Well, frequently.
- ɐ ɯıʞ sıɹɥɔ
.39 (2457/6242) I guess I don't comment much. I do 'like' a lot of things, it would seem.
- Bren, Photophobe
0.62 then again i have over 11,000 comments
- Cee Bee
1.23 (5287/4229) - I am put to shame by Cee Bee's participation, good grief!
- Her Lindsay-ness
So far: Average: 1.27 | Median: 0.81 ... (if you average 1 comment per like, you'd be 1.0 ... if you're 0.xx you might herd content more than discuss ... if you're whole numbers above 1 you may not 'like' much or discuss plenty or both)
- Micah Wittman
InPerpetualMotion(Gina k), I really liked this 'Like' of yours (in a series of pics, so I flickr fav'd it): http://friendfeed.com/e... and commented. Thanks!
- Micah Wittman
.68 6986/10194 Someone wrote a great article on the comment-like ratio a few months ago. Search on FriendFeed is crashing on me... I'll try to get the link.
- Mitchell Tsai
Thanks Mitchell (btw, search crashing on me too - lots)
- Micah Wittman
1316 comments/20221 likes (0.06), according to Windows Calculator, although I probably screwed up.
- Tyson Key
A recent change in FF: now the comment count shows total number of comments (previously multiple comments in one thread only counted as one) http://friendfeed.com/e... so all the numbers above are from the old methodology....
- David HC Soul
My new ratio: 0.76 all time (old methodology .52).... this week 1.39
- David HC Soul
Looks like my ratio as flipped again (comments back to dominating again). Seems to match my own awareness I've lately been commenting without Liking (commenting is my inherent recognition of value to me and the additional Like is when it merits an extra bump to help discovery by others).
- Micah Wittman
Darn - 0.52. I guess I need to say why I like something a little more often :-) Liking this thread because I was wondering the same thing recently. Has anybody worked out the average from the numbers here? </islazy>
- Andy Bold
Andy, scroll upward and you'll see a couple calculations from before (January: Average: 1.27 | Median: 0.81)
- Micah Wittman
Rick, you mean that face with glasses I photoshopped tint into with an apparently disembodied arm which is actually very much attached to my eldest son? It's mostly just me :)
- Micah Wittman
Thanks, Michael. Yes, you have a rising tide of comment percentage (oh, wow, you were one of the originals from January - cool!)
- Micah Wittman
Yeah, that's a decent upward rise in comments, Nicholas.
- Micah Wittman
.6 (6,000/10,000) 3rd update - Now it's time to flip this on its head. My goal is to have (16,000/16,000) next time I post here. Regardless of what happens, I'm just looking forward to the next 10,000 comments, likes, posts, and new relationships I make here. It's all good!
- Michael Fidler
1.76 (7539/4290) My commenting habits haven't chanced much, but it felt like I clicked Like a lot less, and this ratio confirms that for me.
- Micah Wittman
.82 as of right now. edit: on January 8th it was 0.39 -- when I saw that, I decided to make more of an effort to comment. When I hit 10k "likes" I decided I wouldn't "like" anything else until I also had 10k comments.
- Bren, Photophobe
Jimminy, I'm copyrighting every single number. It's kind of a honeypot ;) Actually, it was curiosity mostly, but I also hope to build a sampling (small and self-selecting as it may be) for anyone who might want to analyze it.
- Micah Wittman
Wow I didn't realize I was so out of whack!! 12.23 that's got to be a record (and I don't even import my feeds with the summary as a comment)!!
- Chris Myles
Thanks JA, Chris (wow, 12+ is unusual :), Serkan and Nine!
- Micah Wittman
0.89 (17818/19913) (Somebody better make a cool ass graph of all this data!)
- Haggis (Sean Loyless)
Micah.. I told you I take my likes seriously; ). You *might* want to ask (in a separate post) what percentage of likes were used to "bookmark" a post or save it for later VS actually "liking it". I NEVER used like for that.. but I did use a private group that if filled with my own topics (and comments)..
- Chris Myles
OK, so statistically, what ratio results in better interaction on FF?
- Jason Huebel
I don't think I could argue that any particular kind of ratio is "best", because if Lurkers like to Lurk and cultivate (via Likes) and the Chatty-ites love to chat, to pump out much many more comments than Likes, each can be happy and make for a great social experience.
- Micah Wittman
So I'm fairly balanced, it appears. I would imagine it's because I try to comment on every post I like. That's not always true, obviously. But mostly it is.
- Jason Huebel
Just clicking "Like" seems too easy. I feel like I should say something, too.
- Jason Huebel
wow, what a difference time makes, when i 1st posted on this thread, 6.43%, now = 1.25%, for a 5.18% difference, :o (and this is the earliest post to date i've recovered of my activity on ff)
- chaz2b
chaz, I think there's been a big fluctuation for most people (maybe not that much). This is the oldest post on which you commented that you've recovered?
- Micah Wittman
that was my third post... It's interesting to see how the number has changed. of course, I manipulated the number to a degree, because I stopped "liking" things for a while...
- Bren, Photophobe
Bren, the other thing that can seriously throw off someone's stats is a feed that upon each item it imports adds a comment automatically.
- Micah Wittman
true. that can seriously inflate comment stats, of course. Then you have someone like RAPatton, who posts a gazillion comments, in part because of his playlist posts where he will list each song in a separate comment. I found, after this post in fact, that I tended to "like" things much more frequently than comment on them, that I was lurking instead of participating. I have changed the way I use ff rather considerably, and I think for the better.
- Bren, Photophobe
Thanks Paola, Michael, Artemko, J. and Daniel!
- Micah Wittman
1.09 (9990/9105) From and including: Saturday, April 26, 2008 To and including: Thursday, November 12, 2009 It is 566 days from the start date to the end date, end date included Or 1 year, 6 months, 18 days including the end date to reach 10,000 comments.
- Christopher Harley
It has been wildly inconsistent lately. Sometimes it is right on time, other times there is a major delay.
- Rob Diana
Paul Bucheit wrote that they no longer had access to Twitter's firehose, so it sounds like it may have had something to do with Facebook's acquiring them, but don't quote me on that.
- Jorge Escobar
it's weird that twitter signed a deal to give access to google and bing, but friendfeed seems to have lost that deal.
- gregory
Paul or Bret: what is the latest status please?
- Steve Gillmor
The latest status? They're busy working valiantly on mincing the glory of their FriendFeed UI into the horror show that is Zuckerberg's Facebook UI.
- Akiva Moskovitz
from here to Twitter things are going live
- Johni Fisher
It was mentioned previously as being an issue with Twitter. They are polling now.
- Louis Gray
what? It's OK now? Or is it true that "Paul Bucheit wrote that they no longer had access to Twitter's firehose, so it sounds like it may have had something to do with Facebook's acquiring them, but don't quote me on that. - Jorge Escobar" -
- Steve Gillmor
I am trying to locate the conversation where he said this. But it's clear that Twitter is not giving FF the firehose for *some* reason. And they still aren't.
- Jorge Escobar
"The Twitter issue is a separate problem Jorge -- our realtime feed from them is gone, but we hope to get it restored soon. - Paul Buchheit" on Oct 26, 2009 http://friendfeed.com/paul...
- Micah Wittman
Awesome Micah, I was going nuts for a while. So without going to speculation what do you make of "Twitter's realtime feed from them is gone"? Is it scalability issues? But Google and Bing have no problems?
- Jorge Escobar
It's speculation, but I think it's Twitter saying "Ooopsy, now how did that happen? We'll put Top Men on it." and a Friendfeed Alum with "we hope to get it restored" as technically true, but belying that they know or suspect it's a TWTR business decision dragging-of-the-feet and not merely technical. But this can all be cleared up with an official statement :) Maybe I missed it - if so I apologize for wild speculation.
- Micah Wittman
Thanx Micah, Jorge. We'll wait for the update from Paul or Bret.
- Steve Gillmor
I wasn't seeing updates from Twitter to Friendfeed for 12 hours, but a manual refresh works ok. It is interesting to note the differences in 'real time' for Friendfeed, Twitter and FaceBook they all behave differently - only one of them seems to be 'real' real time -\
- Chris Loft
http://twitter.com/niczak -- I tweet about the following: Programming, databases, parenting, living & enjoying life, and involvement in lots of local activities here in Northern Nevada.
- Nicholas Kreidberg
I have most of you (didn't have Valeria for some reason, but just added), mine is http://twitter.com/jungleg -- see you on the other side ;)
- Jorge Escobar
http://twitter.com/dennis_... (don't forget the underscore) What do I tweet about? Tech, fiction, art, music, politics, comics, and of course my fiction. Occasionally some Seattle or Bremerton related stuff. I also have TwitterFeed tweet my blogs, and I always tweet from Flickr.
- Dennis Jernberg
http://twitter.com/glenc but I have to warn you, I stopped following people on Twitter a while ago. I have about 300 subscription notices (unread) in my email.
- Glen Campbell, B.A.
i post about film and television editing/post production, I'm a bit of a gadget nerd, and i like anything funny on the web. i love followers... http://twitter.com/toddzelin
- Todd Zelin
I'm sure you're all interesting but following 6,000 is my limit. ; )
- Liz
http://twitter.com/cgranier - I tweet about many things -usually tech-oriented, reply to everyone who @'s me, and have lately been posting a lot about #FreeMediaVE, bringing attention to the struggle against communism in Venezuela. Feel free to follow me. @ me for a quick follow back. No spammers please.
- Carlos Granier-Phelps
Thank you all. I hope at least some follow me back else I'll hit my follower limit soon. ;-)
- Kol Tregaskes
http://identi.ca/andyc Microblog about all sorts but mainly OMB and how much I dislike inferior legacy services. No names, no packdrill.
- Andy C
http://twitter.com/Felter i tweet about all, but i don't retweet my FF message. From twitter to FF only. if you follow me in FF, you can read my tweet.
- Felter Roberto
from twhirl
You know, you could have just started feeding in your tweets here and achieved the same, right? Or would that have been too subtle?
- Mr. Gunn
http://twitter.com/glitterpoet Don't mean to offend but it's usually not religious. Porn, drinking,dancing, music,makeup....I still do healing work. I just don't talk about it much anymore.
- Gabrielle V
My twitter stream is the typical... random thought bubbles, food porn pics, and shared items relating to technology, politics, and $$$. http://twitter.com/sean808080 is where you find me. Oh and I like unicorns and fairy dust.
- sean808080
@fossilhuntress or fossilmaitress (I kept getting my email cracked and getting locked out hence the duplicate); all content, linked to digg, delicious... mostly science, paleo and random banter...
- Fossil Huntress
http://twitter.com/wangyip - mostly stuff from FF (tech, startups, web apps, sometimes things about math, medicine, fitness) - I've followed a few here on tech stuff (Edit: Thanks Kol for the thread)
- Wang Yip
http://twitter.com/eoghann... - I post sci-fi news (tv, movies, books or comics I'm probably a fan of it), some tech stuff and the occasional round of venting.
- Eoghann Irving
Steve - Fabulous post! I love the deep level of investigation, research and analysis in this well-thought out and artfully crafted piece. Well done my friend! (Francine LOL)
- Susan Beebe
Good to see that blocking the list maker removes you from the list. Should still be able to opt out of lists
- Mark Trapp
Yes, I'm sure. Blocking completely removes you from the list. Mark: you can opt out of lists. Just block the lists people put you on.
- Robert Scoble
FTR I wasn't attacking them. That link comes from Mark Trapp. It's an interesting conversation though. Also cool that you can block a list and take yourself out of it.
- Jesse Stay
Robert, you can't block lists. You can block people who created lists, which by extension, removes you from the list. That doesn't help people who want to opt out of a list but not block the list creator; I point this out in my post about not wanting to be in technology lists for example. Beyond that, the core issue is that Twitter is now allowing other users to modify your profile...
more...
- Mark Trapp
I also don't understand why it's lame - Mark has some valid points.
- Jesse Stay
FWIW Facebook has this with photo tagging - Twitter should do something similar. If you're "tagged" in a photo or video, you can immediately remove the tag. You can also set privacy preferences as to who can see tagged photos/videos of you (based on list).
- Jesse Stay
That's really all that's required, Jesse: I think it's a simple security/privacy consideration that shouldn't change the functionality of lists. Right now, however, the functionality makes a privacy assumption that doesn't exist anywhere else in Twitter, and people ought to know that or Twitter needs to fix it.
- Mark Trapp
And thus begins privacy controls in Twitter, and thus starts Twitter's journey towards competing with Facebook. :-)
- Jesse Stay
Jesse - have the battle with privacy is not the automated control you put in but the Human Element. If you are that concerned about privacy control it yourself
- Rob Cairns
Rob, I'm not sure where I said anything about automation
- Jesse Stay
Mark, I'm not really seeing your argument here, it sounds a bit paranoid. If someone puts you on a benign list you don't want to be on for some reason, just contact the list creator. If they fail to comply with a polite request, they are NOT your friend and you just block them. Why would you feel the need to still follow them? If someone puts you on a malevolent list of some sort...
more...
- Alex Schleber
BTW, I just scoured Scoble's first few hundred "listed" entries (of his current 1400+), and the most egregious terms I could find were "echochamber", "tech freak", and "scobleitis" :) Hardly slander/libel material. And you know someone out there isn't big on Robert, but I doubt they will bother to add him to a negative list. They just blocked him early on...
- Alex Schleber
Mark: have you even tried this? Steve Gillmor and I have. If I block a list's owner it removes me from all of his lists.
- Robert Scoble
which I have. he's so blocked. Check Tech Pundits. I'm not there.
- Steve Gillmor
Robert: you said repeatedly you can block a list. I said you can't: you can only block a list creator, which subsequently blocks any list they created. Now you're saying the exact same thing I said. There's a difference I don't think you're picking up on: I want to be able to remove myself from lists, not block people. If I have a friend who's decided to categorize me as "technology" and I don't want to be in that list, my only recourse is to block my friend. That's not ideal at all.
- Mark Trapp
On top of the fact that blocking is reactive, not preventative. I have to realize I'm in a list before I can take action to remove myself from it. I don't want to be part of any technology related lists, yet I have to wait until someone tags me as such before I can block that person to remove myself from it. Why aren't lists opt-in, especially considering the list memberships show up on my profile? I have no control over a major part of my profile, which is unlike any other part of Twitter.
- Mark Trapp
At the very least, list shouldn't be part of my profile (since I can't control, directly, what lists I'm apart of) and I should be able to remove myself from a list without blocking the list creator. I don't see how that's unreasonable or the argument against having those two pieces of functionality.
- Mark Trapp
One of the bigger problems I have with sites like Facebook is that I have no control over how others see my public profile (right now you'll prob see 16+ yr old girls asking you to contact them, surrounding my profile. I'm happily married, have 4 kids. Mark has a point. It's hard to maintain a personal brand on the web, and others that can classify you (wrongly) won't help. Then again Twitter is 90% bots so I don't think many will notice
- Alexander van Elsas
Alexander: actually Twitter isn't 90% bots. Just 50%. :-)
- Robert Scoble
Alexander, have you tried privacy settings in Facebook? That's why you use Facebook - it gives you that control. (I thought this conversation was about Twitter) (confused)
- Jesse Stay
Robert, I'm suspecting you are a bot too. Can we do a turing test right now to see :-)
- Alexander van Elsas
Jesse, I tried. But I couldn't find that switch that protected me from Facebook themselves. So I gave up.
- Alexander van Elsas
Alexander: I'm a bot with awesome voice recognition. :-)
- Robert Scoble
Alexander - protected you from Facebook themselves? It's called your own blog. :-)
- Jesse Stay
Jesse, I just looked you up on Facebook. I saw a "buy this cheap house now, color your picture into a cartoon, and a dental advertisement. What does that say about you? Are you a cheap cartoon real-estate dentist, or are you a cool web 2.0 dude?
- Alexander van Elsas
The thing is Jesse, you can set settings any way you want, but Facebook has an advertisement based model. So they'll display ads, usually incredibly badly targeted, next to your profile. And there is nothing that prevents them from doing that. If I use Facebook to connect to people I care about, then I do not want to be associated with badly targeted ads (or any ads for that matter)
- Alexander van Elsas
BTW, it took me 2 screen refreshes to see a beautiful, but way too young girl next to your profile ;-)
- Alexander van Elsas
Alexander, not sure that has anything to do with Twitter or Facebook then - the only place you're completely safe from that stuff is your own blog. BTW, click on the profile - of course you're going to see non-related info next to my name in a search.
- Jesse Stay
Jesse, don't agree. Facebook is for connecting with friends (or business partners). Important in your social interactions. So if Facebook serves badly targeted ads next to your profile it sucks. Especially on the search page, which is the most likely place people that are looking for you will find you! Their business model makes this happen. And their privacy settings only relate to your privacy towards other users, not towards Facebook. They own it all. Sorry for the hijack, will stop now.
- Alexander van Elsas
Still not sure what you're arguing Alexander. I've never had trouble finding close friends and family. Your results will get much more accurate when those friends are already friends of other friends of yours, which is usually the case of how I find people on Facebook. If not, just Google them - those profiles are indexable for at least their names.
- Jesse Stay
Alexander, I agree. It seems to me that there are targeted ads (some I find really offensive as if they think they know what I want) but then there are also ads that are random: they are going to always go for the wide net with those.
- Melanie Reed
Jesse, my point is that if someone searches and finds me on Facebook, Facebook will display ads on the search result page next to my profile. Those ads tend to be badly targeted. Let's say an old friend, business partner, or recruiter is looking for me and sees those ads of 16 yr old girls looking for some action next to my profile, what does that make them think about me?
- Alexander van Elsas
That there are badly-placed ads just like everywhere else on Facebook next to your profile. What does this have to do with removing yourself from Twitter lists?
- Jesse Stay
I mentioned it because I think I understand why Mark Trapp is questioning the way lists have been implemented on Twitter. It is a similar issue I think. If they incorrectly categorize or misplace me ('real-estate-heroes'), it affects how others will perceive me. (Hope I'm right Mark :-) )
- Alexander van Elsas
Alexander I don't see the relation in that case - you can't remove yourself from Twitter search either so long as you have a Twitter account, and you can bet that will have ads in the very near future. What about Google, that places ads around your content? That's just the price for being on the web. What Mark's talking about is the actions of other users - how can I remove myself from a list some other user has placed me in? What you're talking about is a much bigger problem of the web as a whole.
- Jesse Stay
Not looking to be right or wrong, just mentioned it. But hey, I haven't seen this much discussion action on FF in a while :-)
- Alexander van Elsas
I'm talking about both things: someone else shouldn't be able to dictate, by implication or otherwise, how I'm perceived on my own profile. People can @ me, or say, on their own Twitter stream, that I'm a dick, or a puppy killer, or whatever, but that's attached to them, not to my profile. The way Twitter lists are implemented, they're attached to me rather than the person making the...
more...
- Mark Trapp
Mark I don't see how that has anything to do with search though (re: both things)
- Jesse Stay
Alex said I was questioning the way lists have been implemented on Twitter, that if someone incorrectly categorizes me, it affects how people perceive me. You said that I'm talking about the actions of other users, and how can I remove myself from a list a user has placed me in. Both things are under the domain of my argument. I don't really care about search, unless, as Alex is suggesting, things I didn't consent to are being attached to my profile in a search result.
- Mark Trapp
Mark, the latter is just a part of being on the web. Don't open an internet browser if you don't want that. You can't control that on Twitter or Facebook or Google or even your own site (assuming you allow ads) for that matter. It's crazy to think anyone can control how they show up in a search result in relation to ads.
- Jesse Stay
Mark: you are wrong and the era of control is over (Steve Gillmor tells me that every show). Personally this is freaking awesome that you can see how people perceive me. And I can see it too. If I don't like how people are perceiving me, I can block them or I can contact them and try to change how they perceive me. But so far I've been looking at thousands of people and this system is REMARKABLY accurate.
- Robert Scoble
Jesse: which is why I don't care about search, and it isn't part of my argument. Alex is making a stronger connection between the ads served and my profile, and if he's correct, then there's a problem. But I'm fine with him, not me, tackling that problem: I think the Twitter list implementation is problematic even without considering search implications.
- Mark Trapp
Hey Robert, Just looked you up on Facebook and I saw a pretty sleezy looking girl next to you. Facebook decided to do that. You may not mind, but I think it sucks within the context of Facebook and what it should stand for (connecting friends). Facebook could easily decide not to present that advertisement, but they don't. And with that, they affect our personal brand. Jesse. Don't...
more...
- Alexander van Elsas
Robert: there's nothing particular about the Twitter list implementation that ensures that they are being used for actual perception, and not for other uses (I outlined two: spam and maliciousness). Very basic functionality could be added to lists to mitigate those, non legitimate, uses without changing the core functionality. For instance, your use case you just described, being able to see how others perceive you, does not require lists being public or attached to your profile.
- Mark Trapp
Alexander your argument is ridiculous and I'm just going to leave it at that - this is getting repetitive. I see Robert's side of this on the lists - personally, it doesn't matter to me too much. In the end I could just report it to Twitter, but I always have the option of blocking. IMO if the individual isn't willing to remove me from one of their lists after respectfully asking them they deserve to be blocked. They're jerks anyway.
- Jesse Stay
Mark: actually, having them attached to your profile and public means I can learn about how others view YOU. This is ABSOLUTELY HUGE in networking. But, yes, I can see why it would freak you out. You better be nice to all of us or else we'll put you on the nasty list. :-)
- Robert Scoble
Jesse, 'your argument is ridiculous' is a good way of shutting me up. I won't say another word
- Alexander van Elsas
@Robert: You said at #140Conf that Lists aren't spammable. I say they will be. What if scumbag spammers create multiple accounts and add all their usernames to various lists? So, your search for "pilots" could be yield a bunch of phony lists with fake pilots. You could eventually go through the trouble of blocking all those users to kill the lists, but a big waste of time for you. Others could be fooled.
- Bryan Person
@vanelsas you are forgetting that Facebook is targeting those ads AT YOU. They primarily go by YOUR demographics and profile keywords from what I understand. Either way, people understand that ads are not the responsibility of the profile owner (most of them get completely ignored anyway). I really don't get your and Mark's fears about this stuff. Seems overblown. So what if someone says something you don't like about or near you? It's called life...deal with it.
- Alex Schleber
Like anything, lists need to be taken with grain of salt. Most will be ego boosts and people trying to chum one another. I don't think lists will be a "game changer". Too subjective.
- Kasey Skala
This is why lists is in beta, to work out the kinks and I'm sure if it becomes an issue, Twitter will add the ability to opt-out. Perhaps instead of opting out it would be better to use an opt-in format. If someone adds my name to a list I get a DM from Twitter asking me if I want to be on it and if I don't reply in the affirmative I'm not added to the list.
- Hugh Briss
Having to block a person to come off their list is like having to report a newsletter as spam rather than simply unsubscribing. Not to mention it raises flags with Twitter's abuse people when someone is blocked by several people.
- Rooker
TRI-X!! - I *finally* got the roll of Kodax Tri-X400 developed. I shot these in Little Tokyo (downtown LA) when I first got my Oly OM-1. The results are pretty striking compared to the C41 process black and white Kodak film I've been using. Must shoot more of this.
love love LOVE the portraits of the kidlets!
- vicster
The night shots are on a tripod. Soo glad I brought it. Shot with the self timer too.
- Adrian
These are great, but they do look much better on your monitor.
- Anika
Thanks all! Now I really want to go back to downtown at night with a tripod. I did not know what I was doing when I shot these and was just getting used to the camera's viewfinder which is a bear in the dark.
- Adrian
wtb a photoshop filter that does the same thing
- Will Higgins™
Next time I'm in LA for general work drudgery, I'm gonna plan an extra day for a long-overdue downtown photo walk!
- vicster
Vicster, we *love* shooting downtown. If you search my flickr photos for "downtown los angeles", I have thousands of photos! There's so much texture, so much awesome lighting. My favorite thing to do is to search Jason Burns 'Archiving LA' posts on LA Metblogs. It's neat to find shots taken 50, 60, 90 years ago and match them up to where I was.
- Anika
i find downtown very inspiring, too, and want to get back down there soon. Adrian, the ones at night, you used a tripod as well as a flash? Or just a tripod?
- edythe
Thanks MO, Edythe and everyone else! Edythe, I used only a tripod, no flash. I tripped the shutter with the self-timer, and used a long exposure of probably a second, maybe less (didn't take notes).
- Adrian
And just so you guys know, this is how the photos come off the film. There is very minimal processing I've done on just a few of these. And on those that I did, I actually had to *lower* the contrast to bring back some of the highlights, but that's it!
- Adrian
Nope, lab done. I meant digital post-processing.
- Adrian
oooh! You could do some truly delightfully evil and cool things with an off-camera flash and a long exposure!
- vicster
That would be really cool in a very dark area with people moving about the frame. I've seen photos with the LED flashlights and other LED toys mixed with long exposures, but never with flash.
- Adrian
Love the grain of Tri-X (not to mention the composition, subjects, etc.)
- Steve is older than ever
Thanks Steve, I dig the grain too. I dig it a lot. :D I think my composition is a little off on some of these, but in general I'm ok. I need to get contacts again so I don't keep battling the viewfinder with my glasses.
- Adrian
all the photos taken in the store are pretty damn hilarious and full of awesome.
- pea ♥ fierce as a woozle
That's pea and my husband Adrian. My kid in the background.
- Anika
And the ones you took of Derrick and Ilia on the tree still make me laugh.
- Anika
One can't go wrong with photographing D or your kids. It's a guarantee that a good photo will come of it.
- pea ♥ fierce as a woozle
We still have our bandannas too. I was just wearing my last week playing Kung-fu Panda with the kids.
- Anika
I think i need to file a complaint against Captain Come Lately in the background trying to get his suit on. Doesn't he realize that we recognize him in the this picture?
- Carlos Ayala
Idem, working to pay the bills :) But still having some cool exchanges with some people about socnodes. Too bad the people who could help promote the idea and get more people involved (coding) didn't. Probably my fault, dunno
- directeur
I've been tinkering with some things lately (using socnodes). But I don't have anything substantial at the moment. Which reminds me, I need to pull any updates you've made lately. :-)
- Jason Huebel
Please do! I commited some changes since the 1st version. Really eager to see what you're working on, Jason! :)
- directeur
OK, not just me then. I've been busy too.
- Kol Tregaskes
I don't really care about stuff that's outside of my friend group. My friends are already pretty good at bringing me good stuff from outside the group anyway.
- Robert Scoble
This would get rid of all spam and bad actors. Or almost all, assuming you don't follow spammers.
- Robert Scoble
Robert's initial first comment was "be right back", as a placeholder to keep the first slot while he composed his real first comment. Zee was responding to that
- Ken Sheppardson
And it would bring back Techmeme-quality results because it would be based on people you follow and verify. Oh, and even better? The new list feature in Twitter will let you build different kinds of searches.
- Robert Scoble
Ken: but the people I'm following ARE most people and most of them are following too many to keep track of trends themselves.
- Robert Scoble
Most of the 5,000 people you're following are following thousands? I'd love to see the actual numbers behind that... you've done some analysis?
- Ken Sheppardson
want a screenshot of your feed how it looks like?
- ffcode
agreed - that type of search filtering would not only be useful, but the whole point of social network information sharing - using my friends as my distributed search engine for things I am interested in
- Arthur Coleman
ffcode you want me to send you a screenshot?
- Robert Scoble
Ken: informal analysis. I hand followed each of the people I'm following and looked at their following behavior. It is rare to find someone who is following fewer than 200 people now. At least amongst early adopter tech influencers that I like to follow.
- Robert Scoble
Hm... There's an API call to retrieve a list of users a given user is following... would be simple to do a full-blown check....
- Ken Sheppardson
to build a list is also difficult as i have learned from the little experience i have had
- ffcode
StatusSearch did a non-realtime version of this, but they appear to have scratched it at the moment.
- Steve Farnworth
With viewpointapp.com; we are doing real time relevance and filtering within the people you follow. Search and trends sounds like a great idea. We will see what we can come up with!
- Jay
from ViewPoint
It would be interesting to see if the trends differ than the trends posted on the Twitter home page. I'm sure it would correlate to the size of your sample.
- Mattb4rd
I might, Robert. Also, I hope the voice you hear in your head when you read my comments here isn't snide and snarky. I'm genuinely curious about this from a tech standpoint. :-)
- Ken Sheppardson
I've wanted something like this for a long time. I guess I just assumed that it was obvious enough that someone (maybe even Twitter) would already be working on it. Maybe we'll take it up as a side project.
- Ryan Kuder
I think this would be very useful. Twitter Times is going in this direction but right now it doesn't have search or trending topics. Their main focus now seems to be aggregating links/stories (techmeme-style) that are popular among the people that you're following. Here's my personalized Twitter Times page: http://www.twittertim.es/mdoeff
- Mike Doeff
What is being overlooked here and to which I believe I heard mention that Twitter was building in-house was the ability to trend against any topic/individual in the network. Perfect for gaining market feedback on competition outside of your network.
- Gregory Hanson
Granted, it's a little off topic as the main point of the thread was for people you follow, but building an open trending app would broaden market appeal.
- Gregory Hanson
That would be a good tool. But wouldn't it be cool if you got a pair of tech guys, built it out and returned to raise VC money yourself? :) Stop giving away your free ideas!
- Louis Gray
I would love a Twitter-like Top 10 Trends (or 20 or 25) here on FF. I'd be curious to see the difference. Though I'm still pretty new here but people told me you can sort of simulate trends for yourself?
- Christopher Annunziata
from FreshFeed
Louis: I tried building new app at NPR last Friday and I decided I suck at it. :-)
- Robert Scoble
I've been enjoying the "search my timeline" feature in the Tweetie 2 iPhone app -- looking forward to the desktop client getting that feature as well. Totally agree with Robert, though: It seems like search/trends among the people i'm following has an incredible about of value to a user. A user like me.
- Ryan Sholin
Mike Lizun: Works ok though it'd be better if you made trending topics at least 2 words (trending topics always seem to be 2-3 words). I get a lot of one-words that don't give me much. The trend should follow a longer duration of time as well. I am following 2000+ and only see a few tweets for certain trending terms.
- beersage
yeah, i built out the search concept but saw Twitter announce they're doing it. decided to stick to other concepts and chase the $ elsewhere. thanks for the validation of a good idea though
- Gregory Hanson
Wouldn't something similar be interesting on FB or any social network for that matter? Is Twitter more interesting due to the volume of tweets?
- Dave Hodson
Twitter needs to incorporate this in the API, IMHO.
- Dennis Jernberg
Sounds to me like something Facebook would do if they implemented trends.
- James Harnedy
Good idea about the "Trending" element, Robert. As far as search, really FriendFeed got pretty close if only their import of Twitter friends could have been more complete (not just those already on FF). Stands to reason that the FF guys could have added a trending functionality, Alas... BTW, I just noticed that at ~ 2,500 subscriptions on FF, the "Add To List" pop-up craps out. No more...
more...
- Alex Schleber
Yeah you r right, there exists no twitter trends just for your tweet stream/tweet inbox (tweets you receive from other people).
- TrafficBug
Actually we have. http://journotwit.com - take a look at the Tag clouds. Also running http://uktjpr.com for the UK technology journalists and PR community so you can see what's happening right now in UK technology.
- Dan Monsieurle
can you interpret this via the medium of expressive dance? ;)
- alphaxion
Mark: earlier this year Twitter "choose" Bit.ly over other URL shorteners and that caused Bitly's market share to zooooooom up. Is this good for a platform vendor to do?
- Robert Scoble
Oh right. How do these URL services make any money?
- Mark
Twitter had to make some sort of choice. Better bit.ly than tinyurl. I understand why they did it too, public stats.
- Aram Zucker-Scharff
from twhirl
Mark: today? They don't, they are in audience acquisition mode. TOmorrow? I can think of at least three ways these things can make money. Remember Flickr? In the early days they didn't make money either. Now they charge me to get access to my own photos. Seriously. Are we all that unimaginative that we can't think of at least three ways that these things will make money? Really?
- Robert Scoble
Flickr charges you to store your photos. With that comes the access. Monetizing something like a url shortening service is a bit more problematic. Unlike Flickr you wouldn't actually be buying anything tangible. Just the ability to shorten a URL and how crucial is that.
- Gilbert Harding
"There is no way for us to monetize URL shortening -- users won't pay for it" -- TR.IM Founder. Guess he can't think how it would make money without pissing off users either :)
- Mark
Mark: translation: I can only do interstitial ads on URL shorteners but those aren't viable unless you get to monopoly marketshare. Which Bit.ly just got.
- Robert Scoble
I was just wondering what the business model is for URL shorteners. Of course, its advertising.
- Dan
Selling trending data is also possible. The URL shortener gets a good look at what is popular, in real-time.
- DGentry
I agree with Robert and I said as much in my recent post. The reasons they shut down seem a little weak to me. You may not be able to make people pay just to shorten URL's but you can always use what you have to leverage something profitable. It just takes imagination.
- Rahsheen ™, Coach of FF
well yeah but they would have to pump money into it no doubt to do that, and it sounds like there is no money to be raised in the URL shortening area with the way they say they could not even sell the business for a nominal (small) fee.
- Mark
Wow very nice. Now a new shortening service is up and running http://zxc9.com
- vinoth
It'd be cool if you could type the hash symbol before a keyword in the content for that word to be automatically added to the "Add tags" field. Then you could add other tags that aren't also a part of the content, but only when necessary. The problem with an extra field is that it's often not used (too much of a "hassle").
- Grey Drane
Grey, that's a good idea. Also, I like the way Google has implemented it. It's so ... clean.
- Ahsan Ali aka. Slick
Haven't used the Google Reader interface in a while since moving to Feedly. I'll check it out.
- Grey Drane
Definately that is the thing FF is missing - tags are very useful, especially when I'd liek to find some old messages based on poast topic. Please FF add separate tag field.
- Duszolap
I agree - FF is missing tags wich are specialy useful when searching some old messages. Please give us tag support!
- Duszolap
I like the idea of tags in FF, I wouldn't want to give up the hashtag ability :) ... I see hashtags as adding context to signal in a way that helps others organize around ideas... if I had tags, I'd inevitably apply too many and then how would folks 'really' know what the key tag was?
- Holly Rae, FFer
#hashtags ftw! tags take up space on the screen whether they are part of the post or separate, might as well make them as integrated and simple as possible
- Mike Chelen
I want to repeat my prediction that - after a period of much hype - Google Wave will fizzle. A lot of ideas contained in Wave will find their way to the mainstream, but in other ways, through other channels. Not many ideas in Wave are unique though.
With "fizzling" I do not mean it won't find a niche somewhere. Practically anything good finds a niche. FriendFeed has found a niche too. But Wave is *not* the successor to email. And will also not in any way be a major second platform besides the web.
- Meryn Stol
wave is meant to happen like that - it is a protocol after all, so anyone can built interoperable toys or tools that can run over wave, which can also interface which just about any other network. And because of the distributed nature, they dont have to host it all themselves. That lowers the barrier of entry for testing ideas yet again. And what you built won't ask users to duplicate...
more...
- Joelle Nebbe (iphigenie)
I don't see why one would have to take the whole Wave protocol for that. I think the Wave protocol is too big. Adoption of the ideas inside Wave will happen more granular, by existing players. Of course we get compatibility between networks... But why not go on tightening the ropes we've already laid out? Integration of Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, FriendFeed, Google Reader is humming along just fine. Now suddenly everyone will need to talk "Wave"?
- Meryn Stol
Wake me up when prominent people from major networks (esp. Twitter, Facebook), or major open source projects say Wave is the future. I have the feeling all these Wave fanboys are - relatively - at the periphery of the tech world.
- Meryn Stol
Just to be clear: What do I expect instead? Twitter, FriendFeed, Facebook, etc integrating more tightly via things like activitystrea,ms, openid, pubsubhubbub, possibly XMPP hacks and the like.
- Meryn Stol
you always care so much about "prominent people" - who cares what they analysts say, they hype things that vanish all the time, and snub things that turn out to be hugely useful all the time. They ignore as much as they report, often by tactical choice for their brand rather than real analysis.
- Joelle Nebbe (iphigenie)
I guess many are early adopters so that they have the edge if/when something new turns up. Some want to be ahead of the mainstream and ditch it when it becomes too popular.
- Jemm
I love what Google Wave is: [theoretically] self-hostable, open source, standards-based. but there will only ever be one [in]complete implementation of it if it took all of Google's resources, 40 people, 2 years to create this first partially complete version.
- Brian Hendrickson
I havent even seen wave so I cant comment, but to me the future is most certainly distributed - people want control of their interactions, their content etc. they dont want their stuff to disappear without notice, and they dont want to have to manually replicate their network for every task. Google wave is simply the next generation of xmpp, with added persistence and threading.
- Joelle Nebbe (iphigenie)
As I said, Wave's ideas WILL find their way into the mainstream (I'm not merely talking about its UI or end-user features), it will just happen through a more evolutionary path from where we are now.
- Meryn Stol
I am totally in agreement with you on that front - as a matter of fact, you really sounded like me early in this thread "it's not *that* new and not *that* game changing" ;)
- Joelle Nebbe (iphigenie)
Joelle, have you taken a look at Directeur's SocNode project? That's how simple distributed real-time social networking nodes can be. http://www.socnode.org/
- Meryn Stol
I would like to find out for myself. If only...
- Jim Hearts FF
"... a new feature we're testing with a small subset of users. The idea is to allow people to curate lists of Twitter accounts. For example, you could create a list of the funniest Twitter accounts of all time, athletes, local businesses, friends, or any compilation that makes sense."
- Meryn Stol
from Bookmarklet
Interesting: why does PubSubHubbub use a verify token rather than encoding it in the URL? It allows notifications from multiple feeds to be batched to the same endpoint. http://groups.google.com/group...