Julie

"@onreact.com dude! A little less asshole and a little more reason, huh? Mortalwind didn't steal anything. He saw some neat photos and submitted them, if he did anything wrong at all it wasn't being privy to every unwritten rule of the internet. This isn't his blog, it's just a blog he found. Why not send a message to the actual blog owner if you care that much? Anyway, it's really sad that you have nothing better to do than right every wrong committed on the internet. Chill the fuck out. Send a mixx mail next time; it's a lot less jerktacular." - Julie

"This is the key phrase: "The measure represents such a sweeping change that it constitutes a constitutional revision as opposed to an amendment, the documents say. The distinction would have required the ban's backers to obtain approval from two-thirds of both houses of the California Legislature before submitting it to voters." Even though the gay marriage ban is one one of two lines of text, it represents a HUGE changed for the California constitution. Even the yes on 8ers agree to that, in fact, that's what they built their whole campaign on. They said over and over that allowing gay marriage "re-defines marriage" and will changed everything in California. But such a huge, sweeping change calls for 2/3 of votes, and they only got 52%. The measure should never have passed in the first place." - Julie

"@dotlizard hehehe!" - Julie

"ya, I could watch only so much of that" - Julie

"Well, that's a big damn book. I wonder what book has had the most pages?" - Julie

"@McCaffertyHimself I disagree. I think the single greatest threat to the United States right now is the failing economy and everything that goes along with it." - Julie

"@arianrhod agreed" - Julie

""Before the transplant, the patient endured powerful drugs and radiation to kill off his own infected bone marrow cells and disable his immune system — a treatment fatal to between 20 and 30 percent of recipients." bummer, but I'm glad it worked for him" - Julie

"@rmckenzie excellent question! Lol, I will ask my people and get back to you." - Julie

"would not wear the metal ones, but the ones with the grassy plains-- totally." - Julie

<br/> - Julie

"@sheeplescareme I could provide you with my reasons for believing, my "evidence," but they would mean nothing to you because faith is a personal thing." - Julie

"that is awesome. Once I mailed off a letter with 21 two-cent stamps covering the entire thing. I bet the post office was pissed about that, but they delivered my letter." - Julie

"erg, that site was hard to read" - Julie

"@darmstrong8 so just keep watching Fox News (fair and balanced) and don't think about it." - Julie

"This article is a little confusing. First it talks about how the LAPD was shocked not to get the money, thn it talks about how it hasn't spent grants it received in 2004, then it goes on to talk about th extreme backlog of rape cases waiting to be analyzed. Then they say that $55 million is "unaccounted for" whatever that means. If they're futsing around not solving crimes, wasting money and being lazy, then thank goodness their funding got cut. Let them get paid when they do their job." - Julie

"Wow! That is fascinating. And disturbing." - Julie

"this should not be in the photo section" - Julie

"not happy with giving out my email, but w/e. I'll do it to see Joe put some lipstick on his purty mouth." - Julie

"@NedKingsley how can you tell it's not staged? Seems pretty darn . . . staged." - Julie

"That's Santa Cruz for you. My husband goes to UCSC . . . hippies as far as the eye can see. They'll tear a Bush supporter to shreds in three seconds flat." - Julie

<br/>We're finally free! . . . maybe. - Julie

<br/> - Julie

"@cGt2099 you're right. I wouldn't call it breaking, but it is important for right now and I wouldn't have seen it otherwise." - Julie

"This was a really good article, and actually made me feel for the president a little." - Julie

"@McCaffertyHimself lol" - Julie

"Just one more reason why I can't wait for this election to be over! I hope things go back to normal and people stop arguing passionately over really stupid crap like this." - Julie

"@McCaffertyHimself but . . . more than 3,000 americans have died in the war. And this war wasn't even started because of 9/11, it was started because we thought Sadam had weapons of mass destruction, at least that's what they said. Listen, I'm not trying to start an argument. But how many americans have to die in this war before we're finished? We're less safe now than when we started We can't kill an ideology. People are always going to hate the success of americans, the best thing we can do to ward off attacks is not make ourselves a target by fighting wars that don't make a lot of sense ideologically." - Julie

"this thread is cray-zay! We should all take a chill pill and calm the f*%k down. Good day!" - Julie

"wow! What a coincidence." - Julie

from the who-writes-this-stuff? dept - Julie