Mike Taylor has a parable on the Guardian Blog about research communication and I thought it might be useful to share one that I have been using in talks recently. For me it illustrates just how silly the situation is, and how hard it is to break out of the mindset of renting access ...
- Cameron Neylon
okay, "BMC Motors" cracked me up. Well done.
- RepoRat
There seems to be a lot of it about. Another one by Kent Anderson overly on scholarly kitchen which to me kind of misses the point but I'm tempted to add a comment about how as a restaurant apologist he is continuing with the suppression of the development of "Food mining" which means that I am subjected to eating brussel sprouts rather than having them converted into objet d'art which would be a much better, and more easily consumed, use.
- Cameron Neylon
Kent Anderson misses the point, film at 11. I'll be more impressed when he actually GETS a point. Like, EVER.
- RepoRat
The brussel sprout is a tragically misunderstood vegetable. If prepared properly it can actually be quite tasty. In other words, they have very valid uses in both their mined and natural states.
- John Dupuis
I take my vegetables very seriously and the guys at Scholarly Kitchen with a LARGE pinch of salt.
- Graham Steel
Alright John, what about parsnips then? Surely much better as carved novelties?
- Cameron Neylon
"I take the point its an imperfect analogy but I'm not really trying to make an argument here but focus on the mindset that I think is trapping a certain kind of publisher into thinking about every new form of re-use as a potential income stream and not recognising that the whole approach is starting to cause problems - and really irritate certain portions of the research community. Possibly I should have said that at the top - when I use this in a talk it is to try and quickly illustrate what I see as a mental trap - not to make a broader rhetorical point. I am actually looking for a better analogy that doesn't devolve into reports or something similar. Its hard to get to the heart of the issues without provoking all sorts of Pavlovian responses from all sides - so a good analogy would actually be really useful if it enabled a clear discussion of issues with a little less heat. I don't think the various food analogies are too good either. I tried to come up with something to do with..."
- Cameron Neylon
RT @SauropodMike: @SpringerOpen "Tell Congress you support the Federal Research Public Access Act #FRPAA" <-- Good to read this from a division of Springer
Hmm. Given the work I am currently doing, most of this site would not answer the questions people have. Manuscript prep, for instance, does not explain how to write an article; it does advertise for an English-language editing service. I don't see where most of the links add much of anything that cannot be found in the author guidelines. It does create a nifty platform for self-advertisement, though. Sort of like cigarette companies who sponsor quit-smoking programs.
- Mickey Schafer
Oh I wasn't at all intersted in the site, which as you say is basically promotional but in the message, which is at odds with some publisher rhetoric about publication being divorced from the research process.
- Cameron Neylon
...which is to say, research communication is an integral part of the research process and has to be done properly...( re that last RT)
RT @JennyRohn: Anyone out there ever encountered a situation when a mammalian cell nuclei was resistant to DAPI staining? (and it's not the DAPI being off)
Image via Wikipedia Prior to all the nonsense with the Research Works Act, I had been having a discussion with Heather Morrison about licenses and Open Access and... - http://cameronneylon.net/blog...
Prior to all the nonsense with the Research Works Act, I had been having a discussion with Heather Morrison about licenses and Open Access and peripherally the principle of requiring specific licenses of authors. I realized then that I needed to lay out the background thinking that leads me to where I am. There ...
- Cameron Neylon