“what is missing to make the vsion a reality (integration between data and publication, integration of authoring and publication, traditional publications being associated with podcasts and video, professional netowrking akin to social networking)”
Monday at 12:28 pm
- Link
Lambert Heller, suelibrarian, John Dupuis and 6 other people liked this
The willingness of researchers to change their processes. - Dorothea Salo
+1 for Dorothea's point. Also willingness of publishers/content supporters to work with others rather than set up separate silos and have their own internal persistent author ids / data structures / etc - Sarah
unique IDs would help - Richard Akerman
+1 for all three comments above. - Bill Hooker
Ideas are ahead of the technology..... - Maxine
yeah, what Dorothea said. At this point all of the barriers are social. - Euan
Agree with what Dorothea said. I also think that the technology is there, but the execution isn't yet (not excluding Mendeley). - Victor / Mendeley Team
I think there is also an incentive problem -- i.e. journal article still being Coin of the Realm, to the point that nothing else is valued by tenure and promotion committees. - Dorothea Salo
hmmm - actually this was missing from the middle of a microblogging session from the psb meeting (http://friendfeed.com/rooms/ps...). But thanks for your input all! - Cameron Neylon
I would say that the roadmap and marketing strategy (I really mean marketing) would be the next step. Barriers are not really social - as Paulo wrote some time ago, lots of scientists have no idea about the concept and no time to find all the details. - Pawel Szczesny
Cluelessness IS a social barrier. - Dorothea Salo
Cluelessness is not an issue - lack of strategy to spread the word and to show that the concept works *is* an issue. And it's our problem, not somebody's else. - Pawel Szczesny
Chicken-egg problem. We can't show the concept works if nobody's doing it. Also, lack of incentive plays in, and maybe *you* have an impact on what tenure committees do, but I sure don't. - Dorothea Salo
we just have to keep discussing specific examples - Jean-Claude Bradley
"just"? - Dorothea Salo
@Dorothea yes I think that demonstrating simple examples and showing people exactly how to implement simple techniques and telling stories of how researchers benefited is necessary and sufficient to getting a critical mass of people involved - Jean-Claude Bradley
Well, respectfully, I disagree. Busy researchers will not listen without external incentive. Maybe that comes from funders, maybe from administrators, but without it, you are howling into the void IMO. - Dorothea Salo
Dorothea, that's why I don't think we have any "social" barriers. Scientists may be willing, but have no external incentives, and no idea about the concept. We don't have much power over grant agencies, but we at least can spread the word out, just as Jean-Claude says. - Pawel Szczesny
Well, the creation of incentive is a social process; there's certainly nothing technological about it. So is spreading the word, and *especially* so is having it heeded. I do think peer pressure is important, but I go back to John Wilbanks's talk: researchers pay attention to what will keep them researchers as opposed to burger-flippers at McD's. If this vision can't plausibly do that, it's hosed. - Dorothea Salo
It also depends on your definition of success - I think that there will be enough researchers motivated by example of people finding funding, collaborators and jobs using these tools to use them without additional motivation. But if you want to "convert the majority" that is another objective entirely. I don't think you need the majority to have an immense impact on science. - Jean-Claude Bradley
Fair enough, Jean-Claude, and I agree. - Dorothea Salo




