If the presenter is going to make all those rights explicitly available and then add the caveat about "respecting the rights assoc'd with components", it's important for the presenter also to make the relevant component permissions explicit, since whereever that information is not explicit viewers will assume they have all the rights mentioned in the cover slide. - Bill Hooker

Cameron - this is fantastic! Do you have somewhere that people can grab the individual icons that apply to them (for instance, some people may be happy with live-blogging but not video)? We should also consider a reverse slide explicitly asking people not to share the presentation, for conferences where the default is open blogging. - Daniel MacArthur

Doesn't FF have a fancy new "share file" option? I like it Cameron :) - Brian Krueger - LabSpaces

Daniel, working on it - I obviously have the component pieces but it was the last thing I threw up just before losing net connection for the afternoon. Will wack them up as soon as I have energy to create the separate image files. Most of the components are available from http://creativecommons.org/about... and http://www.thisismyurl.com/free-do... - Cameron Neylon

Bill, absolutely - that's why I put the licence (at least in text form) on images I use in talks. Actually in putting this talk together I realised I hadn't done that for some of my slides so needing to go back and find the images again. Also important for people contributing pieces to make licences explicit, ideally via a watermark that gets carried with the item, I've had had several people say recently "consider it CC-BY" but strictly speaking I can't do that. So always best to be clear with a widely used (and appropriate licence) for anything you want people to be able to re-use - Cameron Neylon