Reading: “NET EFFECT: It’s not too late for humanity to survive the digital” by Douglas Rushkoff - ARTHUR MAGAZINE ( http://www.arthurmag.com/2009... )
some equally thought provoking comments on that article page (how unusual is that!?)
- James Tindall
indeed! i was just reading them… it's a too short article to expose such a complex issue, but the point is very good (and actually something i regularly try to discuss with my students while studying computers and digital media) — maybe you also know this text by michael mateas: http://www.etc.cmu.edu/etcpres... ?
- miguel carvalhais
I think you're right it is extremely complex. I sometimes think being engaged in active production of software occupies me so much that I lose (or forgo) as many freedoms as it endows. I hope Rushkoff continues to think and write along these lines as he promises in the article. I always find his writings enlightening. Not read the Mateas article. Will read it now!
- James Tindall
Interesting. Miguel, I wonder what you make of this quote from architecture critic Jonathan Meades: "the difference between craft and art is that art ought never to repeat itself, whilst craft ought always to repeat itself" - I found this quote only recently and thought it to be one of the better explanations of the difference between art and craft that I'd heard. By repetition I...
more...
- James Tindall
Hi James! I obviously agree with the Meades quote, but i wasn't discussing this art vs craft problem. I used "craft" to underline the difference between what happens in media based in industrial reproduction (as print) from what happens in the web and similar digital media where a single "original" is accessed by multiple readers… In industrial processes (in graphic design, to keep on...
more...
- miguel carvalhais