Ya trim it at least. Accepting an award looking all sasquatch might scare the relatives. ;)
- Rodfather
@Spidra, May be I shouldn't have generalised! At least me and most of my friends don't! :) And yeah, it does look terrible on people at times! But I would prefer men with at least a lil stubble! ;)
- rampantheart
The answers to all "should I keep my beard?" questions always favor the beard. Do not taunt the Beardocracy.
- Mark Trapp
Good way to spin it. I just wish they'd come out with their version of a "netbook", perhaps a little more expensive than the typical $500 - $600 price. The MacBooks look like a great deal, though.
- Cheryl Jones
ooooh, you put that very well. very well, indeed. but can one pass the baton *back*? i wrote about something related, but didn't think of trolls (because i haven't found any, i suppose). it makes me wish i knew things about anthropology in a formal, official sort of way.
- idnan
I would never want to be "famous". It would be nice to be known for contributing to a "society", but I wouldn't want to go out and be recognized by everyone. On that same token, I can only imagine some of the more internet-famous peoples im's and e-mail's and moderating a million comments, and so on.. no thank you :)
- Tim Hoeck
That's an interesting perspective of trolls and users...
- Czar
Edit: Cyndy - I think you're right on the money here. Trolls are simply taking the most extreme position possible to draw attention to themselves. Much like a person will do outrageous things in public to attract attention with little regard for anything other than blatant self-promotion or the spewing of today's vitriol. While it would be nice to have stature in a field based on a strong personal brand I would never want to be notorious for being an a-hole. (thanks for the heads up Louis)
- Morgan
Internet famous is just the indie way of being normal famous. And while sure, that article gave trolls a voice (which sounds so-democratic doesn't it? What we can only give voices to the things we want to hear? That's how echo chambers are made), it hopefully opened some eyes to things that happen outside the Kool-aid factory. Very real things that just don't 'go away' if you ignore them.
- Eric Rice
I only want Internet fame if it comes with some kind of bonus. Say tax exemption? :)
- Todd Jordan
If it was an issue of 'reaction' then yes, they are guilty of that. They know exactly what buttons to push. Would be interesting to explore 'faux racism', which is knowing for a fact that throwing a slur at just the right angle will cause people to react... as if on cue. So it's not so black and white like 'oh don't feed the trolls.' That's just ignorant, and saying it aloud is almost worse, heh.
- Eric Rice
I have been guilty of unintentional trolling on occasion. I always feel ashamed after. I mean, I don't mind the living under the bridge thing, but the trip-trip-trap sound gives me a headache, and I don't even LIKE the taste of billy goats, be they gruff or otherwise.
- Slappy Line
Eric, I disagree. I really think if they didn't get a reaction, they WOULD go away. What fun is it if no one reacts? The mere fact that they agreed to the interview (and to be photographed) shows that even the reaction wasn't enough. They wanted people to know who they were and recognize what they'd done. It's the same as keeping your clippings or social bookmarking your mentions, but on a much larger and needier scale.
- Cyndy
Cyndy, because they work as an anonymous group and the group itself feeds. Hence the 'for the lulz'.... it's a parallel not just by tech design of a japanese image board, but the idea of individualism isn't a priority. That's why you see so much of the "Anonymous" thing. It's ABOUT the group, but not the ego. It's so much the anti-blogger it's not even funny, and that's why it works. You can't FIND them to ignore them and on paper they 'don't do anything wrong'. It's a subtle pattern of conversation, like +
- Eric Rice
+screwin with the people at the drive-thru window by faking a broken microphone connection. It takes awhile to realize something's up and by that time, lulz accomplished.
- Eric Rice
In short, the blogosphere (read: tech blogosphere) doesn't -get- the lulzsphere...they think they do, but they don't and that's why the dynamic works. Those news articles are only the tip of the iceberg.
- Eric Rice
Eric: You couldn't have said it better. To elaborate on anonymous 'group' manifestation, is 2-chan, the Anonymous BBS of Japan. ie: Akihabara Massacre, Many, many killing sprees have stemmed from 2ch. (extreme examples)
- Mona Nomura
Even if it wasn't for the complexity of the problem people react emotionally to certain topics, always will. Unless everyone consciously chooses their reactions consistently someone will fall for it and give them lulz. Intermittent reinforcement is good enough.
- Goldie Katsu
Eric, I still call BS. Trolls have been around since the BBS and IRC. The group allows anonymity to stretch it out, but the reaction is still what they are after. The lulz is still attention. If every single person ignored them (EVERY LAST ONE) do you honestly think they'd still do it? Firm answer is no, they wouldn't. No attention, no lulz. It has nothing to do with the blogosphere and everything to do with annoying people to get the reaction.
- Cyndy
They THEMSELVES propagate the attention inward, we could ignore all we want but by the time we get affected, they got the lulz. That's why I'm saying it's not this 'oh yeah just ignore them'... by the time you realize you've been had, it's too late, mission is accomplished. I think our def of trolls is varied. Like Igor and Coulter are trolls to Scoble. Lulz are a diff beast where those rules don't apply.
- Eric Rice
kathy sierra tried to ignore her trolls, no? but she couldn't just wish them away until she shuttered her blog. perhaps she could give insight on how easy or hard that is in reality. i more or less agree with @eric's take here.
- .LAG liked that
Eric is right. Trolls often don't care about the attention. They often just want to stop a conversation. You see this most in political blogs where the trolls are actually paid by competition to keep conversations from getting going. Sort of the same way with Apple fans who were urged on by Guy Kawasaki types. Or teenagers who egg cars. Destruction is a goal, too.
- Robert Scoble
"Some men just want to watch the world burn." -- Alfred the Butler
- Karim
No, Kathy Sierra did exactly what they wanted. She reacted. She said she was afraid. She quit blogging. She pulled out of a conference. Trolls won.
- Cyndy
hmmm...but as i understood it from reading the Sierra story as it unfolded, for a long time, she tried to just ignore them, and then the nooses and such started showing up. these people are relentless. i enjoyed your original post, btw. one thing i'd like further exploration on is what kind of axe does "old media" like the NYT have to grind by giving trolls a public platform. if the interweb is painted as a scarier place, doesn't old media benefit?
- .LAG liked that
I'm not really familiar with the Sierra story, but from the comments and the NYT story, it looks like the trolls will push things as far as necessary to get a reaction, no matter how far he has to go. The only thing you can do for defense is to be ready to close everything down and start anew. I don't know how many people would be ready to do that.
- Steve Lowe
Funny thing is I don't want to be Internet famous, hence my handle. If I were to be famous, everyone in the world would want me to come over and fix their computer problems!
- imabonehead
I wonder if TwitterSearch could be useful for Amber Alerts. Certainly a much faster way to distribute the message and it has a mobile platform which is important since much of the time the target is in a car.
- AJ Kohn