"It's just a little shocking to see such huge disregard for such an important principle - but then again, maybe all it really does is serve simultaneously as explanation and consequence of CNN's chief loser ranking in cable news ratings."
- Colin Ashe
"Downloaded it the other day – it's like listening to a video game soundtrack that you can't quite place with a specific memory, or listening in to some alternate universe where 8-bit gaming turned into a forum for some seriously strange art. I'm a fan :)"
- Colin Ashe
"Was about to make fun of you for reblogging another self-referencing post, but i see you snagged it before i slipped in your attribution - my bad :)"
- Colin Ashe
"Ah, nevermind the typo, I'm just OCD enough to correct it in passive-aggressive quotation driveby :) Where'd you hear that they're upset they're not getting enough credit? I actually think the idea that he/we rallied anyone is a bit overblown. The Cairo speech was good in a much-needed, "Hey, we don't actually want to bomb your deserts to glass," kind of way, but it was a far cry from HW Bush's rallying of Iraqis in Gulf War 1. What worries me is your closing question, regardless of who rallied who. All the elements of the ridiculously overhyped web aspect of the protests – twitter, youtube et al – while transformative, are incredibly fragile. Iran basically bought their networks from Nokia and Siemens wholesale, and didn't quite have a lid on it. But how many videos, how many tweets, how many accounts of any kind have leaked out of Xinjiang? Or, for that matter, from Sri Lanka?"
- Colin Ashe
All known life forms need carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and an energy source to live. Plants need nitrogen, but can’t just pull it from the atmosphere and start using it to make amino acids. Instead, they rely on archaea for that task. Interconnections like these form the basis of an ecosystem, often cheesily called the ‘web of life’. What makes D. audaxviator so special is that its genome, cobbled together from bacterial and archaeal genes, can carry out all life’s functions by itself.
- Colin Ashe
email from Mary Ann Liebert C.:'Many of our authors have inquired about making their articles free online permanently, immediately upon publication. Rejuvenation Research offers its authors "Liebert Open Option" to enable them to do so. The cost of Liebert Open Option is $3,000 for each article.'
what? Authors should pay $3,000 if they want Open Access for making their stuff publicly available for others? Not sure I understand. Do you?
- Attila Csordas
Obviously there's a price to pay to be OA. Someone has to pay for Free Access, too
- Jim Hardy
more expensive than BMC, but understandable.
- Paulo Nuin
I would really love to see a dollar-by-dollar breakdown of that $3000.
- Colin Ashe
Is that in addition to page charges? Then no, or at least not until I'd exhausted the open-access options.
- Chris Patil
I think since the authors are providing the content, and we are talking about academic articles here, you are getting into a weird area of Pay to Play/Publish that is a very slippery slope. The question is to have open access- should there be perhaps a yearly fee? Should regular subscriptions by libraries allow open access to web based content? What about medline?
- Whitney Hoffman
Springer's Open Access fee also used to be $3000 (I don't know what it has been recently). Oxford journals such as NAR charge reduced OA fees to publishers at institutions with a subscription, so the cost is basically shared between the institution/library and the author. The Berkeley Research Impact Initiative http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/brii... subsidizes fees like this for those who...
more...
- Ruchira S. Datta
From the transfer of copyright form [http://www.liebertpub.com/media...] from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., about the NIH Public Access Policy: "In order to assist our authors who have NIH funding to comply with this policy, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers will deposit the final accepted paper (after copy -editing and proofreading) to PubMed Central (PMC) on...
more...
- Jim Till
The restriction on self-archiving and long embargo is likely to make some people think, hmm, I'll just send it to PLoS and not deal with that.
- Mr. Gunn
Actually, Rejuvenation Research has no page charges http://www.liebertpub.com/product... So the $3000 is in line with the $2850 charged by PLoS Biology but significantly higher than PLoS ONE. Thus fees are RR>PB>PO whereas impact factor goes PB>RR>PO.
- Chris Patil
Not much of a difference from other OA publications, as pointed out. Funding agencies are supporting line items for OA publications. I ask for $5000/yr routinely for publications in my grant applications.
- Iddo Friedberg
Chris, IF won't remain that way forever, and I think it's a poor decision-making factor as well.
- Mr. Gunn
Maybe instead of putting the burden on libraries it would take the burden off of libraries. Presumably, authors who want this will build it into their budget and it will be covered by grants, funding, etc and libraries will not have to buy a subscription to the journal.
- Angela Hamilton
I also would suggest not confounding the OA/author pays model of publishing with the deposition. Nature Publishing Group for example mostly consists of subscription journals but these journals (including Nature itself) provide the automatic deposition to PMC (as described above by Jim Till) as a free service to authors.
- Maxine
@Mr. Gunn - I don't make my decisions based on impact factor, and I agree that it's a poor basis for distinguishing between journals. I do think that that relative relationship of impact factors between those three journals is likely to remain the same for a while, however.
- Chris Patil
A fish-supper, anyone ?? - plus I have a fine pot of Earl Grey on (the) simmer......
- Graham Steel
"the OA/author pays model" -- just to clarify, OA and "author side fees" (a more accurate term) are two different things. The majority of OA journals don't charge any author side fees (though the best known ones, PLoS and BMC, do), whereas many toll-access journals charge page and color fees in addition to their subscriptions. For details see Peter's comments here: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters...
- Bill Hooker
"Huh, so I guess using chunks of now public-domain books is a (charming) way of slipping past spam filters? I was secretly hoping the spambot was actually creating its own works of fiction."
- Colin Ashe
"Oh, very serious. Actually, digging through search.twitter.com, I couldn't find any of them - and indeed it looks like the Powers That Be have caught on: http://twitter.com/wheeepo... both redirect to the Owl of silence. But yeah, for example, I tweeted this: http://twitter.com/colinas... and received a "wooooo BACON!" from someone. Twitter is weird."
- Colin Ashe
"Oh, very serious. Actually, digging through search.twitter.com, I couldn't find any of them - and indeed it looks like the Powers That Be have caught on: http://twitter.com/wheeepo... both redirect to the Owl of silence. But yeah, for example, I tweeted this: http://twitter.com/colinas... and received a "wooooo BACON!" from someone. Twitter is weird."
- Colin Ashe
another guerilla gardening how-to... "Seed balls are simply scattered direct onto ground, and not planted. They could be useful for seeding dry, thin and compacted soils and for reclaiming derelict ground. This method takes a fraction of the time or cost of other methods to cover large areas and is also very applicable in small areas..."
- Colin Ashe
a sort of private group twitter / easy-access groupware. calendar, polls, mass txt/voice/emails, file hosting, conference calls, chatrooms. free.
- Colin Ashe