Michael Netzley › Comments

great article on media relations - Michael Netzley

Reputation and Goldman - Michael Netzley

Time management - Michael Netzley

Time management - Michael Netzley

SG case study of using social media - Michael Netzley

Rebecca MacKinnon's recent speech - Michael Netzley

TechCrunch's excessive post. Interesting in light of the lawsuits here - Michael Netzley

Will Moss on PR in China. - Michael Netzley

Blog shops SG - Michael Netzley

campaign from India with ideas for improvement - Michael Netzley

Part 1 of a very nice paper on spreadable media - Michael Netzley

Very good transmedia post. - Michael Netzley

Nice video for research we are doing - Michael Netzley

For FIR Report Dec 14 - Michael Netzley

FIR Report for Dec 10 - Michael Netzley

Useful list to help promote crowdsourcing - Michael Netzley

Lots of data - Michael Netzley

What did Singaporeans search on Yahoo in 2009? - Michael Netzley

China blog and microblog information - Michael Netzley

Regular people in Indonesia influencing governments - Michael Netzley

Important info on building your Facebook presence - Michael Netzley

Great summary of what we need to learn in digital media classes - Michael Netzley

Haha it was quite an experience for us too - first time doing a full-fledged case analysis and seeing the admin lady hover around you pertinent to know if it was 2 hours or 3. - Karthikayini Senthilkumar

I thought it was 3. Sorry about that. I didn't realize anything other than 3 had been published - Michael Netzley

Help students with managing online identity. - Michael Netzley

Twitter expanding sms service into Indonesia - Michael Netzley

List of twitter clone sites - Michael Netzley

Chinese citizens did not understand what Twitter was, when Obama made his reference to the microblog. - Michael Netzley

Additional information for the Coke in India case - Michael Netzley

Interesting forum discussing how we align grading with how people are learning today - Michael Netzley

Limited description, or in some cases no description, of the what the data presented means and few hyperlinks, and in in some cases no hyperlinks, back to a source. This is a reference wiki, and our documentation must be reliable. I am not putting grades on this yet, so you can still go back and quickly add the documentation if it is not there. Just remember that facts do not speak for themselves. They must be interpreted. So the intro description and the link to the original source are very very important. Another issue is contradictory information. One page reports Internet destinations rank ordered, and another page presents a different rank ordering. I am guessing limited coordination between team members? If I look at the data for each page, and who made the changes, I will see if the team simply divided and conquered or if multiple eyes made changes to wiki pages. These sorts of obvious errors should be caught and corrected--credibility issue and we have 850 to 1000 people... more... - Michael Netzley