Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »

Tim O'Reilly › Comments

Tim O'Reilly
"I hear you, Joe. But we've continued to do those things even as we have become more disciplined. There is no question, though, that a lot of our success did indeed come from our ignorance of "how things are done." But I believe it's possible to have a deep connection to your values and mission while still running a tight ship. The pathology you describe is common - putting growth or profit before all else - but I can assure you that O'Reilly is a long way off from that being a problem. We are still dreamers who want to make a better world. We just know that we can do that more effectively if we do our dreaming in a disciplined way." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: If You Want to See How We'll Live In the Future... - http://bryce.vc/post...
"That quote was from Google chief economist Hal Varian. I passed it along after a fascinating dinner I had with Hal and his former student (and co-author of the seminal book Information Rules) Carl Shapiro, fresh from the White House Council of Economic Advisors, discussing the difference between the Silicon Valley mentality and the traditional liberal approach to equalizing society. I think both of them had really good points. While technology is doing amazing things to democratize what used to be exclusive to the rich, it's still got a long way to go. Uber, despite its slogan, isn't "everyone's private driver," it's the upper middle class's private driver. There are people in real need. And yes, cell phone penetration is amazing, but people are still hungry. So we need a fusion of the two ideas: the optimism of tech, so that policy doesn't shoot behind the adoption curve, but the compassion to understand what problems the market isn't (yet) addressing. One of the reasons I'm so..." - Tim O'Reilly
Hello friend My name is miss Ngone Hadiza, i want us to be friends i don't know how you will feel about it,please you can write to me through my email and i will tell you all about my self including my pictures.( Ngonehadiza13@gmx.com ) I'm sorry if i am embarrassing you, i shall explain my self to you ( Ngonehadiza13@gmx.com ) yours in love, Miss Ngone Hadiza Thanks & Regard,s - Ngone Hadi
Tim O'Reilly
"Sounds like your reason #1 may be not reading texts that are long enough to make the point they are trying to make :-)" - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"Yep. Follow the link to viola.org. It was prior art for a huge amount of what followed." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"No problem with the banks in 2009." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"Jay, I'd bet you are right on your first guess, but the second point is a bit harsh. Pruning parts of the business that are not working doesn't necessarily reflect on the people involved. Sure, sometimes it does, but often, the business idea just didn't work, just as a lot of startups fail, and that isn't seen as a negative reflection on those who were part of them. Many of them go on to great success. So it's important to separate the business/financial side from the personal performance side." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Resharing Differences Between LinkedIn and Radar - http://radar.oreilly.com/2013...
"Right. But notice that Twitter and LinkedIn are ignoring this attribute. I expected Google to pay attention. I thought FB would be like Twitter and LinkedIn. At any rate, good for them." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"Tim's original WWW browser didn't do inline images." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"I don't think so. He was in NYC in the financial industry." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Not another VC blog - First Round Review - http://firstround.com/article...
"As this stuff accumulates, want to turn it into a book?" - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"No, that's probably about right. I didn't remember it being 14%. And I really didn't see that as being in the same category as our 2001 layoffs, which were truly forced winnowing, with our continued existence in doubt. Our 2009 layoffs consisted of closing down businesses in which we didn't make any money, and in which we didn't see any future prospect of making money. My point is that we were being prudent in the face of the downturn; we have stopped various other businesses since. Any good business does this, on an ongoing business. I will say that I do regret that we weren't able to make a go of some of those businesses. In many cases, if we had let go of some people earlier through better performance management, we might have saved the broader business unit. We had a constant struggle in the past at O'Reilly to get some of our business units to take the business itself seriously. They are so mission driven that they forget that someone has to pay the bills. I think we're getting..." - Tim O'Reilly
<a href='http://cap.casharbor.com/...' onclick="javascript:window.location.href='http://caprewards.go2cloud.org/aff_c... false;">Make over $10,000 a month! No Experienice required. Post Ads, Make money, Live Happy!</a><br /><a href='http://cap.casharbor.com/...'... more... - Crush Yo
Tim O'Reilly
"Thanks, Bruce. I like your comment that O'Reilly is a bit more Harvard than MIT, which surprises many people (though it shouldn't.) Regarding the one interaction you cite, I'd forgotten it until you brought it up. But it highlights an important point in any organization. There should be lots of room for everyone to speak up, but at some point, it's essential to come to closure and move on. I really enjoyed working with you too, and in the end, I think the things that didn't work out during your tenure had far more to do with external industry trends than with either of us!" - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"We did shutter some non-performing businesses during the 2009 downturn. We did not lay off 14% of the staff. And we were not forced to, as we were in 2001. We were using the opportunity to increase our focus on what was working." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Big Data's Dehumanizing Impact On Public Policy - by Matt Asay - http://readwrite.com/2013...
"I'm sorry, Matt, but I have to disagree. Your argument is based on a hypothetical . That comes out most clearly in the Morozov quote, which, like so much of his work, builds its argument on a straw man that sound plausible only to those with no knowledge of the actual situation. Policy makers don't give out pedometers (or if they do, they do so in quest of additional data to make better decisions.) They look at that correlation and say "Wow, we need to find ways to build more walkable cities." (Check out the Blue Zones initiative, for example, or Bloomberg's focus on making NYC more bikeable.) Correlation is additional data for human decision makers, not blind abdication of common sense. When Mike Flowers of NYC used data about the correlation between illegal apartment conversions and fires to guide building inspectors, he was using not just insight but data to direct fire inspectors to use their limited time most effectively. (See http://www.slate.com/articles/... Nor is your..." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: The Stories I Enjoyed Most in Last Week’s Sunday New York Times - http://radar.oreilly.com/2013...
"Tiomoid of Angle - what a wonderful demonstration of systematic bias you provide! Given the range of articles I pointed to, the fact that you coud find something for your grindstone in most of them while finding nothing of value (apparently without actually reading the articles themselves) says something about how you approach your intellectual culture. For example, your recommendation about health care would be one option for "the more profound change" I was suggesting, and might even be consistent with the "policy consensus" Douthat referred to. But you wouldn't know that if you didn't actually read the article. That is not a conversation I particularly want to be part of." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Tim O’Reilly’s Key to Creating the Next Big Thing - http://blog-admin.wired.com/busines...
"This bit was taken a bit out of context. My point was that if novels matter to customers, they will survive. They don't need special protection. I was reacting to a conversation that I had on Charlie Rose that struck me as very entitled. I had made a comparison to classical music, making the point that what we consider "classical music" was once popular. And that when we got this mindset that classical music needed special funding and protection, it became increasingly disconnected from what people really wanted to hear. I love fiction and consider it a great art form. But if it really matters, it will survive. And meanwhile, it will continue to evolve." - Tim O'Reilly
Hi,Good Day!!! My name is Miss Armela, I pray that this letter meets you well,though we never meet or seen each other before, but I believe that nature has a way of bringing people together for specific purposes.(miss.armela @yahoo.com) If you need a friend Email me back - Mac Mercy
beatyakuol@yahoo.com Hello My name is Miss Beatrice Akuol, I saw your profile and i became interested in you. if my friendship is accepted kindly write to my email so that i will send you my picture for you to know me better. (beatyakuol@yahoo.com) I am waiting for your message in my mailbox. sincerely Beatrice - beatrice
Tim O'Reilly
Re: We’re releasing the files for O’Reilly’s Open Government book - http://radar.oreilly.com/2013...
"Aaron didn't actually release the JSTOR downloads. He did some research on the downloaded corpus. If someone did the same for Safari, I might well have been intrigued and asked for a copy of the research. It's true that if Aaron had actually released all the bulk-downloaded data, in despite of the copyright owner's wishes, he would have been doing something I wouldn't approve of. If you look at my history on the subject, I am all about finding the right balance between open and closed. E.g. when bookshare.org asked for copies of my company's books for scanning, I said, "Why don't we just send you the files?" Now almost all publishers do that." - Tim O'Reilly
very good book to much enrich and for one front information managmet system whit ITIL 4.0 - gabriel eduardo moya
Tim O'Reilly
Re: The future of programming - http://radar.oreilly.com/2013...
"What a great framework you've laid out for exploration, Edd! I can't wait for future installments in this series. In the meantime, what O'Reilly books would you recommend to get a head start in each of these areas?" - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"I totally agree with your thinking here, Joe." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Square Wallet, the Apple Store, and Uber: Software Above the Level of a Single Device - http://radar.oreilly.com/2012...
"Yes, fantastic observation." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Square Wallet, the Apple Store, and Uber: Software Above the Level of a Single Device - http://radar.oreilly.com/2012...
"What a great observation! Local businesses used to do this the human way, without technology." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Square Wallet, the Apple Store, and Uber: Software Above the Level of a Single Device - http://radar.oreilly.com/2012...
"Just because Napster was shut down didn't mean that the future of music wasn't online.... Whether Uber succeeds or not, we can look forward to hailing cabs on our phones with a system much like it." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Square Wallet, the Apple Store, and Uber: Software Above the Level of a Single Device - http://radar.oreilly.com/2012...
"That's an important and thought-provoking point, Alasdair. A world without cash simplifies user experience, but creates many new issues, both the credit-divide issue you highlight here, but also privacy." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"I didn't know Corwin well; I wish I had. The stories told here are a testament to how he lives on in the lives of others. I am reminded of Auden's poem on the death of W.B. Yeats: "Now he is scattered among a hundred cities And wholly given over to unfamiliar affections, To find his happiness in another kind of wood And be punished under a foreign code of conscience. The words of a dead man Are modified in the guts of the living." I also think of Wallace Stevens, as if reflecting on Corwin's intense physicality: "The greatest poverty is not to live In a physical world, to feel that one's desire Is too difficult to tell from despair. Perhaps, After death, the non-physical people, in paradise, Itself non-physical, may, by chance, observe The green corn gleaming and experience The minor of what we feel. The adventurer In humanity has not conceived of a race Completely physical in a physical world." and, Stevens again, reflecting on death and continuance: "How red the rose that is the..." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Who Cares If Samsung Copied Apple? - http://blogs.hbr.org/cs...
"I hear you, Normm. Of course, Xerox themselves later sued Apple, so their earlier spirit of "hey, if you can do something with this, that's great" evaporated in the face of later events. But in any event, the main point of the article stands: copying doesn't inhibit innovation. It may enhance it, as companies need to run faster to stay ahead of those who copy them. You could argue that it inhibits the profits of those who innovate - but it's hard to make that argument today in the face of Apple's enormous success, and their determined attempts to lock-in customers to their entire product suite. So copying by Samsung (to the extent it's happening) is definitely pro-consumer and pro-competitive. And frankly, the idea that Apple can somehow protect the whole idea of the tablet or smartphone is fairly extreme. The iPhone and Android phones are sufficiently different that I find myself having trouble going back and forth between the two. Most of the deepest similarities are in third-party..." - Tim O'Reilly
тупизм - Radion2000
apples creates waves on the markets - Estel Efimova
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Who Cares If Samsung Copied Apple? - http://blogs.hbr.org/cs...
"I agree with your basic point here, but your historical analogy for Apple stretches the facts pretty far. There are decades between Apple's near-death experience after Windows rather than the Mac dominated the windows and mouse paradigm, and their resurgence with Mac OS X, then the iPhone. But it's very true that Apple didn't lose out to Microsoft because of copying.  In fact, the original Mac interface was itself inspired by the Xerox Alto and other work at PARC.  That's the real disingenuous part of Apple's argument.  They copied from Xerox, and the Microsoft copied from them.  But in each case, it was execution (and business model) that made the difference." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
"Evan - the fact that people build proprietary cloud services on top of open source is not news. I highlighted that fact a decade ago in my talks on "The Open Source Paradigm Shift." It's not only not news, it's the way things work. Open platforms always create new value that is captured by people who close the system down in some ways. But we're all better off from the dance. Roger's post is not open source "triumphalism" but a statement about how open source and proprietary, revolutionary and enterprise, have learned to coexist. There is plenty of room still for new open source innovation. The notion that if everything isn't open source, we've somehow failed is a bankrupt notion. My own thinking about open source has always been shaped more by the generosity of the Berkeley/MIT/Apache/Internet approach - here's our work, build on it however you will - than on the hyper-controlling approach of the GPL. There's no question in my mind which of those approaches has created more value for..." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: The End of the World: The State vs. the Internet - http://eaves.ca/2012...
"A couple of points I want to inject into the online discussion (as I injected them into the real-world discussion at Foo Camp): 1. We can already see signs of the corporation as an actor of stature to match the nation-state in the fact that companies like Google and Facebook effectively have a "foreign policy" with regard to China. Google had a foreign policy with regard to the Egyptian revolution. I know at least some people in government who have remarked on this. Perhaps more importantly, it's useful to frame the current financial disorder as a kind of "war" between corporations (particularly hedge funds) and nation states. George Soros vs. the British pound was only a foretaste; since 2008, the destabilization of the Euro is a struggle between financial firms and nation states, with nation states trying to preserve their currency and banking system against those who would profit from destabilizing them. And you can certainly see the recent JP Morgan losses as a cyber war between..." - Tim O'Reilly
Tim O'Reilly
Re: Letter to the DoJ about the collusion lawsuit and settlement - http://www.idealog.com/blog...
"Mike, I completely agree with your analysis. I'd actually go one further, and argue that Amazon's actions are keeping prices *higher* for consumers in many cases. Because Amazon discounts so heavily from list price (using the huge quantity discounts that they demand from publishers because of their near-monopoly position), the publishers keep their prices higher than they would in a world where the publisher was attempting to sell directly to consumers, and needed to find the market price. Right now, if a publisher looks to price books at the market clearing price (the optimum point on the demand curve), Amazon will undercut that price in order to get share, making the publisher look like they are overcharging whatever price they set. In short, we have a market where only one player gets to set the consumer price. Right now, Amazon is using "most favored nation" treatment for themselves to always have the lowest price, and right now this looks good for consumers. But will they still..." - Tim O'Reilly
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook