">Your three premises are not always true. Why? >But even if they were, A here would be "deprive our enemies of 'free speech' and other resources", not "suppress anybody who disagrees with us". You're not changing anything, you simply claim that having the desire to deprive whoever you consider your enemy of free speech and other resources is acceptable. Therefore you would have to find it acceptable for the anti-semites to deprive the free speech of the Jews whom they consider their enemies. The problem is that you hate the fascists because they promote particular actions such as the above, and then consider that it's acceptable to do *the same actions* as long as it's against the fascists themselves. This does not compute. >Indeed. But the only speech left out would be that which is disliked by the vast majority. Fascist ideas will be disliked by almost everyone, and I don't see why the population should have to listen to them if they don't want to. Why should the christian majority..." - Divided By Zer0