Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »

Donnie Berkholz › Likes

Mickey Kosloff
Byte Size Biology » Open Access: what’s in it for me? - http://bytesizebio.net/index...
"One problem that I am facing is convincing colleagues of the utility of an Open Access publication. ... Not everyone operates on large grants. Many lab budgets leave very little room to buy a new laptop, let alone pay for an OA publication (typically the price of two of said laptops)." - Mickey Kosloff from Bookmarklet
Good points here. Proving a rival to current closed-access or setting a precedent to get grant-givers to make line-items for OA publication are good in an abstract/aggregate level, but the individual lab decision-maker is thinking on a lot more concrete terms. Perhaps, some sort of Impact Factor or "open access journal news" to add credence/credibility can substitute? - Benjamin Tseng
I'm glad you've made the point -- I talk about it with students who will have to make these kinds of decisions in the coming years -- and it's a tough one: ideological belief against practical action. Maybe we need a kind of OA investment account where interest can be accrued over the life of a grant. Okay, not realistic...government subsidies, maybe;-)? - Mickey Schafer
Deepak Singh
Zachary Voase’s Blog — Bioinformatics and the Semantic Web - http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/post...
Also check out his other post: http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/post... Awesome awesome stuff. Also, I'm more than a little relieved to find out I'm not crazy. Or at least that I have company in crazy town depending on the interpretation. - Paul J. Davis
Nice post, but I don't think it would sell me on using RDF. It's not like you can't agree on syntax and meaning (or even use ontologies) without RDF. Better to show how RDF helps deal with the fact that not all databases are ever going to agree on a single set of non-overlapping concepts for describing their data, and -- more important -- with more fundamental disagreements (such as what an organism even is). - Eric Jain
Björn Brembs
This is absurd! Since when was the methods section in "Nature Methods" papers in a supplement?
"like" as in "wtf?" - Bill Hooker
Since they started confusing houseflies with drosophila? http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog... - Marcos de Carvalho
Nature Methods - methods = ? Is this process iterative? - Richard Badge from Nambu
Perhaps that's their undercover advocacy for Open Access to the methods sections? - Daniel Mietchen
Iddo Friedberg
Byte Size Biology » Finally: a Nobel prize for the ribosome structure - http://bytesizebio.net/index...
Yes! Finally!!! - Alejandro Montenegro
"The acid test: if I see electrons pushed around, it's chemistry" http://scienceblogs.com/terrasi... - Iddo Friedberg
I really want to "like" that comment, but I guess I'll settle with the whole post... - Donnie Berkholz
Wladimir Labeikovsky
I’m reviewing the situation - Reciprocal Space - Stephen Curry's blog on Nature Network - http://network.nature.com/people...
Imo journals should simply refuse to publish without full M&M details, sufficient for replication. - Bill Hooker
I agree, Bill. Why even show the data at all if no one can replicate it? - Mr. Gunn
More emphatically, my opinion is that it's not science if it's irreproduceable (even if that's through poor documentation). - Donnie Berkholz
My comment is at the post - what Nature would have done under these circumstances. - Maxine
One more reason to go open science - if you keep your notebook online, it should be much easier to find the missing information. Alas, I also struggled quite a while with such an old omission and will probably blog about that soon (after finally contacting my "Carters" who were also the main competitors at the time). In my case, the "Chinese" group was Japanese and finally posted an... more... - Daniel Mietchen
Update: My "Carters" reacted friendly to my friendly inquiry, and we provided each other with more details on the experiments, but it is still next to impossible to reconcile our results, and neither they nor me currently have funds for this line of research - another case where baseline grants would be handy. - Daniel Mietchen
Abhishek Tiwari
Bring Back Reprint Requests :The Scientist [2009-09-01] - http://www.the-scientist.com/article...
"The Internet has changed scientific publishing in many ways, some good and some bad. No one would deny that it is easier to find papers on a particular subject than ever before. Looking up papers in Index Medicus or by browsing Current Contents has long been replaced by online searches on Medline or even Google Scholar. This has not necessarily improved our understanding of the literature, but it certainly provides a quick way to feel up to date." - Abhishek Tiwari from Bookmarklet
quick way to get rid of this pang of nostalgia: file and send the reprints yourself, don't have your secretary do it - Wladimir Labeikovsky
on the other hand. maybe torrents of emails asking for pdfs will motivate the PI's that remain apathetic towards open access - Wladimir Labeikovsky
I agree that the ability to track readership and download stats for my papers would be *extremely* valuable. It will probably just become more so as online papers approach the next-gen prototypes so you could even tell which sections and figures are viewed most. - Donnie Berkholz
Michael Kuhn
Cool study: if you get lost, you will walk in circles. http://www.cell.com/current...
1.jpg
0.jpg
the researches had people get lost in a German forest, and in the freaking SAHARA. If you do that, then you might as well put your research in an Open Access journal. - Michael Kuhn
(Tautological) Fact of the day: "Sahara desert" in the abstract means "Deserts desert" as Sahara means deserts in arabic. - Michael Barton
@Michael: I guess you've seen the list on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... - Michael Kuhn
Heather
Liked: The majority of papers published online in The EMBO Journal now contain in their supplementary material section a Review Process File including referee reports and author responses. We also continue to encourage citing of primary literature through allowing unlimited references. (www.embojournal.org)
It's nice to see other journals following the system Biology Direct has. - Alejandro Montenegro
Transparency has to be good... - Peter Murray
"The majority of papers published" - why not all? - AJCann
Berci Mesko, MD
This is really good! - Björn Brembs
absolutely terrific! And funny in places as well, which doesn't hurt one bit :) - 'Mummi' Thorisson
Great and so comprehensive. Will interest many of us - novoseek
excellent b/c addresses delivery and environment as well as design -- most instructional sites don't do this, though Michael Alley on posters (http://www.writing.engr.psu.edu/posters...) and especially power point presentations (http://www.writing.engr.psu.edu/slides...) are generally excellent, student-friendly guides -- not necessarily humorous, unless you like squirrels. - Mickey Schafer
Abhishek Tiwari
What If Scientists Didn’t Compete? - TierneyLab Blog - NYTimes.com - http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2009...
"What if scientists, instead of rushing to publish or perish, chose to cooperate? Sean Cutler decided to do “a little experiment,” as he calls it, and you can see the results in the forthcoming issue of Science. " - Abhishek Tiwari from Bookmarklet
Wish I could 'Like' twice - Andrew Clegg
If you divide the impact factor of the publication by the number of authors, then you might find out that the outcome of the sum of efforts is less than the sum of independent publications would be. After all, the amount of data obtained by these people does not depend on whether it is published in a single article in Science or several articles in more specialized journals. In fact,... more... - genereg
This is part of how the Gates foundation is trying to accelerate research, by tweaking the incentives so scientists cooperate. I find one of the Tierney article statements misleading: scientists are ultimately competing for funding, not ego. - Wladimir Labeikovsky
"scientists are ultimately competing for funding, not ego" -- I completely agree with this. in many cases, scientists also "cooperate" just to get better funding, not to make better science. - genereg
natural curiosity could provide sufficient energy to drive science without necessity of competition. but for that kind of thing to function academia might need "unlimited" resources...or a more even resource distribution.. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
"...or a more even resource distribution..." - like it was in the Soviet Union or China. Means the end of the current US grant system. - genereg
sharing data with competitors, an interesting concept - science article http://dx.doi.org/10... and summary http://tinyurl.com/cl688w - joergkurtwegner
I don't think cooperation and competition are exclusive. And both can lead to waste if taken too far... - Eric Jain
+1 Eric. Balance is key (and right now I think the balance is tilted way too far towards competition). - Bill Hooker
cooperation and competition go hand in hand. although opposing teams in a soccer match may be competing, they have a mutual pact the goal of which is to have each team play their best. - Mike Chelen
Mike, football teams aren't trying to build a reliable body of knowledge. I don't think the analogy holds up. :-) - Bill Hooker
Bill, they are trying do the best in their field (hehe), isn't the same true for scientists? - Mike Chelen
By determining goals, method of achievement, and providing feedback competition can be designed to encourage cooperation. - Mike Chelen
Jan Aerts
bashreduce - mapreduce in a shell script - http://github.com/erikfre...
Obviously sorting isn't the most parallizable test, but sorting on a dual-core machine took nearly twice as long with bashreduce. I probably should test some quad or 8-core machines before passing judgement. - Chris Miller
Abhishek Tiwari
"What you're doing is very clever, and I see how it's useful, but how is it science?" - Abhishek Tiwari
"It's not. How is your research science?" - Abhishek Tiwari
Bora Zivkovic
They don't make it very easy to send a copy online. - Donnie Berkholz
Bother your US friends? - Bora Zivkovic
Andrew Su
NIH funding in the stimulus package - http://www.nytimes.com/2009...
"The usual N.I.H. research grant is from $250,000 and $300,000 and runs for four years, and each grant supports six or seven full-time or part-time jobs, Dr. Kington said. To provide a quicker economic impact, the institutes may also award two-year grants of $500,000 per year, but soliciting proposals and judging them could take up to a year." - Andrew Su
Jason Stajich
From Beth Weil, head librarian at UCB "Berkeley's Research Impact Initiative turns one year old today. So far we are very pleased with the results. We have received 40 requests for funding, indicating that there is interest and a need for funding of open access journal articles.
There is more good news for UC journal authors. The California Digital Library (CDL) and Springer have signed a ground-breaking agreement in which UC-authored articles accepted for publication in most of the 1700 Springer journals will be published using Springer "Open Choice" which brings with it full and immediate access to all readers. This means that UC authors will pay no additional publication fees in order for their articles to be immediately and fully open to all. Under the agreement, articles will be published under a license in which authors retain the right to distribute and re-use their articles freely. - Jason Stajich
To invoke the "Open Choice" option, UC authors will select a UC campus affiliation from a drop-down box that appears on the acceptance screen which authors must complete once an article has been accepted for publication. A message on the acceptance screen will indicate that the Open Choice option is being made available to them at no charge. (The Open Choice publication fee would... more... - Jason Stajich
Michael Habib
Elsevier Launches SciTopics—Now a Fully Developed Research 2.0 Resource - http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReade...
Do any of you use SciTopics? - Steve Koch
Alexey
Bench Marks » Blog Archive » Information overload is NOT filture failure - http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprot...
"Now, most scientists are familiar with the “cataloging system” of scientific journals, they’ve been reading them their entire careers. Everyone has their own filters, their own rankings of which journals are more interesting, or publish better work than others. And all kinds of tools are available for filtering things down to just the relevant essentials for keeping up with your own field. But even so, most people that I talk to are left with more useful, relevant articles that they need to read than they have time to get to. These are not articles that should be filtered out. These are important, quality findings of direct relevance to their own work. And there are too many of them without even factoring in a need to keep up with science in general and see what developments in other fields can be applied to one’s own." - Alexey from Bookmarklet
Maxine
Science by litigation : Article : Nature - http://www.nature.com/nature...
"A company's lawsuit against researchers should not be allowed to intimidate others." Note: free to access online (registration may be required). - Maxine from Bookmarklet
Melanie Baker
dave: Judge rules Ohio homeless voters may list park benches as addresses. http://bit.ly/JdoMe - http://identi.ca/notice/949211
Bill Hooker
pullquote: "I will review 10 manuscripts per year free of charge. For anything over that number, I will request $50 per review. This will apply to all the publishers of scientific journals. If more scientists join in this action, the publishers will soon realize that they are here because of the scientists and not the other way around." - Bill Hooker
I can't think of any other money-making operation where highly qualified volunteers offer up their services (anonymously to boot) AND often pay to give up their copyright when publishing their own papers - Jean-Claude Bradley
My birthday is in February. I think I might start implementing this. Cool! - Björn Brembs
I wonder how he'd react if a journal said to him "sorry, this is your 11th submission this year so we aren't going to consider it" ;-) Or, if a journal could not find suitable peer-reviewers for his ms because everyone refused to do it as their quotas were full. Bill you are sending your $50 invoice to the wrong place; peer-review is a service that scientists perform for each other. The... more... - Maxine
That's a pullquote, not a me quote. I'm not sending any invoices: I refuse outright to review for toll-access publishers. I don't send them my mss either (when I can get co-authors to agree). I have no problem with publishers charging for the value they add, including managing peer review, but I want value for the money they charge -- and that means Open Access. - Bill Hooker
"I wonder how he'd react if a journal said to him "sorry..." -- journals reject mss all the time for far less sensible reasons -- "sorry, this isn't sufficiently important to be published in our Glam Mag". He'd do what authors always do -- find another journal. There are plenty to choose from. - Bill Hooker
"...if a journal could not find suitable peer-reviewers for his ms because everyone refused to do it as their quotas were full" -- like I said, I don't invoice. If everyone did as I do, publishers would switch to OA. We might not save money but no one would have to pay to read the scientific literature. (And I think we might save money, because author choice is more nimble than library choice, so competition over author-side fees would likely be more effective than competition over subscription fees.) - Bill Hooker
You're welcome to your views, Bill, but I don't share them; I think you misunderstand the peer-review process and who benefits from it. - Maxine
I think *you* misunderstand *me*, Maxine -- but I was just coming back here to wave an olive branch as I came off a bit combative above. My apologies; I didn't mean to. - Bill Hooker
My view: peer review is an essential part of the infrastructure of science, and managing it is sufficient value-add to justify to me a sizeable chunk of whatever fees publishers charge, even if they did nothing else. Peer review in the hands of a diverse group of competitors seems to me much safer from corruption than any other model I've seen. But I want 100% Open Access, so as a consumer I am voting with my dollars (and my reviews) and trying to get toll-access publishers to change. - Bill Hooker
Looks like some of our comments above crossed, Bill. I certainly don't share your view of what you call "Glam Mags" though. - Maxine
Neil Saunders
Farmers bring foot-and-mouth case - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2...
Alleged that the source of the outbreak was 2 research labs - Neil Saunders from Bookmarklet
Shannon McWeeney
Forgotten experiment may explain origins of life - http://blog.wired.com/wiredsc...
"There's a lesson here: don't throw anything away." - Shannon McWeeney
This is why it's better to dry SDS-PAGE gels and keep them too, rather than just scan them (something I have to admit, I don't always do). You can always cut out the bands and run mass spec years down the track .... - Andrew Perry
stephen o'grady
Industry Analysis: It’s About Audience - http://redmonk.com/sogrady...
Andreas Matern
Better access to scientific articles on EU-funded research - Europe's Information Society Newsroom - http://ec.europa.eu/informa...
Deepak Singh
MAKE: Blog: Home science under attack - http://blog.makezine.com/archive...
*sigh* - Deepak Singh from Bookmarklet
I'm afraid people from DIYBio community will face that the same kind of problems. Making bomb at home doesn't scare people as much as making deadly virus. - Pawel Szczesny
To be fair, it's not clear from the article what exactly the chemist was doing at home. I knew a physicist who diverted the gas line at his home to do home explosives experiments. The local fire department were unimpressed and closed him down, I think rightfully so. Still, the article isn't exactly encouraging, and the quote from law enforcement is just depressing. - Michael Nielsen
It isn't. What they found in the end were chemicals no worse than household cleaning stuff, but it broke zoning laws. That in itself makes one wonder - Deepak Singh
It's not what they found I question, it's what he was _doing_ with it. You can do spectacular things with household chemicals. (Thinking fondly of youth misspent on homemade gunpowder, rockets and hydrogen gas. Those were the days!) - Michael Nielsen
Exactly and that's just the kind of things that got me interested in science. People are just too protective ... what happened to individual responsibility (or parents encouraging that) - Deepak Singh
Deepak - I'm not exactly disagreeing with you, just saying that the article is darn short on concrete details. It doesn't say anything concrete about what he was doing. If he was just doing basic home chemistry, fine, local enforcement was way out of line. If he was mixing up stuff that could have resulted in three blocks being taken out, then they were doing their jobs. There's not enough detail in the article to know. - Michael Nielsen
Michael, very true. The part that got me was the quote and I find it difficult to get over the apparent statement that doing "scientific research and development in a residential area" was a violation of zoning laws. - Deepak Singh
Czar
about, "a special flavor of Linux that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need. Extreme performance, configurability and a top-notch user and developer community." - Czar from Bookmarklet
Jason Stajich
Stats reveal bias in NIH grant review - http://www.nature.com/news...
Some great discussion in the comments for this one on Nature site. But will any of the excellent points raised actually be addressed by NIH? How likely they will be able to limit institutional overhead or number of grants per PI. - Jason Stajich
Including "test" - Roland Krause
I agree it is an imperfect system but reform in the NIH is a huge elephant in the room. The salary cap idea is a good one and so are grant caps. But what reform would get a new investigator the same attention and access to a funded grant as an established investigator? That specific concern needs to be addressed constructively in order to build more parity into the system and translate novel ideas into everyday science. - Aarthy
Ntino
A good blog post approaching the issue of why scientistics are reluctant to Web 2.0 - http://michaelnielsen.org/blog...
I'm posting 2-3 snippets from this insightful article: [...Why write a comment when you could be doing something more “useful”, like writing a paper or a grant? Furthermore, if you publicly criticize someone’s paper, there’s a chance that that person may be an anonymous referee in a position to scuttle your next paper or grant application....] - Ntino
[...Some scientists will object that contributing to Wikipedia isn’t really science. And, of course, it’s not if you take a narrow view of what science is, if you’ve bought into the current game, and take it for granted that science is only about publishing in specialized scientific journals. But if you take a broader view, if you believe science is about discovering how the world... more... - Ntino
Like Einstein, we have a small group of trusted collaborators with whom we exchange questions and ideas when we are stuck. Unfortunately, most of the time even our collaborators aren’t that much help. They may point us in the right direction, but rarely do they have exactly the expertise we need. Is it possible to scale up this conversational model, and build an online collaboration... more... - j1m
Deepak Singh
I have a feeling some of you will have something to say - Deepak Singh from Bookmarklet
great letter, thanks! "whole profession looks deeply unattractive to anybody with a grain of sense" - true - Alexey
Michael Nielsen
Harper's Index / NIH stats. In 1980, ratio of NIH grants awarded to those 30 years and under to those 70 and over: 17:1. In 2006: 1:13. - http://www.harpers.org/subject...
The actual link is http://www.harpers.org/archive... (sorry for the broken link above). - Michael Nielsen
Yes, sorry about that. I posted the correct link on the OP. This is just a factoid from Harper's Index, but it's from a direct NIH report. - Todd Harris from twhirl
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook