He's right that intention is important, but to me that is what makes so much of the content on FriendFeed interesting -- my friends are intentionally sharing it with me. Comparing the number of twitter entries to the number of blog entries or whatever doesn't yield any useful information however. Visibility on FriendFeed is driven by many factors, including clustering, hiding, comments, and likes. There are only 4 twitters on my front page right now, and they are mostly commented and liked. - Paul Buchheit

I'm asking a question to myself. How to to build my Personal Knowledge Management based on Friendfeed? - Roger Chen

It's wrong to say that FriendFeed lacks intention. I (intentionally) choose what services I put in and my friends choose what parts of that they take out. - Michael C. Harris

I actually find myself being more conscious about what I share with Google Reader, for example, because I want the items to be more useful for my FriendFeed followers. - Frederic

The comments within FriendFeed are definitely intentional, and that's where a lot of value is being created. - Jason Kaneshiro

The best thing about FF is the ability to comment. That is an intentional act, and it always provides value. Friendfeed makes it easy to import many feeds. If it is so easy to share stuff, people are bound to "forget" that they are sharing on quite a number of places. Sharing with a person is always intentional, with the world it might be. I like FF (although it might look otherwise). But I am not so much of an aggregator fan. FF needs to take filtering and spam measures because of aggregation. - Alexander van Elsas