Jon McAlister
Create an account or sign in to get started
Show: Comments - Likes - Both
FriendFeed
grant posted a link
Obama to be transported in GMC Topkick "Cadillac" - AutoblogGreen
Friday at 7:42 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
There's no doubt that the President of the United States needs a safe vehicle to be transported in. Various assassination attempts prove that case rather easily. President-in-waiting Barack Obama will be getting a brand-new armored "car" that will look like a Cadillac, but will really be based on the positively gigantic medium-duty GMC Topkick chassis. Nobody is quite sure what kind of armament the First Car will be equipped with, but let's just assume that there is plenty, including up to five inches of glass and ceramic ballistics materials. That should make this one heavy vehicle. In fact, a couple of heavy vehicles, as General Motors is likely building multiples so that decoys can be used. With all that weight to move around, we'd expect GM to use a version of its diesel engine (running perhaps on biodiesel? No?) and Allison transmission from its line of heavy-duty trucks. Alternatively, Obama could make a green splash by using GM's 2-Mode hybrid system. Just a thought. - grant via Bookmarklet
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
November 13 at 8:35 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
"If you think this is a silly story, a waste of your time, shame on you. What the Capitol Hill Baby-Sitting Co-op experienced was a real recession. Its story tells you more about what economic slumps are and why they happen than you will get from reading 500 pages of William Greider and a year's worth of Wall Street Journal editorials. And if you are willing to really wrap your mind around the co-op's story, to play with it and draw out its implications, it will change the way you think about the world." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
November 5 at 11:56 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
A glimpse into Google-speak. It's like this all the time :-P. "That would be like trying to drive down the road of innovation with the parking brake on." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
Does the road of innovation intersect the information superhighway? - Paul Buchheit
"But we're not going to let the prospect of a lengthy legal battle distract us from our core mission." *cough* YouTube acquisition *cough* - Philipp Lenssen
YouTube
Dave Winer favorited a video on YouTube
CNN: Palin Talks 2012, McCain Aide "Speechless"
Play
October 29 at 9:31 pm - Link
This is a tactic. "We better vote for McCain just to stop Palin in 2012" ;) - Dion Almaer
I think more likely is that she'll take a shot at chair of the RNC... - Jon McAlister
wouldn't that be like putting the last nail in the coffin? - Steven Hodson
A bull in the china shop, reducing the McCain campaign and the Republican Party to farce. - Sean McBride
delicious
Lilly Irani bookmarked a page on delicious
October 22 at 9:17 pm - Link
some spazzy photos of me here - Lilly Irani
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
Callie Shell - Obama - Digital Journalist
Callie Shell - Obama - Digital Journalist
Show all
October 22 at 2:25 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
Barack Obama cleaning up after himself, and doing pull ups. Lots of great shots here from him from over the last year. - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
YouTube
Paul Buchheit favorited a video on YouTube
Obama Roasts McCain at Al Smith Dinner
Play
October 17 at 2:43 am - Link
Thanks for posting! (I caught the end of it on TV) - Dan Hsiao
McCain was quite funny too. At the end especially when introducing Obama next =) - Davide D'Incau
This is fabulous! "That was a tough primary you had there, John." And thanks for posting McCain's too - about to watch. - Carla Thompson
This is excellent! I wish we had the same kind of moments in French politics! - Antoine Bertier
OMG... the AIG zinger... - Cyndy
the idea of this during a campaign just seemed bizarre to me... - Taylor Davidson
where is the McCain video from the Al Smith dinner? - JohnBfromMemphis via twhirl
I love the quote that the problems with the housing market have been eight times harder on McCain ha! - Joe Dawson (beta)
Good humoured banter. Nice to see the candidates with a sense of humour during the campaign. - Chris Nixon
Its great to think that after the division between candidates, parties and America in the past months, this sort of event could occur. I loved it! Both were great, and we needed a refreshing moment to sit back and realize that at the end of the day, one of the more crucial aspects to life is the ability to laugh. - JC unwired
Obama looked so uptight and our War Hero seemed relaxed---good stuff. - Jonathan Keller
McCain was the best I have *ever* seen him. Won't change my vote, of course, but the McCain in this video is a lot more like the one we used to see before the 2000 elections. - Chris Baskind
both were pretty funny....but i think obama won the standup debate :) - don loeb
McCain was hilarious. As an Obama supporter, I am glad he wasn't that good during all of his other speeches ;) - Bret Taylor
One of my favorite lines was "Many of you know that I got my name, Barack, from my father. What you may not know is that Barack is actually Swahili for 'that one'. And I got my middle name from somebody who obviously didn't think I'd ever run for president." - Bret Taylor
Agree with Bret. McCain's comedic timing was a lot better than Obama's - Deepak
I'm an Obama supporter, but I thought McCain was funnier. This video has the beginning of McCain's speech which includes the jokes about the Clintons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - Chris White
This is really cool! FUNNY!!!!!!! thanks for sharing!! :) - Susan Beebe
Amen, @Chris B. If only the whole campaign were this funny and civil. - Heidi Moon
I'd like to see Sarah Palin and Joe Biden do this too. My suspicion is that Joe would be funnier though, unless Sarah secretly got Tina Fey to do it instead. - Chris White
Hehe. Roast. Conjures up funny images to people here in the UK. - Slippy Lane
They were both hilarious! Their writers need to work in comedy :) I thought Obama was the funniest, but then I am an Obama fan so may be biased. - Sheila Taylor
Swahili for "That One". Too funny. - Clay Newton
"Contrary to rumors, I was not born in a manger! I was actually born on Krypton...." - j1m
Funny, McCain was good as well. Can you imagine having that in France?...Not really! - alice ayel
Dear american friends: should Barack Obama lose the election, can we have him ? - dario
@Dario only if the international community will also accept an American intellectual diaspora as well. - Jason Carreira
@alice, maybe not the 2002 election, but a roast between Sarko and Séngolène would have been interesting. - James Williams
"Greatest weakness: It's possible I'm a little TOO awesome." - Rebecca Sun
FriendFeed
Ross Miller posted a link
Thank God you're a man
October 16 at 7:20 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
they know Mike..... - amelia arapoff
FriendFeed
j1m posted a link
Shortest Tour of US Cities with >500 Population
October 11 at 5:07 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
It really only takes a few passes to get all cities west of Kansas - j1m via Bookmarklet
SIMPLY AWESOME! (And so sorry for the all caps, but I like math and couldn't help myself) - Mike Reynolds
Somebody has too much computing power. - John Lam
FriendFeed
Bret Taylor posted a link
YouTube - Don't vote
Play
October 2 at 9:28 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
248,000 views and climbing ?! - Charlie Anzman
the proxy that i'm behind blocks youtube... is this the kind of thing thats going to make me want to harm puppies? - Chris Hollander
THIS WAS SO COOL I SENT IT OUT TO EVERYONE - amelia arapoff
FriendFeed has certainly made it easier for each person to send this out to 5 friends! - Anne Bouey
Natalie Portman's got her hair back. Looking good - Josh Haley
"I've never done shit on drugs except...play Halo 2" LOL - ♫ Rahsheen™
ROCK THE VOTE DOT ORG - David Lynch
Tried to send it to my sister in the midwest, but she only has internet at work, and they block youtube. =( - Mandi
438,000 views now. - Matt Cutts
i love reverse psychology - potamus
good one - Dobromir Hadzhiev
Is second degree message efficient... except for people who yet agree... - jfayel
my final thinking is it is too clever to be efficient - jfayel
468,783 views now. - imabonehead
Views: 855,261(17:06 EET 04.oct.08) - silpol
1,131,662 Views (10:00 Pacific 06.oct.08) - Steve Craft
pity you can't vote on these issues they're talking about :-/ just hope that there's a candidate that matches enough of your views. yes, votings good, but it hardly covers these issues independently :-( - immaterial
1,323,315 votes - Matt Cutts
delicious
Amit Patel bookmarked a page on delicious
October 6 at 3:11 pm - Link
Google claims that its data centers get an average of 1.2 PUE (20% overhead for air conditioning, battery backup, etc.), much lower than the old expected value around 2.0 (100% overhead), and that one of their data centers got 1.15. PUEs are going up in the graph because cooling needs are higher in summer. The EPA expects that with improvements, by 2011 the average data center will reach 1.9, and the very best data centers will get down to 1.2. - Amit Patel
“In the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will use more energy than we will use to answer your query.” - Sanjeev Singh
One thing that no one ever writes about is how "costly" it is to move electricity, versus how efficient it is to move light/bits. - Christopher Sacca
I'll have to sit down and really read this article later. Looks like somebody's really paying attention to power utilization (and its twin sister heat) - ha3rvey via fftogo
@Sanjeev: I wonder if and how they're amortizing the offline processing that takes place beforehand in the calculation of "energy...we will use to answer your query". But in any case, kudos! - Ruchira S. Datta
They don't mention if the crawling or indexing, let alone networking (switches, routers) are taken into account when determining how much energy is used to answer a query. - Gabe
I don't think the crawling/indexing is included in that comparison, but It's still pretty amazing if true. - Sanjeev Singh
Gabe, the switches and routers probably take negligible energy compared to the servers. - Sanjeev Singh
FriendFeed
Paul Buchheit posted a link
Official Gmail Blog: New in Labs: Stop sending mail you later regret
October 6 at 6:59 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
"When you enable Mail Goggles, it will check that you're really sure you want to send that late night Friday email. And what better way to check than by making you solve a few simple math problems after you click send to verify you're in the right state of mind?" - Paul Buchheit via Bookmarklet
Too bad I don't have Labs in my workplace's hosted domain Gmail account - that's where I really need it! - Chu Yeow
Like!!! Uber-Geeky. - AJ Batac
hilarious ! - Ron Shoshani
I'm still too good at math at the bottom of the bottle - Amber aka SDA
Maybe it should measure your reaction times instead of forcing you to do math. I'm thinking, "punch the monkey". - Paul Buchheit
=Amber -- need to be able to choose how difficult your math problems are. - j1m
the interesting thing is, the most powerful part is just the second-guess: it doesn't have to be a math problem. just a simple "do you really want to send this" reminder might do... - Taylor Davidson
How about letting my Gmail friends review my Drafts, only drafts that get liked will be sent out :-) - Majento
@Taylor: I think the math problem -- or something like it -- is essential. Don't know about you, but I've "permanently deleted" countless files just because I reflexively hit "Okay" when the warning dialog box popped up. Without the math problem to keep one honest, one will end up clicking past warnings in an unconscious, mechanistic manner. *I* would, at least. - Chester
@Chester: I'll buy that. Needs to be more than just a reminder... but the question doesn't have to be math. The key, as you point out, is for the question to require you to answer something... - Taylor Davidson
+1 Majento - Raymond
Stooopid-O-Meter FTW! - Susan Beebe
Brilliant - Bwana
Ditto Bwana - About 10 years overdue - Charlie Anzman
whoa, this could've come in handy... - sami
Chester, have you learned not to reflexively click buttons yet? :P - Tanath
When will they come out with "delayed sending"? I want to have 60 seconds after I click send before the email is actually sent. That little bit of time would stop a lot of confusion. - Benjamin Golub
These are all half-assed suggestions. What we all really need is for our e-mail app to read our minds *and* know better than ourselves whether or not a message should be sent out before further review. - Chester
Is this for real? - Jamelle
Two problems with this gadget, a) I want to make it trigger on every email, but after you solve the problems successfully, there's a window during which you can send more outgoing emails unchallenged; b) even at max difficulty level 5 the problems take only 15 seconds to solve sober - it seems unlikely that they'd take more than twice as long to solve when drunk - though I will have to verify that experimentally, I guess. - ƃuɐʞ
Blog
Ionut posted an entry on Google Operating System
No More Definition Links in Google Search
October 3 at 2:58 pm - Link
More of my code being removed :( - Paul Buchheit
That's hard for answers.com. I never used it though... - ※Fu※
hmm... one tiny thing that made it better. Time to greasemonkey it - Dave Dash
thats a pity :-( it was a nice little bit of functionality - immaterial
Do not like. Seriously, why remove it? - AJ Kohn
That sucks. I loved that feature! - Gabe
Yeah, I used it all the time. in fact, I use it so much that I had a funny feeling something was missing today, now I know what. On the plus side, wikipeadia is usually the first hit for many of the things I am trying to figure out what they are. - Clare Dibble
Bring it back! - Chris Lamprecht
Liking this because I actually dislike it. - Jon McAlister
You can still do "define:________" - Mike Reynolds
"Update: The feature is back." - j1m
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
October 3 at 7:54 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"Now mind you, avoidance is fine if it's, like, on the scale of going out to get a pedicure because you had a bad day. Avoidance is not, however, the best M.O. when it comes to larger issues like, ya know, governance. I mean, sure, I wish we could stimulate the economy in a vibrating chair and, after giving all of the troubled banks a relaxing peppermint soak, use a pumice stone to slough away our national debt, but that's just not how it fucking WORKS." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
October 2 at 10:14 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
"From the Conventions to the First Debate in Three Minutes Slate V recaps everything you need to know about the presidential race from the party conventions through the first debate." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
Google Reader
tony chang shared an item on Google Reader
October 1 at 9:36 am - Link
sadness :( - tony chang
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
October 1 at 9:39 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"As a result, the energy used per Google search is minimal. In the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will use more energy than we will use to answer your query." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
YouTube
Paul Buchheit favorited a video on YouTube
Obama Is Right: McCain Was Wrong
Play
September 28 at 3:22 am - Link
What?! - Josh Jenkins
It is so much more effective with the clips... Wouldn't it be great if they allowed multimedia in the debates? - Clare Dibble
This is how every debatable issue should be remixed. Without memory, and thankfully we have written media and "now" internet to help us out in this domain, humans would be reduced to ad swallowing, nay-saying consumers with an attention span of an earthworm. - Nenad Nikolic via twhirl
This shows how McCain was wrong, but doesn't show how Obama is right. The same thing could be done that shows how Obama was wrong about the surge and the connections between Iraq and Afghanistan. This is just as useless as any other debate fallacy, because it's completely one sided. Except it does it with multimedia. To that end, stop patting yourselves on the back. You look stupid. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
Mark: Everyone makes mistakes, but McCain refuses to acknowledge his mistakes. He has bought so much of his own "maverick" PR that he lives in his own fantasy world, where everything can be referenced to war and where its OK for an air-head like Sarah Palin to be one step away from leading our nation. McCain is dangerous and he simply should not be allowed to assume the leadership of this country by repeating one lie or half-truth after another. - Rob McNair-Huff
Republicans always do that. When you say their guy fucked up, they accuse your guy of doing the same thing. It's totally predictable. They must teach it in the first day of Republican Orientation. - Dave Winer
As does Obama. Has he yet said he was wrong about the surge? The same things can all be said about Obama, and a simple YouTube video could prove that, too, but my guess it'd be called "swiftboating," which is apparently the defense you use when you're a Democrat and a video shows your candidate in a bad light. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
See what I mean? :-) - Dave Winer
lol - Cee Bee
@Mark: Because the surge was a bandaid that didn't get us much closer to getting out. Obama has said the surge has succeeded beyond our wildest dreams. It doesn't mean the surge was the right thing to do. The bailout might be successful in many ways, but it still doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. - AJ Kohn
@Mark - okay...why don't you make a video then instead of huffing and puffing? If you only 'talk the talk' but can't 'walk the walk', well, then, I'm afraid you are the one who looks stupid. - Steve
mark...of course obama said he was wrong. he said, 'the surge exceeded beyond my expectations.' remember mccain said that like 4 times during the debate and obama said, 'yep, i said it.' - Anika Malone
dave, the thing is that most of us have been raised knowing that two wrongs don't a make a right. many hardcore GOP partisans clearly weren't. - Anika Malone
Note that the surge, as successful as it's been, has still not won us the war. - Victor Ganata
Believe it or not, I'd be willing to vote Republican if they just ran better candidates. In this case the ticket is not only not strong (McCain), it is extremely weak (Palin), and they are running against a competent and smart ticket in Obama/Biden. But what frustrates me is Republicans who keep defending a weak ticket simply because of party affiliation. Republicans *should* be pissed as hell right now; but rather than lashing out at their opponents, they should fix the problem with their own candidates. - DeWitt Clinton
I agree DeWitt. Ironically, I would have considered McCain in 2000, but this isn't the same guy. I thought Kerry was weak too. Leagues better than Bush, but still weak. But Obama? The first time I have been excited... maybe ever. :) - Dion Almaer
DeWitt, totally agree. I have voted Republican, but always in lesser-of-two-evils mode. Obama is the first Presidential vote that I make in my life without such a reservation. - Dave Winer
@Steve: re-read my original comment and try that accusation again. I said "his is just as useless as any other debate fallacy, because it's completely one sided." Look, it's not like I ask you folks to read an entire Federalist paper or something long and complicated. Just a couple sentences to read before you try to argue with me. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
@faboo: Saying it succeeded beyond his wildest expectations and admitting he was wrong are not the same thing. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
@AJ: If you don't understand why the surge was the right thing to do (and should have been done from the beginning, as McCain wanted), then your understanding of foreign policy and conflict strategy is far too limited to participate in this debate. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
@Mark: *chuckle* So are you going to explain why the surge was the right thing to do or simply insult me? I mean ... really, this is your debate tactic? Also, that's not even the argument! You've missed it entirely. The argument was about not admitting error as a proxy to one-sided political dialog - of which I provided a cogent answer and analogy. You chose to argue the point of the actual surge instead. That's another topic. - AJ Kohn
Defenders of the Iraq War are unable to explain why it has made sense for Americans to dump several trillions of dollars down the drain in Iraq with the effect of installing a Muslim fundamentalist regime in that nation that is closely allied with Iran. This is the stupidest foreign policy blunder in American history. The "surge" is neither here nor there in making this disaster go away. We've already lost this war and cannot possibly turn it into a "victory." That money is gone, and Iran's power has greatly expanded. McCain doesn't even get close to discussing these STRATEGIC issues revolving around long-range American interests. - Sean McBride
The surge is a tactic, not a strategy, no matter what McCain says. And while it has decreased violence, that doesn't mean we've succeeded. We're still no closer to winning the war. If we can't withdraw those troops without the whole place caving in, then ultimately we've failed. - Victor Ganata
Victor -- McCain has made it clear that he doesn't understand the distinctions between tactics and strategy. - Sean McBride
Could everyone please make an effort to stay respectful and kind? When that doesn't happen people start calling for an end to all political discussion, which would be bad. When that happens the mainstream media get to frame every issue. - Bruce Lewis
@Victor: I've gone ahead and set your comments to hidden from here on out, since you can't be bothered to look up the difference between strategy and tactic. @AJ: My prior statement stands. Again, I'm tired of folks who don't understand their world speaking as if they were experts on everything. Maybe i'll see you both in November when I unblock everyone. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
@Mark: (If you see this) I'm sorry you don't wish to have a real debate. Done appropriately, it is the way we gain better understanding of topics and of each other. I'll take up the strategy v tactic though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... Now, in my mind the surge (adding more troops on the ground) was a means to an end (pacifying insurgents/security) to achieve the objective (Iraqi autonomy). Perhaps you see it differently? - AJ Kohn
I've been involved in several discussions and "debates" with Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins now in which he has made statements which are factually false, and then quickly retreated when the factual errors were pointed out to him. He is aligned with a group of neoconservatives and religious fundamentalists in the room Conservative Oasis in which this kind of behavior is the norm -- they can't defend their ideas in fair, open and democratic debate. They always retreat after two or three exchanges. - Sean McBride
You can never get promoters of the "surge" to talk about the costs and benefits of the Iraq War policy as a whole -- their minds go into lockdown mode the instant the issue is raised. They are unable to think strategically. Bush 43 and the neocons are spending trillions of dollars to secure Iran's control over Iraq. Massive fail. They have essentially wasted American resources and lives to promote Muslim fundamentalism in the Middle East. - Sean McBride
Mark - I'm with just about everyone else here. I need facts, or at least some modicum of explanation as to your logic, rather than repeated sound bites. In that regard, please hide all of my comments as well. No need to unblock in November, but I will leave that up to you. - JC unwired
If you can't effectively defend your beliefs in fair and open debate, and subject them to fact checking, reality checking and rigorous logical analysis, there is a good possibility that your beliefs are wrong. Fair and open debate is the heart and soul of any healthy and functioning democracy. True believers who can't handle debates usually are strongly attracted to authoritarian and totalitarian political systems. - Sean McBride
"Debate" by blocking: Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins, Jay Tannenbaum, Akiva Moskovitz, Soulhuntre, Mark Tefft -- sorry if I left anyone out. One issue seems to unite them: an emotional commitment to neoconservative military aggression in the Mideast. They stand to the right of even the Bush 43 administration. Neoconservatism is more a religious cult than a rational political philosophy. - Sean McBride
I try not to box people into labels. I can only say that, in this instance, Mark chose to insult and then not engage in debate. I'm sure it's difficult for many conservatives on FF who get called names by other 'left' leaning folks. I make an effort not to do that. I would think it would be a nice change to find true debate instead. So, running away from it seems odd. - AJ Kohn
I've seen Hopkins do this three or four times now, and his political allies in Conservative Oasis do the same thing many times as well, so I have drawn the logical and reasonable conclusion -- they hold emotional beliefs that they can't defend against exercises in reality-checking. This is the same political group that promised us that the Iraq War would be a cakewalk and cost Americans next to nothing. Americans have a moral obligation to challenge this destructive nonsense. It's a matter of self-preservation at this point. - Sean McBride
Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins is a *self-admitted* shit-stirrer (see http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/07/...) with a pathological habit of saying stupid things he can't defend. Take a block from him as a high compliment. - Karim
Being a contrarian is fine, but you've got to be a smart contrarian. If you keep losing chess games after three or four moves, and then out of frustration send the chess pieces flying and refuse to play any more games, you aren't much of a player, contrarian or otherwise. - Sean McBride
hear hear karim - Cee Bee
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
September 23 at 8:28 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
"C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success. While accidents of history surely helped, it evidently satisfied a need for a system implementation language efficient enough to displace assembly language, yet sufficiently abstract and fluent to describe algorithms and interactions in a wide variety of environments." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
September 23 at 9:23 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"Yes, OS/2. Our subway runs on OS/2. You're not surprised, are you?" - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
FriendFeed
ƃuɐʞ posted a link
Gothamist: Google Transit Gets NYC Savvy
September 22 at 12:08 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
FriendFeed
Alex posted a link
Move the FriendFeed sidebar to the other side of the page – Userscripts.org
September 21 at 7:59 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
hint hint - Alex
quit monkeying around - j1m
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
September 21 at 11:00 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"What is happening, I think, is this: religious prejudice is becoming a proxy for racial prejudice. In public at least, it’s not acceptable to express reservations about a candidate’s skin color, so discomfort about race is sublimated into concerns about whether Mr. Obama is sufficiently Christian." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
It's ironic, because "being Christian" to the average Republican clearly doesn't mean following Christ. Unless by "love thy neighbor", Jesus really meant "kill them". - Gabe
The author of this article has pulled his punches. When you put horns on somebody and call them the Antichrist, that's not "otherizing" them, that's *demonizing* them. When you imply someone is in league with the forces of Evil, this is *not* "sublimating" concerns about them being "insufficiently Christian." - Karim
The irony being that McCain dropped napalm on non-combatants in Vietnam; McCain said he'll hate "hate the gooks" for as long as he lives; McCain came home and dumped his wife (who had been in a car accident) for a younger, prettier, and richer one; McCain was one of the Keating Five -- and yet McCain is supposed to be some paragon of Christian virtue compared to Obama? - Karim
I've never seen any evidence that McCain actually dropped napalm. Is there any proof that he really did that? - Gabe
Proof, as in "here's a link to the YouTube video, with interviews of his dead victims?" No. :-) But he did say this to the New York Times after the Forrestal accident: "Now that I've seen what the bombs and the napalm did to the people on our ship, I'm not so sure that I want to drop any more of that stuff on North Vietnam." - Karim
When he was shot down, his target was a power plant in (to quote John McCain's words) "a heavily populated part of Hanoi." So perhaps on that run he was carrying 500- or 1,000-pound bombs and not napalm. EDIT: see http://www.thenation.com/blogs... - Karim
Yeah, Karim, that NYT article is the only connection between McCain and napalm I've seen also. It's my understanding that napalm was used mostly to clear jungle, while McCain was mostly bombing Hanoi. I don't think he was out napalming villages. - Gabe
his statement about not wanting to drop "any more of that stuff" is ambiguous... "that stuff" makes sense if he's referring to "bombs and napalm," whereas if he was only referring to bombs, it seems like he would have said "those things." - Karim
people do seem to think the difference is significant, for some reason -- as if napalming villages was the ultimate evil, but dropping 1,000 pounds of high explosive in built-up civilian areas is something people routinely do on Sunday afternoons after church service. - Karim
either way the point still stands -- John McCain rained death upon people, dumped his wife, and was caught up in the Keating scandal. Obama has done none of these things, and yet he's the one being demonized. - Karim
FriendFeed
Bret Taylor posted a link
September 21 at 10:47 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"The most ambitious part of the government plan is to create a new entity to purchase impaired assets from financial firms. The process could work as a type of reverse auction, in which the government would buy from the institution that sells its assets for the lowest bid. However, the government may find itself in a quandary: Does it pay more than fair-market value for hard-to-assess distressed assets, putting taxpayers on the hook for any losses? Or does it drive a hard bargain, buying for pennies on the dollar? The latter approach would further hurt financial institutions, since they would have to write down the losses and take additional hits to their balance sheets. The Treasury department, which hasn't commented on specifics about the plan, is expected to propose issuing debt in $50 billion tranches to fund the purchases." - Bret Taylor via Bookmarklet
I wonder how long they intend to do this as well. We have three more year of resets on Alt-A loans. I've been busy emailing Senators and Congresspeople asking them to put the brakes on this coddling of America. - AJ Kohn
The last I had heard is that Senator Pelosi and Senator Reid were encourageing the Deomcrats not to make any rash decisions and that most of the economic decisions would be made post-election - Jonathan Jesse
yeah, sure, just like pelosi and reid handled iraq ... they are enemies of change - Gregory Lent
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
September 21 at 10:49 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"But in buying bad loans before banks fail, the Bush administration would be signing up for a financial war of choice. It would spend billions of dollars on the theory that preemption will avert the mass destruction of banks. There are cheaper ways to stabilize the system." - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
"opinion has swung behind the radical idea that the government should commit hundreds of billions in taxpayer money to purchasing dud loans from banks that aren't actually insolvent.... This is extremely dangerous." - j1m
"Billions in taxpayer money would be transferred to the shareholders and creditors of banks, and the banks from which the government bought most loans would be subsidized more than their rivals. If the government bought the most from the sickest institutions, it would be slowing the healthy process in which strong players buy up the weak, delaying an eventual recovery....Taxpayers would be spared the experience of wandering into a bad-loan bazaar and being ripped off by every merchant." - j1m
"The government should help not by buying banks' bad loans but by buying equity stakes in the banks themselves." - j1m
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
Inside Obama's Emails | The Onion - America's Finest News Source
September 18 at 11:40 pm - via Bookmarklet - Link
Oooh de-duping. Nice! - Jon McAlister
FriendFeed
Tom Stocky posted a link
Meta-analysis of polls by Princeton Election Consortium
Meta-analysis of polls by Princeton Election Consortium
Show all
September 17 at 9:28 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
"A reduction of recent state-level polls to a single high-precision snapshot of a Presidential election held today." - Tom Stocky
FriendFeed
Jon McAlister posted a link
September 12 at 12:10 am - via Bookmarklet - Link
I clicked this because I thought they were talking about the band. Interesting nonetheless... - Jon McAlister via Bookmarklet
1 2