Sign in or Create an account
Egon Willighagen
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
Monday at 9:25 am - Link
I wonder how far 'medical' can be stretched... - Egon Willighagen
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
Google Reader
shared an item on Google Reader
FriendFeed
posted a message
Saturday at 10:46 pm - Link
del.icio.us
bookmarked three pages on del.icio.us
Saturday at 10:42 pm - Link
Saturday at 10:37 pm - Link
Saturday at 10:06 pm - Link
"Rate of translation by ribosome Bacteria Escherichia coli 12-21 amino acids per second" - Egon Willighagen
Blog
posted an entry on chem-bla-ics
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
Saturday at 11:57 am - Link
Moved from an older location; this is the spot to see why something on SF is slow, not working, etc. - Egon Willighagen
FriendFeed
posted a message
Friday at 5:41 am - Link
Swoogle... found it. Uploaded elements.owl... - Egon Willighagen
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
July 3 at 11:02 pm - Link
"I made a slightly different [Yahoo Pipe] that only shows my group posts, helpful for places like FriendFeed. My name is unfortunately hard-coded, so you have to modify the Pipes." - Egon Willighagen
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
July 3 at 12:38 pm - Link
FriendFeed
posted a message
July 3 at 3:30 am - Link
Just go ahead. We can all block you. ;) - dekay
And now it begins... - dekay
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
July 3 at 12:39 am - Link
More online (bio)chemical community building. Cheers Rich! - Egon Willighagen
FriendFeed
posted a message
July 1 at 5:36 am - Link
Sounds like Pubmed-Fight http://www.pubmedfight.com/ :-) - Pierre
Nice site! But that would only be part of the fight... - Egon Willighagen
"Willighagen E( 9 publications) est victorieux avec 4 publications de plus que Lindenbaum P ( 5 publications)." :) Sorry, just could not resists :) - Egon Willighagen
Oh, this is a clear example that citation count is way too simplistic ... - Egon Willighagen
:-)) - Pierre
I wonder what many a PI would say about such a system - Deepak
"am-I-hot-or-not" for scientists? - dekay
No, a social science-impact factor. - Egon Willighagen
isn't that exactly what the science citation index is about? just without the web2.0 shebang and only people from the same field vote by citation? - dekay
No, because a citation can be anything... "have you seen this crappy research? I just cite it as related work we 'improve' on"... citations do not provide ranking information. Or? - Egon Willighagen
The only thing you'd get by doing this is who's in the news, not impact or quality. Assessment of quality is such a complicated task that it has to be personally done by competent individuals who are familiar with the work of the individual in question. This takes a significant effort which can't be captured by this shallow of an approach, and the results are only useful within each narrow field of research. Systems like this are also extremely vulnerable to gaming. - Mr. Gunn
Since a significant effort is already put into grant reviews, you could simply average across grant review scores to capture this, and weight it by the size of the grant awarded. Then the confounding factor is the cost of research among disciplines. But, if you just want a "name recognition index", your method would be fine. - Mr. Gunn
Mr. Gunn... it seems you have more experience in this than I do. It's a shame that we do not seem to be able to do better than current systems. - Egon Willighagen
I really don't have any personal experience, I've just spent a couple years listening to the smart people who do. How you do it depends on what you're looking to do, obviously. A name recognition index could be useful, if only to find out who the attention whores are. ;-) - Mr. Gunn
Another problem -- "Hooker CW ( 21 publications ) est victorieux avec 12 publications de plus que Willighagen E ( 9 publications)" -- that a working Researcher ID could solve. (I don't have 21 publications!) - Bill Hooker
I'm waiting for the ResearcherID talk to be subsumed into the larger OpenID conversation. Anonymity is impossible nowadays, so maybe people will start taking online identity seriously now. - Mr. Gunn
I really believe that any identity namespace requires some granularity, one than can be linked with researcher id's and the like. What we don't want to do is reinvent the wheel and come up with some other, random standard for scientific identity - Deepak
What is the value of a unidimensional ranking of people, based on whatever single 'summary statistic' or 'impact factor'? Isn't this bound to be an unacceptable reduction in most of the cases? - Thomas Lemberger
Thomas, you just said what it took me 1000+ characters to say. I think this community has a pro-measurement bias, and the more measurements the better, as long as they're not used where inappropriate. I worry about mission creep much like we've seen with FICO scores in the US. - Mr. Gunn
Thomas Lemberger - When you're hiring (or awarding grants) there's simply no alternative: you're trying to rank applicants one against the other, and effectively end up with a rank order. - Michael Nielsen
I'm one of those who thinks that multiple metrics would be better than reliance on any single measure, especially the dreadful Impact Factor. I don't think that granting/hiring/tenure committees are likely to succumb to One Number To Rule Them All the way financial insitutions prostrate themselves before FICO. - Bill Hooker
Michael, I think the issue Thomas had was using one number to rank people up front. Certainly the metric is included in grant funding deliberations, but isn't the only deciding factor. PhysioProf, for example, talks about pulling grants from the wrong side of the pay line, showing the importance of non-IF related factors in getting funding. - Mr. Gunn
I agree. Rather than finding illusory 'universal' metrics, it would be more important to have (controlled) access to the relevant information that describes the many aspects of individual scientific impact (publishing, reviewing, commenting, etc...). This is why I find the concept of AuthorID coupled with 'scientific activity feeds' the most attractive. If the information is there, ad-hoc metrics can be defined or perhaps (less geeky) it can be used with a good dose human judgment...;-) - Thomas Lemberger
FriendFeed
posted a link
July 2 at 5:22 am - Link
And our only current serious alternative (organics) consumes oil... what's C1 chemistry keeping? (Or will we boost chemical recyling...?) - Egon Willighagen
Is this actually true? They keep on saying 'peak oil' – but you never know what happens with higher prices and the resulting 'unlocked' technologies. Level UP. - dekay
"One thing I find funny when I read these is that these elements are not really disappearing. We are just converting them into a less useful form — garbage." from http://selenized.wordpress.com... - Egon Willighagen
Yes, of course. Who of us is working on *useful* recycling technologies? And never forget how much you could extract from sea water. - dekay
There was a disturbin article in National Geographic last year... about people from poor areas in India/China/etc buying this stuff, melting things for recycling... just incidentally in the same 'wok's the use for cooking later in the evening :( - Egon Willighagen
FriendFeed
posted a message
July 3 at 12:57 am - Link
del.icio.us
bookmarked a page on del.icio.us
July 3 at 12:25 am - Link
del.icio.us
bookmarked five pages on del.icio.us
FriendFeed
posted a message
July 2 at 3:38 am - Link
Google Reader
shared an item on Google Reader
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Older »
Other ways to read this feed: Feed