 |
|
| FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more » |
John E. Bredehoft › Comments
That Uhura's apparent function in the new movies is mainly as a love interest is also irritating.
Iván Abrego, Katy S, John E. Bredehoft and 7 other people liked this
Okay, I realize I'm risking my neck here but, did Uhura figure that prominently in the original series? Understandably she was a black woman featured prominently in a regular series in the 60's. And yes there was "the kiss" (I can distinctly remember my father saying, "They ain't showing this in Alabama."). But by today's standards, was Nichol's role all that noteworthy? Now if your...
more...
- MoTO #TeamMonique
Did any women have substantial roles in original trek?
- Todd Hoff
No, she wasn't a major character. But I personally think casting someone specifically as a love interest is actually even more constricting than not having that many scenes or lines.
- Victor Ganata
True, but that's the case for most of the casting for women in Hollywood, yes?
- MoTO #TeamMonique
The pilot for the original Star Trek series had a female second in command (Number One, played by Majel Barrett), but NBC said no. http://www.startrek.com/databas...
- Betsy #TeamMonique
It feels retrograde to have her role defined as a foil for Kirk/girlfriend for Spock rather than as the communications officer who serves as the primary point of initial contact between the ship and other entities. As in, slightly worse than the original show. I'd argue that any member of the cast who appeared as a series regular and was a requirement for the films was a major character.
- Jennifer Dittrich
Betsy: Number One rocked in that pilot. ROCKED! I remember thinking she was waaay cooler than Nurse Chapel when I saw that ep.
- MoTO #TeamMonique
Yeah, granted, casting women as nothing more than eye-candy love interests is standard operating procedure in Hollywood, but I think what makes it galling is that her character had been originally defined quite otherwise.
- Victor Ganata
Uhura was a prime component of the original cast films, featured both for her intelligence as well as her beauty. And there were components in the original series where she was given the opportunity to show that she was more than just good looks. But the crux of it is really this: It's 20-and-fucking-13. We very goddamned well should be doing better in terms of treating one of the only...
more...
- Hookuh Tinypants
I've never seen it, but Nimoy claims that Uhura was assigned a major role in Star Trek (corrected) III (which Nimoy directed). According to Nimoy, the "other characters" were utilized in a way similar to that used by Mission:Impossible (remember Paris?) - each of the people had a key function that had to be executed for the plan to move forward.
- John E. Bredehoft
From all accounts, that was Uhura's high point.
- John E. Bredehoft
Regardless of all that, it seems fairly clear that the character of Uhura in the TV series and the original series of movies had a distinct, well-established identity that many people found inspiring and which wasn't simply "Spock's girlfriend who also happens to have some job on the bridge"
- Victor Ganata
She was a minor character, but she had a job and that's what she was doing when she appeared on camera.
- DJF
OK, now I can say I've seen the scene from Star Trek III. https://www.youtube.com/watch...
- John E. Bredehoft
Wow. As the cobwebs continue to be spun, even the original "feed" purpose of FriendFeed is slowly falling away. The only thing that automatically populates my feed now is my Disqus commenting. After a manual refresh, my last.fm stuff shows up also. Even the empoprises mentions on Twitter aren't showing up any more.
Ah, just manually refreshed Empoprise-BI. Now I have some content here.
- John E. Bredehoft
And I manually refreshed the Twitter search. Wonder if the lastfmfeeds room has shut down entirely.
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Oldest Water In The World Discovered, Only In Canada You Say? - http://www.winextra.com/science...
"Let's give it to the Molson people, eh?"
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Striking the balance between freedom and privacy, and the other Empoprises rule - http://empoprise-bi.blogspot.com/2013...
"Ah, but if I live a self-centered life, the other person's rules don't matter. :)"
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Google Glass: Way Too Much Google For Its Own Good - by Matt Asay - http://readwrite.com/2013...
"I wonder if always-on connected devices will end up changing our expectations about connectivity. Think about it. When I was growing up, my parents had a phone in our house, connected to the wall, that wasn't going anywhere. When we were in the car, we couldn't be reached on the phone. When I was at school, I couldn't be reached on the phone. When my dad was at work, you could only reach him on the phone if you knew his work number; his home phone number would only reach my mom and her dog. When I went to college, you'd have to call a pay phone in my dorm to reach me. At that time, there was no expectation of always being able to reach someone via the telephone. However, mobile phones slowly became more and more popular, and that phone that I would only use in emergencies slowly became a necessity. States such as California had to pass laws because some of us would answer our phones while we were driving down freeways. In the same way, it's quite possible that a few decades from now,..."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Our neighbor, the President - http://blog.chriskima.com/...
"He would have been a good father to you, based upon the way he defended his daughter back in the day."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: The Amazing “Battle Of Helm’s Deep” Made From Lego And Minifigs - http://www.winextra.com/culture...
"I'd suggest that they use a live worm to play the part of Wormtongue, but the worm wouldn't be to scale."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Google Glass: Finally, a justifiable reason for a punch in the face - http://www.infoworld.com/t...
"As several others have noted in the comments, Pandora's Box has already been opened. Even if Google's executives withdraw Glass entirely after throwing up at the results, you can still find online ads, and even infomercials, that provide similar technology with a lot less visibility. As I write this, people are freaking out over the 3-D printed plastic gun. That's another box that's been opened also. I've been reading the thoughts of people, particularly Tad Donaghe, who maintain that privacy as we know it is going away - regardless of what happens to Google Glass."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Who Needs Zombies When We Have Meth [Pics] - http://www.winextra.com/culture...
"While the meth effect is particularly pronounced, any amount of hard living will wreak havoc upon your appearance. (Keith Richards.)"
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Don't let your kids go to contemporary music concerts - http://empoprise-mu.blogspot.com/2011...
"Andrew, you detected my closed-mindedness from the tone I adopted in my praise of real music. But can you blame me? Take a look at the oft-praised popular song "Imagine" by John Lennon, which some people praise because of its political ramifications, religious ramifications, or simply because of its poetry or its instrumentation. It's obvious that the song pales in comparison to J.S. Bach's two-part inventions (to say nothing of the three-part inventions). This is the reason why my Empoprise-MU music blog concentrates solely on real music, and avoids the nasty popular stuff. If you're interesting in reading about popular music, go read Rolling Stone or watch MTV - oh, wait, they've quit concentrating on music. Now we know why. In all seriousness, at some point I do want to write something about the economics of music over the centuries, and how the former system of rich patron sponsorship has moved to a "free market" (sort of) for music."
- John E. Bredehoft
What is your FF Comments/Likes Ratio? (Comments divided by Likes to 2nd decimal place - as of now) - http://flickr.com/photos...
enes guler., Jennifer Dittrich, John (bird whisperer) and 121 other people liked this
1.05 (670/633)
- Micah
from Bookmarklet
Can you remind me again where to find those stats?
- Brian Johns
Brian, go to "Me" link (http://friendfeed.com/brianjo...) which defaults to the Feed tab. Look at the sidebar on the right, below Discussion.
- Micah
0.75 (926/1226) - still relatively new here
- mikepk
I only see my stats for the last week (17/14 = 1.21) Please tell me your 670 number is for more than just a week!
- Brian Johns
1.44 (566/391) for brianjohns (after week tally you should see a comma then 'all time' count - I can see it on your page)
- Micah
OK, sorry. I'm a total dumbass. I stopped reading after the weekly totals...
- Brian Johns
3.74, which seems way off of everybody else's. I wonder what that says. I comment a lot more than I like.
- Cyrus Lendvay
0.79
- Brian Roy
0.77
- Eric - seven eleven
0.67
- Nine Ferdinand
0.77
- Shey
0.76
- FFing Enigma
1.39.
- Rochelle
1.80
- Brian Sullivan
1.61 - I only 'like' when I want to throw my support behind a topic but don't have anything constructive to add.
- Bjorn Stromberg
1.12
- Tinfoil 2.0
1.41
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
5.08 (3181/626) !
- ◄ani625Ξ ಠ_ಠ
0.66 - I tend to 'like' things without needing to comment further, I guess, and I notice I usually like the things upon which I comment. Well, frequently.
- ɐ ɯıʞ sıɹɥɔ
.39 (2457/6242) I guess I don't comment much. I do 'like' a lot of things, it would seem.
- Bren
0.62 then again i have over 11,000 comments
- Cee Bee
1.23 (5287/4229) - I am put to shame by Cee Bee's participation, good grief!
- Lindsay
@Cee Bee I think you meant 0.62
- ◄ani625Ξ ಠ_ಠ
1.27 (902/705)
- Leandro Ardissone ⍨
yes, thanks for the correction. lindsay, you're making me feel bad. lol
- Cee Bee
0.8576, I only like mostly when I'm going to comment
- Molly Song ;)
1.55 endlessly repeating. This Like/Comment included.
- Dana D
before this comment: .69 I kid you not.
- InPerpetualMotion(Gina k)
So far: Average: 1.27 | Median: 0.81 ... (if you average 1 comment per like, you'd be 1.0 ... if you're 0.xx you might herd content more than discuss ... if you're whole numbers above 1 you may not 'like' much or discuss plenty or both)
- Micah
CSV_A: 1.05,0.75,1.44,0.81,3.74,0.79,0.77,0.67,0.77,0.76,1.39,1.8,1.61,1.12,0.141,5.08,2.41,0.66,.39,0.62,.62,1.27,0.8576,1.551,0.69
- Micah
1.83
- Grant Bierman
I tend to like allot of photos which really don't need comments.
- InPerpetualMotion(Gina k)
InPerpetualMotion(Gina k), I really liked this 'Like' of yours (in a series of pics, so I flickr fav'd it): http://friendfeed.com/e... and commented. Thanks!
- Micah
.37 1002/2708
- Michael Fidler
this is what scobes walls would like if he didnt have FF
- sean percival
I haven't seen Marc Canter's fabled fence (just heard about it), but I imagine this but on wood pickets :)
- Micah
This week: 2.48 (1162:467) but this is not the norm, my likes usually match or are higher than comments, overall: 0.95 (14228:14846).
- Kol Tregaskes
Thanks Michael, Kol! I'll recalculate average/median when we build up some more data points here.
- Micah
1.03 748/723
- Keith - @tsudo
.68 6986/10194 Someone wrote a great article on the comment-like ratio a few months ago. Search on FriendFeed is crashing on me... I'll try to get the link.
- Mitchell Tsai
Thanks Mitchell (btw, search crashing on me too - lots)
- Micah
1316 comments/20221 likes (0.06), according to Windows Calculator, although I probably screwed up.
- Tyson Key
*bump*
- Micah
Thanks, Mark!
- Micah
Thanks Spidra!
- Micah
0.95 (1520/1604) - it's 2+ months later, and my ratio flipped (more Likes by .05)
- Micah
.7 (1204/1724) - before this comment at least.
- Rachel Lea Fox
Thanks, Rachel!
- Micah
3.46 (3665/1057) before this comment and like.
- Kevin Fox
Thanks, Kevin. 3+ is quite the comment on your commenting activities :)
- Micah
I've got stuff to say.
- Kevin Fox
3.98 (900/226)
- Richard Lawler
1.02 (3538/3484) for sofarsofarshaun
- Micah
.34 (600/1747, not counting this comment)
- Michael Hocter
Thank you, Siavash and Michael
- Micah
.52 overall, but .68 this week.
- Rebecca Lasley
Nice, thanks Rebecca.
- Micah
1.31
- Rahsheen?
0.56
- imabonehead
Rah and imabonehead - rock on! (Richard too!)
- Micah
0.16
- Anne Bouey
4.62 (287/62) -- Yikes! I'm chatty.
- Ted Roden
Thank you kindly, Anne, jcunwired and Ted.
- Micah
2.63
- Bryce Roney
Thanks for joining in, Bryce.
- Micah
.15 all time, .13 this week.
- Pixie
.52
- David HC Soul
Thank you, Alix and David! (and Alix, you're tied with Siavash for the Highest Like ratio. Wow).
- Micah
2.94
- j1m
Thank you, j1m. Ok, I'm gonna roll this up into a csv and call it a night.
- Micah
CSV_B: 0.95,0.7,3.46,3.98,1.02,0.15,0.34,0.52,1.31,0.56,0.16,1.39,4.62,2.63,0.15,0.52,2.94
- Micah
this week = 0.45%, alltime = 6.43%
- chaz2b
CSV_B Mean: 1.49 (previous mean for CVS_A: 1.27)
- Micah
Of course the numbers can easily lie, but I'm gonna say it anyway: "We're getting more conversational, people!"
- Micah
0.49 (493/988)
- Bluesun 2600
816 / 2502 = 0.326139089 overall | 50 / 233 = 0.214592275 this week I like much more than I comment. (maths via google)
- Chris Loft
3026/5013 = 0.6036
- Roger Chen
chaz2b, Bluesun 2600, Roger, Nicholas — thank you!
- Micah
5.25 but I don't know what this *means, yet. maybe I'm just stingy with my "likes" compared to others?
- Marg Uerite
Thanks jamar78 and Marg!
- Micah
A recent change in FF: now the comment count shows total number of comments (previously multiple comments in one thread only counted as one) http://friendfeed.com/e... so all the numbers above are from the old methodology....
- David HC Soul
My new ratio: 0.76 all time (old methodology .52).... this week 1.39
- David HC Soul
*bump*
- Micah
1.26 (2965/2346)
- Micah
Thanks, Glen and pea!
- Micah
Looks like my ratio as flipped again (comments back to dominating again). Seems to match my own awareness I've lately been commenting without Liking (commenting is my inherent recognition of value to me and the additional Like is when it merits an extra bump to help discovery by others).
- Micah
.38
- Ryan Dadey
Ryan, I have to say, that's one high caliber ratio ;)
- Micah
An update it's .44 which is an improvement from .36
- Michael Fidler
2.00
- Anthony Citrano
0.97
- Willem (@wim66) ☠
2.94 1040/354 I have likes set to post to twitter automatically, so I'm careful with them. :)
- guruvan (Rob Nelson)
0.85
- Steven Perez
0.73 up from 0.66 on Jan 08
- ɐ ɯıʞ sıɹɥɔ
0.37 for the week past, 0.45 on the whole.
- Parth Awasthi
Michael, Anthony, Ahsan, guruvan Steven, sıɹɥɔ and Parth - thanks for dropping in your stats!
- Micah
5.81 i'm not using it as does everyone else here. that is fer sure.
- Marg Uerite
Ahsan, huh, I'd never considered that.
- Micah
17942/30571=.59
- Scoble, Alex Scoble
Alex, thank you, sir.
- Micah
ALmost 2:1 exactly.
- Amani
Much obliged, Amani.
- Micah
3062/5777 you do the maths.
- Will Higgins™
Thank you, amin/gnu
- Micah
7.16
- Ken Sheppardson
*bump* (SEE ALSO http://friendfeed.com/jungleg... )
- Micah
1.45 (4374/3026)
- Micah
1.73
- Aron Michalski
0.92 now. I think the movie reviews have been getting me closer to a 1 to 1 ratio.
- Steven Perez
0.77
- Mathew A. Koeneker
Steven, yep, you were a 0.85 in April.
- Micah
2.10 now ...
- Amani
0.97 now.
- Eric Johnson
Amani, so your comments have climbed a bit.
- Micah
Thanks, Eric.
- Micah
Probably, just chattier then :)
- Micah
I'm down from 7.16 to 6.94 :-)
- Ken Sheppardson
Ken, the FCC may be interested to explore how your "I'm down" may be offensively self-deprecating ;)
- Micah
.56 eeep, must try harder
- Threepwood
4.52. I don't bother to like things I've commented on, since commenting already flags it as interesting.
- Andy Bakun
0.46 (1698/3638)
- Glenn Slaven
Threepwood, Andy, Glenn - thanks (Andy, that's my mo too; then I'll Like if it warrants a "double vote").
- Micah
1.31 (4,471/3,401)
- Karoli
Thanks, Karoli. And the both of us have a _very_ similar ratio and absolute numbers. wow.
- Micah
Thanks, Ryo!
- Micah
Andy, scroll upward and you'll see a couple calculations from before (January: Average: 1.27 | Median: 0.81)
- Micah
In March the Mean was: 1.49
- Micah
1.021276595744680851063829787234042553191489361702127659... via Wolfram Alpha
- tom murphy
Thanks, tom. And though a bit verbose, your friend Wolfram is resourceful :D
- Micah
0.55 (254/444)
- Willem (@wim66) ☠
Thank you, Willem.
- Micah
In April you were 0.97, so you're liking more / commenting less.
- Micah
1.88 (779/414)
- Ton Zijp
Thanks, Ton.
- Micah
0.43 (3597/8305).
- Parth Awasthi
0.74 (1970/2667)
- In Search of Gender
And thank you Parth, Scott.
- Micah
Parth, compared to your April numbers, you've been consistent.
- Micah
2.12 is my ratio.
- Rick Cogley
Thanks, Rick!
- Micah
Np Micah. What is that photo?
- Rick Cogley
.54 (4148/7674) Updated!
- Michael Fidler
Rick, you mean that face with glasses I photoshopped tint into with an apparently disembodied arm which is actually very much attached to my eldest son? It's mostly just me :)
- Micah
Thanks, Michael. Yes, you have a rising tide of comment percentage (oh, wow, you were one of the originals from January - cool!)
- Micah
1.82 from 798 comments / 438 likes
- David Damore
Thanks, nivé and David!
- Micah
2027/1594 = 1.27
- Brome
0.58
- Marc Dong
2.9 (3,242/1,116) mhhh.. time to straighten my use of FF a bit.. thanks for this entry
- Thierry R. Andriamirado
Brome, Marc and Thierry - thank you!
- Micah
Thierry - yeah, 2.9 is fairly high - got to pick the pace on like side :) [but hey, whatever works for you is fine]
- Micah
1.91
- MiniMage
Thank you Nicholas and MiniMage!
- Micah
Yeah, that's a decent upward rise in comments, Nicholas.
- Micah
.6 (6,000/10,000) 3rd update - Now it's time to flip this on its head. My goal is to have (16,000/16,000) next time I post here. Regardless of what happens, I'm just looking forward to the next 10,000 comments, likes, posts, and new relationships I make here. It's all good!
- Michael Fidler
1.76 (7539/4290) My commenting habits haven't chanced much, but it felt like I clicked Like a lot less, and this ratio confirms that for me.
- Micah
It's that time again.
- Micah
.50
- LB: #TeamMonique
Thanks, Laura! (you're a 50-caliber gal!)
- Micah
0.64
- Imabug
Thank you, Imabug.
- Micah
4.67 (I'm greedy :p)
- directeur
0.99
- Steven Perez
1.06
- Jim #TeamMonique
.81
- Brent - Yes I am
.63
- metalerik
Thanks Imabug, directeur, Steven, RAPatton, Jim, Brent and metalerik!
- Micah
.83
- Jimminy IS Everybody
0.78
- Pete D
.82 as of right now. edit: on January 8th it was 0.39 -- when I saw that, I decided to make more of an effort to comment. When I hit 10k "likes" I decided I wouldn't "like" anything else until I also had 10k comments.
- Bren
.11
- Lola Bean (Penguin)
And thank you Jimminy, Pete, Bren and Penguin!
- Micah
2.47 as of right now.
- Jonas, Leper of FF
Micah, are you doing something with these numbers? If so sounds interesting.
- Jimminy IS Everybody
0.58
- Absentee
Jimminy, I'm copyrighting every single number. It's kind of a honeypot ;) Actually, it was curiosity mostly, but I also hope to build a sampling (small and self-selecting as it may be) for anyone who might want to analyze it.
- Micah
Jonas, James and Kurt - thanks you!
- Micah
You're welcome. I hope the results do some good. :-)
- Absentee
.31. I have almost 4 times as many likes as comments.
- edythe
Thank you edythe and Eric!
- Micah
195/245 makes 0.8 rounded not including this one which would be 196/245 making 0.8 unrounded,
- tom murphy
Thanks, Tom.
- Micah
1.98 (588/297)
- Bryan Zirkel
1.67 (19,550/11,684)
- Mitchell Tsai
1:2
- Jeff P. Henderson
Bryan, Mitchell and Jeff P. - thanks, guys!
- Micah
1.18 - it's always been close to 1, since day one, for some reason.
- Laura Norvig
Wow, Penguin is a prolific liker!
- Laura Norvig
2.67 (875/328)
- Nathalie
Thank you, Nathalie!
- Micah
2.18
- Spidra Webster
Thanks, Spidra and Mark!
- Micah
0.49
- Jammy Lee
0.825
- Mathew A. Koeneker
Jammy and Mathew, thank you very much.
- Micah
2.16
- Sue - Friendfeed is best
I don't know I just like that picture
- Brian Hendrickson
.40
- Ben Hanten
Mine was exactly 2:1 about a week ago. Did a screenshot when I had 2,000 comments and 1,000 likes.
- Yo. Shark Dog.
from iPod
SuezanneC, Brian, B E N and Joe - thank you all very much!
- Micah
Joe, it's like see the odometer click through a nice round number - it's just inexplicably engaging. :)
- Micah
1.40, nearly the square root of two.
- Vezquex
Thanks, Raphael and Andy!
- Micah
1.15 (6777/5873)
- JA Castillo
12.23 (844 / 69 ) I guess I take my likes seriously ;)
- Chris Myles
Wow I didn't realize I was so out of whack!! 12.23 that's got to be a record (and I don't even import my feeds with the summary as a comment)!!
- Chris Myles
.87
- Nine Ferdinand
Thanks JA, Chris (wow, 12+ is unusual :), Serkan and Nine!
- Micah
Micah.. I told you I take my likes seriously; ). You *might* want to ask (in a separate post) what percentage of likes were used to "bookmark" a post or save it for later VS actually "liking it". I NEVER used like for that.. but I did use a private group that if filled with my own topics (and comments)..
- Chris Myles
1.78 (8529/4782)
- Micah
Likes are down relative to comments, which matches my much lower frequency of liking. I'm a more selective liker than ever.
- Micah
I don't think I could argue that any particular kind of ratio is "best", because if Lurkers like to Lurk and cultivate (via Likes) and the Chatty-ites love to chat, to pump out much many more comments than Likes, each can be happy and make for a great social experience.
- Micah
383/372
- Ashish
'Just clicking "Like" seems too easy' — Jason, that's because you're from the Chatty-ite tribe :)
- Micah
Thanks, ashish.
- Micah
wow, what a difference time makes, when i 1st posted on this thread, 6.43%, now = 1.25%, for a 5.18% difference, :o (and this is the earliest post to date i've recovered of my activity on ff)
- chaz2b
chaz, I think there's been a big fluctuation for most people (maybe not that much). This is the oldest post on which you commented that you've recovered?
- Micah
When I first saw this: 1.91 Sept 28: 1.94
- MiniMage
536 comments in the last month has me at .8736...still creeping toward 1.00
- Bren
.64
- Shannon Jiménez
Thanks, MiniMage (2x participant!), Bren (3x!) and Shannon (your inaugural visit!)
- Micah
Thank you, SustainedEuphoria.
- Micah
Thanks, Mark.
- Micah
1.45
- Brett Kelly
Thanks, Brett :)
- Micah
5.67 all time. Second highest ratio on here. Woot! I love to talk.
- Kevin L
Thank you both, Kevin and mridul (the two of you balance it each well :)
- Micah
1.80 (10,189 / 5,666) [compared to Likes, my Comments still continue to rise]
- Micah
1.02 (10323/10161)
- Bren
.5666 currently (30,084/53,093)
- Scoble, Alex Scoble
Thanks, Bren.
- Micah
Thank you, Alex :)
- Micah
that was my third post... It's interesting to see how the number has changed. of course, I manipulated the number to a degree, because I stopped "liking" things for a while...
- Bren
Bren, the other thing that can seriously throw off someone's stats is a feed that upon each item it imports adds a comment automatically.
- Micah
true. that can seriously inflate comment stats, of course. Then you have someone like RAPatton, who posts a gazillion comments, in part because of his playlist posts where he will list each song in a separate comment. I found, after this post in fact, that I tended to "like" things much more frequently than comment on them, that I was lurking instead of participating. I have changed the way I use ff rather considerably, and I think for the better.
- Bren
4.26?
- ‘-.-’ Tutivillus Grift
Thanks, Sarah, Tutivillus.
- Micah
1.19
- Joe Bonner
Micah this is like 11 months ago, I see you have almost doubled your rate. lets make a graph for everybody now, :)
- ۳۰ مرغ Loves Y'ALLLLL
Quick, someone write a greasemonkey script to inline some google charts! (tap-tap-tap...wut? don't look at me ;)
- Micah
Thanks, Joe. And you thank you, Mahmood :)
- Micah
Thanks, Glen! Your comments in the ratio have gone up too.
- Micah
1.70 (it was 1.41 on Jan 8)
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
WorldofHiglet, thank you :) The comments are strong in this one.
- Micah
0.64 (2,589/4,051)
- Chieze Okoye
0.58
- Thomas Page
Chieze and Thomas - thank you!
- Micah
*bumpage*
- Micah
So, Micah, we never did find out what you were doing with this info....
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
0.27 (5637/20234) - I only see a couple people lower than me.
- John (bird whisperer)
4.06 (747/184)
- Jan Ole Peek
WoH, World Domination.
- Micah
Rene, John and Jan - thank you, all three! :)
- Micah
0.97 (6,694/6,929)
- Jimminy IS Everybody
Thank you J., Jimminy and آقای تلخک :)
- Micah
2.23
- Paola Bonomo
0.71 (8,200/11,551) updated
- Michael Fidler
0.03 (284 / 10378)!
- Daniel Rowley
Thanks Paola, Michael, Artemko, J. and Daniel!
- Micah
*thanks Christopher thoroughly*
- Micah
14.86 (1442/97) I'm going the wrong way!!
- Chris Myles
1.77 (11831/6622)
- Micah
0.56 (2059/3703)
- Joel Webber
0.89 (1,766/1,986)
- chrisofspades
Thanks, Joel and Chris!
- Micah
In 4 days it will be 1 year since my first recorded stat here. My comments/like were almost a 1:1 ratio then. Now comments are almost double likes for me.
- Micah
Easy
- Kevin J Hatton
jamar78, same trend for you, it looks. :)
- Micah
1.00 a year later. {edit -- screwed it up the first time. not telling what I did.}
- Jim #TeamMonique
Thanks, Jim!
- Micah
.52 this year.
- LB: #TeamMonique
Thank you, Laura =)
- Micah
75,415 comments/1,286 likes = 58.64 - i wish the auto inserted comments didn't get counted... the true number is probably much much close ot my number of likes
- Chris Heath
1.09 (11910/10953)
- Bren
1.97%. thanks again micah, this has been a great metric to measure my first year here on ff. As the year went (this being the first record of me being here that i've found): , 6.43%:1.25%:1.97%
- chaz2b
Chris, Bren, thank you. And chaz2b, thank you too - glad it's a special marker for you. :)
- Micah
0.91
- Bruce Lewis
0.13
- Morton Fox
1.69 now (1.70 on Nov 10th and 1.41 on Jan 8, 2009) -
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
0.23
- Mark H
How is this thread doing in the longest-lived-ff-comment-thresds-ever contest?
- j1m
5.76 right now
- Kevin L
0.53
- Rodfather
1.49 (2,222/1488)
- DB, Just DB #TeamMonique
"I must not ask Micah questions" written out a bajillion times.... :)
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
LOL @Higlet - Correct. (but Brent, you can also ask the Mathematics Dept of West Bohemian University in Pilsen, Czech http://www.fav.zcu.cz/en... [via http://maisonbisson.com/blog... ])
- Micah
0.32 (2011/6291) Looks like I need to comment more. =)
- Beau Liening
Thank you, Beau. And, by stating you want to comment more you're already helping the cause :)
- Micah
2.09329564 (10366:4952) I don't think that I'm the norm here
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
*bump* - It's that time again, folks.
- Micah
1.71 (16,017/9,357)
- Micah
0.91 (13,933/15,222)
- Jimminy IS Everybody
2.66
- Marissa
1.48 (2,469/1,669)
- DB, Just DB #TeamMonique
Thanks, Jimminy, Marissa and Daryl. :)
- Micah
1.21
- Jenny H
Thanks, Jenny!
- Micah
1.10 (4874/4448)
- DGentry
2.13(7957/3734)
- Melanie Reed
Thank you, Denton, Glen and Melanie!
- Micah
63.58 (97,534/1,534) -- interesting that my last three digits are the same there, eh? (note, i already posted a month or two ago when i first saw this thread)
- Chris Heath
Thanks, Chris!
- Micah
0.87 (3770/4312), so I'm either getting more commenty or less likey. [0.74 (1970/2667) was what I previously reported back in June]
- In Search of Gender
Thanks Scott, pea and T. Brent.
- Micah
Brent, interesting. Look forward to more commentary. :)
- Micah
1433/1161 = 1.23
- cdogzilla | downgraded
1.19 (5132/4316)
- Ruchira S. Datta
Thank you, cdogzilla and Ruchira!
- Micah
0.94(15045/15978) 0.83, (28.August.2009); 0.97, (11.Nov.2009); 0.91, (17.April.2010); 0.94, (11.May.2010).
- Jimminy IS Everybody
1.65 (18,070 / 10,970)
- Micah
*bump* It's that time again, folks.
- Micah
1.05 (1710/1625)
- cdogzilla | downgraded
1.66 here. Chattyites 4ever!
- Lo
Thanks cdogzilla and Lo!
- Micah
Last year my comments were around 7000 and likes around 2500, for a ratio of 2.80. I consciously chose to do more liking over the last year. As of today my comments number 10,782 and likes number 7,666, for a ratio of 1.41.
- Stephen Mack #TeamMomo
Jason, Stephen - cool. Thanks for keeping updated here. :)
- Micah
Thanks, RG
- Micah
1.03. Micah you've made over 18000 comments since you first posted this.
- chrisofspades
0.76 (3,624/4,766) Egad that's only .1 improvement since 2009-01-08 :-P but at least it's moving in the right direction.
- ɐ ɯıʞ sıɹɥɔ
3.25 No wonder I always had to stand in the hall in school for talking ;-)
- Shannon - GlassMistress
Still right at 1:1. W00t.
- Jim #TeamMonique
1.15 (14662/12739)
- Bren
chrisofspades, crazy isn't it. :)
- Micah
kima, tortoise wins and all that ;) Thanks, Shannon. Jim, you have maintained balanced in the force you have. Thanks, Bren.
- Micah
2.33 :( my new yr's resolution was to "like" more, imma not doing sucha good job, :(
- chaz2b
Thanks, Mark, and chaz, you'll get there. :)
- Micah
1.61 (20,661 / 12,818)
- Micah
*BUMP* - It's that time again. THANKS!
- Micah
1.76 (15,652/8,886)
- Jenny H
Thanks, Jenny and hollyrai!
- Micah
Thank you, Glen.
- Micah
0.77
- Steven Perez
0.31 (14566/47299)
- John (bird whisperer)
John, you're a 'liking' fool! :D
- Jenny H
Apparently I'm the human version of FALOB
- John (bird whisperer)
Ha! (and thanks, John)
- Micah
Double ha!
- Jenny H
Thank you Steven.
- Micah
1.04
- Scott. Cat Herder.
2.28
- Jesse Stay
1.66 (updated)
- Eric - seven eleven
1.25
- holly #ravingfangirl
Thanks Scott, Jesse, Eric and holly!
- Micah
58,144/3,749=15.509, basically due to multiple feed imports.
- Daniel Mietchen
*BUMP*
- Micah
1.60 (22,066/13,819)
- Micah
:) @Jason.
- Micah
0.69
- Absentee
0.76
- Steven Perez
slightly off of my usual this time: 1.01
- Jim #TeamMonique
Thanks James, Steven and Jim "STAY-ON-TAR-GET" Jannotti. :)
- Micah
.98(20,405/20,834)
- Jimminy IS Everybody
Thank you, Jimminy, Greg and Bren!
- Micah
1.88 (21954/11691) Chatty Cathy, apparently.
- Jenny H
11289/9010 = 1.25 (wonder if some comments are from imported feeds)
- Mike Chelen
Thanks Jenny and Mike. :)
- Micah
Sorry - Micah .... but the math is just too complicated :)
- Charlie Anzman
Charlie, I'm make it simple. I'll do the talking, you drive the get-away car—we'll split it even: 80/20.
- Micah
Damn, More Homework.
- Brent - Yes I am
including this comment (119,119C/1677L) ... 71.03
- Chris Heath
1.21
- Joe Bonner
1.56 (24,076/15,472)
- Micah
*BUMP* - it's that time again. Also, I passed 24K comments recently.
- Micah
0.74
- Michael R. Bernstein
Thanks, Micahel.
- Micah
113,457 comments / 166,887 likes = .68
- RAPatton
2.02 (31627/15675) I need to start liking more and shut the hell up.
- Jenny H
1:1.618, of course.
- Josh Haley
from iPhone
2.60
- Jack&Cleo
I was waiting for that from you, Mr. Haley.
- Lisa | #TeamMonique
from Android
Those are some heavy hitter numbers there, RAPatton. Thanks. :)
- Micah
I've been on FF for a long time, Michah, because I am really, really old.
- RAPatton
LOL Josh. These aren't the maths you looking for. [lateral hand wave]
- Micah
Jenny, do not take your own advice; not advisable.
- Micah
Thanks, Jack & Cleo.
- Micah
RAPatton, you're not old—you triple-comment-excerpt every bookmarklet post :))
- Micah
Cristo, this post is an ancient relic. Handle with care.
- Micah
0.13
- Morton Fox
Okay, Micah. <----I had to resist the urge not to post that because I know it's going to up my comment count. ;)
- Jenny H
But how many of those primordial, high interest posts are still active. Uh huh. :)
- Micah
Thanks, Morton. BTW, when you posted in February, it was exactly 0.13 also.
- Micah
Jenny, resistance is futile; embrace the rising tide of comments.
- Micah
Comments are more difficult and time consuming than Likes. I'd be happy about a high comment:likes ratio except that many are surely imported from feeds, while every Like is manual.
- Mike Chelen
it has changed to 2.2256 now as Sep, 6 2010.Labor Day. :) I added the date for future references.
- ۳۰ مرغ Loves Y'ALLLLL
IN HONOUR OF DERRICK'S 100,000th LIKE: http://friendfeed.com/micahwi...
- Micah
1.54 (25,102/16,257)
- Micah
.82
- Alex Scrivener
Thanks, Alex.
- Micah
2.29.... 26 HR, 89 RBI
- .LAG liked that
.15 on March 21, 2009. Now .19.
- Pixie
Thanks, MarkJ, .LAG and Alix! :)
- Micah
Thank you, Deepak!
- Micah
1.47 (24757/16749)
- Bren
I make a lot of comments but no one like me, so I guess the ratio is infinite or undefined.
- Sue - Friendfeed is best
1.45 (29653/20444) *BUMP*
- Micah
1.22 (31900/26233)
- holly #ravingfangirl
.59 (58,923/99,251)
- Scoble, Alex Scoble
6.61 (2825/427 )... I'm a wee bit chatty
- Shannon - GlassMistress
I had exactly a 2:1 ratio as previously reported [Aug 30, '09], now I am at: 1.7241:1 ratio. 6,067 comments to 3,519 likes.
- Yo. Shark Dog.
0.79 as of 6 Jan 2011.
- John E. Bredehoft
my brain hurts
- Morgan
Two years later and my ratio has climbed from 3.4 to 4.675. I've got a lot to say, apparently.
- Kevin Fox
Funnily, I didn't notice until after leaving that comment that when I reported my stat in 2009 I also followed it up with "I've got stuff to say." I didn't say it was *new* stuff...
- Kevin Fox
1.000 (27093/27080)
- Jimminy IS Everybody
I've had an improvement since the last few times this has come up. I was .49 or close to it, now I'm running a .57 ratio
- Bluesun 2600
1.68 (55826/33281)
- Jenny H
81.1 - rising consistently
- Chris Heath
I think this is the oldest thread I see that still gets new comments added.
- Sue - Friendfeed is best
*BUMP*
- Micah
1.40 (32175/22968)
- Micah
I dunno, I'm not good with math
- sofarsoShawn ~presque...
0.35 ... Apparently I'm not very talkative.
- John (bird whisperer)
Thanks, John and Shawn.
- Micah
from FFHound(roid)!
looks familiar...
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
2.6 (wow, this thread is like my yearly checkup; thanks micah and friendfeed, 3+years and going strong [6.4%, 2.33%])
- chaz2b
1.02 (38,615, 37,927) 9/27/11
- Jimminy IS Everybody
1.29 (36,959 / 28,580)
- Micah
Thanks, Jimminy, Bren, WoH, and chaz2b. :)
- Micah
.46 now. :)
- LB: #TeamMonique
Thank you, LB.
- Micah
0.33 (34741/105115)
- John (bird whisperer)
0.93
- c.a.j.
Thanks John. Gracias, caj.
- Micah
1.57 (24,460/15,624). It was 1.12 the day after the OP.
- Tinfoil 2.0
The likes dim and comms brim.
- Micah
2.91; 6.43% (@ 2yrs ago) 2.33% (@ 1yr ago). for history's sake, this thread was started shortly after i found friendfeed, or friendfeed found me, so it holds a special place in my heart. thanks for keeping it around mr micah
- chaz2b
You're certainly welcome, chaz2b. In some way it feels like a living heirloom to me. :)
- Micah
*BUMP*
- Micah
1.25 (40,008/31,895)
- Micah
1.15
- Kristin
0.33
- John (bird whisperer)
1.41
- Headless Gnad Kicker
5.12
- Julian
3 (2.991) (and now the list has become too lengthy for me to track my progress, ;) [dumb me, i have a post not 10 lines ago in history, from 090711 2.91; 6.43% (@ 2yrs ago) 2.33% (@ 1yr ago) ;) ]
- chaz2b
.79
- Shevonne
24 072 / 35 095 = 0.685909674
- AJ Batac
0,77 (before and after this comment)
- loi
2.65 (69,814 comments/26,281 likes)
- Spidra Webster
1.51 = 28,196/18,717. Was 1.57 in Sept 2011 and 1.12 in Jan 2009.
- Tinfoil 2.0
*BUMP*
- Micah
0.174 (6966/40022) - Not much of a talker.
- Kevin Johnson
1.18
- Soup in a TARDIS
1.23 (41,476 / 33,845)
- Micah
1.43
- Tamara J.
.15 on March 21, 2009, .19. on September 18, 2010, and .22 today (March 8, 2012).
- Pixie
*BUMP* for Ross
- Micah
2.83
- Ross Miller
1.97 on 2012-04-24
- ؛ patrick
0.99 (44,752, 45,200) 4/24/11 || 0.83, (?, ?), (28.August.2009); 0.97, (6,694, 6,929), (11.Nov.2009); 0.91, (13,933, 15,222), (17.April.2010); 0.94, (15,045, 15,978), (11.May.2010); .98, (20,405, 20,834), (03.August.2010); 1.00, (27,093, 27,080), (06.January.2011); 1.02, (38,615, 37,927), (27.September.2011); 0.99 (44,752, 45,200), (24.April.2012);
- Jimminy IS Everybody
0.90
- Uli - Sent to Coventry
1.6
- AJ Batac
1.03
- Ryan Kaisoglus
1.34 Did you finish all your profiling yet, Micah?
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
1.22 (42,526 / 34,975)
- Micah
Glad to see you here, Ross. Thanks for the updates everyone. WoH, the master plan is coming together nicely.
- Micah
Excellent *steeples fingers*
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
*staples fingers*
- John (bird whisperer)
Hmm, can you order finger-steeples on Amazon?
- Micah
*readies the Band-Aids*
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
Micah: I can sell you some, cheap. Just fax your credit card, SIN and maiden name to the usual number.
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
My facsimile machine is in dry dock at the moment, but I'll pigeon over a small scroll with all the requisite datums.
- Micah
Done and done.
- WoH: Professor MOTHRA
2.95
- RudĩϐЯaЯïan
0.45
- Ahmet Yükseltürk
0.31 <-- about the same as usual
- John (bird whisperer)
After the last 19+ hours, it's high time to log-in your stats again.
- Micah
1.20 (45878 / 38084)
- Micah
1.54 (32,913 comments / 21,412 likes)
- Tinfoil 2.0
Thanks, Tinfoil.
- Micah
Try dividing by zero and find out (http://friendfeed.com/micahwi... )
- Micah
1.04 (10778 / 10303)
- DB, Just DB #TeamMonique
Thanks, DB.
- Micah
Currently 0.3.
- John (bird whisperer)
Thanks, John.
- Micah
1.01 (47,240, 46,956) 9/13/12 || 0.83, (?, ?), (28.August.2009); 0.97, (6,694, 6,929), (11.Nov.2009); 0.91, (13,933, 15,222), (17.April.2010); 0.94, (15,045, 15,978), (11.May.2010); .98, (20,405, 20,834), (03.August.2010); 1.00, (27,093, 27,080), (06.January.2011); 1.02, (38,615, 37,927), (27.September.2011); 0.99 (44,752, 45,200), (24.April.2012); 1.01, (47,240, 46,956), (14.September.2012);
- Jimminy IS Everybody
0.62
- Zulema ❧ spicy cocoa tart
from Android
Thanks, Jimminy and Zulema.
- Micah
BUMP - in honor of Kevin's 8K comment threshold.
- Micah
from FFHound(roid)!
.38 - March 15, 2013
- Jennifer Dittrich
0.279 (58096/208087)
- John (bird whisperer)
0.172283 (8005/46464)
- Kevin Johnson
0.75 (38,250 comments / 50,175 likes) (My entry above from 2 years ago said I had 10,782 comments and 7,666 likes for a ratio of 1.41. I've been busy, and my pattern seems to have changed.)
- Stephen Mack #TeamMomo
Thanks, Jennifer, John, Kevin and Stephen. :)
- Micah
from FFHound(roid)!
0.51 (6,883/13,438)
- Stephan Planken
from iPhone
5.72, though I deleted my first account, like, 3 years ago
- Meg V. Meg
1.03 (51,436, 50,018) 3/15/13 || 0.83, (?, ?), (28.August.2009); 0.97, (6,694, 6,929), (11.Nov.2009); 0.91, (13,933, 15,222), (17.April.2010); 0.94, (15,045, 15,978), (11.May.2010); .98, (20,405, 20,834), (03.August.2010); 1.00, (27,093, 27,080), (06.January.2011); 1.02, (38,615, 37,927), (27.September.2011); 0.99 (44,752, 45,200), (24.April.2012); 1.01, (47,240, 46,956), (14.September.2012); 1.03 (51,436, 50,018), (15.March.2013);
- Jimminy IS Everybody
.44. I guess I'm getting lazy.
- LB: #TeamMonique
2.22. I use YouFeed a lot, and liking takes an inordinate amount of time on the app....
- RudĩϐЯaЯïan
3.10 up from 2.83 a year ago.
- Ross Miller
Thanks, Ross.
- Micah
from FFHound(roid)!
BUMP
- Micah
from FFHound(roid)!
0.51
- Ahmet Yükseltürk
1.07
- Kristin
1.90
- Jason - The Opaque
from Android
0.62 (5077/8197) as of 4/29/13
- Betsy #TeamMonique
2.49 today
- Marissa
Re: New name for ONT? - http://www.insidesocal.com/davidal...
"As someone who wishes that the Angels were still the Anaheim Angels, I have no problem with our airport's current name. And Los Angeles International Airport shouldn't get high and mighty. After all, as Frank Black once noted, they have a Los Angeles in South Patagonia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?..."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Dave And Killer And The Surprise Attack - http://jonathan-hardesty.com/2013...
"I laughed, I cried. Boffo!"
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Ramon Sanchez, iconic Ontario restaurateur, dies - http://www.insidesocal.com/davidal...
"It just occurred to me that Ramon Sanchez, like Roger Ebert, worked until almost the last possible moment. Neither of them presumably needed to, but they both enjoyed what they were doing."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: A handy guide to discerning counterfeit Google Glass - http://www.geek.com/android...
"I had seen some of these pictures yesterday when they were shared on Google+. I am glad that you are pursuing the truth! Another thing to look for - remember that the word "Google" does not have three o's, and that the word "Glass" does not have only one s. If you receive a product with an inaccurate spelling, it may not be the real thing. Now if you'll excuse me, my Rollexx watch is telling me that it's time to watch Sunday Night Football."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: How much does an artist make from a single stream of a song on iTunes Match and Spotify? - http://thenextweb.com/apple...
"If song prices were based on length, I'd pay for "Wild Honey Pie." "Honey Pie" would be another matter."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Don't let the mission statement fool you, your company's first goal is to make money - http://bobstanke.com/blog...
"For publicly traded companies, you can be legally liable if you DON'T pursue a goal of making money."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Remembering Farrell’s in Montclair - http://www.insidesocal.com/davidal...
"Years before I met my wife, her family went to the Farrell's in Montclair one evening, and her brother took up the challenge to eat a "pig's trough" of ice cream. He successfully ate the ice cream, but much of it ended up on the Montclair Plaza parking lot afterwards. While we're thinking about that period, the area where Applebee's now stands today used to host a 50's place with a dance floor. Can't remember the name, however..."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: More on ignoble professions - http://empoprise-bi.blogspot.com/2013...
"I failed to credit Cdog Zilla for originally sharing the Heather Horn article. https://plus.google.com/#11357... My apologies."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Bedroom depot? - http://www.insidesocal.com/davidal...
"It gets worse. I know someone who works at Home Depot (not the one in Upland) who is an "appliance specialist.""
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Augmented reality app makes Japanese newspaper more engaging for kids - http://www.springwise.com/...
"The ending of the video says that certain companies prepared ads accessible to both parents and children. Does this mean that special preparation is required to create articles that can be rendered kid-friendly by the app?"
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Hard Drive: 14 Killer Features of the Bill Gates Condom - http://www.esarcasm.com/24133...
"You forgot the most important feature. Unlike other manufacturers who have closed systems and arduous rules ("don't hold it like that"), the manufacturers of the Gates products promise an easily accessible architecture that easily accommodates add-ons from third (and, if you're really into experimentation, fourth) parties. CPO Steve Ballmer has even produced a video in which he expresses his...um, commitment to those DEVELOPERS that will produce compatible products. And I understand that he got really sweaty during the making of that video."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Things You Think Aren’t Sexist, But Really Are - http://www.ruthburr.com/things-...
"I haven't seen the post in question, but (see my comment above) I have no problem with a post that discusses wardrobe essentials - as long as it's not implied that women need to worry about wardrobe, but men do not."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Things You Think Aren’t Sexist, But Really Are - http://www.ruthburr.com/things-...
"Your "context is important" message is an important one, even in the examples that you describe as appropriate. What if I say that I like your blazer, and that I like Joanna's blazer, but I never tell Rob that I like his blazer? Hmm..."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: The Death of Google Reader: Email Killed the RSS Star? - http://www.staynalive.com/2013...
"Chris, my blogs are using a "Subscribe by email" feature that is offered by Feedburner. Of course, this begs the question - what if Google kills Feedburner also? I do not know the ins and outs of ensuring that subscription emails are not marked as junk. Jesse, you have me thinking about something. If I write it I'll let you know."
- John E. Bredehoft
When your feet are stuck to the floor of the bar it's time to go?
Kelli H., Kirsten, Stephen Mack #TeamMomo and 10 other people liked this
when your feet are stuck to the floor of the bar it was time to go ten minutes ago.
- RepoRat
My socks, I can't move my socks!
- Meg V. Meg
It's as if we're glued to the spot!
- Headless Gnad Kicker
<3 <3 <3
- Meg V. Meg
As long as you can feel your feet, everything is fine.
- Jen
What Jen said.
- t-ra: not givin up
from Android
Not until your head is stuck to the floor.
- John E. Bredehoft
*throws rice*
- Marie
RT @ArsenioHall: A writer said, Rodman is "over his head" hanging with "sleezy" dictator Kim Jong Un. Dennis can handle sleezy characters, he dated Madonna!
has Rodman hacked someone to death with a hatchet, tho?
- Joe "Bad Guts" Silence
I'm sure S&M roleplay includes this scenario.
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Senate District 32 aftermath - http://inlandutopia.com/2013...
"The main reason for the low turnout is the common perception that local elections aren't important, and that national elections are the only ones that matter. I'm sure that idea about unimportant local elections would go away very quickly if the city of Ontario failed to pick up the trash for a few weeks. Romney and Obama aren't going to pick up our trash (literally or figuratively)."
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Google Reader's demise, part 2 - http://threads2.scripting.com/2013...
"I'm still searching for a product that meets my personal needs to have access to the RSS feed collection on a variety of platforms. Feedly immediately jumped in to offer its services, but its Windows support of selected web browsers is a deal-breaker for me - IT has locked my work computer down so that it only includes Internet Explorer, which makes it difficult to read forensic/biometric feeds via a service that refuses to support Internet Explorer. At this point I can't tell if Google's absence will create a flood of interest in the creation of new RSS readers, or if Google's absence will cause those same companies to ask, "Why bother?""
- John E. Bredehoft
Re: Destruction Of Bloglines Now Complete; Founder Prepares To Switch To Google Reader - http://techcrunch.com/2008...
"Well, now it's 2013 and Google Reader is about be to shuttered, so I'm checking out options for a free online feeder that works on something other than a phone or tablet. Is anyone using Bloglines today? Does it work?"
- John E. Bredehoft
Other ways to read this feed:
