"The Corrupted Blood incident was a widely reported virtual plague outbreak and video game glitch found in the ... game World of Warcraft... The plague began on September 13, 2005, when an area was introduced in a new update. One boss could cast a spell called Corrupted Blood, which would deal a certain amount of damage over a period of time, and which could be transferred from character to character. It was intended to be exclusive to this area, but players discovered ways to take it out, causing an epidemic across several servers. During the epidemic, some players would help combat the disease by volunteering healing services, while select others would maliciously spread the disease. These people have been compared to real-world disease spreaders, including early AIDS patient Gaëtan Dugas and Typhoid patient Mary Mallon... [World of Warcraft creator] Blizzard [was forced] to do a hard reset of all of its servers for the game."
- Michael Nielsen
"a tool that can augment Google Scholar and monitor Google Scholar (and other services like Libra, CiteSeerX, SSRN), and also monitor the Web (Google, Bing, Ask) for mentions of the paper. You can access a pre-alpha version at http://www.citation-tracker.com"
- Bill Hooker
from Bookmarklet
ok, what did you figure out. i'm stuck on the start page, too.
- Christina Pikas
ah, you noticed that it put your e-mail name in the login instead of your user name. got it.
- Christina Pikas
at a first glimpse it doesn't really work for me being an organometallic chemist. it's easier to check scifinder (chemical abstracts) to see if someone cited me or use the journal's citation alert. i assume since scifinder is a commercial product it's not possible to implement it?
- Oliver Schuster
Call me naive, but all of the comments on that post are very pessimistic. Yes, someone who shared her data got blatantly "scooped". But there was punishment, and a high profile media piece on the situation, which should be more than enough to tarnish the offending researcher's reputation. I find this almost a victory for openness - it was quite clear where they got the data, who they...
more...
- Shirley Wu
from twhirl
It seems strange to me that data can be made public but it cannot be used. Better to just keep data private until you are willing to let people build with it using proper attribution.
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Shirley I was thinking the same thing. But I don't know the details either - there may have been a misunderstanding. It does seem very counter-intuitive that data found publicly could not be used with attribution. What is the point of being able to access data then have to pretend that you don't have that knowledge when publishing your own work?
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Jean-Claude, what about for example the public human genome project? Should those data have been kept private until publication? Or should they have risked someone else publishing the analysis first? I think the idea of embargoes or marker papers (as described in one of the opinion pieces) is a good idea. The rules won't prevent cases like this, but I think they help people who are trying to do the right thing to remember their obligations.
- Andrew Su
Andrew - how are researchers allowed to use public data under embargo? When they write papers do they say "there are no other examples of this type of sequence" when they are fully aware that such sequences exist but are under embargo? I mentioned it was counter-intuitive to me because of my experience but that doesn't mean it is counter-intuitive to others who are used to operating under such conditions. I just wonder what use it is to have public data that cannot be discussed.
- Jean-Claude Bradley
You could just write up the papers, and submit them on the day the embargo ends.
- Rajarshi Guha
So if 5% of your paper involves embargoed data - you wait 6 months to submit your article - potentially getting scooped yourself by somebody else using your data without that 5%? The alternative would be to pretend the data does not exist and write your paper accordingly. I'm just wondering what benefit there is to science to make the data available at all before the paper comes out if...
more...
- Jean-Claude Bradley
I think if somebody scooped you on the same topic/problem, without the use of the embargoed data, that would at least say something about the initial need for that data :)
- Rajarshi Guha
This is why I liked the idea of a marker paper. Basically the people generating the data put a flag for the basic analyses they want to do before they release data. People shouldn't step on toes in those pre-claimed areas, but are otherwise free to use the data as it comes out. sounded like a reasonable compromise to me.
- Andrew Su
The weird thing for me is that this sort of data embargo and openness happens constantly in DNA sequencing. There are tons of genome sequencing projects that put out the sequences before publication and there is an agreement that analysis papers will wait for the main publication. Many times there are several papers published at the same time. A recent example it the 12 fly genome...
more...
- Pedro Beltrao
i like how PNAS took librarians into account in leaving the article on the page :) I want to say that the sharing of data early happens in Astro, too, but I'm not sure
- Christina Pikas
A less clear example is the structural genomics consortium (www.sgc.ox.ac.uk). They are mandated to put out structures, through the PDB and on their website by the end of every month. On this case there is no target goal (ex all human kinases) that can serve as a milestone for publication. There is also no agreement or guidelines for how to use the data but obviously people working there need some publications as well for the future.
- Pedro Beltrao
"Using an original method for controlling the intrinsic value of papers--identical duplicate papers published in different journals with different impact factors--this paper shows that the journal in which papers are published have a strong influence on their citation rates, as duplicate papers published in high impact journals obtain, on average, twice as much citations as their identical counterparts published in journals with lower impact factors. The intrinsic value of a paper is thus not the only reason a given paper gets cited or not; there is a specific Matthew effect attached to journals and this gives to paper published there an added value over and above their intrinsic quality. "
- Michael Nielsen
should have also figured in the year of appearance. if they appeared (were available to be cited) a year apart, that would make a difference in a field with a high immediacy... otherwise very interesting, though.
- Christina Pikas
These are fellow UQAM researchers (my school!). Look up Gingras' work. Lots and lots of papers on similar topics.
- Daniel Lemire
"duplicates papers as those that are published in two different journals and have the following metadata in common: 1) the exact same title, 2) the same first author, 3) the same number of cited references. Using this method, we have identified 4,918 pairs of papers." is it just me that finds it odd that there are actually 5000 pairs (!) of duplicated papers, same tittle, same 1st author and same references ? I find that amazing in itself.
- Pedro Beltrao
It would look strange in a c.v. to have two journal papers with the same titles.
- Daniel Lemire
I'd like to join Pedro and Walt in the How Can That Be Club.
- Neil Saunders
i've seen it. also, you might have the case in which it's a conf paper reprinted in a journal and then a journal article - but that's not great either. i'm sort of surprised about the number of citations -that's something i would expect to change as a consequence of review
- Christina Pikas
I'd be interested to know the variance in publication date across the pairs. This stunt is easier to pull off if you submit to two (or more) journals simultaneously; a lit search won't turn up the ringer.
- D0r0th34
I do know of Emerald's stunt (publishing the same articles and even whole issues in different journals) and, of course, the Australasian Journal of... stuff--but should any of that be in the source database for this study?
- Walt Crawford
The more I think about it, the more this bothers me. There are so many possible confounding factors that could easily play a causal role here (date of publication, how the authors themselves promote the paper at conferences and to colleagues, and so on). The empirical facts reported are interesting, but I'm not sure it's possible to conclude much. In particular, the inference that it's...
more...
- Michael Nielsen
Show me the duplicate papers data for social sciences. I want to understand how first -- I have seen perhaps one or two qua-duplicates in many years of reading, never two perfect duplicates, at the exception of reprints (articles becoming book chapters in edited collections, for example -- in which case citing the article is no Matthew effect at all).
- Fr.
In this post, White predicts the demise of complexity/network science unless it gets more careful methodology-wise. I think he is being optimistic. Countless (sub)fields have survived despite dismal methodology. As an anonymous commenter writes: "Too many people are easily seduced by models, and too many people don't have a proper appreciation for rigorous testing, for that brand of "science" to ever go away."
- Seb Paquet
Sure, it can go on forever, but if you sit down one day and realize that your work is useless, what do you do? Keep going or reform? I think most scientists prefer to feel useful.
- Daniel Lemire
Hmm, tough call. I'm not sure. Does your statement mean you believe that most scientists doing that brand of "science" are self-deluded, rather than just playing the game?
- Seb Paquet
People play games, but there are rules. While you can go on forever with fuzzy thinking, I think that scientists will tend to reform over time and fix their mistakes.
- Daniel Lemire
Yes, I guess they will reach a point in their career where they have the luxury to let their productivity (in terms of # of papers per year) take a hit and shoot for quality instead of quantity. But I wonder if most of them will do it.
- Seb Paquet
Still don't understand why their costs are higher at all - for instance, they tend to have less figures (particular ones in colour) than STM journals.
- Daniel Mietchen
probably volume is one thing - they probably print and sell many fewer copies. there's hardly any advertising, and what advertising they can sell is not like what a science journal can sell. (think about the advertisements for the newest and coolest $100k piece of lab equipment or even lab consumables vs. whatever you might advertise to historians!) As the article mentions, the acceptance rate is <20% where in specialty science journals (particularly some places in physics) >60%. Articles are longer...
- Christina Pikas
It's a sweeping generalization I know but it's still largely true across all the humanities disciplines that the monograph is more important as a form than the journal article. Also there is no great impetus for speed of publication; most humanities journals (again a sweeping generalization) can publish with a quarterly frequency and no one minds much, which translates to less of a...
more...
- Jill O'Neill
"The aim of this 3-year research project is to explore these processes through a detailed reconstruction of the ways in which the naturalist Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) assembled, filed, and cross-referenced information about plants and their medicinal virtues."
- Mike Chelen
from Bookmarklet
Shirley - this is an excellent essay on this topic, which is very close to my heart. Well done!
- Peter Binfield
Shirley, excellent (LONG) post. Can't wait to read your books ;)
- Ricardo Vidal
Thanks! This took me a couple days pretty much full-time to write (the luxury of not working a job right now); how do people with jobs do this??
- Shirley Wu
Tom Roud (?) writes an interesting rebuttal against article-level metrics - or at least cautions against some of the metrics that might be used (such as blog and media coverage). It's in French but I used Google translator to read it. My memory of high school French classes only allowed me to decipher the first paragraph, and get the gist that it was an argument against. http://tomroud.com/2009...
- Shirley Wu
The post on tomroud.com is interesting. Both your response on his post and the comment by Mitch on your post address most of his concerns, methinks. Popularity contests are no good, but there are ways around them (Mitch), they are just one of many metrics to be used with caution (PLoS), and GlamourMagz are also popularity contests where quirky papers have no chance (you). But his thesis...
more...
- Bora Zivkovic
@shirley: how do we do it? In pieces over many days...
- Björn Brembs
or get a job where writing this stuff is what you are supposed to be doing ;-)
- Bora Zivkovic
Having read the piece, I actually have some less vacuous comments: 1. To my knowledge, Garfield introduced the IF to help librarians cut subscriptions, not for scientists to help them chose publishing venues? 2. As you point out, journal level metrics are mathematically inadequate for what they are used for now. However, Thomson's IF specifically is worthless because it is negotiable...
more...
- Björn Brembs
Do not forget adding to Zotero and making me a sandwich. Then, we're talking.
- Paulo Nuin
Excellent, I just blogged about the disconnect between rss readers and reference management 2 weeks ago and this appears!
- aarontay
I'll bet Mendeley would be interested in setting this up, too.
- Mr. Gunn
Of what, adding to Zotero? That would be cool, if the Mendeley team do that (street cred). Not about the sandwich, I'd take a Philly Cheese Steak.
- Paulo Nuin
Dr. Pek Van Andel, who won an Ig Nobel Prize for making the first MRI images of a couple's sex organs while those organs were in use, also made a video. Obviously, NSFW... (via Improbable Research) - http://www.youtube.com/watch...
I dared not to, but I dared and watched this. Dr. Peck(er) Van Handle is one -crazy- interesting person, dude. Whatever will he 'plunge into' next??
- Graham Steel
Que faire si j'ai bu plusieurs gorgées de lait tout pourri (mais pas tourné ?), acide et au gout horrible ? OK, j'aurais du sentir le gout plus tot, mais j'avais du brownie dans la bouche. VDM.
Arrete, c'est dejà horrible comme ça. Je me sens muter, un alien se développer dans mon estomac. Si on moins je savais me faire vomir. A apprendre d'urgence dans mon Plan Pour Devenir Tout Terrain et Survivre Dans Toutes Les Situations. Y a du boulot !
- elifsulavraie
from email
burk encore... tu dois bien pouvoir trouver ça sur un site de type je-suis-anorexique-2.0.com ....
- Pierre Lindenbaum
alternative : manger 1 deuxième brownie pour ecraser le gout, passer à autre chose (du boulot), ecouter de la bonne musique. Mais si je donne pas de nouvelle d'ici ce soir, s'affoler ! dire que je viens de voir Into the Wild il y a 2 jours et que le gars meurt empoisonné...
- elifsulavraie
from email
I am humbled. I thought "Innkeeper at the Roach Motel" was the best title ever. It is nothing, nay, LESS than nothing before the marvel that is ncbirofl.com.
- D0r0th34
Those are hilarious. Although, in all honesty, my favorite title ever is a serious one. I love it for the sheer audacity of the partial quote at the end: Louise Robbins' article "The Library of Congress and federal loyalty programs, 1947-1956: no "Communists or cocksuckers"".
- Katy S
Should also see the winners of the ignobels given at harvard. I like the girl that says -- "I'm bored, I'm bored" to end the longer acceptance speeches.
- Joe
from iPod
Speaking of the ignobels, I was going to suggest Improbable Research as a fine repository of this stuff: http://improbable.com/
- Walt Crawford
http://improbable.com is the best tip not only for titles but also with the surprising materials and methods, dramatic results and tragicomic conclusion parts of articles!
- Nazlı
I love Improbable, but it is designed to be funny. I am looking for serious papers in serious journals with funny, catchy, memorable titles.
- Bora Zivkovic
ScienceDirect - Discrete Applied Mathematics : Recognizing DNA graphs is difficult http://bit.ly/I4v [not hilarious, granted, but memorable!]
- Chris Leonard
Christina - I think there's many fascinating questions to be answered; my posts don't nearly do the project justice. I'd like to know the answer to questions like: How did the pattern of participation change over time (e.g., who was replying to who, how long the comments were (it changed, I'm nearly certain), what caused lulls in the conversation, what caused the conversation to move...
more...
- Michael Nielsen
We challenge the need for formatting an article before acceptance. The assessment of the scientific value of a paper doesn't require meticulous formatting. Editors should be satisfied with a readable, generic submission. Authors would format the article after acceptance. This is a simple way to save time and unnecessary effort: We call upon journal editors and publishers to take action.
- Neil Saunders
there are two things to do before re-submission to another journal: 1. change the structure, e.g. insert sub-headings and adapt abstract etc. to length requirments 2. change figure labels from upper to lower case, subtly change the reference format etc. I think the second, nitty-gritty details might as well be done after submission.
- Michael Kuhn
NB: when people read only PDFs and no complete paper journal anymore, does it even make sense to enforce consistency like Fig 1a vs. Fig 1A?
- Michael Kuhn
If this article doesn't dominate my best-of-day here for a couple days, I need to reconfigure who I'm subscribed to.
- Mr. Gunn
I had much the same reaction, MrGunn.
- Bill Hooker
surley fig. 1a verses 1A is a stylesheet issue for the publisher. Get the content right and marked up in a common format and the rest can be done at publish.
- John Cooper
from fftogo
What cat? All publishers need do is agree to accept a generic format for review -- the responsibility for formatting can still be pushed onto authors (who are less likely to hate it if it's for an *accepted* ms!).
- Bill Hooker
Calling PLoS peeps: any chance y'all could take the lead on this?
- Bill Hooker
You don't think some journals might take offense to this? You don't want to ascribe to their crazy formatting issues so it makes it easier for you to resubmit to another journal if it gets rejected at the first one? That's probably their first qualification filter. Will the researcher take the time to format it properly, or is he just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see where it sticks? I'm all for this because it makes sense, but...
- Brian Krueger - LabSpaces
Some journals probably will. If enough climb on the no-formatting bandwagon, though, they have a hearts-and-minds advantage over those who don't. For a top-tier journal, this may not matter much. For a middle-of-the-pack journal, it might matter a lot!
- D0r0th34
I use LaTeX whenever my co-authors agree, so Michael's type 2 changes are automated. However, I am very sympathetic to the no-formatting wagon and would like to spin it a bit further: Many of the type 1 changes are due to limitations of printing ink on paper and thus also becoming increasingly irrelevant (for an example, see the 51-page PLOS ONE paper on dinosaurs at...
more...
- Daniel Mietchen
The responses to this are really interesting. From "why do we even have formatting standards?" to "why do we have so many formatting standards?" I fall in the second camp: all of our problems would be solved if all journals used the same style. There are of course too many vested interests for that ever to happen. I wonder how, historically, journals chose/diverged from one style in the first place?
- Neil Saunders
I would assume like everything else, that they just sort of evolved that way. I don't get, however, how chemists can deal with those citations that don't even have the article title in them and all the journals are abbreviated so strangely that we have to use CASSI to figure them out!.
- Christina Pikas
What always struck me about the GlamMagz is why should something so allegedly important not fit the IMRAD format and instead be condensed such that anyone besides the author has trouble understanding it? Heck, in some journals it's hard to even find the methods! IMRAD format FTW!
- Björn Brembs
For the review process formating is irrelevant. Who here has had any journal turn away a manuscript because it used 1A vs 1a? Now, if you weren't reviewed at a shorter format journal like Nature and choose not to use the extra space afforded at the next journal to sell your story or make difficult passages more clear before submitting, perhaps THAT is a sign of the the "see what sticks" approach. Moving on, having format standards to match a particular branded image is perfectly reasonable after acceptance.
- Noah Gray
from iPhone
"having format standards to match a particular branded image is perfectly reasonable" -- now that I think about it some more, I don't think I agree. The last thing I want to waste my time on is someone else's image. If they're so concerned about it, let them do the formatting -- and since it's being done to establish a brand, that is, for their benefit not mine, they can eat the cost as...
more...
- Bill Hooker
@Bill, there's a lot of sense in your points. I guess I just can't get that worked up over it, regardless of the position I'm in. Like I said, if a journal assesses formating (other than when the authors submit a 100-page novella) prior to acceptance, you don't want to publish there. If afterwards the authors don't want to participate in making things look nice, fine, but don't complain...
more...
- Noah Gray
Formatting is irrelevant for the review process? From Nature: "Before sending your manuscript to Nature, please ensure that it meets the requirements stipulated in the formatting guide" (http://www.nature.com/nature...).
- Neil Saunders
" I think most scientists... like things to look pretty" -- I would think the direct opposite. I think most scientists don't give a rat's ass what something looks like, so long as the data are intelligible. I very often hear disparaging remarks about artistic slides, posters, etc -- "someone has too much spare time, if they can spend that much on making things all pretty". I don't mind if someone else wants to spend that time, but I'm not going to bother doing it myself.
- Bill Hooker
As Neil points out, many (most?) journals expect you to follow their format prior to review. Having never actually done otherwise, I don't know how many journals would in fact return a submission and say "we won't consider this until you format it our way". I wonder what would happen if there were a website offering a handful of standard templates (in LaTeX, Open Office, Google Docs), and people just started using them to send their papers in...?
- Bill Hooker
Nothing more to add from my side. I would just write what I did above. We just disagree on the extent to which scientists in general care about the look, efficiency and clarity of data presentation.
- Noah Gray
Personally, a paper looking nice is not relevant. What is relevant (admittedly very subjectively!) is that it has a look and feel of being official. Like a stamp that says: "been through peer-review". Of course, that's almost insanely subjective, easily manipulated and all that. Most relevant to this discussion, it can be replaced with any other convention that distinguishes an accepted paper from a manuscript. Could it be that this is what this discussion is at least partly about?
- Björn Brembs
Ceterum censeo: all scientific papers for which it is feasible should be published in the IMRAD format (we all know which journals don't adhere to it), no matter what the layout. http://friendfeed.com/brembs...
- Björn Brembs
We are talking about the same thing. Look/feel of being official + IMRAD formatting = paper looking nice + efficient + data clearly presented. Anything beyond that is quibbling about 1A vs. 1a, which is way below all of us and not worth the time/effort. I'm not going to defend certain branded styling in formatting, but these styles mostly meet the ends we are discussing, even if they deviate slightly from IMRAD. If instead it is presented as I(R+D)m...whatever.
- Noah Gray
It's easy to say that "looking pretty" isn't important, but good presentation is a part of readability. "Looking terrible" can impair readability and scannability. Stephen Curry has a nice post on NN about problems with poorly formatted supplementary information http://bit.ly/EyZTm that is relevant here.
- Frank Norman
Perhaps when Elsevier have bought up all the journals they will impose a common standard ...;-)
- Frank Norman
This Vocabulary contains extensions to FOAF and other vocabularies, providing terms which are useful for describing academic researchers.
- Pierre Lindenbaum
Why, oh why has Google not created at least a basic RSS filtering service by now? I know I can do this outside of GReader and then use that RSS feed but that's so backwards. Filtering can be such a time saver in certain feeds.
Avi, are you implying it's already possible? Tell us how (don't bogart that thought, my friend, pass it over to me).
- ianf ⌘
How does Google Bundle allow me to filter within a feed? Correct me if I'm wrong but this feature just allows me to group feeds together and then share with others. No filtering...
- manielse (Mark Nielsen)
A Serbian molecular biologist has beaten off competition from around the world to win International FameLab, a kind of Pop Idol of science. The competition is the brainchild of the Cheltenham Science Festival, in partnership with NESTA and supported by the British Council.
- NESTA
Le séminaire se penchera sur l'émergence des Digital Humanities (DH), en Amérique du Nord et en Europe, à l'intersection des sciences humaines et sociales et des computer sciences. Ce terme désigne tout à la fois un ensemble de pratiques de recherche mobilisant de manière structurelle des moyens informatiques, des modèles épistémologiques relevant du concept de "e-sciences", mais aussi des modes de diffusion des résultats de la recherche qui mobilisent les nouveau moyens de communication en réseau. A un autre niveau, le développement des Digital Humanities a des implications en terme de politique scientifique pour les sciences humaines et sociales en faisant porter l'attention sur le besoin d'infrastructures de recherche d'un nouveau type (développement des cyberinfrastructures, grilles de calcul et plateformes d'édition).
- Marin Dacos
Et hop, je me suis abonné à la liste de diffusion du séminaire :-)
- Enro