Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
The entry you requested has been deleted
Eric Logan

Eric Logan

"The universe is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper". I am sharpening my wits on FriendFeed.
Showtime in Detroit - WSJ.com - http://online.wsj.com/article...
Showtime in Detroit - WSJ.com
Detroit in January isn't an exotic destination, with wind chills in the teens and snowplows scraping streets in their annual battle with winter. But more than 5,000 journalists, many from overseas, will flock there next week for the preview of the 103rd annual auto show. When the North American International Auto Show opens Jan. 16 an expected 700,000 visitors will see more than 700 new cars on display, including more than 30 global debuts. They'll also see an industry transformed. The stakes at this year's auto show are enormous because the focus won't be only on the cars but also on the companies themselves. Since last year's show, General Motors and Chrysler have gone in and out of bankruptcy. GM is mostly owned by the government, and Chrysler is being run by Fiat. Toyota has announced its first loss in nearly 60 years and the largest car recall ever. GM's once-venerable Pontiac, Saturn and Saab brands will be absent from this year's show. Pontiac and Saturn are dead, victims of... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
History of Darpa - 'The Department of Mad Scientists,' by Michael Belfiore - Review - NYTimes.com - http://www.nytimes.com/2009...
History of Darpa - 'The Department of Mad Scientists,' by Michael Belfiore - Review - NYTimes.com
Two years ago, in his book “Rocketeers,” Michael Belfiore celebrated the pioneers of the budding private space industry. Now he has returned to explore a frontier closer to home. The heroes of his new book, “The Department of Mad Scientists,” work for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as Darpa, a secretive arm of the United States government. And the revolution they’re leading is a merger of humans with machines. The revolution is happening before our eyes, but we don’t recognize it, because it’s incremental. It starts with driving. Cruise control transfers regulation of your car’s speed to a computer. In some models, you can upgrade to adaptive cruise control, which monitors the surrounding traffic by radar and adjusts your speed accordingly. If you drift out of your lane, an option called lane keeping assistance gently steers you back. For extra safety, you can get extended brake assistance, which monitors traffic ahead of you, alerts you to collision... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
EU Referendum: Pachauri and Big Oil - http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2009...
Millennium Assessment of Human Behaviors - Eric Logan
The Philosophy of Strikes - William Graham Sumner - Mises Institute - http://mises.org/daily/3854
The Philosophy of Strikes - William Graham Sumner - Mises Institute
This essay first appeared in Harper's Weekly, September 15, 1883. It was republished in the collection On Liberty, Society, and Politics: The Essential Essays of William Graham Sumner. ----------------------------------------------------- The progress in material comfort which has been made during the last hundred years has not produced content. Quite the contrary — the men of today are not nearly so contented with life on earth as their ancestors were. This observation is easily explainable by familiar facts in human nature. If satisfaction does not reach to the pitch of satiety, it does not produce content, but discontent; it is therefore a stimulus to more effort, and is essential to growth. If, however, we confine our study of the observation which we have made to its sociological aspects, we perceive that all which we call "progress" is limited by the countermovements it creates, and we also see the true meaning of the phenomena which have led some to the crude and silly... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
The future of brain-controlled devices - CNN.com - http://www.cnn.com/2009...
The future of brain-controlled devices - CNN.com
In the shimmering fantasy realm of the hit movie "Avatar," a paraplegic Marine leaves his wheelchair behind and finds his feet in a new virtual world thanks to "the link," a sophisticated chamber that connects his brain to a surrogate alien, via computer. This type of interface is a classic tool in gee-whiz science fiction. But the hard science behind it is even more wow-inducing. Researchers are already using brain-computer interfaces to aid the disabled, treat diseases like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, and provide therapy for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Work is under way on devices that may eventually let you communicate with friends telepathically, give you superhuman hearing and vision or even let you download data directly into your brain, a la "The Matrix." Researchers are practically giddy over the prospects. "We don't know what the limits are yet," says Melody Moore Jackson, director of Georgia Tech University's BrainLab. Adds Emory University neuroscience... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Fouad Ajami: A Cold-Blooded Foreign Policy - WSJ.com - http://online.wsj.com/article...
Cape Coral records first homicide of 2010 - http://www.news-press.com/article...
A New Year’s celebration turned into a fatal stabbing shortly after midnight when two residents got into an argument at a party Joshua Jay Sands, 35, became the city’s first homicide victim of 2010 after he was stabbed several times by Reginald Etienne, 31. At 12:31 a.m., Cape Coral Police responded to a 911 call at 1140 SW 47th Terrace reporting a stabbing. Sands and Etienne had been arguing at a party at the residence, and Etienne left the party and went home next door to get a knife. Etienne then returned to the party where he and Sands continued the argument. The argument moved away from the home and to the roadway, where some pushing and shoving occurred. Etienne took the knife and stabbed Sands numerous times. Sands was transported to Lee Memorial Hospital where he died from the injuries. Etienne was arrested and charged with murder. He was booked and transferred to Lee County Jail. - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Joshua Sands, my first cousin was killed last night in Cape Coral in this incident . He leaves behind 4 small children and a distraught extended family and fiance. Really sad and obviously unexpected beginning of 2010 for my family :( - Eric Logan
what dreadful news. My condolences to you and your family. 8-( - Andrew Terry from iPod
So sorry to hear that. What a tragic end to what should be a night of celebration. Oh beautiful world, why do you have to be so ugly at times? - Chris Heath
Time Lapse Blue Moon Rising - Key West, Florida http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Time Lapse Blue Moon Rising - Key West, Florida http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9pBz09fxvE
Play
The Obama Disconnect: What Happens When Myth Meets Reality | techPresident - http://techpresident.com/blog-en...
If Many-Worlds Had Come First - http://lesswrong.com/lw...
If Many-Worlds Had Come First
Macroscopic decoherence - the idea that the known quantum laws that govern microscopic events, might simply govern at all levels without alteration - also known as "many-worlds" - was first proposed in a 1957 paper by Hugh Everett III. The paper was ignored. John Wheeler told Everett to see Niels Bohr. Bohr didn't take him seriously. Crushed, Everett left academic physics, invented the general use of Lagrange multipliers in optimization problems, and became a multimillionaire. It wasn't until 1970, when Bryce DeWitt (who coined the term "many-worlds") wrote an article for Physics Today, that the general field was first informed of Everett's ideas. Macroscopic decoherence has been gaining advocates ever since, and may now be the majority viewpoint (or not). But suppose that decoherence and macroscopic decoherence had been realized immediately following the discovery of entanglement, in the 1920s. And suppose that no one had proposed collapse theories until 1957. Would decoherence now... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
""All right," says Nohr. He sighs. "Look, if this theory of yours were actually true - if whole sections of the wavefunction just instantaneously vanished - it would be... let's see. The only law in all of quantum mechanics that is non-linear, non-unitary, non-differentiable and discontinuous. It would prevent physics from evolving locally, with each piece only looking at its immediate... more... - Jason Wehmhoener
This reminds me of why quantum physics makes me so sad. - Amit Patel
""This is the world where my good friend Ernest formulates his Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment, and in this world, the thought experiment goes: 'Hey, suppose we have a radioactive particle that enters a superposition of decaying and not decaying. Then the particle interacts with a sensor, and the sensor goes into a superposition of going off and not going off. The sensor interacts... more... - Jason Wehmhoener
Happy New Year
Happy new year! - Rochelle
Happy New Year, Eric! - Eivind
Who's in Denial Now? - http://www.aei.org/article...
Who's in Denial Now?
Responses to "Climategate"--the leaked e-mails from Britain's University of East Anglia and its Climatic Research Unit--remind me of the line "Are your feet wet? Can you see the pyramids? That's because you're in denial." Climate catastrophists like Al Gore and the UN's Rajendra Pachauri are downplaying Climategate: it's only a few intemperate scientists; there's no real evidence of wrongdoing; now let's persecute the whistleblower. In Calgary, the latest fellow trying to use the Monty Python "nothing to see here, move along" routine is Prof. David Mayne Reid, who penned a column last week denying the importance of Climategate. Unfortunately for Reid, old saws won't work in the Internet age: Climategate has blazed across the Internet, blogosphere, and social networking sites. Even environmentalist and writer George Monbiot has recognized that the public's perception of climate science will be damaged extensively, calling for one of the Climategate ringleaders to resign. What's... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Adding "climate catastrophist" to my Dictionary of Ridicule. Thanks a lot, Eric :) - LANjackal
Here, smoke this cigarette, and another, and another. Trust me, they're harmless. It's really unfortunate that people now have even more "reason" to continue destroying the Earth. Anyone that doesn't want to move to renewable energy is profiting from our current, unsustainable system and/or an idiot, plain and simple. Neither reason is a good reason not to invest in renewable energy.... more... - ·[▪_▪]·
Robot: you're confusing energy independence - the lack of a need to rely on foreign energy sources - with environmental friendliness. In many cases the 2 goals are at loggerheads. This confusion is part of the reason we've thrown billions at politically rosy but pragmatically unworkable "solutions" such as ethanol and hydrogen. The jury's still out on whether former is actually a net... more... - LANjackal
And I'm not saying we shouldn't invest in renewable energy. We should. But any technology that can't stand on its own in the free market without govt assistance is *economically* unsustainable in the long run. There are no free lunches. - LANjackal
It is easy to see your angle on this argument Robot. The fact of the matter is that the alarmist agenda of the IPCC, is a political tactic to push legislation "Cap and Trade" that is not designed to tackle the extremes of climate change if you accept them at their word. The entire topic is filled with disinformation and how much forcing is actually occurring due to CO2 should be a scientifically determined, paramount endeavor not a political exercise. - Eric Logan
No, i'm not confusing energy independence and environmental friendliness. They are one in the same. Energy independence in the sense of independence from limited resources. Limited resources means limited energy, which translates into supply and demand economics, which implies control and distribution, which is a dependency. The only solution to the dependency is renewable or, better,... more... - ·[▪_▪]·
"It's in the market's best interest to remain on unsustainable path we're on until the very last ounce of resources are depleted." - That's what people who don't understand economics would have you believe. As conventional resources become scarce, their prices will increase. This naturally spurs a search for a cheaper alternative. For example, much of the current push toward efficient... more... - LANjackal from IM
My mention of "Plants get their energy for free" is in reference to the fact that access to the sun's energy is FREE, not that there isn't a cost in extracting the energy. The point i'm making, that you seem so intent on assuming i'm clueless about, is that the recurring costs of solar can be far less than the cost of all other sources of energy. Also, the reliability is assuming we... more... - ·[▪_▪]·
Energy production transitions will occur when cost per mega watt/hour metrics are competitive or advantageous for new methods. Solar energy production despite recent technological improvements still costs $ 160.00 per mega watt /hour according to D.O.E. estimates. Traditional fired plant based generation gas, coal and nuclear all average approx $ 60.00 per mega watt/hour. The only presently viable clean emission technology that meets demand requirements and cost efficiencies is nuclear energy. - Eric Logan
Amen brother Hallelujah preach the Gospel. Glad someone sees the light :) - LANjackal from IM
Maybe the best solution is a multifaceted solution. When issues get so complex you can't look at a single cause for the problem, it seems to me the complication allows for diversity in the solution(s). No, sun isn't consistent in all places. But I don't think it has to be. The structure of relying on one source of energy has general caused people to assume you need a direct replacement.... more... - Heather
Article in todays WSJ Get the U.N. Out of the Climate Business -http://bit.ly/7bDV8D - Eric Logan
Nuclear is a great alternative. If Americans would stop criticizing the French and realize we can learn some things from them, we might be able to move to nuclear. Nuclear provides almost 80% of France's power and their safety record is excellent. But to follow their lead would require strict regulations to ensure the plants are built and run to very high standards. Something the... more... - ·[▪_▪]·
Nice to hear that from you, robot. Actually the US *already* has strict nuke regs. Too strict, as a matter of fact. That's why no new nuclear plants have been built here for decades. As for spilling waste, I'm an engineer and am very familiar with reactor design. Next gen units are in fact extremely safe with multiple redundancies. The ironic thing is that the increase in the "strict... more... - LANjackal from IM
Your point about regulations preventing movement is a perfect example of exactly why capitalism, er, a free market, doesn't work in some scenarios and why governments must be involved in certain sectors to see progress in the public's best interest. Capitalism is all, and only, concerned with profitability, sometimes at the public's expense, quite often, not even to the public's... more... - ·[▪_▪]·
"When lives are at stake, it's better to be too strict and back away over time" - With that kind of attitude it's no wonder we haven't built anything new. Why did you suggest nuclear as a solution if you're unwilling to create the legislative environment for it? Many of the rules for nuke plants just plain aren't necessary, aren't reflective of advancements in the field, or were slapped... more... - LANjackal from IM
I'm not sure nuclear is really as harmless as you guys make it sound. I know it's not as bad as most people think, but like with any technology there are drawbacks. Nuclear plants require water for cooling, and the most efficient way is to plop down on a river and suck in the passing cool water and send the heated water out downstream. Hot water in a stream is not natural and can... more... - Heather
@Heather That's definitely a concern, but I think the alternative of nuclear is much better than fossil fuels. But like you said before, it will probably take a multi-faceted approach to solve the energy problem. No one tech is going to be the answer. - Shey, Jamaican of FF
"Nuclear plants require water for cooling" - Newsflash buddy: ALL steam-driven powerplants (combustion + steam cycle, nuclear, solar thermal) require cooling. The amount of cooling required is a function of the power output of the plant, NOT the generation method. Translation: a 1600MW solar thermal plant will require just as much cooling and discharge just as much hot water as a 1600MW... more... - LANjackal from IM
@LAN - I think Heather's point about the cooling is that nuclear plants dump their waste water (which is much warmer than the natural water of the environment) is dumped back in to their surroundings. From what I've heard, they use a ton of it. - Shey, Jamaican of FF
Shey: ALL steam-based powerplants do that ... - LANjackal
@LAN It would be interesting to see a comparison of what the volume output of water per watt created would be - Shey, Jamaican of FF
That's a routine calculation, see any applications of thermodynamics textbook - LANjackal
"Your point about regulations preventing movement is a perfect example of exactly why capitalism, er, a free market, doesn't work in some scenarios and why governments must be involved in certain sectors to see progress in the public's best interest." I don't understand this or am having trouble parsing it. If regulations, created and enforced by the government, are preventing movement,... more... - Andy Bakun
+1 Andy. BTW it IS possible to build a nuclear plant that uses less water *per se* by using Helium as the working fluid instead. But wait: that would be a brand new design, which means it would have to go through years of hurdling objections by people who couldn't even tell you how their car works much less a goddamn power plant. Thankfully the rest of the world isn't retarded and is... more... - LANjackal from IM
Helium : "At our current rate of consumption, Cliffside will likely be empty in 10 to 25 years, and the Earth will be virtually helium-free by the end of the 21st century. " http://www.wired.com/wired... - ZN Moment
According to Scientific American's October 2009 issue, most of the world's fossil fuel (including natural gas) deposits remain either unexplored or beyond the reach of *current* technology. As the latter improves, so will the proven (the technicality here is that "proven" refers to stuff that can be economically extracted, which means that it changes with time, technology, and prices)... more... - LANjackal from IM
Wow, I really didn't think my comment warranted that kind of response. I guess this topic is reserved for those with technical expertise in physics, thermodynamics, engineering, chemistry... what did I miss? I know I missed something. For some reason though, I thought a small amount of consideration for environmental impact was possible. I guess I'll shut up about the few things I know regarding this thread. (Oh, and I'm not your buddy, pal.) - Heather
All I'm suggesting is that people inform themselves completely about a topic before camping out on a particular position. Technical topics are significantly more involved, which means the time and effort to reach an informed state will be relatively large. The same is true for law, which is one of the reasons I dutifully put "IANAL" before expressing a legal opinion online, for example - LANjackal from IM
So people who don't have "complete" knowledge shouldn't even think about taking sides? I'm seeing such a pathetically small amount of environmental consideration I can't believe this thread started about the environment. - Heather
LOL it appears we will always be on either sides of the battle lines, grav' ;) #donshelmet #picksupaxe - LANjackal from IM
Seriously? *rolleyes* You denialists have it backwards. Climate change denialism is largely a product of the oil and coal industry. The "climategate" emails aren't worth mentioning. Even if you throw out everything they've ever done it wouldn't make any difference. The IPCC reports are arguably some of the most peer-reviewed scientific documents in history, and the IPCC is an... more... - Tanath from fftogo
Way back in time, when the earth was flat and some whackjob proclaimed that no, it was round, I'm sure there were proclamations throughout the land that the science was in and everybody agreed.... And the whackjob was decried a heretic. - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
@Heather: Also in reply to what you said - Exactly. If I'm not a doctor, then it doesn't matter what I think about whether a tumor is cancerous or not because I'm NOT a qualified expert. If that weren't the case, then college degrees, certifications, etc. would be pointless. Opening the decision making process to non-experts only results in poor decisions and doesn't improve the... more... - LANjackal
I did not like this article - Logan Lindquist
No one who subscribes to the religious zealotry of Gore-ism would. Not to say that you're one of those people - LANjackal
Another interesting article from Mi2g. Carbon Conflict ? http://bit.ly/7ZgOKR - Eric Logan
Science deals with evidence. There was never any evidence the world was flat. When people thought that (thousands of years ago), science as such didn't exist. - Tanath
And there is a clear scientific consensus now on AGW. No scientific papers have been published in good peer-reviewed climatology journals contradicting the consensus in nearly the past 2 decades. - Tanath
Your last statement Tanath tells me a lot about how much you have researched this topic. The Anglia e-mails themselves refer specifically to attempts to keep recent dissenting scientific views from being published in two peer reviewed journals the GRL = Geophysical Research Letters and the JGR = Journal of Geophysical Research. Here is a listing of 500 peer reviewed skeptical papers http://www.populartechnology.net/2009... - Eric Logan
I was thinking of this meta-analysis done by Science (a premier peer-reviewed science journal): http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi... It's perfectly understandable to try to keep crap out of otherwise respectable journals. The science journal Nature (another premier peer-reviewed science journal) found nothing in the emails to undermine climate science: http://www.nature.com/nature... - Tanath
How many of those papers are legitimate science though? How many of those journals are fronts for industry? How many of those authors are shills for same? See "Doubt is Their Product" for many examples of these. Industry has a history of creating sham science to cast doubt, prevent regulation and protect profits. The tobacco industry does it, industries relying on many various chemicals and other materials do it, and the oil, coal, and car industries do it with global warming. - Tanath
@LAN- I had an entire class in college that was devoted to smacking the idea "Opening the decision making process to non-experts only results in poor decisions and doesn't improve the situation at all." in the face. Why are technical experts the only ones allowed opinions? When your doctor tells you "You need to loose weight" they don't put you in a weight lose clinic and keep you there... more... - Heather
Heather, authorities (eg., experts) are unreliable. The only things that are really reliable are logic and evidence. Even a survey of expert opinion can be unreliable. If you really want the truth you need to look at the evidence. And properly peer-reviewed science papers constitute the most reliable evidence we have. - Tanath
Here's my response to all that: http://xkcd.com/675/ Expertise matters. Period. - LANjackal from IM
Good old xkcd. :) Nothing I said should be construed as contradicting the spirit of that xkcd. Most non-experts just aren't equipped to contribute to any given technical field, but that doesn't change the fact that the only thing that's truly reliable is logic and evidence. Even experts fail to do so at times though. - Tanath
As for the CRU emails, they've been checked, and checked, and checked. See http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/index... and http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/index... - Tanath
I think it's also noteworthy that the vast majority of (english) books skeptical of AGW have been linked to conservative think tanks: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp... - Tanath
Tanath "As for the CRU emails, they've been checked, and checked, and checked" Try "whitewashed" I know how to read and in the case of the e-mails no one has to depend on anyones separate analysis. Nature and The Climate Science watch journal use the exact same press release in the links you have provided. Seth Borenstein from the AP link is part of the story. In fact he penned this... more... - Eric Logan
Again, even if you throw out everything the CRU has done, it wouldn't make a difference to the climate science. The consensus would be the same. There's plenty of stuff out there adressing concerns about the emails if you care to look. And if you want to avoid bias you should be looking to disprove your preconcieved notions and doing just that. - Tanath from fftogo
So a journalist from the AP emails the CRU asking for an opinion on a "contrarian" paper in a journal he says is legit, and you want to claim something based on this? - Tanath from fftogo
There is no Consensus. Unless you count competing camps as a consensus. There is an alarmist AGW camp. There has been a lobbying effort by a vested interest anti-AGW camp. Discerning the truth and filtering out personal belief and bias is a learned discipline. I have read much more pro AGW material than dissent. - Eric Logan
If you want to contest AGW, then OK, but "climategate" won't help your case. - Tanath from fftogo
That AP story is just an example of how closed the system is. In this example Phil Jones actually provides a good rebuttal to the publication in question. I do not need or intend to cherry pick the data. I am not personally an ideologue. When you are picked to serve as an impartial juror or arbiter, impartiality dictates that you recuse yourself if you have a relationship with the witnesses or facts of the case. - Eric Logan
No consensus?! Now I know you haven't done your homework. The scientific literature shows a very clear consensus. The vast majority of those 500 papers supposedly contradicting the consensus actually don't argue against the consensus view. Some are in dubious journals, some are in a known denier journal, some are decades old, etc. But even if they were all good cites, it would still only comprise a fraction of the relevant literature. - Tanath from fftogo
I posted those 500 papers for expediency Tanath. You made the outlandish statement that there "has been no scientific papers that have been published in good peer-reviewed climatology journals contradicting the consensus in nearly the past 2 decades." I have tons more citations that are contained or bookmarked in my own computer many of which I have not had time to review or do not... more... - Eric Logan
By "denier journal" I mean a journal with a certain bias, denying the legitimate scientific consensus. Most are done by thinktanks and used as fronts for industry. Again, see "Doubt is Their Product" for many examples of this. The journal I'm referring to in this case is "Energy & Environment." - Tanath from fftogo
All words are labels. I used words that should have conveyed my meaning. And I still haven't seen anything that really contradicts my "outlandish" statement. Journals like Science and Nature are much more credible than random people on the web. - Tanath from fftogo
Your last statement completely illustrates another outlandish contradiction in your argument here. There where 19 citations among the 500 examples already provided that where published in the journal Nature. There were also 21 citations published in the journal Science. I can' t help you with cognitive dissonance or intellectual laziness. Here is a random sample http://www.nature.com/nature... - Eric Logan
How about one that actually challenges the consensus? Why would Science have a survey of the literature finding no papers contradicting the consensus if they had published them in their own journal? - Tanath from fftogo
The meta analysis you link to is not produced by the journal it is a published essay written in 2004 by Naomi Oreskes. In the essay she reported an analysis of “928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and published in the ISI database with the keywords ‘global climate change’” It does not account for any published literature that does not include that phrase. - Eric Logan
I know this. - Tanath from fftogo
I couldn't tell ? Roger Pielke Jr. has been on the record as early as 2005 supporting Naomi Oreskes and the IPCC he in fact co authored a paper with her. This is what he has to say today about the Climategate scientists http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009... and his original 2006 opinions on consensus http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometh... - Eric Logan
If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit? Just keep throwing more crap until they give up and go away. Good tactic. - Tanath from fftogo
Thanks for playing come back next year and try again. Tactic has apparently worked for the last two decades on you. ;-) - Eric Logan
A natural experiment on plant acclimation: Lifetime stomatal frequency response of an individual tree to annual atmospheric CO2 increase
Jihadism and the Cold War -- latimes.com - http://www.latimes.com/news...
futurity.org/top-stories/race-to-replace-gas-with-green-batteries/ - http://futurity.org/top-sto...
Race to replace gas with green batteries - Eric Logan
Nexus One details revealed in Google leak - http://vator.tv/news...
VatorNews - Condoleezza Rice joins stealth carbon startup - http://vator.tv/news...
VatorNews - Condoleezza Rice joins stealth carbon startup
VatorNews - Condoleezza Rice joins stealth carbon startup
Three SEC forms filed over the last two weeks show former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and former Senator and Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham have joined the board of C3, a mysterious startup founded by Thomas Siebel, former CEO of Siebel Systems which was bought by Siebel’s previous employer Oracle for $5.7 billion in 2005. The filings also reveal $26 million of investment. In addition to the two politicians, Siebel has brought on Jay Dweck, a Managing Director and Global Head of Strategies and Technology for the Institutional Securities Group at Morgan Stanley. Dan Levine points out that Dweck could be helpful in the creation of a market for carbon securities. Rounding out the team are former Siebel Systems and Oracles executives Patricia House and Edward Abbo, which suggests the company is developing enterprise software. On the company’s sparse website C3 describes itself as an “Energy and Emissions Management” company. Add the high-profile politicians (who were... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Jimmy Wales and Andrea Weckerle: Keep a Civil Cybertongue - WSJ.com - http://online.wsj.com/article...
How Algal Biofuels Lost a Decade in the Race to Replace Oil | Wired Science | Wired.com - http://www.wired.com/wiredsc...
How Algal Biofuels Lost a Decade in the Race to Replace Oil | Wired Science | Wired.com
Show all
For nearly 20 years, a government laboratory built a living, respiring library of carefully collected organisms in search of something that could grow quickly while producing something precious: oil. But now that collection has largely been lost. National Renewable Energy Laboratory scientists found and isolated around 3,000 species algae from construction ditches, seasonal desert ponds and briny mashes across the country in a major bioprospecting effort to find the best organisms to convert sunlight and carbon dioxide into fuel for cars. Despite meager funding, the Aquatic Species Program (.pdf), initiated under President Jimmy Carter, laid the scientific foundation for making diesel-like fuel from the fat that microscopic algae accumulate in their cells. Fifty-one varieties were carefully characterized as potential high-value strains, but fewer than half of those remain. “Just when they started to succeed is when the plug got pulled,” said phycologist Jeff Johansen of John Carroll... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (Vintage) - http://www.amazon.com/dp...
The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (Vintage)
Cause and effect in the "Terror War - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com - http://www.salon.com/news...
A well authored article with merit; agreed certain members of Congress would love to see the administration open another front on Al Qaeda, but I earnestly feel the President, without over reacting, had to do something in light of events that occurred on Christmas, hence the enhancing of getting the CIA involved . However, I also feel the President and Sectary Gates are smart enough not to open any more battle fronts on foreign soil. - Tom Awtry
Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up | Magazine - http://www.wired.com/magazin...
Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up | Magazine
It all started with the sound of static. In May 1964, two astronomers at Bell Labs, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, were using a radio telescope in suburban New Jersey to search the far reaches of space. Their aim was to make a detailed survey of radiation in the Milky Way, which would allow them to map those vast tracts of the universe devoid of bright stars. This meant that Penzias and Wilson needed a receiver that was exquisitely sensitive, able to eavesdrop on all the emptiness. And so they had retrofitted an old radio telescope, installing amplifiers and a calibration system to make the signals coming from space just a little bit louder. But they made the scope too sensitive. Whenever Penzias and Wilson aimed their dish at the sky, they picked up a persistent background noise, a static that interfered with all of their observations. It was an incredibly annoying technical problem, like listening to a radio station that keeps cutting out. At first, they assumed the noise was... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Goodbye to those we lost in 2009 || OnlineAthens.com - http://www.onlineathens.com/stories...
Goodbye to those we lost in 2009 || OnlineAthens.com
From the businessmen who clothed and fed us, to the politicians who led us, to the questioners who made us reconsider our own conscience - we recognized their loss by remembering what they gave us - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook