“Thought: for a social media site to be successful in the mainstream, it needs to offer something to non-participants - FriendFeed looks like chaos, Digg/Reddit/Newsvine make immediate sense even to non-users”
September 16 at 8:36 pm
- Link
Elliott Ng, Daniel Falk, Aviv and 2 other people liked this
mmm, for non-participant, twitter and friendfeed indeed looks like chaos. Once you see someone's personal feed though, structure arises, and then friendfeed becomes actually quite structured: his linkedin profile, blogging activity, etc.. I do agree that the examples you give, like digg, reddit, etc are more clear at first glance for a non-participant, because they are dedicated to 1 thing like social bookmarking and their front page gives an overview of what is hottest at the moment, while ff and twitter offer a public timeline that is basically gibberish, even for participant. - Nick Boucart










