Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
opengoverment_#bct09

opengoverment_#bct09

Virtual event group/room for topics related to open government, main group here: http://friendfeed.com/barcamp...
Marcus Povey
Thanks all for attending this evening, I hope you found it enjoyable! I hope at least some of you can attend on Sunday - virtually or otherwise! Please feel free to continue the discussion here, and please blog/tweet your experience!
Sylwia Presley
I will say good night and head off, but if you feel like talking, please continue anytime - let's keep the good thoughts coming:)
Rich
I'd like to ask a question about adapting Number 10 petitions - http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/faq At the moment the petitions are a list and number of people signed. Could this be still subject based and more split by constituency, linked to MP actions, and therefore see how much representatives represent? Interesting, or more surveillance?
That could be interesting, and I suspect that this could be done since it asks you to list your postcode (and thus pinpointing you down to about 3-10 houses). The idea of petitioning bothers me somewhat tho... the idea that it makes most people feel like they're doing something so they don't do anything further... takes the edge off. ~3M people marched on london against the war and the govt still went to war... if they don't want to listen they won't. - Marcus Povey
You should note that they are No10 petitions, so you are only writing to the PM. So in a sense the constituency is irrelevant. - Chris Rimmer
I know that Tom Steinberg of MySociety has defended the site by saying that he believes getting people involved even in a small way is a step in the right direction. To be fair, the road pricing petition did make a difference. Other than that though, it mostly acts as a way for the PM to spam you with a "thanks for your petition, but here's why I'm ignoring it" email. - Chris Rimmer
What's a fair number of signatures for a petition to be considered passed/ rejected? Is it still a decision based on the personal judgement of a few at No 10 at the end of the day? - Kedar Iyer
Seems they only take notice if you can get a million people! - Chris Rimmer
@chris I agree that getting people involved even if its in a small way... but I do find the "this is why we're ignoring you" emails somewhat de-motivational... Re road pricing, there is a fair amount of evidence that this idea was never going to be implemented... seems to be a reoccuring tactic to table several options (through leaks or whatever) and see which draws the most flak... - Marcus Povey
By a petition being split by constituency you put the emphasis both on your MP and Number 10. If you link it to mysociety website reporting on MP records and actions this becomes not just a way to see what your MP is doing, but commenting on what actions you would like them to take. You can also see local support rather than national, which could motivate local discussion - Rich
That does sound good, but a step change from the No10 petition site. More like Hear From Your MP: http://www.mysociety.org/project... - Chris Rimmer
Kedar Iyer
This is a discussion that deserves a participant from the government. Is someone, say from the local council in Oxford going to attend on Sunday?
we hoped so, Marcus? - Sylwia Presley
I really really hope so, many have been invited but generally I have had polite refusals... Libdems seemed quite accommodating and hopefully one of their councillors will be along, Labour and Conservatives can't make it themselves but have passed it on to their colleagues. Others including the more applicable NGOs have not responded... currently I think we suffer from being a bit of an unknown quantity :) - Marcus Povey
The discussions from today and Sunday may help get their attention to further the conversation, hopefully. - Kedar Iyer
I really hope so, in the end it IS the field for everyone to express their point of view as well... - Sylwia Presley
More than that, I expect more than a few interesting projects will come out of this weekend... get the snowball rolling :) - Marcus Povey
It will, I'm sure. Bon Courage! :) I'm dropping on my keyboard, it's 12.30am here. Thank you all for this stimulating virtual BarCamp. I'll be back to check on the stream later. - Kedar Iyer
Please do, thank you for all your input! :) Great to have you here! - Sylwia Presley
Marcus Povey
@kedar Interesting idea, but we did rely on the honour system before and look where that got us ;) I prefer to see a distributed system... the problem as you rightly put is the difference in scale between the individual (small) and the state (huge). Same reason that your corner shop is more receptive feedback than Tesco
... and even more receptive when you add a CarrotMob http://carrotmob.org/ :) - dan
Kedar Iyer
Though the scale and complexity of participation is much greater today if governance becomes open, the values and ideals would have to be the same as they did centuries ago among tribes. Let's bring back the ethics in governance and transparency will soon follow.
yes, and no - at the moment the more governments increase their presence on-line, the more strict they become with web usage - fear? ignorance? or power drive? no idea... - Sylwia Presley
@sylwia The key idea behind democracy is balance - no one power/interest block should have overwhelming control. This makes this inefficient but then that's how democracy should be... means nobody can become tyrannical. - Marcus Povey
agree... - Sylwia Presley
I'm intrigued by this framework of four organisational forms: Tribe, Institutions, Markets, Networks (TIMN): http://twotheories.blogspot.com/2009.... As it says " each form develops into a realm, even a system of thought and action. Each form embodies a distinctive cluster of values, norms, and codes of conduct.Each form’s rise spells an ideational and structural revolution." - dan
Kedar Iyer
@marcus Government today is no longer a system where village elders sat around a tree to solve the problems of the entire village, politics is not a noble profession meant to serve the interests of people. The web can also be used to bring the government back to its people. Toppling regimes, changing leaders, implementing reforms along the way.
I agree with you whole heartedly... so how do we bring that control back to where it belongs? Data to see what your government is up to and the tools to analyse it would be a start. If we say "we want more democracy and transparency" and they say "err... no, I don't think so".. what do we do then? - Marcus Povey
Starting bottom up maybe? Electing local leaders that demonstrate the values needed for new governance? - Kedar Iyer
or people who understand the ethics of the web and the mechanisms behind it?;) - Sylwia Presley
Bottom up, yes. Perhaps though, circumventing the idea altogether? I don't need to be governed... could having the information and tools at our fingertips lead to greater engagement and democracy? I'm just reminded of the truism: Whoever you vote for, the government gets in. Its a monopoly on power, and a monopoly is always bad... - Marcus Povey
@sylwia .. then you just elevate another group of elites up in their place... power should be distributed, and tools and information made available to everyone for that purpose. Witness the good work mysociety are doing, also scoresonthedoors etc - Marcus Povey
I see, thx:) - Sylwia Presley
The fundamental problem with government policy is 1 rule for all, but the technology offers personalization. So, if we can change governance to make it personal for every citizen/ resident then Marcus' point about self governance comes into effect. - Kedar Iyer
Hello All. This is Richard. I met Marcus at Oxford Geek night. I study communication and development, worked for NGOs, participation, a newbie geek wannabee. I like playing pool. I hope OK to introduce myself here as it seems the active thread? - Rich
How does technology offer personalisation of governance? Can you explain? Do you mean more local governments, or no government? or .... - Rich
Hi Richard, glad to have you join. This discussion is getting more interesting. :) In my earlier comment I was responding to Marcus' idea of, do I need to be governed? I was highlighting the contrast between governance and technology in that, the former does not allow for personalization, but the latter does. So, how can we use technology to reform governance so that it is no longer one rule for all, but can embrace individual governance of some sort. - Kedar Iyer
Hi Rich, good to see you on here! I do wonder tho... even if it's individually personalised, its still government governing you? - Marcus Povey
if governance is personalised, is it governance at all? It is hard to see how you can personalise things such as Human rights, amount of tax to pay, etc. But I can see stronger more localised governance being helped by technology? also any type of governance having more 'input' from more people. - Rich
Not just input - scrutiny and accountability (which comes from the former) - Marcus Povey
exactly. and accountability would have teeth if citizens could be more active in governance, have time to be more active, want to be more active, know how to be more active - Rich
Which brings us back to having the tools and the data... - Marcus Povey
I think it is also the opportunity. I think people have less and less time to actually participate in government, even activism. That is why activism has in some way become professional and paid career. Tools and data are essential, but so is opportunity, and incentive that something will actual change. A system that makes participation natural rather than a massive effort except for ever few years I tick the box of the the person I dislike the least :) - Rich
The first step towards personalization is in governance becoming more participatory i.e. citizens becoming more active as Rich put it. Decision making can be crowd sourced by laying the facts for people to comment and critique per Marcus. - Kedar Iyer
I agree with Rich. An incentive to participate is needed, the promise of change isn't always enough for the masses. - Kedar Iyer
Having said that though, examples of change, however small can help more people see the benefits of their contribution. - Kedar Iyer
I think to a certain extent in the UK the critique is already there, except there is little trust in the critique, or what is being critiqued. The critique is also sometimes empty - yes I know this is shit, but it is too hard to change. At the moment in the UK, the incentive to compete is stronger than anything else - for housing, money, jobs, food, status, voice, political opinion,... more... - Rich
Glad you bring up collaboration as the new way forward over competition. Governance in isolation cannot change, as businesses and the economy start to remodel around collaboration governance for such a system will incentivize participation over passive consumption. - Kedar Iyer
It would be nice to see more people taking control and DIYing it. Its easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission afterall, and who are the government if not just people... I like things like Brighton's peer to pier, or FixMyStreet as examples of really useful tools and infrastructure set up by individual innovators - Marcus Povey
At social innovation camp we try to catalyst that kind of innovation; using the web to reorganise the world one problem at a time (& without asking permission :) http://www.sicamp.org/ - dan
Kedar Iyer
@Sylwia The reasons as you've highlighted are all of the below, fear, ignorance, power, control, etc, don't you think? The web doesn't support any of these principles leading to a disconnect between the medium and reasons for using it. If government chooses to use a medium, it's values should be aligned too. Think Iran, China, UAE, etc
I would like to see less paranoia. State seems to want to control everything, but this is at odds to engagement. Most adults are fairly sensible, we should treat them as such - Marcus Povey
OK, remember when we talked about it during BarcampUAE - more understanding is needed from users, incl government - but if they learn the rules, will they actually follow them? And what is there to stop restrictions? - Sylwia Presley
I agree with Marcus - but is it always paranoia, or using paranoia as excuse? (ah, I start speculating already:/) - Sylwia Presley
Distribution and transparency. The system is distributed with many eyes checking things over and cross-referencing - sure there can still be abuse, but the wiggle room is somewhat less. - Marcus Povey
Yes, distribution is a good way forward as it decentralizes control and flattens traditional hierarchy in governance. - Kedar Iyer
how is it in your country, Kedar? is state ready to let it go and stop controlling (social) media? - Sylwia Presley
UAE is a bad example, but I can speak for the change happening in India. Even in a country which suffers from corrupt govt. officials, there is progress, one politician at a time. Shashi Tharoor, Minister of External Affairs is setting an example by listening to the people of his constituency and bringing transparency into his department. - Kedar Iyer
he must be facing criticism from his own colleges, no? - Sylwia Presley
In Shashi's case, he is the boss in his ministry, so guess the others don't have a choice but to participate. :) Isn't the biggest hurdle to get a politician to take the first leap into this space, because once he/ she does the benefits are overwhelmingly evident? - Kedar Iyer
truth, i am glad to hear this is happening. but what is not? do you try to change each person? - Sylwia Presley
I don't know the exact numbers, but let's say there is 1 government leader for every 100k people today. So, that's 1000 leaders for a country of 10M. How hard is it to change the 1000 leaders? I think it's easy, right? - Kedar Iyer
sorry, country size should be 100M for 1000 leaders ;) - Kedar Iyer
it is.:) - Sylwia Presley
So, who are going to change first? ;) - Kedar Iyer
I personally would change the general perception, the public; educate the crowds and choose right leaders - or force the existing ones to accept the change - but I think it's utopia... - Sylwia Presley
I agree, it's harder to make the existing generation to change radically. As the old gen. leaves the system, the new ones will be the change. - Kedar Iyer
Sylwia Presley
what do you think about recent cases of suggested web usage restrictions or monitoring of social media presence in the UK, bloggers strike in Italy because of this, the proposal for EU telecoms package? it seems to me that we tend to think about non-European countries facing challenges, but in the meantime here restrictions begin. why?
Distraction and the "couldn't happen here" mentality... that and the paranoid control-freakery .... - Marcus Povey
I agree with the first part - we assume too much of our democracies... - Sylwia Presley
Gordon Brown talked out collective problem solving for humanity at TED, has he started implementing steps to make that happen in UK? - Kedar Iyer
Gordon Brown is about as top-down as they come. If you wanted to go see him give that speech in Oxford you'd have to spend $4500 and fill out a form explaining why you were worthy. - Chris Rimmer
Look out for littleted next year eh? ;) ... but yes, the idea that everything is top down is pretty much endemic in the idea of government... innovation providing you do what we want you to do. Its middle management syndrome.. like middle managers, if they're doing their job right nobody should even notice that they exist. Which is fine if they weren't in it to be personalities and get on the lecture circuit... - Marcus Povey
Marcus Povey
Greetings, I will be one of your moderators for this evening! Don't forget all the other channels can be found at: http://friendfeed.com/ff-bct0... http://friendfeed.com/ff-bct0... http://friendfeed.com/ff-bct0...
Kedar Iyer
Hello there, I'm tempted to begin at the origin of governance. The current trend can be likened to tribal governance, a participatory system with a leader consulting members of his tribe for solutions to problems. As tribes got larger, their management got more disconnected from the common member due to the lack of 1-to-1 communication tools.
Alejandro Ribo
Now it was me who was quiet.Following up from your definition.There is the WHOM question of transparency and open government: by whom (who should open it), to whom (who should have access to what) and for whom (why should be opening and who should benefit from it). Often we use the term "citizen" as a real entity,but it means too much and nothing
Marcus Povey
@alejandro Open government is the idea that all levels of government should be open to public scrutiny and oversight. So that has a lot to do with transparency as you might imagine and we want to discuss practical ways of facilitating this, providing tools to make the process easier for the citizen and giving less wiggle room to the government ;)
Marcus Povey
Welcome in the space dedicated to Barcamp Transparency virtual event (24th July) - this site is focusing mainly on Open Government and I will be moderating the discussion here. I hope you grabbed your ticket, if not, do it here: http://barcamptransparencyuk.eventbrite.com/
Sylwia Presley
I am sorry, Alejandro, for being quiet:) Marcus will moderate this space, so I will ask him to keep an eye on it. Thank you for starting the discussion:) Good to see you here:)
Alejandro Ribo
hi, this is probably the first post of this room on opengov. Welcome to everybody. I don't know if there is a moderator, or if we need one. In any case, let me start with a question: short definition of open government (less than a paragraph)?
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook