@susantran < Report regarding Kadyrbayev "Rule 11" hearing today. "Azamat Tazhayakov's brother left court saying only his brother, who was convicted last month, is doing ok." <7News Here you see Sharon D'Angelo AKA Erika Brannock with her friend Hao. Last pic 7News
Kadyrbayev per the news and the case docket is schedule for a 2 PM Rule 11 Hearing on 8/21/2014 NO WHERE ON THE COURTS MASTER DOCKET IS THIS ADDRESSED. I included the most recent criminal docket and Master Docket today's & one from 15th < search term "Rule 11" you will see such an event belongs on the all recent orders master docket.
A search for Dzhokhar Anzorovich Tsarnaev "Jahar" with the federal inmate locator system has never found him to be in custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) by his given name or AKA in the court records. http://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... provides a bogus register number.
After the 9/23/2013 status conference, Dkt #100, a procedural order, regarding sealed motions was rendered. The order did not make it to the all recent orders docket. Included "The order will state the reason(s) for grant or denial." re: sealed motions. The Criminal Justice Act (CJA) was cited at the status conference in relation no. sealed motions
This graphic is in re to the corrupt judicial assignment. After the fraudulent continuance regarding the indictment, an indictment came forth on 6/27/2013. They put the Magistrate Case
Number on the Indictment and Clerk Staff assigned US District Judge O'Toole; then they immediately referred the case right back to Magistrate Judge.
3 10 2014 Motion to Withdraw in another case by Conrad so you can compare to document properties http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u.... Note that no CJA 20 filing was ever made in regards to Conrad, Fick or Watkins. Only legally deficient CJA 30 for Clarke & Bruck = FAKE CASE
Appointment of Attorney Bruck was hopeful but it appears to be a fraudulent order. Note the CJA 30 form was slid onto the criminal docket but is not found on the activity docket. The form is BOGUS just as the CJA 30 form re: Clarke was bogus, neither, have been signed by a Judge AS REQUIRED & Bruck's says sub for federal defender.
Magistrate Judge Bowler who took assignment of this case from its initiation had no authority to appoint Judy Clarke, WHO WOULD HAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE, per the US Courts Vol 7 Defender Services. No wonder dkt. 15 never made it to the Court's ALL RECENT ORDERS DOCKET and the Electronic Pro Hac Vice ORDER had no Dkt. #
Finally phony "defense" filings regarding the leaks by the government. It only took them a little over a year to address this ongoing issue. Perhaps they are reading all about Summer Shack and Borderfree so the need to ensure all blame falls on those with impunity has intensified. Latest filings posted. http://friendfeed.com/0p6dsum...
Latest filings and truly unbelievable. Filing undersigned Clarke has an attachment that is a declaration. The party providing declaration signed /s/ INVALID ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE there is no declaration and whomever the corrupt person was that wrote the body of the doc wrote the declaration. The government didn't even bother to sign proposed sched
SEALED orders, motions to enlarge time, notice regarding EX PARTE submission of Todashev items for in camera review etc. Motion by Fick appears to have come from the FPD Office. I can't keep up with these criminals. Not all the orders made it to the all recent orders docket. Posted for your review Activity docket and ALL recent orders master
Latest criminal docket posted. Another ORDER that is not sealed allowing a sealed motion is once again unavailable to the public in violation of the court's own orders in fraudulent Dkt. #100. The enlargement of time as requested with a joint motion undersigned and filed by Conrad but actually drafted at the DOJ in DC was Granted.
Latest docket for the three boys captured by the corrupt US Government via the Corrupt Massachusetts FBI. The charges need dismissed and they should sue; only all relief should come from the pockets of the corrupt in this gov not the taxpayer. It looks like defense attorneys fighting the fight!! Somebody should inform them Campbell #Alive
These corrupt people are not even trying to hide the corruption. This joint motion supposedly entered by Conrad has the same properties as the last 2 Defense Motion that have the NM Death Penalty case and appear to be coming from DOJ in DC. Enlargement of time requested re suppression of statements motion.
It appears that AUSA Warbel DC DOJ has been assisting in the fraudulent documents coming from defense where Custom properties have been noted. He must be using 2 different computers to come up with both PDF Maker 10.1 for word and PDF Maker 11 for word PDF's but using his personal word program to construct the documents http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u...
The government would like to know if Tsarnaev has plans to use a mental defect defense in these simulated proceedings where the lies and defrauding of America continue by taxpayer supported psychopaths.
4/16/2014 "show" hearing & as per usual Judge O'Toole's corrupt Deputy Clerk, Paul Lyness, entered his clerk's notes only on the case docket and not into the ALL RECENT ORDERS docket. Note the date/time the clerk note was entered on the Activity Docket then look for the same on the all recent orders - you will not find the entry!
The corruption just continues -Why would properties of last 2 defense motions contain information for John McCluskey's Grand Jury instructions re Death Penalty which is a case from the New Mexico Federal Court 1:10-cr-02734-JCH-1. No attorney in Tsarnaev case is on McCluskey's case. Is the DOJ writing the Defense motions?
Why does the court filing, supposedly entered by an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA), "NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY" have PDF properties that indicate this PDF was created from a computer inside the US District Court of Massachusetts?
Look at docket entry #247 by Judge O'Toole's corrupt Docket Clerk where he slid all the extra page motions into one entry where these documents were filed on the same day of the request without awaiting leave of the court. The motions were terminated before today's hearing and did not have the routine usual order you see with request for leave.
Note the criminal docket has a new SEALED ORDER entered 4/8; the all recent orders docket does not record this ORDER. Corrupt Docket Clerk entered the order only on the case docket - they continue to file motions by illusive attorneys not legitimately before the court. New Clarke motion 4/8/2014
Fwd: Proof that Tsarnaev criminal case in the USDC of Massachusetts is phony the column with SHA-1 is missing multiple digital stamp #'s NO NEF's which means Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) were not sent; are all the documents being created on court computers & entered directly only on the case dockets (via http://friendfeed.com/conspir...)
Strong appearance that a phony jury may be in the makings for the Tsarnaev criminal case. The corrupt US District Court of MA has an open operations manager position 3/7/2014 that has never been listed at the national US Courts employment site. New position includes oversight of jury unlike same position posted in 2011
Multiple filings supposedly by Defense-3/28/2014 yes, the properties of these documents are more than fishy and appears that Watkins and Fick are back on the case by the signature block. Will address in comments after I read them.