Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
Fraud Upon the PEOPLE

Fraud Upon the PEOPLE

Simulated Criminal Proceedings in the US District Court of Massachusetts where patsies take the fall so the government can continue DEFRAUDING AMERICA
Justice Seeker
The United States has an illegitimate government that terrorizes & defrauds its own population! It appears that foreign nationals were engaged in a Government PSYOP to first terrorize and then defraud the United States population. - Justice Seeker
keep your eyes on #Iraq #SeanHannity #Hannity was falling all over himself trying to read off his #Zionist talking points from his #Teleprompter. there must have been a lot of exclamation points because he was having trouble faking just the proper amount of outrage. #OpIraq #WorldCup #OpWorldCup #LNYHBT #KKKlannity #ANonAM #AnonFM - p01yN0Nym0u5
And the fraud carries on. More "victims" want One Fund money. Massachusetts legal community appears in on this fraud!! http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
After the 9/23/2013 status conference, Dkt #100, a procedural order, regarding sealed motions was rendered. The order did not make it to the all recent orders docket. Included "The order will state the reason(s) for grant or denial." re: sealed motions. The Criminal Justice Act (CJA) was cited at the status conference in relation no. sealed motions
Criminal Justice Act When a court appoints and supervises counsel for an indigent criminal defendant, the court is not exercising the judicial function at the core of the common-law and constitutional rights of public access.35 The Criminal Justice Act, however, affords the public a qualified right of access to information about funds spent pursuant to the Act.36 Court approval of defense expenses in appointed-counsel cases, especially expenses for services other than counsel, is usually an ex parte process so that the confidentiality of the defendant’s litigation strategy is protected.37 However, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 requires, in capital cases, a “proper showing” of a need for confidentiality to conduct ex parte proceedings concerning the approval of expenses for investigators, experts, and other service providers.38 Public disclosure of appointed-counsel expenses is often delayed until after judicial proceedings pertaining to the case are completed.39 - Justice Seeker
Open the Sealing_Guide for the case law in the foot notes. Generally, such information [pertaining to activities under the Criminal Justice Act and related statutes] which is not otherwise routinely available to the public should be made available unless it is judicially placed under seal, or could reasonably be expected to unduly intrude upon the privacy of attorneys or defendants;... more... - Justice Seeker
At this point the case docket reflects 54 missing docket numbers, two SEALED ORDERS, 14 Granted sealed motions to seal, 10 Granted Sealed Motions where the document is either not available after the link is clicked or the orders were entered with an electronic order which provides no document and most of those electronic orders provide no reasoning behind the allowed sealing. - Justice Seeker
The distinction between the rights afforded by the first amendment and those afforded by the common law is significant. A first amendment right of access can be denied only by proof of a "compelling governmental interest" and proof that the denial is "narrowly tailored to serve that interest." Globe Newspaper [Co. v. Super. Ct.], 457 U.S. [596], 606 [(1982)]. In contrast, under the... more... - Justice Seeker
No reason provided behind the sealed documents in conjunction with all the aberrations in this case from missing docket entries, to the sealed electronic order that continued time to indict that appears fraudulent now that it is public, to the hidden arrest warrant with all its peculiarities once public, to all the orders that never made it to the COURT'S ALL RECENT ORDERS DOCKET along... more... - Justice Seeker
Links to the court's ALL RECENT ORDERS DOCKET that show the 9/23/2013 "show" status conference Clerk's Notes and subsequent excludable delay order only made it as far as the case docket http://friendfeed.com/impolit... - Justice Seeker
This corrupt court running simulated proceedings continues to keep the public BLOCKED from the decisions made in the case with ORDERS regarding allowed and/or denied sealed motions unavailable to the public or entered as electronic orders leaving absent the rationale behind the rendered order; this has occurred with multiple decisions regarding sealed filings even when the ORDERS are... more... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
This graphic is in re to the corrupt judicial assignment. After the fraudulent continuance regarding the indictment, an indictment came forth on 6/27/2013. They put the Magistrate Case Number on the Indictment and Clerk Staff assigned US District Judge O'Toole; then they immediately referred the case right back to Magistrate Judge. Bowler.
8  DKT 59 60  6 27 2013 judicial assignment.png
One would think that Carmen Ortiz, US Attorney for Massachusetts, known to present in the state on the day of the indictment because she attended a news conference regarding the same, would have endorsed the indictment. This is a death penalty case that alleges an act of terror in the state of Massachusetts yet Ortiz's hand signature is not on one document pertaining to this case! - Justice Seeker
The case Activity Docket shows the actual time the orders are entered as does THE COURT'S ALL RECENT ORDERS docket. Orders on the criminal case docket/activity docket that have not been processed as legitimate orders of the court will not show up on THE COURT'S ALL RECENT ORDERS docket. To assess for legitimate orders you look at the time entered for the order on the case Activity... more... - Justice Seeker
There is a strong appearance that the fraudulent continuance on the indictment happened so that Judge O'Toole would be the drawn US District Judge when the indictment returned. - Justice Seeker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia George A. O'Toole, Jr. (born 1947) is a United States federal judge. Born in Worcester, Massachusetts, O'Toole received an A.B. from Boston College in 1969 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1972. He was in private practice in Boston, Massachusetts from 1972 to 1982. He was an Associate Justice of the Boston Municipal Court from 1982 to 1990, and... more... - Justice Seeker
This earlier entry was inadvertently deleted and now re-posted. - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
3 10 2014 Motion to Withdraw in another case by Conrad so you can compare to document properties http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u.... Note that no CJA 20 filing was ever made in regards to Conrad, Fick or Watkins. Only legally deficient CJA 30 for Clarke & Bruck = FAKE CASE
Justice Seeker
Appointment of Attorney Bruck was hopeful but it appears to be a fraudulent order. Note the CJA 30 form was slid onto the criminal docket but is not found on the activity docket. The form is BOGUS just as the CJA 30 form re: Clarke was bogus, neither, have been signed by a Judge AS REQUIRED & Bruck's says sub for federal defender.
The only attorney on the attorney sheet that has a filed Notice of Appearance, as required by local rule, is AUSA Nadine Pellegrini. Not one Defense Attorney in this case has made the required, by court rule, Notice of Appearance. RULE 83.5.2 APPEARANCES pg. 94 There was no appearance by the USA with the Complaint because the criminal Complaint was signed off by FBI Special Agent Daniel Genck and he is not an Assistant United States Attorney. http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/general... No Pro Hac Vice fees have been paid by Clarke or Bruck; Bruck does not even have an ORDER allowing him to appear Pro Hac Vice. See the bizarre docket entry by the Magistrate's Clerk regarding the ALLOWED Motion undersigned by Conrad with a request that Clarke be allowed to appear Pro Hac Vice. http://friendfeed.com/uncle-s... - Justice Seeker
I checked the GPO web site and the order that allowed the appointment of David A. Bruck is not there. I pulled up the written opinions report and it is not there either!! http://friendfeed.com/0p6djud... - Justice Seeker
If the district judge presiding over the case, or the chief judge if a district judge has not yet been assigned to the case, determines that the appointment of an attorney, who is not a member of the CJA panel, is in the interest of justice, judicial economy or continuity of representation, or there is some other compelling circumstance warranting the attorney's appointment, the... more... - Justice Seeker
If the court orders appointing these attorneys are not true orders of the court IMO someone from the clerk's office cannot sign the CJA 30 by order of the court. A true order of the court appears on the Court's All Recent Orders docket, the written opinions report and makes it way to the GPO web site where you can look up orders from the US District Court of Massachusetts. http://www.gpo.gov/ - Justice Seeker
This link will take you to the only four orders that made it to the GPO web site in this case and two of those orders are not true orders of the court because they never made it to the the Court's All Recent Opinions docket; a staff person entered them on the written opinions report to make them appear legitimate and if there they transfer to the GPO. .... more... - Justice Seeker
Activity docket as of 3/11/2014 now has the CJA 30 report - exactly when the corrupt staff of this court amended is unclear but they have had several opportunities to enter the docket with new orders coming in. - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
A search for Dzhokhar Anzorovich Tsarnaev "Jahar" with the federal inmate locator system has never found him to be in custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) by his given name or AKA in the court records. http://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... provides a bogus register number.
Devens.png
Most believe that Jahar is at Devens and base that belief on the fact that a search for Jahar's two friends that are, also, detained returns no results with the BOP locator; they have accepted the disinformation out there that has led them to believe that an inmate only shows in the system after conviction. Pre-trial Boston FEDERAL DEFENDANTS detained like Jahar's two friends usually go to a facility which is contracted with the US Marshal but they do not come up in the BOP as in custody or have a BOP register number because it is a state facility http://www.pcsdma.org/PCCF.asp This is where federal defendants stay while awaiting trial and after convicted while awaiting transport to a federal facility. Inmates in transit after convicted can not be found with the federal locator because they are not yet in a federal building; once housed in a federal BOP institution, the system will find them with a correct name AND especially if there is a known register number. This is not the case... more... - Justice Seeker
10 Prison Security Techniques Being Implemented on the American People http://www.policestateusa.com/2014... Also describes the security and monitoring that goes on in a federal prison; the federal BOP does NOT lose track of any prisoner! - Justice Seeker
His sisters said they saw him at Devens. They are either lying or they changed things up just for him. And I read about Whitey Bulger. Some are saying he is in a pen in AZ and others are claiming he is in CO....and some were saying NY. These were journalists claiming how hard it was to find him. I will try and remember where I read it. It was just a day or two ago. - Ralph Hornsby
There is a set number of days after conviction that inmates are allowed to stay in the state contracted facility; during that transition period, an inmate can not be located with the BOP locator. As I stated, the locator found Bulger at at Tucson USP. Perhaps these journalist were looking before he was a resident of his new digs. If the locator found him in different institutions at... more... - Justice Seeker
Why would National Guard be assigned to guard an inmate at Devens which is NOT a federal military prison as the article claims? http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/x115516... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Magistrate Judge Bowler who took assignment of this case from its initiation had no authority to appoint Judy Clarke, WHO WOULD HAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE, per the US Courts Vol 7 Defender Services. No wonder dkt. 15 never made it to the Court's ALL RECENT ORDERS DOCKET and the Electronic Pro Hac Vice ORDER had no Dkt. #
Part A Guidelines for Administering the CJA and Related Statutes Chapter 6: Federal Death Penalty and Capital Habeas Corpus Representations § 210.30.30 Pro Hac Vice Appointments (a)If the district judge presiding over the case, or the chief judge if a district judge has not yet been assigned to the case, determines that the appointment of an attorney, who is not a member of the CJA panel, is in the interest of justice, judicial economy or continuity of representation, or there is some other compelling circumstance warranting the attorney's appointment, the attorney may be admitted to the CJA panel pro hac vice and appointed to represent the CJA defendant. (b)Consideration for preserving the integrity of the panel selection process suggests that pro hac vice appointments should be made only in exceptional circumstances. (c)The attorney, who may or may not maintain an office in the district, should possess such qualities as would qualify the attorney for admission to the district's CJA... more... - Justice Seeker
Graphic/PDFs Above ORDER absent from Court's All Recent Orders, Conrad's Motion, Clarke's Affidavit http://friendfeed.com/impolit... The attorney already admitted to the bar of the court, i.e., Conrad (the Motion is undersigned by Conrad), files the motion for Pro Hac Vice status regarding the out of state attorney, Clarke, yet the Magistrate's Clerk entered the document as a motion by Clarke. - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Finally phony "defense" filings regarding the leaks by the government. It only took them a little over a year to address this ongoing issue. Perhaps they are reading all about Summer Shack and Borderfree so the need to ensure all blame falls on those with impunity has intensified. Latest filings posted. http://friendfeed.com/0p6dsum...
279-1.pdf 646 KB
279-2.pdf 132 KB
279-3.pdf 135 KB
279-4.pdf 298 KB
Justice Seeker
Latest filings and truly unbelievable. Filing undersigned Clarke has an attachment that is a declaration. The party providing declaration signed /s/ INVALID ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE there is no declaration and whomever the corrupt person was that wrote the body of the doc wrote the declaration. The government didn't even bother to sign proposed sched
I read the expert discovery one earlier. Who typed that? It had spaces all over in between the letters in the words. - Ralph Hornsby
Justice Seeker
SEALED orders, motions to enlarge time, notice regarding EX PARTE submission of Todashev items for in camera review etc. Motion by Fick appears to have come from the FPD Office. I can't keep up with these criminals. Not all the orders made it to the all recent orders docket. Posted for your review Activity docket and ALL recent orders master
Apparently only the judge and the criminals at the DOJ get to see the Todashev items at this point. That's if there actually is a real judge. - Justice Seeker
From what I can see there were several orders on the 24th. Not one made it to the ALL RECENT ORDERS DOCKET. There were SEALED ORDERS and one order regarding a sealed motion where, again, the court ignored its own order as per dkt. #100 and the order regarding the sealed motion remains unavailable to the public. - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Latest criminal docket posted. Another ORDER that is not sealed allowing a sealed motion is once again unavailable to the public in violation of the court's own orders in fraudulent Dkt. #100. The enlargement of time as requested with a joint motion undersigned and filed by Conrad but actually drafted at the DOJ in DC was Granted.
Justice Seeker
Latest docket for the three boys captured by the corrupt US Government via the Corrupt Massachusetts FBI. The charges need dismissed and they should sue; only all relief should come from the pockets of the corrupt in this gov not the taxpayer. It looks like defense attorneys fighting the fight!! Somebody should inform them Campbell #Alive
Justice Seeker
These corrupt people are not even trying to hide the corruption. This joint motion supposedly entered by Conrad has the same properties as the last 2 Defense Motion that have the NM Death Penalty case and appear to be coming from DOJ in DC. Enlargement of time requested re suppression of statements motion.
Justice Seeker
Large-scale fraud in US courts amounts to unannounced regime change in the United States. PACER/ECF, enabled fraud http://www.opednews.com/article... Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is a VICTIM!!
The electronic signature in the US Courts for parties filing papers into the Electronic Case File System (ECF) includes signing off the document with a simple typed signature that includes /s/ before the party’s name. Example: /s/Rule O. Law, Esq. - Justice Seeker
For the outside of the court party, the user login and password required to submit documents to the electronic filing system serve as the ECF Filer’s signature on all electronic documents filed with the court. “Authorized” court staff file (considered filed when entered) Judicial orders and “they” are, more often than not, the ones drafting the documents and typing the signature /s/Honorable Judge Whomever before entry into the ECF system. - Justice Seeker
For court staff the signature on the document is not determined by the login and password; it is determined by the courts ECF Administrative Procedures. http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinf... See page 16 and note the language “The assigned judge, chambers staff or deputy clerk shall file electronically all signed orders.” There is no guarantee in that language that the "signed orders" were upon approval of the Article III or even the Magistrate Judge. - Justice Seeker
After a document is entered into the ECF system by a party or court staff, (including ELECTRONIC ORDERS with a docket number absent a hyperlink because there will be no document [only corrupt courts render Electronic Orders without a docket number]), a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) with a digital document code automatically issues to the registered email of all who are participating... more... - Justice Seeker
The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is one of the many key factors in determining a legitimate record of the court yet is excluded from the public record. As alleged in the Tsarnaev criminal case, the staff in this court appear to be drafting documents on COURT COMPUTERS and undersigning with the names of, both, the prosecution and the Defense Counsel; the NEF's to these documents... more... - Justice Seeker
The US Courts’ electronic filing system does NOT include Judicial digital signature on ORDERS or any other court rendered documents. The peoples' lives, liberty and property have not been determined by the US Courts to be worthy of the highest level of protection; instead they instituted an electronic signature system that enabled FRAUD. There is no guarantee that a court order rendered... more... - Justice Seeker
There are dishonest attorneys standing bar in these courts, and they have insider connections; with the assistance of corrupt court staff enabled by a substandard electronic signature, dishonest attorneys, both, private practice and corrupt government can determine the outcome of any case before a simulated court! I encourage you to take a look at... more... - Justice Seeker
For high risk transactions, the only acceptable electronic form of signature is a cryptographically based digital signature created with a private cryptographic key that corresponds to the public key specified in a digital credential that is recognized by the Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) at Medium Hardware or High assurance, or by the COMMON Policy at the Common... more... - Justice Seeker
Follow links and links inside links for a look at the evidence that supports that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is being subjected to corrupt simulated criminal proceedings with the death penalty fraudulently on the table. http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u...... more... - Justice Seeker
Dr. Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (NGO) has engaged in tireless effort to bring this matter regarding the FRAUD in the US Courts to the attention of the greater mass. Please read the sample of his extensive work available at the link in the opening statement. - Justice Seeker
National Archives and Records Administration October 18, 2000 Policy and Communications Staff Office of Records Services – Washington, DC Modern Records Program Records Management Guidance for Agencies Implementing Electronic Signature Technologies Electronic signature: A technologically neutral term indicating various methods of signing an electronic message that (a) identify and... more... - Justice Seeker
The US Courts have corrupt staff! There is no guaranteed nonrepudiation in the ECF Administrative Procedures nor is nonrepudation possible by the very nature of the courts policy. We do not even have a clue as who may be under oath in this court. The docket clerk is not named in the Administrative Procedures yet he not only files orders with documents but he also enters electronic... more... - Justice Seeker
U.S. District Court Federal Magistrate Judge Issues First Digitally Signed Judicial Order http://www.safenet-inc.com/news... Now five years later the corrupt USDC of Massachusetts continues with the bogus /s/ where even the court's janitor could render a bogus judicial ORDER! smh - Justice Seeker
it may be said that the "unannounced regime change" happened with the assassination of #JFK. it has also been said that #GHWB may have been involved. #Dallas #Texas #OpWhiteHouse #OpOvalOffice #OpPOTUS #OpPOTUS44 #IAcaucus #WIunion #OWS #NWO - p01yN0Nym0u5
Justice Seeker
All the latest government motions/oppositions where these corrupt fools in the Massachusetts DOJ are responding to fraudulent Defense Motions written by a corrupt AUSA at the DC DOJ. http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u... http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u... http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u...
Justice Seeker
It appears that AUSA Warbel DC DOJ has been assisting in the fraudulent documents coming from defense where Custom properties have been noted. He must be using 2 different computers to come up with both PDF Maker 10.1 for word and PDF Maker 11 for word PDF's but using his personal word program to construct the documents http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u...
Justice Seeker
The government would like to know if Tsarnaev has plans to use a mental defect defense in these simulated proceedings where the lies and defrauding of America continue by taxpayer supported psychopaths.
Justice Seeker
Rules/Procedures of USDC Massachusetts willfully ignored to carry simulated proceedings http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/attorne... http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/general... http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinf...
It appears the court is going to alter the rules to fit their corrupt agenda where the mandatory, as denoted by "shall", "notice of appearance" for all appearances beyond the the initial complaint will no longer be required. http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/general... - Justice Seeker
COMPARE RULE 83.5.2 APPEARANCES (a) Generally. The filing of the complaint shall constitute an appearance by the attorney who signs it. All other appearances in a case shall be made by filing a notice of appearance containing the docket number of the case, name, address and telephone number of the person entering an appearance, in compliance with Rule 5.1(a)(1). (b) Appearance Pro Se. A... more... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
4/16/2014 "show" hearing & as per usual Judge O'Toole's corrupt Deputy Clerk, Paul Lyness, entered his clerk's notes only on the case docket and not into the ALL RECENT ORDERS docket. Note the date/time the clerk note was entered on the Activity Docket then look for the same on the all recent orders - you will not find the entry!
Justice Seeker
Defense motions to order government to comply with automatic discovery obligations DENIED in simulated death penalty case where the Defense motions are actually coming from the DC DOJ and are drafted by Assistant US Attorneys http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u... http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u... http://friendfeed.com/fraud-u...
This order is a joke and clearly some fool in that court has a computer that produces PDF's with the properties that look the same as PDF's directly from a US District Judge's computer. IMO the order is so pathetic it is an Impeachable Offense. Well over 70 pages on motions and oppositions in regards to the matter in this order which was "taken under advisement" per the bogus clerk's notes at the hearing. A little over 24 hours later, where O'Toole has been noted to take even up to a year when he says he will take a matter under advisement, this ORDER has not one cited case law or interpretation thereof to validate the DENIED motions regarding the fake Defenses' Motions to compel the corrupt prosecutions' compliance with automatic discovery rules. - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Government Defrauding America Letter to ACLU-MA USDC Massachusetts with evidence of Simulated Criminal Proceedings in the Case Re the Defendant Charged With the Boston Bombing
Published by tired_of_corruption ACLU Notified United States District Court of Massachusetts is DEFRAUDING AMERICA http://www.scribd.com/doc... UPDATE; The last two Defense motions have revealed that any defense motions with custom tracking data are coming from the DOJ in DC and likely drafted by an AUSA Named Michael Warbel who represented the USA in the death penalty case 1:10-cr-02734-JCH-1 USA v. McCluskey et al in the New Mexico Federal Court! http://ff.im/1hbxXO http://ff.im/1hbEUa Is the US Congress ignoring complaints of corruption in the US Courts so they can later engage the corrupt public servants in these courts in carrying the governments' agenda that will further oppress the US population while bringing benefit to themselves and the Military Industrial Complex? Is the future of America going to be just general acceptance that we no longer have a legitimate justice system where the... more... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
The corruption just continues -Why would properties of last 2 defense motions contain information for John McCluskey's Grand Jury instructions re Death Penalty which is a case from the New Mexico Federal Court 1:10-cr-02734-JCH-1. No attorney in Tsarnaev case is on McCluskey's case. Is the DOJ writing the Defense motions?
Michael as noted Author: in the properties of the PDF's with documents undersigned by Conrad and Clarke is an AUSA in DC who represents the USA in the John McCluskey case http://ff.im/1hbEUa Michael S Warbel U.S. Department of Justice 1331 F. Street NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 514-5605 202-353-9779 (fax) Michael.Warbel@usdoj.gov - Justice Seeker
https://pbs.twimg.com/media... Open the PDF to Conrad and Clarke's motions and see for yourselves. Right click to view properties once PDF is open. - Justice Seeker
The case was investigated by Albuquerque and Phoenix Divisions of the FBI and the New Mexico State Police. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Linda Mott and Gregory J. Fouratt of the District of New Mexico and Trial Attorney Michael S. Warbel of the Criminal Division’s Capital Case Section. http://www.justice.gov/opa... - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Why does the court filing, supposedly entered by an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA), "NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY" have PDF properties that indicate this PDF was created from a computer inside the US District Court of Massachusetts?
You will note that the supposed latest motion (dkt. #208) purportedly by Judy Clarke filed late Friday 2/28/2014 includes Attorney Bruck in the signature blocks. First, the motion IS NOT BY JUDY CLARKE - 2nd, Bruck has not been issued a may proceed pro hac vice order nor has he made an appearance in the case. They are manipulating the properties of the PDF's to reflect what they want the public to believe. Remember motion Dkt. #154 undersigned by attorney Watkins had Clarke as the author in the properties of the PDF and there was tracking data under the Custom selection; the document appears to have come from a court computer. There is strong evidence in the court records that indicates bogus filings supposedly by the prosecution and defense counsel are coming from computers inside the court including the notice of intent to seek the death penalty (dkt #167) supposedly entered into the ECF by AUSA Pellegrini. Dkt. #180 (unable to assess origin because it is scanned) & dkt #208 appear... more... - Justice Seeker
Further, the LAW requires that the notice be signed by the attorney for the government, meaning Carmen Ortiz not /s/minion such as AUSA Pellegrini. 18 U.S. Code § 3593 - Special hearing to determine whether a sentence of death is justified (a) Notice by the Government.— If, in a case involving an offense described in section 3591, the attorney for the government believes that the... more... - Justice Seeker
Remember these are the people that caused the death of Aaron Swartz with trumped up computer fraud charges piled high. Apparently a government job and a law degree means you can break any law you want including the furtherance of a criminal conspiracy that INVOLVED murder and TREASON. - Justice Seeker
Aaron Swartz was working on a story about a global porn ring. Somehow Eric Holder is involved in it. Protecting the elite perverts or maybe something worse. Carmen Ortiz was getting tired of covering for him and they are telling him he needs to go...before the Tsarnaev 'trial' starts. - Ralph Hornsby
Note the properties of this PDF by #JackPirozzolo which is a legitimate filing by DOJ AUSA; there is no data under the custom selection in DOJ AUSA PDFs entered into the ECF system. http://ia600504.us.archive.org/29... Having few death penalty cases in the USDC of Massachusetts, they used the Gary Sampson case, in which Conrad... more... - Justice Seeker
UPDATE- VERIFIED motions undersigned by Bruck & Clarke and a few undersigned by Fick, Conrad and Watkins are being drafted by a DC DOJ AUSA see http://ff.im/1hbxXO http://ff.im/1hbEUa - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Look at docket entry #247 by Judge O'Toole's corrupt Docket Clerk where he slid all the extra page motions into one entry where these documents were filed on the same day of the request without awaiting leave of the court. The motions were terminated before today's hearing and did not have the routine usual order you see with request for leave.
USUAL ORDER WOULD APPEAR >Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting (dkt # x y z) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. as to Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev (1) (Danieli, Chris) - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Note the criminal docket has a new SEALED ORDER entered 4/8; the all recent orders docket does not record this ORDER. Corrupt Docket Clerk entered the order only on the case docket - they continue to file motions by illusive attorneys not legitimately before the court. New Clarke motion 4/8/2014
Justice Seeker
Fwd: Proof that Tsarnaev criminal case in the USDC of Massachusetts is phony the column with SHA-1 is missing multiple digital stamp #'s NO NEF's which means Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) were not sent; are all the documents being created on court computers & entered directly only on the case dockets (via http://friendfeed.com/conspir...)
Justice Seeker
Strong appearance that a phony jury may be in the makings for the Tsarnaev criminal case. The corrupt US District Court of MA has an open operations manager position 3/7/2014 that has never been listed at the national US Courts employment site. New position includes oversight of jury unlike same position posted in 2011
3 27 2014 no op manger position.png
The position as of 4/1/2014 removed from the USDC MA employment page; it was NEVER listed at US Courts SEARCH JOB VACANCIES. http://www.uscourts.gov/Careers... 3/31/2014 Conrad's pro hac vice motion was filed/entered by an operations manager which rendered Conrad's electronic signature illegitimate . OPERATIONS & DATA QUALITY Craig Nicewicz, 8-9161 Deputy Assistant Operations Manager http://www.linkedin.com/pub... It is more than apparent that this position has now been filled for the purpose of corruption! - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
Multiple filings supposedly by Defense-3/28/2014 yes, the properties of these documents are more than fishy and appears that Watkins and Fick are back on the case by the signature block. Will address in comments after I read them.
These are BOGUS! JUST NOT HOW IT WORKS. I don't know what game they are playing on the taxpayers back but we have dkt 233 undersigned /s/ David I. Bruck and the certificate of service was by Conrad. Bruck has no order by the court regarding pro hac vice status - he has made no appearance in the case and it is mandatory electronic filing in this court unless submitting an ex parte/ sealed motion, Watkins filing has Judy Clarke as the author and the documents, including this one, all look like they came from court computers. Compare properties dkt 232 exhibit 3 from an Illinois US Court; that appears to be a legitimate document by a law clerk where it appears she names her school under custom and approved by the Judge. - Justice Seeker
Entered: 05/02/2013 09:39:12 Filed: 05/02/2013 Category: order Event: Order on Motion for Leave to Appear M. Bowler Type: jud Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (1). (Bowler, Marianne) [1:13-mj-02106-MBB] - Justice Seeker
Above is the BOGUS pro hac vice order for Clarke that had no docket number. Below is a legitimate pro hac vice order. - Justice Seeker
03/28/2014 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Francis M. Jackson. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Moore, Kellyann) (Entered: 03/28/2014) - Justice Seeker
In the above order and ALL pro hac vice orders the language regarding must register is IN RED! - Justice Seeker
Interesting that dkt #232 exhibit 1 has "Judy" as the author and totally different computer properties than where "Judy Clarke" appears as the author, again, in a filing by Watkins. Even more interesting is that a New York Times publication is being used as an exhibit to make their point. We have documents that now have the author as Customize Profile and W & L under custom. see http://ff.im/1gohPF - Justice Seeker
In a word "BIZARRE" - Justice Seeker
AGAIN, For the outside of the court party, the user login and password required to submit documents to the electronic filing system serve as the ECF Filer’s signature on all electronic documents filed with the court. “ There is no legal filing with a legal signature of David Bruck in these Friday, otherwise known as propaganda day, 3/28/2014 filings. - Justice Seeker
A bogus order granting leave to file pro hac vice for Attorney Bruck today. The motion came from attorney Conrad with her /s/ signature but was entered by one of the clerks of the court into the Electronic Filing System which renders the /s/signature invalid as the person who signs with the /s/ has to enter the motion into the ECF or hand sign the document if submitted directly to the... more... - Justice Seeker
Here we have the person who filed/entered Conrad's pro hac vice motion today where his doing so rendered Conrad's electronic signature illegitimate . OPERATIONS & DATA QUALITY Craig Nicewicz, 8-9161 Deputy Assistant Operations Manager see http://ff.im/1gFtOJ - Justice Seeker
Justice Seeker
A motion undersigned by Watkins 20 pages -MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH AUTOMATIC DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS contains a direct request that court order the government to turn over multiple pieces of evidence including 1200 items that underwent forensic analysis from Watertown
Justice Seeker
Attorney Bruck seems to have a rather thin federal court history. Fed Court Hx-I viewed ten. I thought would find a filing by Bruck; I saw Petitions for Habeus Corpus, Stay of Execution, a suit against Attorney Bruck by an inmate that was dismissed; appears Bruck then advocated for him in State Supreme Court. No filings by Bruck in any case.
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook