Gabor Cselle
Create an account or sign in to get started
Show: Comments - Likes - Both
LinkedIn
Jared Jacobs updated their job title on LinkedIn
September 1 at 1:02 pm - Link
Congrats! Why'd you leave the goog? - Gabor Cselle
Hmm, Pascal-Louis is there too, right? You guys will be a JS compiler power-house :) - Mihai Parparita
I've decided that I prefer small companies, and this one sounded exciting. - Jared Jacobs
Yes, Pascal's here. Mike Tsao too. And a couple others I've come to respect quickly. With any luck you'll hear about us in the news by the end of the year! :) - Jared Jacobs
Good luck! - Sanjeev Singh
Twitter
Neha Narula posted a message on Twitter
Blog
Gabor Cselle posted an entry on Gabor's Blog
July 23 at 2:11 pm - Link
Wow, the news is out. Exciting times! - Gabor Cselle
FriendFeed
Paul Buchheit posted a message
“How long does it take to develop a "good" product? Google search took at least 3 years (1996-1999) and Gmail was about 2.5 years (2001-2004). How about others?”
July 18 at 2:01 am - Link
how long did FriendFeed take? - Jamie
I'm guessing that the iPhone was under development for at least several years before 1.0 was released. FriendFeed is less than a year old -- I bet that it will be a lot better when it is two years old. - Paul Buchheit
But as you know well, Gmail have got quite many updates after that (but most of them could be counted as minor fixes probably). Just saying that product is good only if it's been maintained. ;) - Daniel Schildt
Does good mean, good enough to go live? I'm a little confused by how good is evaluated. Our hotels meta-search product (wego.com/hotels) has been around for about 2 years now, but we did a re-write a couple of months and it's much much better than before, but still don't know whether it compares to GMail's 2004 level of goodness, or Google's 1999 level of goodness. - arunthampi
Yes, of course good products must continue to improve. The Google of 1999 wasn't very good by today's standards either. It only searched about 70 million pages, for example (vs maybe 20 billion now). - Paul Buchheit
arunthampi, I'm thinking of products that will stand out and have significant impact on the world. - Paul Buchheit
FriendFeed have been under development for just little bit of time but considering that amount it has gone greatly forward. I wish it will develop to even more advanced (but still usable) tool for keeping persons updated without too much of information flow. I wish there would be more features for filtering of information that user could set and control from settings. - Daniel Schildt
Not sure how long Evan was working on identica prior to launch but I am absolutely staggered and amazed how far identi.ca has come in what must be less than 6 months.” - Andy C
2-3 years. Based on Moore's law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... - Igor Poltavskiy
I started eventseer.net 9 years ago, but it wasn´t until recently it became good (after Thomas took over 3 years ago). - Amund Tveit
Habari has been in development for about 18 months. It's a "good product" now (though with pretty low market penetration :) but it will be a lot better in a year. - Michael C. Harris
I think the iPhone was under (serious) development for 3 years prior to its launch last June. - Jamie
@Paul, ah in terms of significant impact, maybe we don't measure up (as yet) but im guessing that will happen very soon :) - arunthampi
It depends on what you mean by "good product". Good for lead users? Good for a distinct social milieu? Good for the masses? Also I believe it is very hard to tell when a product has been finished. Gmail 2010 won't be the same as Gmail 2008. - Benedikt Koehler
"Good to use" is not universal since different people have different need and for some of them, tool can be always difficult to use. - Daniel Schildt
Software is generally asymptotic to good, (isn't it?) because as software gets better it attracts more users, each of whom has a slightly different definition of "good". But some more random examples: Windows 1 -> Windows 3 == 5 years; Unix 1969 -> 1985 (by which time it was clear it was dominating workstations except for DEC); Linux on the desktop 1991 -> 2007 (Ubuntu 7); Mozilla/Firefox 1998->2005. It's pretty clear that web software matures quicker than desktop. - Nick Lothian
if you write software you should consider your users as BORC, not those weak dumb individualistic humans. that way you write software that fulfills needs. the more streamlined your BORG can do it the better. leave the task to make pretty buttons to the designers. the last step would be to imagine a human again and make your software human/error-proof. - krz9000
It looks like the incandescent light bulb was around for 75 years before it was commercialize-able: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I... - Clare Dibble
Game development is about 2-3 years but not sure if there's much correlation of development time to quality. - Chris Bentzel
Human brain software takes 2–3 years before it is able to reasonably control its host human. - Amit Patel
how long does it take for a good product to go bad or rot? Why do some products still remain relevant after many years? - Shakeel Mahate
The first fax machine was sold in 1861. - seth
I heard Writely was built and sold (to Google) in 10 months - Stewart Rogers
Interesting question, but I can't answer it because I can't figure out how long anything has been in development other than by the community of people who are working on it, but then I can't correct for the bakedness of ideas when a community starts. And then I'm not sure which of the ideas in the bundle that is a product was really important to its success. Hmm. - Daniel Dulitz
Products are so different from each other, it doesn't always make sense to compare them. Products that are built on existing technology usually take less time than those built from scratch. The reality is usually a gradient between the two extremes. Consumer electronics often take longer than other products because of the difficulty developing, testing, and certification of hardware, as well as having physical alpha and beta testing of the software. - Chris White
@ seth Sadly, the first fax spam came in 8 minutes later from a travel agent offering a package to Hawaii. - Brian Norwood
The original version of WebTV was built within one year. I refuse to ever work that hard again. :) - Chris White
I think it's a question that can be answered historically, if you look at the time from when a group of people commit themselves to the realization of some idea, to the time when a similar group with a similar idea make an impact on the world. The answer for software *seems* to be 2-3 years, much of which is spent fumbling around in an unfamiliar space. For new drugs or new modes of transportation or new paradigms in visual art or whatever the time is different, and there's a lot of variance in any case. - ⓞnor
based on the startups i've seen over the years, 1 yr to prove the concept and 2 yrs to fully launch first "stable" iteration, then improvements from there on out to succeed (definition of success differs based on model/plan) - that'd be my swag of it... - mike "glemak" dunn
I like this topic Paul -- don't see it delved into all that much, at least in places that I tend to keep my eyes on - Eric Berlin
great topic.. longevity is key to successful product. if you are working on something new (not a copy of something else), you got to factor in some iteration time as well. It's interesting that many here are coming out at the same 2-3 year time frame - i agree also - Travis Parsons
I've been PM for an enterprise software suite for 8+ years now and it's taken that long for it to mature to the point where large corporate customers around the globe are deploying it for mission critical applications. We've gone through 4 major releases and countless minor/dot releases in that time. This is technology that originally was developed by a startup back in the 1996-2000 timeframe that was bought and sold via M&A activity 3 times in just over 8 years. - Brian Daniel Eisenberg
“software is lettuce, not gold” (Brian Behlendorf) so perhaps it's never good.. particularly if you are marketing guy facing ever-changing competition - Travis Parsons
I'd say 2-3 years easily, just to get real traction and work out the kinks before the product really starts to mature (if it's any good to start with). If you're out too early and it stinks and everyone bails on it, what's the point? (Case study: Friendster.) - Brandon Uttley
somewhere between 3 days and 3 years - Gabe Ragland
Varies. You can nail it first time (rare) or you can work toward it from a decent base. The latter generally happens in the 2-3 year range. If it takes longer nobody adopts it unless they have to (or if they can change it). - xero
it depends on the company ( big, small or a startup) usually when big/established companies trie to build a product in a market which already has competitors, they try to make it game-changing (a.l.a iphone), or differntiate it ( gmail ) and this means spending sometime on the product to get it right and better. Also, big companies have the advantage of scale means they will have a user base that's willing to try their product out... This could also be a disadvantage, as they would need to worry about all the issues beforehand. That's the reason Google worries about scalability, Microsoft spends months to years testing their operating systems... I guess its different with startups.. how long did it take to build a youtube or a flickr or even a friendfeed ? Months ? Most of the consumer software startups work on their product for a few months and then put it out and iterate over it. - Krishna Gade
Until it's ready. Sort of like toasting a piece of bread. - Ryan Massie
Seems to me like it should be possible to develop software of low complexity in less than the 2-3 year range cited here. For example, Reddit was developed pretty quickly (3 months?), and Twitter must have taken only a few weeks. Of course, once that's successfull, you need to iterate and scale, but that's another topic I think. - Gabor Cselle
Reddit's initial version supposedly took 3 weeks, according to Spez. The fastest I've done anything that got any sort of attention was 1 week - Scrutiny, ArcLite, and Randomicity all took almost exactly that long, and it looks like my FriendFeed interview question will too. Of course, they needed (and sometimes didn't get) lots more time before they'd actually be useful. - Jonathan Tang
FriendFeed
Paul Buchheit posted a message
“baby”
baby
June 25 at 11:07 am - via mail2ff - Link
Wow! That was fast! Great job, Paul and April! Height and weight? - Louis Gray
Congrats! - Benjamin Golub
Congrats!!! - Dan Hsiao
Wow! This is like baby overload all of a sudden. - Brandon Titus
Congratulations! Why do I have the opening from the Six-Million Dollar Man playing in my head? - Mark Trapp
that really was fast. Congrats! - Robert Seidman
Congrats Paul and April! - Hutch Carpenter
Congrats! Second delivery this week on Friendfeed! Just plain awesome. - Brian Daniel Eisenberg
@Mark because you're old? Congrats, Paul! - Zach Landes
Congrats! Now we need baby pics. - Tad - the Meme Maker via fftogo
Congrats! All these babies are making me feel domestic and stuff. I should go do some manly stuff like change my oil. - ha3rvey
That *was* fast. Congrats and hope everyone's doing well! - Carla Thompson
@harveysimmons Typical guy comment ;) Congrats. I want a baby damn it! - Michelle Marie Miller
@Harvey, change a diaper instead. It's a safe middle ground. - Louis Gray
How is the baby? Everything OK? - RAPatton
Congratulations :) - kbourke
Felecitations les Buchheits! :) - directeur
Congrats! - Michelle Martinez
Congrats Paul we all welcome the newest FriendFeeder! - Mark Krynsky
wow! Congrats - Bindu Reddy
Congratulations! - Cyndy
congrats! hope everybody is healthy and happy - David Vasileff
Whole-hearted congrats and hope the baby is well...... - Chris Reed
Congrats! A brand new social media user. :) - Dana Franks via twhirl
Congratulations:) - Zahra HB
Congrats! - Shey
Congratulations April and Paul! How is little Beavis doing? - Jim Norris
woo-hoo! Congratulations Mr. Paul! - JA Castillo
wonderful news! congrats - Peter Fenton
Fantastic! - Mitchell Tsai
Congratulations! - Benedikt Koehler
So great - Christopher Sacca
:) - edythe
Welcome Baby Buchheit! I hope mom and baby are both doing well. - Clare Dibble
Mazel Tov! Welcome, Beavis. - Gabe
Congrats! - Erica Baker
Congrats! - Steve Rubel
I'm happy to see the extraction was successful. Congratulations, - Robert Felty
Congrats! Mabrook! - Mo J.
Congratulations! - Anne Bouey
Congratulations!! - Gabor Cselle
Awesome! - Thomas Hawk
con'grats!! - Peter Dawson
Congrats! - Mike Doeff
Hey Paul, congrats! - dario
congratulations! - Sarah Perez
that's awesome :) congratulations!!! - Georges Harik
congrats! - Derek Collison
Conga-rats! Yay!!! - Lisa L. Seifert
Congratulations! - Sam Harmon
Congratulations ;) - Alejandro S.
Congrats! - Igor Poltavskiy
WOW... a BABY Buchheit entered the world while I wasn't looking...amazing! great secret there Paul!! Congratulations on your new addition to your family!! :-) - Susan Beebe
Congrats! :) - Aviv
Thanks everyone! - Paul Buchheit
I wish all good things for the new life. - Daniel Schildt
Wow, Mazel Tov! - Paul Haahr
congrats Paul and April! - Loic Le Meur
FriendFeed
Bret Taylor posted a message
“Very happy FriendFeed stayed up and fast through the WWDC. Good work, everyone at the FriendFeed HQ!”
June 9 at 11:51 am - Link
rock solid - Dobromir Hadzhiev
Go FriendFeed!!!! EPIC WIN! - Steve Isaacs
FriendFeed was rock solid throughout. Way to go Bret, Paul, and the rest of the FriendFeed team. - Brian Daniel Eisenberg
I never had any doubts. Nice job, guys. - Louis Gray
Love Ya Friendfeed! - Parth Awasthi via twhirl
Indeed ! that's was very nice! Have you done anything special about this Bret? (Like twitter's folks) - directeur
very nice. anyone could guess Friendfeed would make it. - Josh via twhirl
way to keep the fail whales away - Jeremy Raines
We did move a few things around, but nothing temporary - the event inspired us to optimize a few things we had been meaning to optimize anyway. - Bret Taylor
yay scalability! - Neha Narula
Bret: Big! Congrats! You've done a very nice job ! :) - directeur
I guess that I will be hanging out with ya'll for the rest of the day. :) - Mathew A. Koeneker
FriendFeed FTW! - mathew ingram
unlike the oh so much stress Twitter will be having FriendFeed will be up and running - Outsanity
I'd like to second this notion: well done Friendfeed, you guys have your shit together and I respect that. - ryangraves
Rob (Radez) actually just said the same thing. Good work, guys! - Gabor Cselle
Even wordpress hosted sites are down! FF is well hosted and manged! - Lakshman Prasad via twhirl
well done you guys. - Tsega Dinka
Me think FriendFeed cousin Googawl... - directeur
It rocked... simply the best place for live updates. - Vince DeGeorge
This was great! FF had updates faster than the folks liveblogging the event. - Jennifer Dittrich
ya, man, FriendFeed Rocks! - Ralph Poole via twhirl
Kudos..It was your stress test - Varun Mahajan
nothing beats FF! - Dieter Schwarz
FriendFeed triumphs yet again - Shey
can we have some traffic stats please? - Ivan Pope via twhirl
well done! friendfeed deserves all the hype it can get! - krz9000
Does it count as hype if it's true? - Amit Patel
pity we cannot say the same for twitter :) - Photo Larry via twhirl
Amit: A wise man once said it isn't bragging if it is true. - Russellreno
Twitter
Gabor Cselle posted a message on Twitter
Tip: Now you can add FriendFeed to your blog with our new customizable FriendFeed widgets!

Other ways to read this feed:Feed reader