Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »

Jim Hardy › Likes

Just Joe
She presented at #scio11 - Just Joe
Ha, get in line, Joe.. - Jim Hardy
Looks like a fun project from Macmillan, can't wait to see what develops... - Mr. Gunn
I bet there is a pretty long line already... - Just Joe
boys, boys, boys. (oh my word, i *just* saw this). :) //blushing. - Kaitlin Thaney
Not just the boys! Academic crush from over here too ;) - Heather Piwowar
:) you guys just made my morning. //waves from chicago. - Kaitlin Thaney
Naomi Most
Well, whaddya know. The closest 24 Hour Fitness to us has a Kids Club. $2 an hour to park a baby (6 mo+) while I work out. HMMMM!
Kaitlin Thaney
playing the catch-up game: work, notes, blog posts, emails, reading. armed with a giant cuppa + slipper-ed feet. http://twitpic.com/38hrro
playing the catch-up game: work, notes, blog posts, emails, reading. armed with a giant cuppa + slipper-ed feet. http://twitpic.com/38hrro
Naomi Most
Omg. I just had a baby. http://twitpic.com/2ucwjd Meet @CalvinChaos
Omg. I just had a baby. http://twitpic.com/2ucwjd Meet @CalvinChaos
Lee Buckler
We've got a # of people looking for their next project. Very experienced. Stem cells, bio, cell therapy. Scientists, PD, ops, mfg, eng, etc
Hey Lee, want to put *me* on that list? - Jim Hardy
FrederickEvents
So you think the #Tesla is fast? Check this out: http://earth2tech.com/2010...
Here's a picture I took of that car next to Larry Paige's Tesla while I was at Google SciFoo camp in '08 http://picasaweb.google.com/lh... - Jim Hardy
Robert J Berger
RT @CourageCampaign Tell the California Democratic Party to endorse Prop 19,the initiative to tax and legalize cannabis http://www.couragecampaign.org/page...
Mr. Gunn
What Is Your Notebook? | Scimatic Software - http://scimatic.com/node/325
Windows Office OneNote is what I use. On the Groove platform it is open and shareable, although I don't know many people doing this. A lot of trust is required, I guess. Still keep my lab notebook in OneNote. Is there an Open Office similar? - Jim Hardy
Jim - a lot of our clients are using onenote. We used feedback from some onenote guys when designing samples. You sharing method is interesting, we're now exploring various options to let people share data easily. Also looking into export formats... - Jamie McQuay from iPhone
What makes open science work is open sharing, so psyched to hear that. - Mr. Gunn
If you haven't tried it yet, I suggest you give Evernote a go to. I'm not sure how to compares to OneNote future wise, but in any case you'd gain cross-platform access (including from iphone, and other devices) as well as the ability to give others access to your notebooks. See for example: http://blog.evernote.com/2009... - Meryn Stol
Does it have voice recognition? I'm so dying for that. - Mr. Gunn
@Gunn - RDF formats... FOAF, DOAP, Dublin Core, BIBO, what works for experimental data? Maybe contact me via email jamie-at-scimatic-com would love to get some advice on formats. Thanks! - Jamie McQuay
Kaitlin Thaney
dear boston, 5 in. of snow that *hasn't fallen yet* doesn't warrant use of "snowmageddon". grow a pair, and accept the impending weather. ;)
Regenerative Medicine
Lecture: Hal Broxmeyer - The road to and future of cord blood transplantation - http://hematopoiesis.info/2010...
Mary Canady
ScienceBlogs: Photo of the Day #847: Black rat snake [Laelaps]: A black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta), photographed ... http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps...
One of my favorite and most common snake in these parts. The young frequently mistaken for "Copper Heads" and decapitated or stomped. They are quite docile and easily handled. Probably the biggest I've caught personally about 6 foot. I <3 snakes. - Jim Hardy
Bill Hooker
Open-source science takes on neglected disease : Nature News - http://www.nature.com/news...
Tags: oaos.examples Posted by: cwhooker - Bill Hooker
Attila Csordas
Gene Patents Under Legal Attack - http://www.wired.com/wiredsc...
Still don't understand how anyone thinks they can patent a piece of me or anyone else. Too much big $$ behind this, just like all patent law. - Jim Hardy
Bora Zivkovic
Mr. Gunn
Don't let Twitter, Facebook, Google be the only game in town - CNN.com - http://edition.cnn.com/2010...
"And wasn't that the promise of the Web in the first place? Weren't we going to stop relying on individual companies as gatekeepers for communication? When blogs took off a few years ago, wasn't it with the promise that we'd all be able to share our voices without having to ask any company for permission? Why did we give that up?" - Mr. Gunn from Bookmarklet
I've had a blog post half-written about this very idea. Particularly as it applies to device manufacturers... - Mr. Gunn
Anil has been around long enough to see how things have changed from when sites on the web were made by a bunch of geeks who had other jobs to now when MBAs graduate and write business plans to build the sites. - Mr. Gunn
Got a chance to spend some time talking to Anil at #scio10 and he's definitely a bright guy - Deepak Singh from iPhone
He's not the only smart guy saying .gov is where the action is headed, either. What do you think? - Mr. Gunn
I am still not so sure. When push comes to shove I am always in favor of private enterprise being more effective, more efficient and more useful. That said, .gov has a future which is more than you could say some months ago - Deepak Singh
That's kinda what I was thinking. No question it's growing, but how much room it has to grow is very much questionable. That said, my limited experience with governmental offices does indicate that modernizing could keep a lot of people very busy for a long time. For example, the DMV in San Diego scores driver tests *by hand*. - Mr. Gunn
Nils Reinton
Jay Rosen
Several people sent me this: The AP took a good hard look at the climate emails: Science not faked, but not pretty http://www.google.com/hostedn...
It's utterly unsurprising to me that the details of a bunch of personal and professional emails are a little ugly. That's probably true for almost any of us. Who wouldn't, in their reasonably private communications, hurl a few barbs at people who've been relentlessly attacking your work and your person for years, tying you up with constant frivolous data requests, and in some cases (as with Wei-Chyung Wang) having people threaten to have you arrested for fraud? I'm glad I don't work in that field. - Joel Webber
The Nature review raises a good point: What kind of support will scientists need to cope with frivolous FOIAs and other attempts to legislatively hinder their work? - Mr. Gunn
Thanks for the Nature link, Hisham. The ending paragraph sums it up well, I think: "In the end, what the UEA e-mails really show is that scientists are human beings — and that unrelenting opposition to their work can goad them to the limits of tolerance, and tempt them to act in ways that undermine scientific values. Yet it is precisely in such circumstances that researchers should... more... - Joel Webber
Nils Reinton
Climate Change Deniers vs The Consensus | Information Is Beautiful - http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visuali...
Climate Change Deniers vs The Consensus | Information Is Beautiful
link directly to the image from: http://friendfeed.com/nuin... - Nils Reinton
this is very cool. thanks for sharing, Nils. - tim
I especially like the "Consensus conclusion" at the bottom: "Man made CO2 emissions are driving climate change this time. We don't claim that greenhouse gases are the major cause of the ice ages and warming cycles. What drives climate change has long been believed to be the variation in the earth's orbit around the sun over thousands of years." - Nils Reinton
"In a normal warming cycle, the sun heats the earth, the earth gets hotter. The oceans warm up releasing huge amounts of CO2. This creates a green house effect that makes warming much much more intense" - Nils Reinton
"That's why humanity's release of CO2 is so perilous. We're out of step with the natural cycle.And we haven't even got to the stage where the oceans warm up." - Nils Reinton
Victor / Mendeley Team
Yippieh! Mendeley is Nr. 6 in the Guardian's list of Top 100 Tech Media Companies! http://www.guardian.co.uk/tech-me...
Graham Steel
Box #2 of PLoS swag winging it's away (shortly) from San Fran to Glasgow.Which is nice... #PLOS
PLoS.jpg
It arrived today. Have a stack of PLoS t-shirts in various sizes/designs. I now need to think of a cool way to give them away to folks that will wear 'em (I already have 4) . Any ideas? - Graham Steel
Exactly. But what for? - Graham Steel
send them to people who research blog an article from one of the plos journals? Or just people who ask politely? :D - Allyson Lister
Nice one, Allyson. Will run this by Dave Munger of researchblogging.org - Graham Steel
And have now done so. - Graham Steel
Me! Me! Me! Want! Want! Want! (subtle, huh?) :) - Ricardo Vidal
Wore mine from #sbcPA yesterday. All the non-science peeps needed explainations. - Jim Hardy
@ Ricardo, (you is as subtle as a brick shaped object) what size are you? I'll trade you one for a Mendeley one :) - Graham Steel
Since I've yet to hear back from Dave M, plan T is now underway. Here are the shirts http://www.flickr.com/photos... Top row middle is now winging it's way off to Dr H Gee of Nature.com http://twitter.com/McDawg... even though, this might be rejected via i-stone !!. Ricardo V (shirt size yet to be disclosed) might have another (he has 12 hours left to comment) , so there are still four avaliable for free from me as matters stand. Code = ask politely/candidly. #PLOS - Graham Steel
After what I suffered in the link posted above, I think I would be extremely happy to have a new PLoS T. Thanks! - pn
Paulo, one can still do S, or L or XL. (One XL one went to someone in Cromer). Name your size and it will be shipped. ONLY three left now and you folks must try harder to convince me give this stuff away, err convincingly. (Each pack will contain other PLoS goodies too). - Graham Steel
I will take the L. Can you send me an email with whatever you need? Maybe it's too far for you to ship :-) - pn
And the L will be shipped to Paulo later in the month. So what's left? After a re-count, 2 S and 1 XL. Rather than simply giving the last 3 away in the manner thus far, one shall devise a competition and three lucky winners will get the last of the pickings. - Graham Steel
Hmmm - somehow this comment thread dropped off my first few FF pages... Good luck with the competition, I might be a M but I'm not a S, so I'll pass :) - Allyson Lister
Competition Idea ! As matters stand, me thinks it's boiling down to some form of pub quiz thang down in the, err pub after Science Online London http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/blog... It will last for 5 - 10 mins and will be called "Who's Round Is It Anyway" Whilst the rules will be made up as we go along, the Host (not me) will ensure 'fair-play'. Cheating will be allowed within reason. 10 Prizes up for grabs inc. a priceless mystery top prize !! #solo09 - Graham Steel
Above comment updated, nudge. - Graham Steel
Graham - I'll happily take you up on the trade-for-Mendeley shirt! :-) Yes yes yes! - Victor / Mendeley Team
Game on. Must dash - I have a train to catch...whooosh - Graham Steel
I recently posted on researchblogging.org and have published in PLoS ONE. Does that qualify me for one of the red or black ones in size M? - Karen James
Did I read Mendeley shirt? (am actually wearing one of my PLoS One shirts right now...) - Björn Brembs
By the time I got round to playing "Who's Round Is It Anyway" most folks had gone, so I adopted a new strategy under the circumstances. In the end, the priceless mystery top prize was won (at random I hasten to add) by Brian Kelly:- http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2664... On Monday, 2 shirts went to Victor and Jan @ Mendeley. Thanks guy's for the Mendeley shirt in return... - Graham Steel
Shirley Wu
Personal Genome Project - Participate - http://www.personalgenomes.org/partici...
"The Personal Genome Project is an open-ended research study that aims to improve our understanding of genetic and environmental contributions to human traits. We are enrolling members of the public who are willing to share their genome sequence and other personal information with the scientific community and the general public." - Shirley Wu from Bookmarklet
I'm debating whether to apply for enrollment. Obviously, the open aspect of it is very cool. But this isn't kidding around - medical history and personal information become public domain (CC-0!): http://www.personalgenomes.org/public.... It's not an extension of yourself going open (i.e. your research), it's _you_... and I need to think a little more about the implications. - Shirley Wu
Yeah, it's why I haven't done it yet. Just haven't had the time to think through the implications - Deepak Singh
But your name will not end up in the CC0 data, will it? Why should I care if my digital copy ends up in that data set if no one would be able to link that to me? Got to read the ToS right now... - Egon Willighagen
I suspect that the level of detail of information allows one to infer who it may be. Specially medical information. Also, from what I've seen, they take head shots of each person (with a little measuring tape on the forehead for scale!) :) - Ricardo Vidal
I signed up for more info in the first phase, but have been sitting on my invite. As cool as it would be, I'm not sure the risks outweigh the rewards, at least until better protections are put into place. GINA is a start, but there's much work to be done. - Chris Miller
Egon, I've spoken to enough people who say that you don't need a name with whole genome data to figure out whom it belongs to. I will likely end up doing it since I don't care even if they had my name up there, but just from the conceptual standpoint, it's good to understand. - Deepak Singh
Right, there is definitely more than enough information to connect you to your data. In fact, just the zip code, sex, and DOB are enough to identify 87% of people in a de-identified database (saw this stat yesterday, can't remember where), and for PGP you've got a fairly complete medical history as well as photos. I'm pretty torn about this because I really think a large, open database... more... - Shirley Wu
You also have to worry about the privacy of your kids, I think, even if they're not born yet...very frustrating and confusing issue! - Steve Koch
I signed up months ago and have passed the first qualifying tests. On to level two, for consideration as one of the PGP100 or PGP1000 if I don't make the first cut. I have no fears of my DNA being exposed. - Jim Hardy
@Jim, I assume that means you also have no problem with people knowing your medical history, including, hypothetically, potentially "too much information" about, say, that anal fissure you had a year ago or your chronic irritable bowel syndrome? - Shirley Wu
Right, Shirley. It's mainly the fear of losing insurance that deters me. Without a good social safety net for healthcare in the US, I can't justify releasing information that could prevent me or my future offspring from getting quality medical care. - Chris Miller
Garret McMahon
I wonder how many friendfeed and Facebook users like me have made a conscious decision to divide professional and private social networking between these respective services.
Yeah, which is why I do not want a Facebook account... Facebook, MySpace, etc, is for non-working contacts... FriendFeed I use for collegues, not 'friends' or family... - Egon Willighagen
Agreed. Facebook is for socializing, family, friends. FriendFeed, twitter used, although not exclusively, for science and work stuff. - Jim Hardy
+1 to Garret, Egon and Jim - exactly how I divide it :) - Allyson Lister
Facebook = Friendbook, FriendFeed = WorkFeed. All nicely partitioned until merger made worlds collide. - Richard Akerman
This is a "me too" comment. - Mr. Gunn
Nils Reinton
Oh please shut up about the friendfeed/facebook thing already. See what happens - then complain
But that sounds too much like ObamaCare ;-) - Jim Hardy
Are we gonna have "death panels" here? - pn
Obama-who ?? Care-what ?? I'm from a socialist country remember. We're used to death panels apparently - bring it on .... - Nils Reinton
Socialism!! - pn
Ricardo Vidal
GENOME: The Future Is Now WEBISODE 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch...
GENOME: The Future Is Now WEBISODE 1
Play
Before any discussion about genomes, genetics or whatever. George Chuch swimming in a koi fish pond? - Ricardo Vidal
I think a metaphorical allusion to diving deeply in the gene pool :-) - Jim Hardy
Ricardo Vidal
rvidal on There is a growing consensus (at least in Silicon Valley) that the information age is about to give way to the era of synthetic genetics. - http://www.reddit.com/r...
"I understand Craig Venter's importance in the Human Genome project, however it was a massive project done in conjunction with a very large group of scientists, not just himself. I do believe he's done quite a lot with his "fame" and fortune. Namely his expeditions and work with marine/ocean microorganisms. However, as I stated before, in my opinion George Church has done more hardcore and groundbreaking science." - Ricardo Vidal
Venter's ego really gets in the way. No one really likes him in Rockville and pretty sure he's banned from Bethesda. Knew a lot of people who worked for him. He took credit for everything. George Church is an unassuming, Professor-type and much more likable. Probably a much more skilled scientist, too. - Jim Hardy
Naomi Most
Tune in at 3pm for @UnscientAmerica interview on @PirateCatSF - 87.9fm in SF and LA - stream: http://www.piratecatradio.com/pcr... #piratecat #radio
Ricardo Vidal
Shirley Wu
Overheard regarding papers published in PLoS ONE - "it was rejected somewhere else", "The bar is 'not crackpot'", "people publish in CNS because that's where the attention is, I don't know anyone who reads PLoS ONE", "The reputation of the journal is a good way to filter out noise". Is there truth to these claims? Discuss.
Almost all papers, in all journals, have been rejected from somewhere else. Our bar is "is it science, is it conducted properly, is it reported properly, and do the conclusions follow the data etc" - the bar is not "is it sexy, or impactful, or a major advance". At the same time, we are not CNS - as we are not selective. CNS combined publish just 5,000 articles a year between them but... more... - Peter Binfield
Peter, I certainly don't disagree with what you're saying and think PLoS ONE is valuable and innovative. But I was wondering if these negative judgments are pervasive (FF/twitter is a bit of an echo chamber and the real world can be a shock sometimes) and if so how to change them. There are those who argue that CNS has high precision even if they miss some good papers and so it's more... more... - Shirley Wu
The problem with echo chambers is that the Internet echoes forever; and forever is a long time. We just need to push out as much positive info as possible to try to combat any negative comments which may have been made rashly, or in error, but which get re-referenced for eternity. Our article-level metrics program will presumably show people whether any given paper in PLoS ONE is 'high'... more... - Peter Binfield
There's this thing known as FUD. Happens when someone sees their status eroding. The whole PLoS articles are not as good is just that, FUD - Deepak Singh
Indeed, it may be fear, uncertainty, doubt. It may also be lack of information and hard data. We are going to fix the latter. Certainly, people are voting with their feet - we have 37,000 published authors in under 3 years, and people are publishing with us in ever increasing numbers (http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2009... ) - Peter Binfield
"it was rejected somewhere else" - perhaps. This is hard to tease out, but I have a feeling that most of the manuscripts that come to PLoS ONE have never been submitted elsewhere - Bora Zivkovic
"The bar is 'not crackpot' - good bar, IMHO. Why is any other bar necessary? Think. Really. - Bora Zivkovic
"people publish in CNS because that's where the attention is, I don't know anyone who reads PLoS ONE" - who still reads journals? Srsly? Don't people search online for papers they are interested in? Do physicists read biology papers when their copy of Nature arrives? No, they read Nature for "news and views". - Bora Zivkovic
"The reputation of the journal is a good way to filter out noise" - perhaps a century ago when every scientist could read every scientific paper and understand it, and every scientist was a 'Victorian scholar' who felt the need to keep up with ALL of science. Today, you read papers in your narrow field - you find them online. News from other sciences you can find in pop-sci magazines, on blogs, etc. - Bora Zivkovic
@Bora, I think there are still a fair number of people who don't search for papers necessarily, but browse TOCs, and so only browse the journals they're familiar with. During the discussion, someone asked, baffled, "but there are already so many papers [without PLoS ONE publishing so many more], how would people find ones of interest to them??" - Shirley Wu
A related discussion - based on a correspondence in Nature by a proponent of the views Shirley cites - is at http://ff.im/4GWlM . - Daniel Mietchen
@Shirley - although ToCs are certainly an important discovery tool, any publisher will tell you that the vast majority of their usage comes in from Google (who then read an article, and leave again to run another search) - Peter Binfield
@Peter, that would make sense, but I'm wondering if that necessarily translates into Google being the majority of people's preferred method for finding papers. At least the impression I got from folks in my lab was "so many papers, so little time" and so they're skeptical of anything that adds to the glut of papers without clearly adding value. They might agree on the principle that... more... - Shirley Wu
They also think, "if [a peer reviewer] didn't make a value judgment on whether this paper is significant, why should I waste time reading it?" - Shirley Wu
"I'm wondering if that necessarily translates into Google being the majority of people's preferred method for finding papers" - Good point. I guess you would want to measure time spent on page by people who come via the 2 (or more) routes to see how targeted their interest was - Peter Binfield
@Shirley - Then they are admitting that they would prefer one (or perhaps 2 or 3) other people to decide what is important for them, and so decide on their behalf what they should be reading. Doesnt sound like a very informed way to filter imho... - Peter Binfield
@Peter, more that a million people access papers through google 25% of the time will mean that publishers see google as a huge source of traffic, but doesn't mean that people think of google as their preferred method to find _NEW_ papers. - Shirley Wu
@Peter, well, it's using expert opinion. We all use it to some extent in areas we're not familiar with. If people aren't that internet savvy or aren't that organized, they depend on other people or name-brand journals to bring things to their attention. Also, commenting on papers hasn't really taken off yet - just a matter of time, probably - but it just means that the post-peer review process hasn't really proven its value yet. - Shirley Wu
"but it just means that the post-peer review process hasn't really proven its value yet." - indeed, and we DONT view our efforts as post-pub peer review. We view it as a new way to do post-pub evaluation / filtering / discovery. - Peter Binfield
Oh, the other thing that someone mentioned was "comments are valuable" - meaning "why would I give away my intellectual capital?" People are willing to share their comments with their labs or close colleagues, but not to the public or to the general scientific community. Is this just another mindset we combat with positivity and action? How to combat the vicious cycle of "no comments, so no value", "no value, so i won't comment"? - Shirley Wu
"Is this just another mindset we combat with positivity and action?" - I would say we combat it by showing them the power of being open about these things. For example, social bookmarking only works when everyone shares their bookmarks - in this example there is a clear benefit to both contribute and use. If people realised that by leaving comments they would be advancing science;... more... - Peter Binfield
@Daniel, ah yes, I remember that thread now. Unfortunately I think many scientists are similar in mindset to the letter writer. They don't know about or understand new ways of receiving content, which might seem strange to those of us here, but there are many more people out there than are in here. - Shirley Wu
Also, you could use the same argument about peer review: "My time and thoughts are valuable, why should I do peer review". Apparently academia feel that the quid pro quo works in that situation at least (and that is done anonymously!) - Peter Binfield
@Peter, true, though I think some of that is tied to the reputation of the journal again - being a reviewer for Nature > reviewer for PLoS ONE (in their eyes), editors know them, they can talk about it and gain status. They get tangible and subtle career boosts. Whereas commenting on papers online and publishing in PLoS ONE doesn't get someone tenure (yet). "It would be very brave and... more... - Shirley Wu
Peter - given the problems that journals have finding suitable reviewers, I would hesitate a bit calling that a working system. - Daniel Mietchen
@Daniel :) - Peter Binfield
Another link that may be useful reposting here: Pubfeed at http://pubfeed.cs.toronto.edu/ basically allows you to treat the whole web of scholarly articles like a TOC alert (just a bit more customizable) and pipe that into your preferred feed reader. - Daniel Mietchen
@Shirley - please dont forget that there are 25,000 journals in the world and millions of papers published per year. CNS is just 3 titles, and if you lump together all similar titles (highly exclusive, professional editors, well known brands, conferring 'bragging rights' on anyone who works with them) then you are still talking about just a handful of the titles, with a small percentage of the content. We need a system that works for everyone, not just a small sub-set - Peter Binfield
@Peter, oh, I'm well aware, just parlaying bits of an impromptu debate I had earlier today with people who don't see the value of venues like PLoS ONE. These are all arguments they make, and while I don't agree with them, it is tough to convince people - Shirley Wu
You could try asking them exactly how many downloads their last paper in a 'high impact' journal got... - Peter Binfield
Fair enough, but you know, I really don't think they think about that. They think "what will be in my CV?" and they think any journal that is somewhat competitive [includes other PLoS journals, BMC journals, etc] looks better than one that accepts anything that's methodologically sound. Again, not my view, but perhaps one that is held by many. Do people list # of downloads on their CV for publications? - Shirley Wu
They dont, because they dont have the data. However, people do list if their paper was rated by F1000; or if BMC designated it a 'highly accessed' article. So I think they will start to say "this paper was downloaded 5000 times in the first 3 months which put it in the top x% of all PLoS ONE articles, the top y% of all PLoS articles, and the top z% of ALL articles" (when the rest of the world starts quoting this data) - Peter Binfield
I think of it as trying to set up a social experiment. If I'm right and a more cooperative model can produce better science than the current hypercompetitive structure, then over the next decade or so, facility with new methods and metrics that center on Open practices will provide a competitive edge for some researchers, and unwillingness to change will put others at a disadvantage. We... more... - Bill Hooker
And isn't that the scientific way? - Deepak Singh from IM
"I think there are still a fair number of people who don't search for papers necessarily, but browse TOCs" Could it be that those are the people publishing in CNS and miss the most important papers for their work? http://bjoern.brembs.net/comment... It's only one example, as anecdotal as it gets, but it shows two things: 1. CNS 'quality' is merely correlational and highly noisy.... more... - Björn Brembs
My environment is rather positive about PLoS ONE. We all know about the difference between relevance and quality. While many PLoS ONE papers might not be of widespread interest, the review process is of comparable quality or better to smaller conferences and e.g. high volume BMC journals. Other journals have severe issues with reviewer quality these days, and it seems to become worse. - Roland Krause
I'm still wondering about the degree of scalability of post-publication (significance) peer review systems. Is it really realistic to think that once (all) journals go OA and implement such a system that the entire scientific community will benefit? Assuming that it's "fair" for all journals to get equal amount of attention from "scholarly feedback communities", how can we encourage... more... - Wobbler
I agree with Bill Hooker's statement just above. Those who echo Shirley's original quote will be at a disadvantage, which means better odds for the Shirley's of the research world. - Jason Hoyt
I often say something along the lines of what Bill said. The environment is changing. To succeed in the new environment, one has to change not just one's publishing habits, but also rethink how to do research and how to write it. Thus, people who think about it early on will be able to gain advantage over people who are still stuck in the old ways of doing things. As the new environment... more... - Bora Zivkovic
Ricardo Vidal
Listening to the RealScience podcast "building something scifoo style". Who's the host, William Shatner wannabe?What's with the paused talk?
I thought it was a pretty funny little piece. I liked it. - Jim Hardy
I also liked the podcast, for it's content. I just couldn't stand the way the guy was talking. Sounded like he was reading and not very fluidly. I probably read the same but then again, I don't host a podcast. - Ricardo Vidal
Attila Csordas
first tweet with 2 hands after the bike accident :)
Glad to see you back in dual-hand-twittering action :) - Ricardo Vidal from iPod
2 handed freedom still couple days away :( - Attila Csordas
Liking for the fact that you're (nearly) healed, not the accident! - Bill Hooker
Next time, try using training wheels :-) - Jim Hardy
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook