Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »

Grace McDunnough › Likes

Kol Tregaskes
Jared Jacobs
don't worry Google, i don't use email much anymore anyway
Joe Dawson
Today's Real-Time Web Makes Blogging and RSS Seem "Too Slow" - http://www.louisgray.com/live...
I wonder sometimes if the only people that care about the real-time web are bloggers. Virtually no one that I know in real life cares except for their Facebook updates - Kevin Kuphal
Very true Kevin - Joe Dawson
not really. I'm not a blogger, but I like it. I prefer to chat the way I talk... in realtime. - vijay
What do you guys think of Wave? - Joe Dawson
David Armano
5 Predictions for the Future of Collaboration - #2 - The Platform - http://blogs.cisco.com/news...
In the technology industry we tend to focus a lot on the underlying computing model and how best to deliver functionality and value. That makes sense, because it’s core to what we do. But as an industry need to move beyond this conversation. Ultimately User Experience is what matters. - David Armano
Mahdi Ebrahimi
Every roads lead you somewhere!
roads_004.jpg
roads_008.jpg
Show all
The one on the left leads to the whiplash-effect-department of the hospital. - Vijayendra (V-Mo) Mohanty
Love the tree tunnel - Josh Haley
I would love to drive in the road on the right. - Sudar
AWESOME - Charlie Anzman
I think driving in the left road might be so adventurous. but lead to hospital :) - Mahdi Ebrahimi
If I could get on 95 and end up in Rome, I'd be one happy American. - Kim G.
Seriously, you all think the road on the left is bad? I'm going to have to go find a map to post of something called "The Tail of the Dragon" =D BRB - FFing Enigma (aka Tina)
Tina: It's not 'bad' per se. Just that high speed travel will kill you. Now, if only I still had my bicycle... - Vijayendra (V-Mo) Mohanty
تو این جاده (عکس1) با سرعت 200 تا بری و تو جاده (عکس2) پیاده روی کنی. عجب حالی میده - ♥ D E V I L S ♥
Sometimes it feels like, every road leads me back to you... - Zahra (raoros)
Bes of this week . - Arash
In these pleasant ways destination isn't important... - saeedeh
the roads for stay, not to going away... - ardiba
*LOVE* - Anna Haro
The aim is going indeed, alireza :) - saeedeh
راه تو را فرا فرا میخواند - روز واقعه «Mr.Mahdi»
it's strange how happy these pictures make me feel... i love driving so much,, mmm, and the trees... - Melissa Maskevich
Melissa, i also love to driving with one Ferrari in first road :) - Mahdi Ebrahimi
Thomas Hawk
Facebook’s “In-House Sociologist” Shares Stats on Users’ Social Behavior - http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009...
Facebook’s “In-House Sociologist” Shares Stats on Users’ Social Behavior
"In other words, Facebook users comment on stuff from only about 5-7% of their Facebook friends. And as has been shown by many other studies, women communicate with more people in all cases than men. “People who are members of online social networks are not so much ‘networking’ as they are ‘broadcasting their lives to an outer tier of acquaintances who aren’t necessarily inside the Dunbar circle,’” Lee Rainie, the director of the Pew Internet & American Life Project, says." - Thomas Hawk from Bookmarklet
then again, I comment on stuff from only about 0% of my Facebook friends, because, well, Facebook is pretty boring. - Thomas Hawk
likewise. - Parth Awasthi
@Thomas: +3. The only reason I go there is when one of my High School friends finds me there. - AJ Kohn
I'm doing something wrong or I'm really unpopular, 120 "friends" or 500 "friends", who are these people? - Ace
Interesting stats. I do have to work on those 10 friends, I am not quite talkative. - Carlos Lorenzo
every now and again it sort of freaks me out when I log on to facebook and some random person tries to chat with me. I don't want that. I have AIM and Yahoo Messenger for that. - Thomas Hawk
Memo to Web sociologists: Dunbar Number is meaningless online. It is a measure of physical interaction in the RW, limited by time and transportation, not mental abilities of humans. Online, we can have multiples of Dunbar numbers simultaneously. - Bora Zivkovic
That is incorrect: "Dunbar's number was first proposed by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who theorized that "this limit is a direct function of relative neocortex size, and that this in turn limits group size ... the limit imposed by neocortical processing capacity is simply on the number of individuals with whom a stable inter-personal relationship can be maintained."" - coldbrew
Dunbar was dead wrong - the limitations are not cognitive, - Bora Zivkovic
It was and is a theory, and it didn't ever cite a specific number. Your original statement was that it was based on real world interactions when, in fact, it was based on "neocortical processing capacity." - coldbrew
The Memo was to sociologists, not to Dunbar himself, because it is them who took it and ran away with it, assigning it a number and not realizing that limitations are physical, not cognitive. They fell in love with the idea, without critically engaging with it. I am glad that I know Communications profs who have realized this and teach about Dunbar Number correctly in the context of the Web. - Bora Zivkovic
or: "Facebook’s “In-House Sociologist” Shares Stats on Boring People's Behavior" ;) - Meryn Stol
From the post, it was unclear whether the communications were measured for all time, or just within a particular period (i.e. the last six months). I just joined Facebook Thursday morning, so my comment ratio is pretty high. - Ontario Emperor
So you could probably handle 300,000 personal relationships because cognition isn't an issue? - coldbrew
It is to be seen what the cognitive limits are. Online, one can swiftly move from one social circle to another. A lot of it does not even require 1-to-1: I check quickly what everyone is broadcasting, and I hope many of them quickly scan what I am broadcasting. I may get into 1-to-1 with one or several of them in the morning, and a totally different group in the afternoon. - Bora Zivkovic
About 90% of the people in the world - and this includes the highly mobile USA - are born, live and die in one place, often in the same house, rarely or never traveling more than 100 miles from their birthplace. They build their social network in RL - and that is about 150 people. - Bora Zivkovic
Online, one can have multiples of social groups. Last week in NYC, I met and had a grand time with my "NYC social circle", all initially discovered online, although I may not be in daily contact with any one of them. One's social groups go in and out of one's attention all the time. We go through phases several times a day. - Bora Zivkovic
And I do not consider my NYC friends any lesser than friends I have at home where I live. I know some people from online interactions MUCH better, in greater depth and detail of mutual understanding, than my next-door neighbors, in-laws or the person I worked with for a year in 2001. - Bora Zivkovic
I'm having trouble rectifying two statements you've made: 1) "the limitations are not cognitive" 2) "It is to be seen what the cognitive limits are." - coldbrew
Dunbar Number, used by sociologists to be around 150 is not the cognitive limit. Cognitive limit will be larger, much larger. It exists, but we did not get there (i.e., determining/measuring it) yet. Ask Scoble - he may be close ;-) - Bora Zivkovic
"Dunbar's number is a theoretical cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships...No precise value has been proposed for Dunbar's number, but a commonly cited approximation is 150." - coldbrew
Another problem is temporal. In the example of the usual people who never travel, their social circle is pretty static throughout their lives. But for people like us, it can be quite dynamic. You engage intensively with a group for a while, then move on, then come back to the same group 20 years later, etc. So, there is now a temporal dynamic on top of spatial and we need to agree on what the definitions are (e.g., time-frame of one's Number). - Bora Zivkovic
I agree with that, and I believe the number will differ among people substantially; but there will always be an average. I don't think you'll find an argument from anyone that digital communications removes the barriers to interact with greater numbers of people, but one's Dunbar number depends on whether a few simple interactions constitutes a "stable social relationship." [EDIT: removed pronoun for clarity ] - coldbrew
I agree we need to have a good definition of the terms "stable", "social" and "relationship". I am now brewing a blog post about this - thank you ;-) - Bora Zivkovic
That sounds like a good idea. This can be quite an academic discussion, and somewhat distant from my formal education (hm, I wonder if you could draw parallels to molecular interactions? Some proteins are comprised of thousands of atoms.). I'll be sure to read your take. - coldbrew
Social media is really great for increasing one's "loose ties". It doesn't have to be merely broadcast. You can engage with people when they're doing something what interests you. - Meryn Stol
http://friendfeed.com/e... "What mainly goes up, therefore, is not the core network but the number of casual contacts that people track more passively. This corroborates Dr Marsden’s ideas about core networks, since even those Facebook users with the most friends communicate only with a relatively small... more... - Noah David Simon
I really don't see significant difference here between gender. I would of thought it would be higher. ...no I really do think it would be higher.. these numbers are quite misleading. the intimacy in the contacts are quite different in a number spread between genders. women are more apt to have more semi intimate friends and males are more likely to have more very intimate friends. and... more... - Noah David Simon
tag: Dunbar - Bora Zivkovic
I think FB missed a bet to turn off user comments on a whole host of things. When users post status updates to their own wall, any of their friends can comment. When anyone else writes on a given user's wall, no one can comment on those posts. Stupid decision. - Andrew C
Woot, and today I see comments on wall messages are back. - Andrew C
Simon Wicks
Messenger Bag Director’s - Must-Have Accessory For Trade Shows - http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009...
Messenger Bag Director’s - Must-Have Accessory For Trade Shows
'While wandering the floors of a trade show like CES, the only thing more important than having a bag for stashing press kits and other assorted crap is finding a comfortable place to sit while writing. Unfortunately for me that turned out to be the floor 90% of the time, but not next year!' - Simon Wicks from Bookmarklet
129 dollarsfor a chair? Not for me. - Richard A.
Rich
Amazing art made with old audio cassette tapes - http://www.boingboing.net/2009...
Amazing art made with old audio cassette tapes
Amazing art made with old audio cassette tapes
These are cool! (see image 2) - Rich
Hendrix made of tape. (see image 3) - Rich
Louis Gray
27 Things To Do Before a Conference - http://www.chrisbrogan.com/27-thin...
some useful stuff, although a bit self-promote-y - Richard Akerman
Alja Sulcic
The first 50 days at The Moderator Community - http://blog.linqia.com/2009...
Sarah Perez
Why Facebook is Failing Me - http://www.sarahintampa.com/sarah...
FriendFeed hasn't fully addressed this issue either, though rooms help. - Bruce Lewis from fftogo
I also ended up using FB for personal network only and stopped using Twitter bridge. However this is not enough. One of my problems is that (same in FF) it is a global network, not everyone speaks English, so I annoy one part of my friends no matter which language I use. There needs to be better tools, may be status messages for specific groups, etc. - berkay
@berkay: I love the idea of status messages for specific groups, wish they had that now - great idea! - Sarah Perez
Sarah this is such a great post. You articulated frustrations I'm sure MANY are feeling. -sigh- - Mona Nomura
I feel like this too - my friends fall into three or four groups, with the smallest one being people I've actually met. I don't want to cancel my connections with the others, but filtering would be great. - Sharon Hurley Hall
@mona: thank you! - Sarah Perez
Great, great post. I think Facebook should realize that in order to become the one social platform for all, they need to allow us users to customize and slice people. I recently erased all my social friends who I've never met from Facebook, cause I didn't want to spam them with personal stuff and my Spanish-speaking family with geeky Twitter comments ;) - Jorge Escobar
I've been using FF for tech and FB for non-tech for a while, but this is a lousy solution. I'm not sure that slicing friends on a single platform is the right approach - what we're actually talking about here is wanting to slice _yourself_ into different aspects then people can sign up to whichever one (or three) they're interested in. When posting something on whatever platform you'd be able to indicate which aspect it's for (kind of a me-tag). - Yan
I'm very conservative about what personal information I supply to FB in the first place, and aggressively use lists and privacy settings. But the control granularity for the Friends list and Wall posts are almost non-existent, as are good controls for Profile | Basic | Personal info. - LogEx
I have the same issues. I've created lists with different privacy settings but my biggest beef is that I can't control who sees what content I create, especially imported feeds. - Shey, Jamaican of FF
I love Facebook - sofarsoShawn
For a lot of things I have two accounts - one for professional stuff, the other for hobbies-and-daily-life stuff. It's a mixture of conveniences and inconveniences but works pretty well for me. - Deborah Fitchett
Hmm, didn't Plaxo have some sort of "Personas"/self-slicing feature? I'm sure that Facebook could always pinch that, although of course, there's the Wall/Friends granularity problem that's been hashed to death... - Tyson Key
I decided to use Facebook only for a very small circle of friends and family. It's quite a nice platform still. And handy that it's not on the public web. - Meryn Stol
Agreed, although I was happy on Twitter and Friendfeed and didn't want to go onto Facebook ;-) In the end I went on to network with mainly offline or old friends. - Alistair (alpinefolk)
Brad Kligerman
An office built almost entirely out of cardboard... space, structure and ornamentation - http://www.creativereview.co.uk/crblog...
An office built almost entirely out of cardboard... space, structure and ornamentation
Show all
Mich D.
Matt Cutts
Link to a specific part of a YouTube video - http://www.mattcutts.com/blog...
that's badass - fijidaddy
Very handy - John Honeck
Hutch Carpenter
Please, I don't want your automated DMs after I follow you. This practice needs to stop. I never click your links, it's just spam.
I don't understand why @twitter doesn't give the option of disabling DM's completely - Keith - @tsudo
I wouldn't disable my DM, because I do get some that are legit. I think this is going to be a social persuasion. Maybe we need some folks to start a new convention of unfollowing those who send out these automated DMs. Unfollowing is the worst fear of these automated DM types. - Hutch Carpenter
Twitter should allow users to opt out of DMs altogether. I tend to unfollows accounts that send auto-DMs, it immediately diminishes their value to me. Too impersonal -- not what I use Twitter for. I know where your website I'd but I'd prefer to receive your updates via Twitter. Imagine if every RSS feed began with a form letter pitch... - Andy Sternberg from fftogo
Good analogy on the blog RSS feed subscriptions. And if I've taken the time to look at your tweets and the link on your bio, you don't need to send me anything else. Just keep on tweetin'. - Hutch Carpenter
I don't know why this pisses people off so much. The furor over the DMs to me is more annoying than the DMs themselves. I just don't like the boring pseudo-sincere "let me know how I can help you" ones. I use one and dig it. - Steve Isaacs
Spams are everywhere! XD - Midori
It's annoying in the way spam email is annoying. My Gmail spam filter saves me from dealing with the spam deluge, but does nothing for these spam DMs. - Hutch Carpenter
i think if your twitter account is a business, it's a perfect opportunity to link a new follower to something useful to them - Nathan Chase
LD - SocialToo lets you auto DM? I just use it for stats, not that. - Hutch Carpenter
Nathan - I agree that a link to something useful is fine. Say I tweet about something, and you have a link that is relevant. @ or DM me. But how do you know what's relevant with an automated DM after following? - Hutch Carpenter
If you have one of the "let me know how..." ones, I will let you know, and if you ignore my @, I'm just going to drop you. To use auto-dm to begin convo = not bad, but to not continue convo = fail - Michelle Darnell
@Hutch - for instance, if you follow Flickchart (my startup) on Twitter, it auto-follows and responds with. "Thanks for checking us out! Be sure to sign up for our beta to get your invite soon! - http://www.flickchart.com" - does that seem annoying or misplaced? - Nathan Chase
Agreed. Twitter should review this. It's becoming an epidemic. It diminishes my impression of someone immediately. - Seamus Condron
There is a use for it in places, but the issue is like anything else once spammers get ahold of something it destroys it for everyone. I wouldn't opt to disable DMs because I sometimes reply by DM if I get behind in getting back to people so I don't flood timeline with chatter - BCK
Nathan - that seems OK. I mean, I'm following a company (Flickchart), so I'd be interested in getting a beta. But there are a lot of marketing types and life coaches who fire these things off. Often after they've followed me and I follow back. Wasn't expecting to get spammed in that transaction. - Hutch Carpenter
I actually don't need DMs at all. If someone wants to contact me privately they can follow the link to my website and contact me through it. It seems that it would be very easy for Twitter to add a "Disable DMs feature." - Keith - @tsudo
SocialToo can help you block many automatic DMs. http://www.socialtoo.com - Louis Gray
Louis: You mean if I join SocialToo I can tell it to not send me auto DMs from other SocialToo users, or is there something more sophisticated? - Ken Sheppardson
I use an auto DM to send silly phrases to people when they follow me. It's the "let's tweet soon" ones that grate my cheese. - Jon, the Chilled Beartato
Ken, it will block DMs from SocialToo users and TweetLater users, for starters. - Louis Gray
What is the biggest complaint about DM's? Is it the links? Number of DM's you get a day? I use an automated DM to aid in being cordial. I got the following DM this morning and thought it was a good one, "Checked out your profile and you are an amazing person! Keep it up!" - Damond Nollan
I had Auto DM's setup as a way of saying Thanks for following ...Ive heard at Podcamp Toronto that many people dont like them .. so OFF they go ... no MORE Auto DM's - johnpiercy
I didn't even know you could setup auto-DMs...awww and here I was so happy everytime someone wrote to me ;) - Dennis Bjørn Petersen from twhirl
I can't stand those who send a DM to invite me to become "friends" on Facebook, I've only known of your existence for a whole minute and are we supposed to be "friends"? Mind you, I received a message from someone on Diigo who is looking for a husband and I thought it was a social bookmarking site. - M F
What if it's just a simple "thanks for following me" message and not a link or sales pitch? - Mattb4rd
@Matt, I hate those "thanks for following me" messages just as much as the automatic sales pitches. If someone wants to "thank" me for following them, then follow me back. Or, if that person followed me first, there's no need to do anything. - Joey Gibson
SocialToo is awesome. Also, I've learned to ignore spam DMs the same way I can ignore spam emails. With that said SocialToo makes it easy to reduce the number of them greatly. - Bwana ☠
David Armano
adaptive path » blog » Brandon Schauer » Seeing tomorrow’s services - http://www.adaptivepath.com/blog...
Om Malik
facebook can't be serious about this shit? not uploading my photos and videos to that site no more :-) http://consumerist.com/5150175...
EVIL. - atul abraham from twhirl
Oh. Yeah. That sucks. - Admiral Anika
If it was Google, I'd expect a quick retraction... http://friendfeed.com/search... But Facebook seems to be moving the opposite way. - LogEx
was it so that the content will still be treated in line with the privacy rules you had set? e.g. if I set a photo album to be visible to no-one, would they still be allowed to republish it? - Davide D'Incau
@Davide, in the termination section : it says, the "Privacy practices" will survive the termination. I hope it means the "privacy settings". - Olivier Castets
I removed all my info from Facebook about a year ago. I'm glad I did. - Paul Grav
The tech geeks and privacy advocates will cry foul about this, and we are. Yet, the rest of the population, that is the majority of Facebook users won't care. And they shouldn't: the probability that this will become an issue for anyone is low. Life goes on. - Nitesh Dhanjani
nitesh: how about you send me snaps of your family for me to do with as I wish - ? will you buy that ? no. why will " the majority of Facebook users " then ? - atul abraham from twhirl
@Atul. Because the majority of facebook users will not be confronted with a situation such as you describe. - Paul Grav
@Olivier: That is what I was thinking too, but the legal texts are always hard to read for someone not practicing law ;-) - Davide D'Incau
paul : you still dont get it, FB is going to take any image, text - whatever they please and do with it as they wish. if that doesnt strike you as very wrong, im sorry, you have no clue what you are taling about. FB was supposed to be social networking, they are now behaving like Stalin. - atul abraham from twhirl
and to address the point - it IS the majority who will be affected, FB can choose to " own " any and all content, as i see it the majority is already owned. - atul abraham from twhirl
@atul. Where have I stated, or even implied, that I believe what Facebook is doing is correct? - Paul Grav
paul:you did not say that and i didnot assuem you did, but you said the majority wont be " confronted by a situation like .. " thats where your way wrong - it IS the majority - i have friends on FB who struggle to use the site, but they are there cos their friends are there and friends of their friends. they are going to be fed on. - atul abraham from twhirl
@atul. To be clear. I think that Facebook can write whatever it wants in its Facebook EULA. Personally, I think the EULA is unnecessarily nasty. Subsequently, I've chosen not to share my info with Facebook. Unless the media draws attention to the nasty parts of the EULA, most Facebook users will be oblivious to it and even if they do become aware of the problems, I doubt the majority of users will take the action that I've taken. - Paul Grav
paul:you did not say that and i didnot assuem you did, but you said the majority wont be " confronted by a situation like .. " thats where your way wrong - it IS the majority - i have friends on FB who struggle to use the site, but they are there cos their friends are there and friends of their friends. they are going to be fed on. - atul abraham from twhirl
im sorry paul, i dont know one person who will allow FB to own pictuers of them with family and friends, just doesnt wash. - atul abraham from twhirl
anyway im on CET, its a work day, i have already alerted my network, and now im getting back to other work. - atul abraham from twhirl
Very concerning and also not very public to all those Facebook users.. but then they have a loose understanding of copyright issues anyway - Ian D. Nock from twhirl
@atul. My point is that most users are not aware of the content of the EULA. - Paul Grav
i hear you paul, and thats why you need to tell your friends who need to tell theirs and so on. facebook is the new dumb and NASTY. - atul abraham from twhirl
I think the only photo I've ever posted to Facebook was one of a woman breastfeeding (goes to check if I've been censored there yet or not), Nope, looks like she's still there: http://www.facebook.com/home... - Thomas Hawk
It isn't just content you post. Take a look at the definition of "Post", it includes content you may have elsewhere and link to in Facebook. Just posted my analysis to http://webtechlaw.com/what-fa... if you are interested. - Paul Jacobson from twhirl
@atul. I mostly ignore things that I don't like, don't agree with. Others can go inform themselves, no skin off my nose if they continue to use Facebook. - Paul Grav
I don't think terms like this are necessary: http://ourdoings.com/2009-02... - Bruce Lewis
Thank you for the heads up. I'll be reading through the legalize and most likely removing my content in the next few days. - Becca
I second you on that too! - Sampad Swain
Just removed all the content I care about and won't be adding anymore - Ace
I think people are making the EULA say more than it really does. There is another clause that limits what FB can do with the content - "each of (a) and (b) on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof". - Brian Milby
Rather than interpret the Facebook ToS, or debate whether Facebook is trustworthy, here's a specific feature request that would seem to meet the privacy needs of users and the stated privacy philosophy of Facebook: Enhance the 'Delete This Photo' feature on Facebook by adding an optional checkbox [x] I own this photo, so please replace it with a placeholder saying 'this photo has been deleted' when anyone tries to look at it (e.g. in an Inbox Message, on a Wall Post, or as part of a third party application) - Bob Hitching
Techcrunch's summary is that "It's complicated". However, the reality is that it really is not. Facebook can easily delete content upon request (and mark the content no longer available to someone else that sees this). For example, try viewing a deleted user on Flickr. The problem is Facebook does not seem to think that it has any incentive to do so. It's a fairly simple programmatic problem. - Jauder Ho
damn i missed this entire thread. i hate lack of bandwidth sometimes and having to use a mobile to access this site. hard to participate. maybe a blackberry client will come from Bret, Paul & Company :-) - Om Malik
l0ckergn0me
Yes, it's true - I'm now the Tech Expert for CNN.com. :) http://www.cnn.com/2009... - I should find a better photo...
Chris that brilliant! The gig, that is. You are right about the pic....:) - WorldofHiglet
Congrats! - Admiral Anika
Awesome news. Congrats man! - Thomas Hawk
Fantastic. - Russellreno
Cool, big time! Keep them from going left wing on tech reporting. - Douglas Hopkins
Congrats! I disagree with that article, but hey congrats anyway!! :) Yeah, that photo... yeah... it's ok..but...yeah..you can do better :) - Bwana ☠
Congratulations, Chris!!! - Fa La La La Lindsay
Congratulations! - Karoli
Congrats! - Hutch Carpenter
Congratulations - Kreg Steppe
Excellent!! Congratulations Chris! - Tracy Lee Carroll
And you thought I wasn't participating in FF as frequently because I didn't like you... :) - l0ckergn0me
@Norwood - I'm actually a registered Republican. :) - l0ckergn0me
Congrats Chris =) Perhaps we'll be seeing CNN on FF sometime n the future? - FFing Enigma (aka Tina)
Cha ching? You deserve it, bro. Go get 'em. - Josh Haley
that should help that MASSIVE new monthly expense eh? - andy brudtkuhl
wow, cool - congrats - Peter Efland
gratz Chris! - timepilot
Chris, that's awesome! Congrats!! - David Finch
Fantastic, congratulations! - Ginger Kenney
well done - Mattb4rd
How cool is that? Congrats Chris - Charlie Anzman
Nice! - Jennifer Leggio
Chris had to engage in hand-to-hand combat with Miles O'brien to secure this position. - Chrimmus Tad
you have come a long way my friend :) - mike "glemak" dunn
Good job! - RAPatton
Does it pay anything? If not, turn it down:-) - Francine Hardaway from twhirl
Congrats Chris, I can think of no one better - Aaron Krug
Congrats Chris - that's great to hear, and you're perfect for the job. - Jesse Stay
Congrats! nice! - mikepk
Yeah!!!!! CONGRATS Chris!! that is soooo cooool! - Susan Beebe
Awesome Chris ... great news .. your famous - johnpiercy
Awesome to hear! - Helen Sventitsky
A better photo? Like this one? http://img185.imageshack.us/img185... (sorry, had to. go ahead and delete this comment) - Josh Haley
OMG! BAD JOSH! I much preferred the one with Palin, didn't know that one was out there :( - MiniMage TKDteacher of FF
Congratulations on the gig and the article, both excellent. - Rubin Sfadj
Congratulations! Looks like they found the best! - Cheryl Allin from twhirl
Congrats! :D - Ron
Brilliant. Just brilliant. - Phil G
Congrats! - Igor Poltavskiy
well deserved, congratulations! - Rajiv Doshi
Awesome. Us geeks are taking over. - Mark Krynsky
Article on FriendFeed forthcoming, we'll assume. Yes, and congrats are in order. Nice one, Chris! - Pete Delucchi
Congratilations! - Nia
Make that money and make us proud...in that order :) - Anthony Farrior
I sure hope they don't make you wear a suit and a serious face! - Glenn Batuyong
Congrats, Chris! I want to see you duet with Andrerson Cooper sometime! - susan mernit
Great! It will be great to see you there! ;-) - Erhan Erdogan
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook