my comment on the blog post is being held for moderation. it reads as follows: "One suggestion: it might help advance the cause of respectful discussion if you would release a version of the position paper which includes citations for the evidence supporting the claims made therein. I look forward to it. Thanks!"
- Luke Rosenberger
Abram's post certainly has a very different tone than the original position paper.
- marthalib
this is not the first time in the recent past that Abram has tried to have it both ways.
- DJF
Yes. I think it's fine to take offense at ad-hominem attacks and name-calling (his *family* though? Did people really say something about his family?). But this paper is FUD pure and simple *even if* some of it is grounded in reality.
- Your Neighbor Steve
Agreed with Steve, Josh, and Luke. Without citations and evidence, it's not "critical thinking." That's what we teach our first-years, and it's what I'd expect of any professional in the library field.
- Catherine Pellegrino
Also, you know, I wouldn't be happy if people were calling me names. But I suppose I'd recognize that it goes with being somewhat well-known in our community. Abram is far more well-known than I am, and at *least* as happy to go out on a limb and say obnoxious provocative stuff. The dude needs to quit crying about that stuff, as it goes with being the public face of his crummy company.
- Your Neighbor Steve
I have not called Abram names in any discussion about this paper. Not even off-line.
- DJF
David, most people haven't. I think his reaction is partly genuine and partly more FUD trying to distract from the real criticism. Hmmm, maybe I should make another bar graph.
- Your Neighbor Steve