By Theresa Velden and Carl Lagoze: "New web-based models of scholarly communication have made a significant impact in some scientific disciplines, but chemistry is not one of them. What has prevented the widespread adoption of these developments by chemists — and what are the prospects for adoption over time?"
- Hilary
With a discussion of the role of open access, data sharing, electronic lab notebooks, preprint servers, and blogs in chemistry communication.
- Hilary
I think the latter part of the article by Velden and Lagoze hit the nail on the head albeit sideways. There is a lot of chemistry disciplines and the pharmaceutical and beauty industry would be especially open to espionage. There is also the issues of security with the organic chemistry field as research from that branch could be turned into catastrophic weapons of mass destruction. The...
more...
- Aaron Kendrick
so given that those fields are only small parts of a decentralized whole, why should they hold the rest of the discipline hostage?
- D0r0th34
Aaron: is that scenario realistic? the knowledge and facilities required to make nuclear or biological weapons are considerable. simpler methods such as guns or explosives may still be a more effective and reliable means for violence
- Mike Chelen
it is confusing that this article states "Hardly any established scientists maintain a blog" then cites an article http://dx.doi.org/10... which says "they contribute to the current practice and reputation of science as much as, if not more than, any popular scientific work or visual presentation" - how could blogs be so influential with supposedly no participation from established scientists?
- Mike Chelen
Security of biological weapons is a much more serious issue than for chemicals. Mustard gas is nasty but limited in spread, and most seriously nasty chemicals are natural in origin anyway. On top of that I think its been reasonably well established that security in e.g. cryptography is best served by an open approach. Espionage similarly is a separate issue. What we have at the moment...
more...
- Cameron Neylon
i definitely don't think the issue is about weapons/weaponization, an undergrad in chemistry (or a high school kid who can read on the internet) should know enough to make some serious bombs. Velden talked about her dissertation research at 4S. It was interesting how the members and PIs of the labs carefully do not reveal details of their work. They've had things scooped by other labs with more money/people so they don't talk about the details at conferences.
- Christina Pikas
This talk of "dangerous science" is a red herring for a discussion on Open Science. It could leave one not familiar with the chemistry publication process with a very false impression. With very rare exceptions, all the information required to synthesize explosives and other dangerous compounds is already contained in regular research papers. If anything Open Science could make science...
more...
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Finally got round to reading the Nat Chem article. Can we stop talking about weapons in this thread - totally irrelevant. The article makes some excellent points, particularly in the section "Chemistry distinguished". The "focus on creation" paragraph will irritate many, but there is an element of truth there, as anyone will acknowledge who spends much time reading organic synthesis or catalysis papers. When/where is the second workshop?
- Matthew Todd
"This paper is intended as a starting point for discussion on the possible future of scientific communication in chemistry, the value of new models of scientific communication enabled by web based technologies, and the necessary future steps to achieve the benefits of those new models. It is informed by a NSF sponsored workshop that was held on October 23-24, 2008 in Washington D.C. It provides an overview on the chemical communication system in chemistry and describes efforts to enhance scientific communication by introducing new web-based models of scientific communication. It observes that such innovations are still embryonic and have not yet found broad adoption and acceptance by the chemical community. The paper proceeds to analyze the reasons for this by identifying specific characteristics of the chemistry domain that relate to its research practices and socio-economic organization. It hypothesizes how these may influence communication practices, and produce resistance to...
more...
- Hilary
By Theresa Velden and Carl Lagoze, with input from myself and several others.
- Hilary
Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing: http://www.pnas.org/content...
An analysis of acknowledgment statements (mostly in the computer science literature) - the authors compare acknowledgments to citations and finds that "[the] number of citations made to the most acknowledged individuals does not correlate well with the number of acknowledgments to those individuals".
- Hilary
A long report/book from the National Academies of Sciences with recommendations for how to address issues related to data sharing and code/software sharing. Several journal policies have been based on this, such as the PLoS journals statement on software sharing: http://www.plosone.org/static...
- Hilary
The library is dead. Long live the library! The rebirth of libraries in the 21st century: Tuesday, December 08, 2009, 9 AM - 4 PM, Cambridge, MA: http://neasist.eventbrite.com/
Do you use the The Directory of Open Access Repositories or Registry of Open Access Repositories? Help shape their development by taking the survey here:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s...
Peter Hirtle comments on the case with a view towards fair use - the case involved Blackwell, Elsevier, OUP, Sage and Wiley (spelled Wily here???) who sued a coursepack copying shop (Excel Copying) and its owner. Summary judgment has been granted in favor of the publishers. Excel argued first that the copying was permitted under UMich's licenses, and then that they did not engage in direct infringement because the students were doing the copying. The court also rejected a fair use defense "because Excel is a commercial operation, the purpose of the copying was not educational".
- Hilary
Hirtle wonders about the potential liability of libraries: "it is common for libraries to receive from a faculty member a copy of a course pack and place it on reserve (much as faculty members provided copies of their course packs to Excel). If a student then borrowed that course pack and copied it on a library photocopy machine, would the library be liable?" As the commercial nature of...
more...
- Hilary
Playing devil's advocate: I almost hope a library does get sued, because it's PAST time faculty felt the pain of their own decisions to blithely sign away rights to their own materials.
- D0r0th34
Problem is, D, if the *library* gets sued the faculty still might not feel it...?
- Bill Hooker
They'll feel it when the library cuts off reserves.
- D0r0th34
'Stanford will save “hundreds of thousands of dollars annually” by closing its physics library, said Michael A. Keller, the university librarian. That facility, one of 21 Stanford libraries, was chosen because most physics literature is available electronically, Keller said.' // Never thought about it this way before, but it makes sense. I guess centralized eprint repositories are not only "competing" with publishers, but also libraries?
- Wobbler
Absolutely. We have scientists of varying stripes here who proudly boast how little they use the (physical) library. However, the closing of small branch/departmental libraries is soon to be a nationwide trend, and not just in the hard sciences. Babysitting underused public spaces is just not the best use of librarian time or library resources these days.
- D0r0th34
Though the volume count is a bit of a red herring. Other than weeding, these books aren't going to be thrown out; they'll be consolidated with another collection.
- D0r0th34
Much as I'm a print person, what Dorothea sez: Smaller branches have been problematic for big academic libraries for a long time; they're expensive to run relative to value add. In disciplines where almost all the literature is electronic, it's hard to argue for maintaining the physical space *as a library.* (My alma mater, Berkeley, was consolidating smaller branches even when I was...
more...
- Walt Crawford
But won't this make the whole "institutional repositories + some kind of open protocol like OAI-PMH = OA win" a bit harder to realize?
- Wobbler
Er, it was ever easy? Besides, with any luck at ALL some of that librarian energy that isn't going into keeping the lights on might head for IRs or OA. (Yes, I'm dreaming.)
- D0r0th34
Hold on a second. I think I went on the wrong path somewhere. When Stanford says 'most physics literature is available electronically', did they mean arXiv or their own institutional repository? If it's the latter, then I confused "print versus digital" with "institutional versus disciplinary/centralized". And if that is the case, I guess it's not that big of a deal?
- Wobbler
They meant the formal published literature (bought by the library, of course, but not housed in a physical space) as well as arXiv and other OA resources, I suspect. As a rule, most faculty have absolutely no idea where a paper they're reading came from or who paid for it.
- D0r0th34
I see, OK thanks for clarifying that. That still means Open Access = everything digital = a bit of a problem for (some) librarians? Weird how I never considered that perspective before. I wonder how they (will) adapt to the increasing popularity/significance of OA and search engines for those OA sources? Other than being let go, of course.
- Wobbler
This information still doesn't organize, preserve, find, or evaluate itself. :) I'm thinking we'll have jobs for a good long while yet...
- D0r0th34
I see. Alright then :) Not sure if you've answered this before D0r0th34 (and if you did, I apologize for bringing it up again), but are you more for the "institutional repository + open protocol" route to OA or the "disciplinary/centralized repository" one?
- Wobbler
I don't care. OA is OA. Whatever works. Disciplinary is easier to sell to researchers, so fine by me. I'm still not out of a job -- remember that arXiv is run by Cornell University *Libraries*.
- D0r0th34
Any time. The danger in disciplinary repos, of course, is sustainability. If a disciplinary repo doesn't find an institution to be its sugar daddy, it may fold. (Google "Mana'o repository" to see what I'm talking about.) There's also some free riding going on in the library community -- many aren't ready to support OA with additional budget and staff resources at this juncture. I think that will change (I think it has to!) but faculty are still the prime movers.
- D0r0th34
It has also been a few years since I stepped into a library .. I don't even know where the UCSF library is. I am guessing that a lot of libraries already do this but given the shift to online shouldn't the role of the libraries include helping people find what they need using current tools. Ex - setting up automatic queries, getting suggestions on what to read via online bookmarking...
more...
- Pedro Beltrao
"Academic abstention is the doctrine (never formally promulgated) that courts should defer to colleges and universities when it comes to matters like promotions, curricula, admission policies, grading, tenure, etc. The reasoning is that courts lack the competence to monitor academic behavior; they should get out of the way and let the professionals do the job....In 2009, courts still pay lip service to this doctrine but in practice, Amy Gajda tells us in her terrific new book, “The Trials of Academe,” they now boldly go where their predecessors feared to tread... “litigation and ‘rights talk’ have permeated every crease and wrinkle of academic life.”"
- Hilary
Has the increasing willingness of courts to rule on cases involving the ivory tower/s led to an increasing reliance by academics on a legal framework to navigate and frame academic disputes (e.g. use of contracts in academic work and the rise of explicit university IP policies), perhaps as an attempt to preempt legal problems? Or has the increasing use of contracts encouraged court...
more...
- Hilary
"The bulk of digital books in libraries are treated like printed ones: only one borrower can check out an e-book at a time, and for popular titles, patrons must wait in line just as they do for physical books. After two to three weeks, the e-book automatically expires from a reader’s account."
- Hilary
"Students with research interests in scientific data management, sharing and reuse have a unique opportunity to participate in the Open Data fellowship program. Open Data is an Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) sponsored by NSF. Open Data fellows engage in a vibrant set of research activities at the University of Michigan in the conduct of responsible data-intensive science and engineering involving faculty and doctoral students from SI, Computer Science and Engineering, Bioinformatics, Materials Science, and Chemical Engineering."
- Hilary
This follows the earlier announcement of Cell Death & Disease, a new OA (-only and online-only) journal from NPG: http://www.nature.com/press_r...
- Hilary
Open access options - now online:- http://www.nature.com/ncomms... Authors can either publish through the traditional subscribed access route or make their paper open access through payment of an article-processing charge (APC). The article publication charge is as follows: * $5,000 (The Americas) * €3,570 (Europe) * ¥637,350 (Japan) * £3,035 (UK and Rest of World)
- Graham Steel
Wow. Five large makes this the most expensive author-side fee I know of. My (very) rough estimate of author-side charges for regular Nature articles (page fees and color charges) is ~$1700 per article, and my somewhat better estimate of average income-per-paper at TA journals is around $2100-2900 per article. Given that Nature probably spends more than average on editing, typesetting...
more...
- Bill Hooker
Higher than I would have pitched it certainly. I must write up the "Nature should have OA supported by submission charges" post at some point. Tough to see this as value for money unless the editorial support is really very special.
- Cameron Neylon
wow , those fees are way to high to get any traction. I know of several people that have problems even with the fees from PLoS or for example Mol Sys Bio (EMBO/Nature publishing). I would like to know what the rationale is for Nature Communications having a higher open access fee than MSB, a journal from the same publisher dedicated to high impact research (latest IF ~ 12).
- Pedro Beltrao
might the additional competition drive down the price?
- Mike Chelen
from IM
As a librarian well aware of the disconnect between pricing and value in the journal arena, I'm just SALIVATING at the idea of a price war. It's the transparency of prices *to researchers* that does it.
- D0r0th34
I just wish we had a mechanism at Drexel to pay such costs - I inquired with our library but there are no plans in the works
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Very few libraries do at this juncture. You'll have to keep asking. Also, go through faculty channels as well; does the money have to come from the libraries as long as it spends? Honestly, though, I'm concerned that if librarians and administrators just step into this breach without thinking first, we'll end up in the same stupid state we are now -- where researchers have no clue about...
more...
- D0r0th34
D - the reality is that I don't know any of my close colleagues who can afford 10K a year for OA publishing. In the last few proposals I wrote it was tough enough just getting within budget for absolute necessities.
- Jean-Claude Bradley
If librarians are going to cover OA fees, they should make it clear that that money has to come out of subscriptions. Publishing is an integral part of research, but researchers are used to ignoring its costs. For the cost of two Nat Comm OA papers you could get three in PLoS Biology and most of a fourth in PLoS ONE; or five papers in BMC Biology; or... ain't competition grand?
- Bill Hooker
Bill - I agree with that - even if it means getting Interlibrary Loans instead of paying for access to all current journals.
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Bill, I agree with you, but most of my librarian colleagues wouldn't, I'm afraid. There are times I am not proud of my profession. Jean-Claude, at the rate subscriptions are falling by the wayside you'll soon have to choose whether to fund publishing or reading. As for ILL, that isn't costless either, and (again) as subscriptions die, will anyone be available to ILL the material *from*?
- D0r0th34
D of course ILL costs something but isn't it possible to look at current usage of a journal and compare it with ILL costs - then get rid of subscriptions based strictly on economics?
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Sure. Libraries do it all the time. Faculty howl.
- D0r0th34
Jean-Claude: Do pay attention to the last sentence in Dorothea's earlier post: You can't use ILL if the last sucker--er, infinitely well funded--library cancels its subscription. And the number of academic libraries able to afford all the journals they might want is already, I believe, roughly zero.
- Walt Crawford
Worst case scenario - if no libraries carry a journal - can't a single article usually be purchased from the publisher?
- Jean-Claude Bradley
By an individual user, yes. By a library for continued access, usually not. The problem from a library's perspective is that we can't offer articles a la carte because we have no way to budget for it (cost is completely unpredictable), and we may have to pay multiple times for the same article for multiple users. It's a losing game for us -- not that we have any wins other than OA at this point.
- D0r0th34
"Tranche is a free and open source file sharing tool that enables collections of computers to easily share data sets. Designed and built with scientists and researchers in mind, Tranche can handle very large data sets, is secure, is scalable, and all data sets are citable in scientific journals"
- Hilary
The hashes seem to be a bit long to use as references, though...
- Jan Aerts
Hook'em up with DOIs for referencing, like peanut & jelly in a sandwich...
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
This is the endorsement from Nature Biotechnology that they mention on their website, Democratizing proteomics data - http://www.nature.com/nbt...: "The lack of raw data sets associated with proteomics and molecular-interaction papers is a long-standing and pernicious problem[...] This has begun to change, however, with the advent of the International...
more...
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
Jan - +1 on the hash URLs; would be good to at least have a URL-shortening alias thingy on there, like FriendFeed offers.
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
even better if it were a preservation-quality redirector such as an ARK or handle
- D0r0th34
what's different between DOI and ARK? long hashes are aren't too bad since a search URL...
more...
- Mike Chelen
Exactly - the short URLs would just be for convenience: DOI registration for each dataset would be a natural extra component to add to this system (along with a few other features I can think of, like feeds for new/updated datasets, OpenID login etc.).
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
BTW from dict.org: tranche = ' a portion of something (especially money)'
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
@Mike - apparently an ARK (Archival Resource Key, http://www.cdlib.org/inside...) does something akin to what a DOI does in terms of identifier persistence and whatnot. An ARK is an actual URL, whereas DOI by itself does not specify the resolution protocol (hence the http://dx.doi.org resolver service). Not too clear on in which domains ARKs are used, have never actually come across one of those in my work.
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
Mummi: wonder if the hashes could be resolved by multiple servers as well. thanks, that helped explain things a lot.
- Mike Chelen
Thanks for sharing, Hilary! Looks ideal for sharing of raw data from high-throughput sequencing, which has been a problem for us across multiple sites. And tranche in French is a slice of whatever - in the case that best springs to mind, brioche.
- Heather
So the hashes contain an MD5 and an SHA-1 and an SHA-256. Hope the rest of the system makes more sense :-)
- Eric Jain
With a college like MIT actively endorsing student blogs (uncensored!), I wonder if this might later encourage science blogging and open research when these students move on to become grad students, postdocs, and faculty...
- Hilary
hmm if you pay people to blog surely it will influence the content
- Jean-Claude Bradley
@Jean-Claude I disagree--so many of these 'we'll get the XXX's to blog for us!' strategies suffer because they offer no compensation and end up being perceived as pyramid schemes. Also, $10 an hour for a max of $40 a week? Come on, that's nothing...
- Mary Canady
True enough, Mary, but if you had a choice between a fully independent blog (or group of blogs) and another group whose authors were paid -- no matter how little -- to write the content, which would you trust more? Even if the money has no real effect, the perception of influence is important.
- Bill Hooker
Hasn't Warwick been doing this for a while in the UK? OK, it's not MIT...
- Peter Miller
Sounds ok to me. I think it's a great idea for opening the sciences up to internet interaction. @bill, what are the perks of writing for science blogs? There's no revenue sharing there??
- Brian Krueger - LabSpaces
Do you mean ScienceBlogs (Seed Media), or science blogs? The former do share advertising revenue with their bloggers. As for perks, I guess everyone gets something different out of blogging... I'm not saying it's a Bad Thing to pay bloggers, just that there's both potential for, and a likely perception of, pay-for-play.
- Bill Hooker
"This year, 25 freshmen applied for four new spots, and, Mr. McOwen said, it was hard to choose. " -- only 25?
- Mickey Schafer
My thoughts are similar to Bill's. If someone is already an active blogger and they get a small revenue stream down the road that is different from a non-blogger starting to blog because they get paid. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that but I think many people would assume there was a conflict of interest.
- Jean-Claude Bradley
Something that occurs to me on reading Jean-Claude's comment -- people like "us" (FFers), who are comfortable online, are probably less likely to be bothered about the potential conflict of interest -- we have multiple sources (many of them blogs that have passed our trust filters!) and bullshit meters in good working order, so we will sniff out pay-for-play if it happens. I can easily imagine, though, that anyone who is already a bit suspicious of blogs in general would be doubly suspicous of paid blogs.
- Bill Hooker
"NCBI developed an archival service to support research shared through new venues for rapid communication enabled by the internet. Introduced in August 2009, the archive, called Rapid Research Notes (RRN), allows users to access and cite research that is provided through participating publisher programs designed for immediate communication....PLoS Currents: Influenza, [is] the first collection being archived in RRN. NCBI expects the RRN archive to expand over time to include additional collections in other biomedical fields and other critical topics." All articles in the RRN archive are available under Creative Commons Licenses.
- Hilary
NB: the email provided on the about page (RRN@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) does not work :(
- Hilary
Stanford University loses patent rights for novel method of measuring HIV concentration - Clause in employment contract requiring researcher to assign rights trumped by agreement to "to *hereby* assign": http://www.patentlyo.com/patent...
At Stanford, all employees are required to sign an agreement promising to assign any future inventions that emerged from his/her employment to the university. This employee signed an agreement with Cetus to "hereby transfer" rights in the invention prior to actually assigning rights to Stanford. Therefore "[B]ecause Cetus’s legal title vested first, Holodniy no longer retained his rights, negating his subsequent assignment to Stanford during patent prosecution."
- Hilary
Per the comments at the bottom of this post, I would suspect this would lead to likely changes in Stanford's (and other universities') employee agreements which would automatically transfer rights upon creation of the invention.
- Hilary
This is the rollout of a redesign discussed back in Aug at an NLM meeting: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs... (the presentation also provides a good overview of what has changed)
- Hilary
Good to see people taking the ethical side of this seriously. I'm less convinced about the value of specific rules and more by the idea that this should just be seen as bad behaviour but very glad to see people coming down on it like a ton of bricks. That's what will make people feel safe - not rules, not regulations, and not compulsions either, but very strong and public responses to breaches.
- Cameron Neylon
@Cameron +1 . But ideally some kind of consequences/punishment surely would be order as well, e.g. the authors responsible would not be kindly received next time they ask for ethical approval to access controlled-access data from NIH (or other) repositories. Some sort of blacklisting for 'repeat offenders'?
- 'Mummi' Thorisson
Not greatly in favour of blacklisting per se. I would say that it was a disciplinary offence though that ought to consider dismissal from post. Which really amounts to the same thing.
- Cameron Neylon
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the consequences ("punishment") was that their paper was retracted.
- Hilary
The paper was published Aug 31, retracted Sep 9, when all the authors had to do was to ask PNAS to publish it no earlier than Sep 23 to comply with the GENEVA data embargo policy. The closeness of all the dates suggests to me that it was more a serious messup than a malicious breach of policy. http://www.pnas.org/content...
- Iddo Friedberg
Hilary, I would say that the retraction is just the reversal of the act rather than punishment. Paper shouldn't have been published, therefore it was "unpublished". If (and there should definitely be a proper investigation) someone thought they could get away with playing outside the rules there should be punishment above and beyond simple reversal in my view. This is "conduct unbecoming..." etc. But as Iddo says, not clear from the dates whether it might just have been a screwup.
- Cameron Neylon
Cameron: a retraction is a very bad thing to have on your record. It is for all intents and purposes synonymous with"fraud".
- Iddo Friedberg
from Android
Without *knowing* the intent was malicious, forcing a retraction seems a bit harsh. If data is online it should be intended for use by the public. IMO this is just another argument for mandatory DOI's and better dataset citations. On the other hand, calling out a group for not having the courtesy or awareness to contact the originating lab is a good thing. Like Cameron said, the social norms are probably the best way to play this.
- Paul J. Davis
Also, don't physicists have a pretty good system for the whole idea of citing datasets? NCBI's ability to provide transparency in terms of what data came from where and when is pretty atrocious, so its a bit weird to consider for biology. But I thought I read that the LHC data was pretty much available for citation.
- Paul J. Davis
Iddo - I disagree on two counts with that. There are plenty of retractions out there that are honest mistakes or re-assessments. Embarrassing yes, emblematic of sloppy work yes, synonomous with fraud, nah. But more importantly if we take that kind of attitude then people will be too scared to correct things in the future - when we will (hopefully) have much more fine grained approaches...
more...
- Cameron Neylon
Paul - I think citing datasets at NCBI isn't so hard. I'm not sure that's really the problem in this case (if it is then it's a definite mark against the authors). The problem is the culture in biology that collecting the data isn't worth anything so having a highly cited dataset isn't useful on your CV - no matter how good or useful it is. Only the paper matters. I have to say I haven't actually had the time to look over this case in detail though.
- Cameron Neylon
On citing datasets - that's the easy part. What people do not record properly is how they processed the data. Microarrays for instance - there are plenty of public datasets (NCBI GEO, EBI ArrayExpress). But when the associated description reads "Data were processed using the limma package in R" - and that's it - how are you to repeat the work?
- Neil Saunders
This also raises issues of roles of journals, institution employing authors (often several, in different countries/legal systems, as papers now almost all multi-author), and funders in "policing" sci ethics. Lots of talk everywhere about this. Journals can publish policies and retract/correct (ensuring linking in A&I dbase searches etc) - but how can sci community deal with wider issues beyond the paper? (quite apart from the technical problems with enforcing eg "blacklisting")
- Maxine
Neil - in response to your Q above - v hard in practice to be perfect but from journal's perspective: (1) consult with relevant community and state policies for standards all agree and (2) the peer-review process (advice from reviewers on repeatability). Also, of course, journals can in general encourage authors to disclose more rather than less.
- Maxine
Thanks Maxine. I think that journals and data repositories should require, in addition to raw data, deposition of any code (e.g. scripts) used to process the data. Not at the journal or repository site, but somewhere on the web (Github, Google code, Sourceforge etc.)
- Neil Saunders
+1 Neil and Maxine. There is too much of an expection for "the journals" to sort this out. Publishers have an important role to play but we need to clean our own house. Or someone will do it for us. Probably the public. And probably by saying that they're not so interested in funding science any more.
- Cameron Neylon
Thanks, Cameron. I agree, journals can and should help but as part of a wider process that scientists themselves (as a profession) decide is "best practice". Neil - have had this "code" discussion with eds here before - one view is that the documentation better/more meaningful to scientists (who aren't programmers in the main) - also many programmes are not open-source. Probably other points which I don't immediately recall. Nature Biotech is running community consult at the moment on this, I think.
- Maxine
"The semantic article isn't going to come from individual scientists rebelling and marking up their own text. It's going to be a publisher value-added service - "let us make your article integrated, and comprehensible, so that you maximize your citation count and potential collaboration."....[Machine] Translation is a service for which authors would gladly pay. For which searchers would gladly pay. And it's a market that is going to get more valuable as a result of open systems, not less valuable, as the cost of controlled scientific published content drops thanks to green and gold open access."
- Hilary
This reminded me of many of the discussions surrounding open science - the author asks "What would happen if every court and legislature released their output in a machine-readable, XML format, tagged with a standard document type declaration (DTD) written by the best minds in the legal profession? What if these documents were tagged with metadata such as legal subject-area, parties, attorneys, rules of law and cases cited, accessible via a public API and a permanent URI for each decision, statute, and regulation? Sounds good to me." Sounds good to me too!
- Hilary
Wow. Based on the fact that Scribd hosted a copyrighted work, and Scribd's response (to take it down based on DMCA Safe Harbor procedures) wasn't good enough.
- Peter Murray