 |
|
| FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more » |
McEnroe has called Federer the greatest ever but he couldn't get Laver, Sampras, or Borg to say it. #wimbledon
Federer needs - and can afford - that bigger plane. #wimbledon
Get rid of Prince Charlie and just crown Federer king. #wimbldedon
Hey, tweets, if you are not watching #Wimbledon, you're going to regret it.
Daughter watching Wimbledon: "My fingers hurt from crossing them." #federerfan
Score disappeared off NBC's screen for minutes. Strange.
Nerves on high in the Jarvis household watching Wimbledon (Federer fans, all).
@jayrosen_nyu @timobriennyt Yes. It's not a ? of whether information 'wants' to be free (vs. 'should' be paid). It just is. Now find the biz
GREAT comment from @dweinberger in the great discussion about journalistic narcissism: 'Is there such a thing as news?' http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009...
Daniel Ionescu liked this
@TimOBrienNYT Agree. @chr1sa & I argue there's a biz model in free (others put that as a moral issue-e.g., Cheap, in your review today)
RT @cshirky: "Newspapers will fail in spectacular ways when asked to cope with shrinkage." Yelvington debunks API report http://www.yelvington.com/fatal_a...
@jayrosen_nyu @timobriennyt + one need understand new economics of abundance & networks vs. the economics of control. it's fundamentally new
@TimOBrienNYT But he's also saying that free isn't a bridge always to fees; it's also a means of distribution & branding.
@alansmurray You'd think that WSJ journalists, better than any other, would understand the economics aren't about wishes or "should"s.
@harrisj I didn't single out @timobriannyt, you did.
Peter Preston rounds up cozy efforts by govts to bolster fading newspapers. Murdoch says he want feed at that trough. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media...
Other ways to read this feed:
