The headline is confusing - I thought it was a bureaucratic war between the Google corporate folks and the old Blogger folks.
I couldn't read Google's communication on my mobile phone, but a one letter difference between a product and another product could be considered deceptive. For example, oracledatabases11g.com or microsofts.com could be misleading.
e - Ontario Emperor
The key is filtering and hiding. Click on any service icon to see other entries like it. For example, go here to see only FriendFeed posts from everybody http://friendfeed.com/public?s... - Bwana McCall
I like using Twhirl though - wish Twhirl had an easier-to-use interface - Jesse Stay via twhirl
I like Twhirl for Twitter...I think it's the best...but I haven't seen a client that can keep up with the FriendFeed website. - Chris Rossini
posted a message
“Twitter really needs someone paying the bills so they have someone to be accountable for. I actually wish they had advertising so this would be the case.”
As I mentioned earlier I think it's going to take an open technology, free from the bonds of a company, to bring everything together. We're back to the Microsoft vs. Apple / Microsoft vs. Google wars again with Facebook going against everyone else. Who will prevail? Is still argue Facebook has grounds to stand on - vendor lock-in is very powerful, and that seems to be the way Facebook is going on the web. On the other hand, you don't even know you're going social when you use Google so perhaps they have a chance as well. - Jesse Stay
I just wish Twhirl would give me a new sound when people replied to my posts like it does for Twitter. - Jesse Stay via twhirl
From my current mobile platform using MojiPage's FriendFeed widget, I can comment on and like recent items in the "friends & me" feed, but can't enter new native FriendFeed items. - Ontario Emperor
"guriboysf that's the thing - it's up to the leaders - it's not scripture, and targeted towards leaders which is why they don't want it disseminated. If it were for the general public they wouldn't care. I used to share excerpts all the time when I had access to the manual - it's a great resource as a leader and in a church lead by members, very much needed. I have no need for it now because it doesn't target me where I'm not a leader. There's no reason for Wikileaks to be distributing it, and they're sharing it in a manner that wasn't intended for it to be shared. Even under the GPL, wouldn't you want your software used in the way it was intended for? That's what the GPL does - it protects your software from being used in a manner it wasn't intended for. You want your software to be shared, and the GPL ensures that continues to happen. The same with the Mormon church's copyright on this book - it was written to protect so that only those it would most benefit would receive it." - Jesse Stay
"And that's news? Dude, you need to talk to more Mormons - I think people have been hiding from the Mormons far too long to think they want to hide their religion from you." - Jesse Stay
"In fact, the church openly quotes from it in News articles, etc. The church wouldn't be going after this if they cared about it getting into the hands of others. The Mormon church gets the groundswell - they recognize this information isn't "secret", but rather copyrighted information that they need to defend." - Jesse Stay
