Paul Bacchus, John Dupuis, dekay and 4 other people liked this
I do that all the time. I can highly recommend it. Add some tagging (or branches) for versions you send around for review, and you're all set. Beats version tracking in Word. - Egon Willighagen
I have always preferred a service like Google Docs, at least for the rough draft stages of a paper that is. Cleaner and faster to get started, especially for people who are new to those things. - Daniel Jurczak
http://blindscientist.genedrif... and http://blindscientist.genedrif... - Paulo Nuin
I'll second Egon - though it really shines if you're working in LaTeX. I've never tried to merge two Word docs via subversion. Would it work? - Rajarshi Guha
We are using Google Docs to write a grant, but people who are using it are a little bit skeptical to say the least. It's a slow progress. I never tried to merge Word via subversion, but I guess this is something to check. A quick search showed this: http://nicolas.lehuen.com/inde... - Paulo Nuin
I wish I had posted the whole series I wanted, dunno why I didn't. - Paulo Nuin
multiple editing on a word document can present some issues as it is a binary file, difficult to merge changes via svn. I would recommend LaTex - Frank
If LaTeX is an option then just go for svn. :-) - Daniel Jurczak
@Frank: most of the time, LaTeX is not an option, unfortunately. - Paulo Nuin
Google Docs doesn't seem promising - poor offline version (gears) + inability to tackle anything beyond standard documents (even emf/jpg images do not fit). - Yaroslav Nikolaev
@Rajarshi, Daniel & Frank: what's so special about SVN with LaTeX vs Word? don't have any experience with the former unfortunately...If its only binary vs ascii - one still has ability to track changes/comments from within the Word document, which might be an easier track for an average researcher ;) - Yaroslav Nikolaev
As far as free services are concerned, I've been happy with GoogleDocs for private sharing and Wikispaces for public sharing until the very last formatting step, where we generally use Word. Note that people in my field don't use LaTeX. - Jean-Claude Bradley
@Jean-Claude: what about schemes, images, etc - or you generally don't have a versioning issue on these? - Yaroslav Nikolaev
@Paulo: thanks for the plug, svn-time-lapse looks impressive! - Yaroslav Nikolaev
@Yaroslav, SVN+LaTeX is a nice combination because the latter is plain text. Therefore a simple diff allows you to quickly look at changes etc. I agree that it is not for eveybody - certainly most people in chemistry dept's do not (will not?) use LaTeX. Word's track changes is nice, and indeed I do use that when my collaborators won't use LaTeX - but the lack of branching can be a pain. But in general, I passionately hate Word - anything beyond 5 pages with many figures is simply a pain - Rajarshi Guha
@Yaroslav: My personal caveat with Word+SVN is as you've already guessed the binary vs. ascii thing. Maybe it is just a personal bias. :-) - Daniel Jurczak
More generally, when one writes regularly, the value of focusing on content rather than presentation is a huge boon. And LaTeX documents look sexier than Word documents for the same amount of effort :) - Rajarshi Guha
Its the issue with multiple editors of a binary file in svn - not word vs latex. If two different people check out the same version at 9:00am and work on it. If one person checks back in at 10:00am, the second person trying to check in at 11:00 will get a conflict because svn in not clever enough to resolve or merge conflicts in a binary file. - Frank
LaTeX looks better with LESS effort than Word. Specially now that they abolished menus in Word. - Paulo Nuin
GoogleDocs for the non-Tekkis and LaTeX+VersionControl for the Tekkis, or for the web2.0 freaks a Wiki with RTF export option, this allows post-editing in OpenOffice or Word. One good example is XWiki (Java). - joergkurtwegner
@Frank: this issue is clear! However in non-geeky context it seems easier to resolve it using Word built-in tools, rather than forcing everyone to use LaTeX. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
Any opinions on Git? It sounds more promising in terms of speed & stability (distributed system), however does not seem to have a stable Windows port so far (apart from over-cygwin version)?! - Yaroslav Nikolaev
You could consider using a WYSIWYG LaTeX editor... - Egon Willighagen
Oh, the Git port to Windows is fine, the GUI seems a little bit rough but the command line with SSH included works just fine. The git Eclipse plugin also works fine with most commands, but I had problems pushing things to Github from it. - Paulo Nuin
@Yaroslav For the projects I've been on images and figures don't change enough that it's ever been a problem. On Wikispaces I would just fix the image and replace it. Text is where the massive editing takes place. - Jean-Claude Bradley
One major shortcoming of Google Docs (and most Wikis I've seen) for scientific publications is the lack of support for numbered references - Eric Jain
Eric: that's usually the place were Zotero with its drag and drop comes in. - Daniel Jurczak
Problem with Zotero drag/drop is that it doesn't insert named/numbered citations, just the reference list at the end. The Word/OO plugins are better in that respect, but lag behind the latest Zotero release. I'm sure it wouldn't take too much javascript to get data from Zotero->Google Doc as both citation and reference, if anyone fancies a nice coding project ;-) - Neil Saunders
Neil: Well that's true. To be honest I have never used anything other than LaTeX/BibTeX for "larger" documents, so for me manual adding of references was never a major problem. - Daniel Jurczak
@Eric: exactly the point! that's why file-sharing beats document-sharing in research-paper-writing perspective - one can share a reference library along with the docs.. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
Unfortunately Zotero also suffers from inability to share the library between users/computers..they promise multi-computer sync in Zotero 1.5, and multi-user social sharing in Zotero 2.0...However we're not there yet.. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
Yaroslav: I guess you could use DropBox and put the Zotero library into the shared folder. (??) Have never tried it, so just a guess ? - Daniel Jurczak
The Zotero Sync works pretty well and you can access your database online. - Paulo Nuin
The only thing is, I guess you can't access your papers? Does it also sync up attachments, or at least snapshots? - Chris Lasher
tested Zotero 1.5 Sync (Preview): library metadata and text notes are synced over Zotero servers, while for attachments and snapshots have to use any third-party WebDAV disk (in future developers plan to employ Amazon S3 for this purpose). The problem here is that attachments on WebDAV are stored in own Zotero format (which appears as a collection of .zip and .prop files), so one would have to sync full library with metadata to dig out the appropriate file. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
actually the idea of using Zotero for collaborative paper writing seems very interesting, however currently (v1.5) it only fosters single-user synchronization mode, and hacking for group sharing appears cumbersome...'d have to wait for Zotero 2.0.. - Yaroslav Nikolaev
and rethinking the above discussion (including binary vs ascii part) - it appears that would Zotero or Mendeley extend their desktop clients with a "2.0" text-editing functionality (multi-user + version control), they might actually win over the conventional workflow [Word/OpenOffice <> plugin <> reference repository]. Unless Neil will mashup Zotero with GDocs before that ;-) - Yaroslav Nikolaev






