 |
|
| FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more » |
Jon Galloway
@a7an I've been skimming the FriendFeed API docs to see if #witty could be hooked up (as Twhirl does). Anyone else looked at that?
July 1, 2008
from Twitter
- Comment
- Like
- Share
Matt Casto, Paul Whitaker and Ryan Farley liked this
I feel that changing Witty to work with FriendFeed would mean a big redesign as the two services are just not the same.
- Alan Le
Sounds like a plan, time for "Fitty"!
- Adam Kinney
Or how about "Fatty"? Hehe.
- Ryan Farley
from twhirl
"Fatty" ha! that cracked me up.
- Alan Le
There would have to be a complete re-design around both binding and the simple "IMessageService" interface I threw in there. It could be done, but perhaps the Twhirl approach, e.g. a window per service, would work better?
- Scott Koon
from twhirl
I would take a user-centric approach. what are the primary actions on ff, secondary actions, what info is necessary, how to reduce info-overload, etc. starting with this type of brainstorming, it would probably mean creating a new client vs a client that does both twitter and friendfeed.
- Alan Le
I agree. Now that I've used FriendFeed for a bit, I'm seeing how a client like AlertThingy pulls that together. With FriendFeed as a superset, I don't really need Twitter anymore.
- Jon Galloway
I agree with Alan, FF has so much more info available, it would be better to design for FF than fit in an old box.
- John Stockton
Where's the Witty/Fitty/Fatty room?
- Adam Kinney