Hoax and High Treason… Adam Lanza Never Existed!… Sandy Hook School Was Not an Operating School at Time of Shooting! | KnowTheLies.WordPress... Alternative News From Around the World - http://knowthelies.wordpress.com/2013...
#CorruptCourt USDC of MA Why is Judy Clarke's name in the properties of a document filed by the federal public defender? Why is a document supposedly filed by Judy Clarke coming from the Public Defender office? Why did this supposed Judy Clarke document just disappear off the docket? Is the fed defender office forging Clarke's name? #FreeJahar
"SHOW" PROCEEDINGS - JOINT report filed 9 17 2013 has only AUSA signature yet he typed Judy Clarke's name on 2 10 2014 JOINT Status Report - Protective order cited in both status reports is fraudulent; never entered recent orders NOT on Written Opinions Report Electronic Order that initially allowed it does not have a docket number
Fwd: The transcript for the 11/12/2013 hearing is posted but does not have a court stamp. I thought the problem was browser related in regards to the court stamp but the stamp hit or miss is happening with IE and Chrome. Some documents that had stamps no longer have a stamp. See comment re arrest warrant. (via http://ff.im/1gmTg5)
NEW ORDER allowing appointment of 2nd death penalty attorney. < appears may actually be drafted on computer of a US District Judge but I believe this is DECEPTION. Supplemental motion by Judy Clarke regarding SAMS. < Scanned document unable to assess from where it originated. Other dkt #'s sealed.
Filings by Fick - note 144 was likely drafted by a paralegal and that is why the properties are different; however, who ever wrote and filed it used his exact style. Compare the signature blocks to the supposed filing by Judy Clarke in dkt 208 and note author in properties as well as data under custom. text =court stamp (via http://ff.im/1gnyF6)
Now look at docs filed w/ the court supposedly by Judy Clarke. The affidavit is totally legally deficient & filed w/ the motion by Conrad YET Magistrate Bowler's Clerk entered the document & it was a screwy entry see the comment. Then look at dkt #154 which is undersigned by Watkins yet has Clarke in the properties. (via http://ff.im/1gnyF0)