in principle yes, but it's a flawed idea, after all what's the point of you being up if all of your contacts are offline....
- Duncan Riley
Probably not - would be happy with ads tho
- Silverbrow
More than likely no, although it would really depend on what feature(s) paid members receive that would be the determining factor for me.
- Scott Jarkoff
Probably, depending on what the paid service offered. I pay for Flickr every year because of what I get.
- Dion Hinchcliffe
from twhirl
Yep, it depends. Like Flickr, what do we get? A small annual fee to not have to deal with the outages would be nice. But... we're all on FF now aren't we? That changes the game a bit...
- Allen Fuller
I don't mind paying for something if I can be sure it's going to stick around a bit....via feedalizr
- Ro (Lilyhill)
They hardly inspire confidence in their product which makes it hard to justify paying for it. Will they ever be in a position to charge given the current state of affairs? And what will paying for Twitter achieve? 99.99% uptime? Prove you can consistently provide the required uptime before going pay.
- Gabriel Nijmeh
I think they should offer additional services, grouping friends by category etc
- John Cass
No, based on my current usage and the little value I get from it. But yes, if it was as essential to me as some people claim it is to them.
- Michael Hocter
Flat out no.... I would move to Pownce, Jaiku, or FriendFeed
- Mike Wills
from twhirl