Sir Shuping is just sir
This hit the ILL list over Christmas break about CCC either making more prominent or changing their terms and conditions (thinking the later myself) that is causing some concern due to the wording. Kevin Smith at Duke wrote a post on it: wonder if anyone here
has encountered this, has thoughts on this, has it always been like this and folks just haven't paid attention? - Sir Shuping is just sir
*bumping* for the monday crowd. - Sir Shuping is just sir
coming back to this is anyone doing anything different about ILL copyright over this? I've been asked to investigate this for mpow to see if folks are still going to CCC, doing something different, negotiating with CCC, other? - Sir Shuping is just sir
It is under legal review at mpow - Aaron the Librarian from Android
I'd be interested in what y'all decide Aaron. Our legal consul has reviewed it and was unhappy with it (hence my investigation now) - Sir Shuping is just sir
mfpow has always been "f*** CCC, we'll existing-license and fair-use it." uni legal is behind 'em on it. it's one of the things I admire mfpow for! - RepoRat
what do you mean by existing-license? I wonder if I could get mpow to go with that...hmmmm - Sir Shuping is just sir
basically, "if we have an existing license for it, damn if we're paying the CCC *again* to use it in classrooms." - RepoRat
ah gotcha. thanks! - Sir Shuping is just sir
I would say there's a gap between ILL and classroom use on this question - since ILL has strong existing best practices (and I think some actual legal-ish agreements? it's been a long time since I studied ILL copyright, and it's not part of what I do) of paying for stuff-beyond-article-5-from-the-same-journal through the CCC... not sure how/if we are handling ILL issues at mpow. - Marianne