What? People seem to be throwing around calls of "monopoly" around too liberally. It doesn't really apply here yet, especially as the market is far from settling down and is still in its infancy. This is in comparison to operating systems or search/search advertising where true monopolies currently do exist and should be defeated.
- Nate Janewit
If search has become a commodity as this article seems to suggest (it's already "good enough" with whatever is out there), then Bing along with the entire search industry is in a lot more hurt than I currently estimate.
- Nate Janewit
Mini tends to be rather spot on with his analysis from a company insider standpoint, so this is meaningful. That said, I'm still skeptical...we'll see from the results.
- Nate Janewit
I've been using the internal release, and Outlook especially is a TON better than previous releases. I still think the Exchange web interfaces suck, but that's to be expected from Microsoft.
- Nate Janewit
Google Docs' TOS is really evil, I admit. Consumer Watchdog nailed that Google's privacy record is really spotty--and that they are spinning this to whomever in government will listen.
- Nate Janewit
The promotion only really consolidates Windows engineering with Windows marketing. Hopefully, that will mean marketing will be a little more realistic in its aims.
- Nate Janewit
The war to disrupt Microsoft's monopoly is on! At the same time, though, can Google succeed against a very strong, entrenched product line? I'm all for competition--Windows is in dire need of it--but the consequences if Google were to win would be almost apocalyptically dire: complete control over our means to access information and our means to manipulate and use it on our "own" machines.
- Nate Janewit
On a side note: I wonder what the Mozilla Foundation (and perhaps all of the many other groups this announcement could potentially quash like Ubuntu and Debian) must be thinking.
- Nate Janewit
It's incredibly interesting that LBS services, much like what it promises to users, are themselves regionally rather than universally popular. "Popularity of...applications is still dependent on region. For example, here in North America, navigation and family-safety solutions are the most popular. In Western Europe, navigation is the most used, followed by local search and friend finders, but there's no significant uptake in safety applications. These sorts of regional preferences will lead to a dynamic LBS market worldwide."
- Nate Janewit
Sounds like an interesting read, if the writing style is more substantive than the almost immediately obvious "Long Tail." An important point relevant to search: "Free can also be used to kill off competition and create a barrier to entry."
- Nate Janewit
What does this mean? It likely means Google is ready to aggressively market these products in distribution deals to supplant Microsoft's monopoly on the space. This would be a good thing--if they didn't have to resort to funding it using the monopoly of their own on search advertising.
- Nate Janewit
Reading the Heretech article saddens me. The primary reason for not switching seems to be mostly "I'm used to Google, and this isn't Google" despite admissions that Bing is largely just as good. It is too early to say, as the author also points out, but if the author is true, despite the data and the early indications of success, Google's search and information monopoly would be unstoppable--and a far more dangerous monopoly than any that have ever existed before.
- Nate Janewit