I love this: "Over the last few months, we've been working with the IE engineers at Microsoft to address these issues: they released a critical update to their JavaScript implementation that fixed a performance problem with how the script engine allocates and frees memory." - Paul Buchheit
Perhaps Google won't bother addressing these challenges in future, and instead tailor everything for Chrome? - Slippy Lane
No, things will have to work with ie6 for a long time, but what they can do is make some of the enhanced features be Chrome-only (things that aren't possible in other browsers). - Paul Buchheit
That's probably a much fairer assessment, given your exposure to the aforementioned, lol. In that case, then, I suppose it's up to the boys and girls at Microsoft and Mozilla to take advantage of the opportunity and get in on the action. I imagine they're already studying the guts of chrome as hard as they can :-) - Slippy Lane
Hopefully, we'll never see "to get this cool feature in Gmail, install Chrome". A plug-in like Gears is a reasonable requirement, though. - Ionut
I wonder if that IE fix addresses the problems we've been having. Does anybody know the KB article for it? - Gabe Schaffer
What is the issue Gabe? I believe the problem they fixed was with GC performance once there were a large number of objects. - Paul Buchheit
Paul: The problem is that after running for some time the app just becomes untenably slow. Our hypothesis was that the GC would run a collection on every allocation once there got to be too many objects, and we were exceeding that limit. I seem to recall you were quite skeptical at the time, Paul, because Gmail hadn't run into that problem. - Gabe Schaffer
“Ah, I forgot to pre-debunk the "Dude, Google claims that they own everything you do in Chrome!" conspiracy. Debunked that last night in a Mashable comment and then again this morning: http://bit.ly/2toGWg . Sheesh.”
Thanks for setting us straight Matt! - Anne Haynes
When we are discussing legal documents, it's the verbiage that matters, not the intent. As long as clauses 11.1 and 11.2 are in the EULA, they have full effect. - Franci Penov
that is how Mozilla reads it and why they are not scared - Fred Grott
Thanks for setting people straight, Matt. It was so obvious that the EULA was a c/p job from another service that I never gave it a second thought, and I was utterly stunned that so many people lost their minds over it. Guess expecting common sense is just entirely too much to ask these days. - Vincent Ferrari
I have a feeling they actually launched Chrome too early and simply did not have time for such a stupid legal thing. Unfortunately for a company attracting attention like Google does it is something to avoid. - Svetlana Gladkova
why all the google bashing? Chrome SHOULD be a more secure browser than FF when Google is finished.. isn't it still in beta? hello? - paisley via twhirl
Yes Matt, but then why the legal language that says otherwise in the TOC? What Google say and what they did are two different things here and the law upholds what is written. - Sally Church
Most times I'm really glad I'm not in Matt's shoes. Other times i think it would be pretty neat to have 'a view' at the Plex :) - Charlie Anzman
Sally Church, that's why I'm glad we changed the TOS/EULA. - Matt Cutts
I read the TOC's and didn't download this morning - Sally Church
Suggest you guys read Matt Cutts' piece yesterday before uninstalling http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/... can find similar stuff with almost any browser out there, in most cases worse - Charlie Anzman
I don't see how this addresses the TOC/EULA concerns. I can see what they were aiming for with the EULA language but I don't play around with my copyrights. Ever. - Lindsey Smith
this is the kind of EULA that sounds kinda bad but would almost never result in any of the horrors you are thinking of. Don't get me wrong, they should remove it... but I can't imagine what you really think will happen in the real world? - Stefan Hayden
I agree Stefan . . . in 99.999999999% of cases nothing will happen with it. But . . . - Lindsey Smith
I suspect this EULA term came about due to Google Picasa/Blogger/Pages/Sites, where Google really does require perpetual rotalty-free rights. - Denton Gentry
Wow, you give up rights to your pictures with Picasa? And content with Blogger? Glad I don't use either... - Lindsay Donaghe
Always assume that you're giving away the rights to anything you store on a Google Service, whether shared or not. It has ever been thus. This is just a step further on. I don't imagine Google is being evil, probably just protecting itself against frivolous yet damaging lawsuits. - Slippy Lane
Lindsay: I suspect that the Chrome EULA problem has nothing to do with Google going evil and everything to with cut-and-pasting from the Picasa / Blogger / Sites etc EULAs. - Tudor Bosman
@lindsay when @denton said "requires" I think he means it in a technical sense. They require the right to "redistribute" or "publish" royalty free because they need the right to render your content within a web page multiple times for as long as your content exists on their servers. It's a technicality that should probably be reworded, but no, Google is not trying to steal people's copyrights. I'm guessing as @denton said that this language is in Chrome to prepare for eventual picasa/blogger/etc integration - Jason B.
I'll agree to their intent but what you agree to as worded is what you are bound to. Rarely does intent work in your favor. - Lindsey Smith
and: (IANAL, but) you don't give up the rights to your pictures; you grant Google a license to display your pictures (according to the TOS of the particular service). This is to prevent someone from posting a picture on Picasa, and then trying to sue Google for displaying their picture to the whole wide world without paying them royalties (EDIT: what Jason B said). - Tudor Bosman
The deal is, Chrome is not a "service" it's an application... I don't upload anything TO Chrome... I use it to upload content to other services... but this seems to imply that using it as the transport mechanism also gives them rights to the content that I transport with it. - Lindsay Donaghe
read the fine print again its not just display rights as in other Google TOS's - Fred Grott
I think you all need to actually read the TOS. I quote: "11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services." All they essentially want is the right to *republish* them. How else will it work? I don't see anything particularly troubling there. - Vinay | विनय
The right to republish your work is a core right of copyright laws. If they take the right to republish my work without monetary compensation then they publish it anywhere, make money off of it and you get bent over and screwed royally - Lindsey Smith
@lindsay The whole point of Chrome is for google to start blurring the line between service and application. Before long you're going to start seeing tighter and tighter integration of the browser with the service (especially when the browser and service are made by the same company). This TOS uproar is probably 80% prepping for future integrations, 10% bad cut/paste job from existing EULAs and 10% poorly researched articles being posted to The Register - Jason B.
Nonetheless Jason . . . I don't want to make a mistake based on Google's mistake. They cover their ass . . . I'm going to cover mine. - Lindsey Smith
If I understand correctly, Chrome's EULA is identical to Google Terms of Service ( http://www.google.com/accounts... ), which is a general document applicable to all Google services and products. The section quoted in the article is titled "Content license from you" and you'll find it in the TOS of almost any service that accepts user-generated content. Since Chrome is a browser and not a web service, I think that section is not applicable. If you are worried about licensing or if you want to get the latest build of Google Chrome, install Chromium, the open source project used to create Google Chrome. - Ionut
Lindsey, Google is asking for a "non-exclusive license to reproduce", which means that you do not lose the rights. - Vinay | विनय
also worry about hidden or obscure "features" that make it easier for Google to track queries and browsing behavior to "improve" the browsing experience - Wilma Stoneflint
Vinay, I don't want Google to have any rights to republish something I created simply because I decided to use their browser. - Lindsey Smith
@Jason this all TOS stuff is all about one thing -- it is not enough to use dataceners data to make money for Google shareholders, so they sprawl further down the customer... this is LITERALLY as if bank would find counting your money on your account at their bank as NOT ENOUGH to do business and draws your to count money in YOUR REAL POCKETS - silpol
Quote: "Because Google Chrome was not launched externally until today, we haven't yet changed Google Analytics to recognize it when you segment by browser within reports. However - this will change in the coming weeks (until then, the browser will show as Firefox). We'll let you know when the change happens." So Google Analytics has been lying to us? Did they pick Firefox so that it would look less suspicious that Safari and get lost in the other stats? - Tony Ruscoe
"The browser will show as Firefox". Why not Safari? I suppose not many people used it before launch. - Ionut
The solution has at least two major bugs: it doesn't split the text into words and it doesn't have a way to properly merge the results from the asynchronous requests. So you'll almost certainly get bad results. - Ionut
From the post: "In the interest of setting the record straight I think it's incumbent on Google to send their little camera van back around and get a more accurate photo of how the house looks today. After all, I invested a lot of my vacation time this summer getting the landscaping done out front and the house looking as it does today." - Ionut
I heard similar requests, but this is one is pretty funny... "I think it's incumbent on Google to send their little camera van back around and get a more accurate photo." - Ionut
"some information such as IP, browser type, regional and language settings" - one assumes they already know the browser type :-) - Alex Gawley
I couldn't figure out how they show the suggested sites when you visit https://ieonline.microsoft.com... . They don't use cookies or user accounts. - Ionut
There are certain scenarios that require user data to be sent in order to make the user experience better, as suggested by http://tinyurl.com/3yue6c. Which if you read closely, discloses that Google collects exactly the same information if the user installs Google Toolbar and opts in particular features. - Franci Penov
Hi, Franci Penov! Remind me what part of MSFT you work at? I guess I thought that Google's disclosure at http://bit.ly/2Jiwrg with the big red capital letters and disclosure in the first sentence was more clear than MSFT's disclosure, which was buried deep in the IE8 privacy page. - Matt Cutts
Doesn't it say that it is the search provider which collects this data, and not the browser? That means it's more equivalent to the third bullet on this page. http://www.google.com/intl/en/... - David Owens
9 processes are loaded with the browser in Windows (No doubt toolbar type tracking processes). You can turn them off but it's not as easy or obvious as recent efforts by Google and Yahoo to opt out. - Charlie Anzman
hmm.. well you can find out this much information about visitors to your websites and blogs too. But if MSFT finds out this info, they're blasted? - Imran Hussain via feedalizr
Matt, I work on Windows Live Toolbar. :-) I have not seen the big red letter warning you point to, as I have not installed Google Toolbar (exactly because of the product I work on). But you could've just mention that you have a problem with the disclosure clarity. I'll make sure your feedback gets to the IE guys. - Franci Penov
http://tinyurl.com/6q9vou - Chrome Privacy Policy. Not as obvious as Google Toolbar big red letter warning; I personally had to dig a little bit around before I found it. I'd say about as clear and discoverable as IE8 Privacy policy you complained about. :-) - Franci Penov
Franci Penov, thanks for passing on my feedback to the IE guys. I don't think Google Chrome has anything to hide (e.g. it doesn't send your browsing info to Google as you surf the web). In fact, I just did a separate write-up on the communication between Chrome and Google. Read it at http://bit.ly/2jnBYZ - Matt Cutts
Imran, I think it's fair to point out that IE8 gives users virtually no disclosure that their wholesale surfing data (including queries done on other search engines) will be sent to Microsoft if they turn on this innocent-sounding feature. - Matt Cutts
@mattcutts the Google reputation manager? :) - HollowMarkeD
" What is TinEye? TinEye is the first image search engine on the web to use image identification technology. You can submit an image to TinEye to find out where and how that image appears on the web, or to find modified or edited versions." - Ionut
"We figure out what works by running experiments - tiny tests for a small number of users which help us determine whether that feature helps or hurts. At any given time, we run anywhere from 50 to 200 experiments on Google sites all over the world." - Ionut
"Steve Jobs held a press conference today and revealed that Michael Phelps was the inspiration behind the iPhone. Jobs said in a pre-written statement, "In early 2003 Michael Phelps approached me with the idea, and at first I was skeptical--not to mention perplexed as to even how such technology would be created. However, Phelps came with the idea, design, and even a prototype. After discussion with our engineers they said it was the beyond the scope of our labs." - Ionut via Bookmarklet
"There's no such thing as a free dinner. A worker at Google tells us the company is taking evening meals off the menu: "Google has drastically cut back their budget on the culinary program. How is it affecting campus? No more dinner. No more tea trolley. No more snack attack in the afternoon."" - Tudor Bosman via Bookmarklet
Note that this is from Valleywag, I have no inside information and don't (yet) know whether it's for real or not. - Tudor Bosman
ⓞnor, do you work at Google or have friends there? - Philipp Lenssen
"The company told CNBC’s Jim Goldman this afternoon that the rumors, started yesterday by Valleywag, are completely untrue and that they don’t know where they came from." http://www.alleyinsider.com/20... - Ionut
I am shocked, shocked to discover that once again ValleyWag has got something wrong. I'd expect this sort of thing from random bloggers but ValleyWag employs professional journalists.</sarcasm> - Adewale Oshineye
"If you want to detect a Linux user, look for telltale signs such as stacks of O'Reilly books, an anti-MS worldview, and a stuffed penguin collection." - Ionut via Bookmarklet
From the Pandia article: "Yahoo! has also dropped support for the AND operator. This is not equally serious, as Yahoo! will do an AND search by default." So they dropped support for an option which has always been used by default ?! - Ionut
It's really interesting how the current UI, not having undergone any "Wow it's all different" iterations, is so similar yet different from where we started. - Kevin Fox via Bookmarklet
It reminds me how much I dislike JPG for screenshots :) - Paul Buchheit
It took me a while to figure out what was going on here, until I realized you'd Bookmarket-ed a blog post from *2004*! That's ancient history, man! - Paul Wilcox
Great to see you had a Prius label in 2004 :) - Roshan Vyas
Archive is nice :D it is very interesting to see the evolution. Thanks Paul :) - Harun Baris Bulut
I love the fact the delete button wasn't introduced yet. I tell people about this and they don't believe me - Derek Coatney
not being able to delete was a bit strange, I remember. - Josh Haley
Delete was there from day one -- it was just in the "more actions..." menu. - Paul Buchheit
Is there any important feature in today's Gmail that hasn't been envisioned from the beginning? - Ionut
That's an interesting question. I guess it depends on your definition of "important" and "beginning". In the very beginning, the only definite vision was to make something "better". However, pretty much everything in there today had been prototyped or at least talked about well before launch (see the chat integration in http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-c... for example). As usual, coming up with the ideas is easy, but fitting them cleanly into the product is hard. - Paul Buchheit
The funny part about this is I was being sort of snarky but didn't really mean for Kevin to post the thing about the bandwidth. I had a legacy server in the Google datacenter from the Blogger acquisition that I was using to host shellen.com and evhead.com. Kevin went ahead and made screenshots of that thread anyway. :) I got a few angry comments from people on my blog that I was 'stealing from Google'. This is why the internet needs a sarcasm mark. - Jason Shellen
Yeah, I actually recalled that faux pas when I reblogged this now. 'Oops!' Psst, you don't still have that server in a Google datacenter, do you? FriendFeed could always use some free bandwidth... - Kevin Fox
I just assumed FriendFeed was being hosted from servers in a Google datacenter anyway. They wouldn't really miss the bandwidth anyway, would they? ;-) - Tony Ruscoe
"Comic book covers presented at Cover Browser are republished within a fair use context." Why it's fair use? - Ionut
'Cause I don't show the inside, but just the cover of the book, comic etc., and then if you want to see the full thing you would need to buy it (like web shops show product covers). This specific postcard cover series is probably in the public domain though due to old age, so that's a bit different. - Philipp Lenssen
"If you ever harbored a secret desire to rebuild your tattered relationship with IE6—to rekindle that flame—it’s easily done. Simply spend a little quality time working with HTML email and I guarantee you’ll have the words “I HEART IE6” tattooed on your left buttock by the second week... The Legion of Doom is an insidious crew of desperadoes led by the Evil Outlook 2007 and also including Gmail, Hotmail, and Lotus Notes. Each uses their own unique but evil super-powers to subvert and destroy your HTML rendering... Gmail actively strips all background images and will remove background-color information too if you’re not careful in how you declare it. It rewrites your email with a tangled web of random CSS classes that make it almost impossible to track which rule is doing what." - Ionut
is it really 113 ? then google receives a big WOW from me :D - Harun Baris Bulut
Even Google Reader had around 200 servers one year ago. - Ionut
@Harun: I said *had* 113. That was almost two years ago and it's wasn't confirmed. - Tony Ruscoe
If this is accurate, each server consumes ~490W on average. Also 8 machines / rack. So these are pretty conventional data centers (~30A / rack) , holding pretty big machines. - Sanjeev Singh
"T-Mobile will be the first carrier to offer a mobile phone powered by Google's Android software, according to people briefed on the company's plans. The phone will be made by HTC, one of the largest makers of mobile phones in the world, and is expected to go on sale in the United States before Christmas, perhaps as early as October." - Ionut
Another one of those 'Like for linking' not 'Like for content'. I really want Grand Central to be open for all, and Jaiku - we barely knew ye! - Kevin Fox
People don't seem to understand that the smaller Google acquisitions (not YouTube, DoubleClick, etc) are generally for the people, not the product (or at least not the product as it is). - Paul Buchheit
@Paul, totally. I work with great people everyday and a lot of them came as part of an acquisition and I couldn't imagine some of my projects without them. - Jonathan Terleski
@Paul People often don't understand that because it's not made clear when the acquisition is announced. - Kevin D. White
+1 Kevin. If a service has users pre-acquisition and the intention is that the service will be mothballed and the engineers re-distributed then that intention should be made clear to the users. I believe that Grand Central will eventually open up again, but Jaiku? And what's FeedBurner done lately? - Kevin Fox
@Kevin Given that all 3 services you've mentioned are working just fine and serving their existing users I'm not sure what more could be expected of them. Given that Google doesn't pre-announce stuff all you can know is that these things are still working. I think we all know better than to believe that because there are no user-facing changes or dramatic announcements that a service is dead. Sadly many of the pundits don't build software and so think that if you go more than a few months without feeding - Adewale Oshineye
the hype machine then you must be dead. There's no real way to refute these sorts of allegations without making thing worse. It's like being asked "when did you stop beating your wife?" - Adewale Oshineye
@Adewale: Sorry for any confusion. I wasn't making an allegation, I was raising a question. I honestly don't know what's going on at Jaiku, but I do know there are products that have been bought and augmented, products that have been bought, torn apart, and re-worked into other services, and products that have been bought for talent, where the service was mothballed and I'm openly wondering which category Jaiku and FeedBurner will end up in. Also, I would suggest that a social network service that has closed signups isn't "working just fine and serving their existing users" but that's not the point I was trying to make. Sorry if I ruffled any feathers. - Kevin Fox
As long as people understand that there is a difference between when they see on the outside and what is really happening on the inside. Obviously I can't comment on some stuff simply because it isn't public. But I appreciate that perception matters, of course. And vice versa, the public should appreciate that they're only seeing one part of what is going on. - DeWitt Clinton
@Kevin I can't speak for FeedBurner or even Jaiku. However the best way to learn what's going on with Jaiku is to join the site and follow jyri/teemu/termie. Drop me an email on adewale at gmail and I'll send you an invite if you don't already have an account. - Adewale Oshineye
@adewale, in your comment to Kevin, you said that these services were "working just fine." Maybe you don't use any of those services, or you have a very loose definition of what "just fine" is. These services are slowly being mothballed and deconstructed bit by bit. That is NOT fine. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
Google used to define innovation now they simply stifle it. Their motto: If you can't beat em, buy em and bury them in the backyard. - Matt Shaulis
Matt, I'll play Devil's advocate: What did Google ever innovate? They weren't the first search engine. They weren't the first company to sell CPC ads by auction. They weren't the first to do web mail, online documents, web video, IM, blogging, wikis, or any number of other things. Google's strengths are making incremental, yet essential, improvements and doing it on an unheard of scale. Immunity to Not Invented Here syndrome is a positive. - Steve Weis
Everything is incremental. Products don't have to be entirely new in order to be innovative, and in fact an entirely new product would probably be completely incomprehensible. - Paul Buchheit
Call me biased, but I still think Google Maps was a damned awesome launch. If you want to talk about acquisition success stories, you can't get much better than that. Not every acquisition works, but I think Google has got a way better track record than most, including some total home runs. - ⓞnor
Yeah, Google Maps was great, though the acquired product was actually a windows client, so it's also a good example of changing the product direction post-acquisition (for the better). - Paul Buchheit
Google Maps was a game changer. It really changed how we thought about what could be done with the web. - Jason Carreira
Yes, part of why I call it a success story is that it wasn't just Google buying something and slapping the brand on it. Where 2 had this crazy idea that you could pre-render maps for the entire world and use that to drive a totally different user experience, and they had a serious passion for high quality map rendering. Google knew a lot about Web design and large scale services, and a combined team brought it all together to launch something neither company would ever have pulled off by itself. - ⓞnor
@Mark You state that "hese services are slowly being mothballed and deconstructed bit by bit." I'm on the internal Google mailing lists for 2 out 3 of these services. I see them writing and checking in code on a daily basis. That's what I base my belief upon. What basis do you have for your claim? - Adewale Oshineye
@Paul exactly, talented people are a great reason for acquisition. Precisely why Google took over jaiku. Not because of the service, but because they got their hands on some really talented mobile guys - Alexander van Elsas
Adewale: I base them on the fact that I've been users far before acquisition on two of the three, and the fact that I'm really observant. GrandCentral is rotting away and getting less usable by the day, and FeedBurner continues to be robbed of major features that make it in any way an attractive solution. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
"Why not build new services and integrate at the same time? There are lots of opinions about the best way to go through integrations. Our perspective is that the time you lose trying to continuously merge an updated legacy codebase with a new rewrite causes you be in a world of never actually getting the integration done because you're constantly working on merge problems, which gives you less time to add new features OR get the new backend integration done, and eventually you kind of grind to a halt." ( http://blogs.feedburner.com/fe... ) - Ionut
@Mark You're still not getting it. Ade just told you he see's code being checked in for 2 of 3 of the services you mention. How does this equate to "rotting away?" WRT FeedBurner, exactly what major features was it robbed of that makes it unattractive? I've been a huge FB user since long before the acquisition so I'm curious about the functionality I should be missing. Everything still works like it did before for me. - Erica Baker
No, I think it's you guys who aren't getting it. Don't get me wrong, I love a lot of Google stuff, but you folks are killing some of my favorite features. Replacing FAN with AdSense? Completely dumb move. GrandCentral used to work reliably. Now, half the time I can't download or listen to voicemail. You guys may be doing stuff to the code, but I'm here to say it isn't improving the service. These aren't temporary problems or issues - these are shifts in service levels. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
This is the kind of awesome targeting we've seen from AdSense for Feeds since Mashable switched over from FAN: (http://mashable.com/2008/08/15...). Gay pr0n and ponzi schemes. As I said earlier in the week, robbing FeedBurner of the one key advantage for publishers (i.e. sophisticated monetization) will kill FeedBurner. It's trivially simple to set up RSS redirection, which is the only other major benefit to FB. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
As for GrandCentral, I and the Mashable Staff use it to record our phone interviews. Or I should say *used* it. Reliability on recording retrieval has gotten so shoddy that we now turn to *TalkShoe* for something that's more reliable. As Cyndy and Alexander will likely tell you, when TalkShoe is more reliable than your product, you've got a problem. - Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins
"Given that Google doesn't pre-announce stuff" Not true. - Philipp Lenssen