Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
@NYMeng I can't keep up with me, either. I'm going to slow down next week, with the help of tryptophan.
Getting better every day RT @terracreative: Jamming on @printcasting.... what else? Lots of great advances being made with this project!
@connectme Disagree with you on open source. It's the only reason we have a consumer Internet after dot-bomb days. Open source took over.
@connectme Only the new big gatekeeper companies make money on software & hardware now. MS, Apple, broadband. The rest is all value add.
@connectme Ironically, if AOL had never had dialup subscribers it would be just fine. Beware customers who are paying for the wrong thing.
@connectme I believe there are deep parallels between AOL's dialup business and newspaper / magazine subscription. Probably cable, too.
@connectme AOL's problem was never lack of functionality. It was all those subscribers paying for dialup, then leaving for broadband.
This is all good news for those of you working on new products that have no revenue. You have nothing to lose, and everything to gain.
One day advertisers will move from Google keywords to something else. Then what? Google will be screwed, just like other legacy companies.
@connectme I don't believe many truly make money selling online consumer software. It's all about service, and always has been.
@connectme I talked to many justthisclose companies. Interesting time, especially as 2000 approached & everyone was running out of capital.
I have nothing against Google. #justsayin that every company eventually deals with transition. It's hard to wean yourself from current $.
I'll never forget the day I was in an AOL VP's office & he was told that partner Google had made $6 million on these new pay-per-click ads.
I know I'm weird for caring that AOL is laying off 1/3 of its staff. I remember when it was at the top, and was lucky to work there.
He said, "Let's get more of those!" Years later, $6 million is like an annoying gnat to Google and AOL is rebooting.
AOL was a true trailblazer early on, but became a "legacy media" company. All in just 15 years. Maybe it will get past that now.
Why would I want to do that? To test cross-platform compatibility, primarily browsers. Hate that I have to install a whole OS for that.
Just upgraded to Parallels 5 for $50 and I'm liking it already. I can comfortably run XP and Vista on OSX. (Have Windows 7 on a Netbook).
@orihoffer Yeah. They should have listened to us more back then, dammit! ;-)
The Vatican of all places is now searching for ETs out of a facility inArizona: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009...
A successful family owner / publisher in S. America told me he never expects to profit and only ever hopes to cover expenses.
I'm starting to think that using journalism to make a profit is unsustainable. At best you break even & invest in the future.
@connectme The problem is that the goals of informing a community and making hand over fist $$ are very different.
@connectme I've been told that many LatAm newspapers are byproducts of other successful businesses. Their objective is not primarily profit.
I've resigned myself to the fact that I'm basically a monk who operates under the title of "journalist."
Maybe a digital monk. I'll never make a lot of money, but I will help make good things happen.
@oliviagarcia Peruvians e-mail, MMS and post photos for a chance to get them featured in print as well. So lots of social media down there.
@oliviagarcia At La Republica in Lima, they have various polls and contests in print where people compete to get their SMS quotes featured.
@oliviagarcia Latin American newsrooms love Bakotopia.com and many either seek to emulate it, or already are. Who would have guessed?
I have all these metal-mouth images from Molly Ringwald movies going through my head. Soon to be me!
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook