This is a great well thought out and balanced post.
There are always a lot of angles to consider, word of mouth is always the strongest way to gain visibility, but then you also need continued support with reputation management and another pair of eyes to take your vision and put into a well thought out and concise press release and even conversation with those who would not only be interested in your technology, but can benefit from it.
I think there is definitely room for both--of course if done correctly. - Pierce Mattie via FriendFeed MT Plugin
I sort of agree with the blog. Yes good technology does market itself but there are several cases where competing technologies (in a similar sector) exist. All looking for more visibility and grab as much of the pie as possible.
Marketing and PR can help with getting people on board quickly.
Another advantage of PR is trust, generally speaking if the Guardian/Telegraph covers a technology a user might feel more comfortable in trying it.
Obviously all that comes at a cost ($5K/$10K). Although I'm a firm believer of founders marketing their own brand/technology. They can explain the technology like no one else + they are highly motivated/passionate. - Raj via FriendFeed MT Plugin
Nice article Marshall. Really good subject to talk about.
Great PR skills is fantastic, and rare. As with most things it comes down to definition. If you want someone in PR to 'build awareness' then that's crap. If you want someone who understands the media, knows how to position you, knows when to put you out there and works in with your over all strategy - then that's a good start.
At Kazaa, Kelly Larabee was amazing. She was my first call every morning and she was a significant asset to the team.
Sussanah and Chris from ICON Media were great. Very understanding and wonderfully responsive yet patient.
And I +1 for Erica Lee and the Strategic Lee team. Solid work load, balanced, frank (and fun to boot).
Of course Brian Solis is hot too, but I haven't had the chance to work with him yet. - Mick Liubinskas via FriendFeed MT Plugin
This is a great well thought out and balanced post.
There are always a lot of angles to consider, word of mouth is always the strongest way to gain visibility, but then you also need continued support with reputation management and another pair of eyes to take your vision and put into a well thought out and concise press release and even conversation with those who would not only be interested in your technology, but can benefit from it.
I think there is definitely room for both--of course if done correctly. - Pierce Mattie via FriendFeed MT Plugin
I think it has to do with the time factor to achieve some level of success.
I do believe that growing organically and natural are really outcomes of worthy products and services but there's also a competitive landscape to think of (aside from bleeding coffers) that put pressure on companies to make that leap and grab that PR lifeline. And let's face it, a great dev guy doesn't necessarily possess the skills to do the pitches and all the related aspects of marketing. It doesn't mean they can't learn but again it is all about the time you have allotted for it to succeed.
Best.
alain
mor.ph - Alain Benedict Yap via FriendFeed MT Plugin
Hi Jason, I hope you don't mind that I link this, but I did a great interview with the Executive Editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer about the print industry is changing and how they are using social media to keep up: http://www.piercemattiepublicr... - Pierce Mattie
No way, that's great! Thanks for sharing, nice piece. - Jason Kintzler
Actually I don't find Brian to be anti-PR at all, just very frustrated with how people pitch him and follow up. I've been interacting with him on twitter and have seen the countless times he's tweeted that someone's tried to force his hand or bully him about a story or client. I wouldn't have a warm fuzzy feeling about PR either after things like that. - Pierce Mattie
I don't find many of the requests very useful, quite off topic, PR Newswire's filters are much more relevant, interesting to read the commentary though. - John Cass
Just started to get these. Wondering if anyone has found this useful... - Al Stevens
Al, I am sure people have, just a matter of doing some digging. A filter would be nice. - John Cass
John - It's still a case of you get what you pay for I guess. It looks like he's focusing on demand in the hopes to get more supply...or vice versa. - Kevin Dugan
As someone who is a ProfNet subscriber and a HARO recipient, I have to say that more queries are moving over to Peter's "project." I'm certain the folks at United Business Media have started noticing the threat to their high-margin service. - Cyrus Afzali
Cyrus he is certainly getting quite a few message, however, I have my ProfNet messages set up on a filter, a fairly narrow focus, and I receive far more queries on that subject from ProfNet than the email list. I would imagine the numbers are still greater on ProfNet. - John Cass
On a different level, this is a great case study/example of building a brand - very quickly - online. - john ratcliffe-lee
I've found it to be a 50/50 relevance with Help a Reporter Out, but the same holds true for me with ProfNet as well. It certainly doesn't hurt to be on both lists, although I am starting to see some of the same inquiries on ProfNet showing up on Peter's list as well. It's also a matter of timing--I get Peter's first listing much earlier than I get my ProfNet feed. I definitely think there's benefits to both. - Pierce Mattie
Does anyone know how many reporters are using HARO? - Andrew