Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
...but the statement that G+ accepts pseudonyms is blatantly false. I've hardly ever seen a more aggressive strategy to ask for real names.
Important and long overdue. Vint Cerf: Google services should not require real names http://news.yahoo.com/google-... via @newsycombinator
Creating research synergies between libraries and #Wikipedia MT @BoingBoing: A match made in heaven http://boingboing.net/2013...
Creating research synergies between libraries and Wikipedia MT BoingBoing: A match made in heaven http://boingboing.net/2013...
The single blog post you should read to learn why building WYSIWYG editing into Wikipedia is harder than you think: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013...
The Economist on Yahoo's work from home ban (and its impact on women) http://www.economist.com/news... ht @edchi
RT @jdforrester: Here's a quick video from us about the VisualEditor that my team are building for @Wikipedia: https://www.youtube.com/watch...
A large collection of #opendata resources: repos, marketplaces, companies, search engines and journals http://blog.bigml.com/2013... via @bigmlcom
.@CKANproject congrats on the release, is the DataHub going to be upgraded when the stable version is out?
RT @CKANproject: CKAN 2.0 beta has arrived! Details of our new #release & demo: http://ckan.org/2013... #opensource #opendata #ckan
RT @WikiResearch: A year’s worth of Wikipedia research: 225 publications reviewed in 2012 and the full bibliographic corpus http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013... #cscw2013
#altmetrics MT @AndreaWiggins CSCW w/ highest acceptance rate had highest avg citation rate. Lowest downloads, citations = lowest acceptance
Article for deletion debates are becoming a major body of research. Fascinating talk on "ignore all rules" http://dl.acm.org/citatio... #cscw2013
#cscw2013 Interested in updates on recent academic Wikipedia research? Follow @WikiResearch
.@jschneider dissecting the main sources of confusion/frustration for newbies participating in deletion discussions in Wikipedia #cscw2013
Arguments about deletion in Wikipedia and what they tell us about online deliberation. @jschneider on stage http://dl.acm.org/citatio... #cscw2013
Effects of surfacing controversy on Wikipedia talk page activity on the perceived quality of an article http://dl.acm.org/citatio... #cscw2013
Great #cscwopen session on Wikipedia research collab ideas with Rosta Farzan, Bob Kraut, @dwmcphd and @wbtthefrog https://twitter.com/ReaderM...
#cscwopen RT @ReaderMeter: Want to collaborate with @Wikimedia on our high-priority research questions? Join us in Regency West 6 #cscw2013
Want to collaborate with @Wikimedia on some high-priority research questions? Want to use our data? Join us in Regency West 6 #cscw2013
Labor hours spent editing Wikipedia as measured via edit sessions. @staeiou #cscw2013 https://twitter.com/ReaderM...
.@staeiou: We need better ways of conceptualizing CSCW work and measuring it using time-based metrics #cscw2013
Editcountitis, an obsession with the number of edits you have made to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... @staeiou #cscw2013
.@staeiou: using sessions to measure participation in Wikipedia (and a success story on mixed methods) http://dl.acm.org/citatio... #cscw2013
Socializing new members of an online community with 7 links in a welcome message likely to cause the opposite effect. @Capt_Swing #cscw2013
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook