"too good! Priceless. I did see two people dancing until a very long time later - so the test *is* accurate!"
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
from Bookmarklet
...well, then...the wife won't be happy when I tell her I failed this gay test!
- JA Castillo
The fact that it said GAY TEST at the top probably made me think something "gay" was to follow, hence me seeing two people dancing. (that's my story...and I'm sticking to it)
- Rah-PM 2012
@Sarah: Imagine the stick figures' heads are nips... You'll see it.
- rowlikeagirl
Wait, so if I see boobs I'm *not* gay?! This test is SEXIST :P
- Lo the Baker
Missing part: "News for you: If you are female, you are het. if male, gay" - I assume.
- Richard Walker
I saw boobs. I don't know if that makes me gay, or just dirty-minded. And the latter is certainly not news to me.
- Penguin
Definitely zoomed in an the boobage aspects, though I did have a bit of a struggle trying to figure out if that was a G string down below...
- Mark J Subtly Severe
My life has come to a complete halt and I cannot go on living until this riddle is revealed! Partner thinks it is because male figure is not touching his female partner and is obviously posing and twirling or as billy idol would say dancing with myself oh oh oh o
- Thom Collins
@Thom.Collins It took me a while to get it (I'm gay) but the straight guys are supposed to see the naked woman immediately ~ imagine the heads of the figures to be nipples, and the \/ in the lower portion of the image (or the right leg of person on left + left leg of person on right) to be belly of a woman...
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
@Jason.Huebel ...It's ok to be gay :) What did you see before anyway? Since you 'liked' it a long while back, I could only assume that you did see two different images? :)
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
One thing that I thought was #genius about this photo is that while most 'psychology tests' explore the positive / negative space, this image explore the 2d / 3d perception. the first kind I have come across. :)
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
@Jason.Huebel I'm not the author of this so I can't give you a psych evaluation....! But if you follow to the Freudian view of the world, everyone is bisexual anyway, so ultimately I guess it does not 'mean' anything... I personally don't follow the doctrine of homosexual / bisexual / *sexual - I think that if two people love each other, they should be together, period. Sex or not is rather besides the point. #smlphilosophy
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
Sex is a necessary step for procreation, and although it is often related to love + relationship, I hypothesize that it's possible to love someone without having sex with them. (aka platonic relationships) - in this regard it does not change anything regarding your marriage. (I am a very strange thinker...)
- See-ming Lee 李思明 SML