Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
Miguel Caetano
#Security: Stuxnet ≠ cyberwar, says US Army Cyber Command officer • The Register /via @0vigia - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012...
#Security: Stuxnet ≠ cyberwar, says US Army Cyber Command officer • The Register /via @0vigia
"Clark also said that cyber “attack” is over-used in the media, as he feels the planet is yet to see a real cyber-attack . “Stuxnet was not a cyber ‘attack’, Estonia was not a cyber ‘attack’, that pipeline that some people say ‘yeah, that was malicious code’ wasn’t a cyber ‘attack’,” he said. “Stuxnet was a big campaign,” he says, by virtue of its use of a combination of software, its attack vectors, its use of digital certificates. He is therefore happy to label it “a game-changer”. However, by the more precise definitions needed to invoke laws of armed conflicts, that does not create the conditions needed to regard it as a cyber-attack. And why does this definition matter? In other words, why should we care about loose media use of “cyber war”? Because, Clark explained to El Reg: if policy-makers are only informed by the catchphrase and not the definition, they will make bad policy. ®" - Miguel Caetano from Bookmarklet