Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
Miguel Caetano
#OpenAccess - Added Value: I do not think those words mean what you think they mean - Cameron Neylon (Science in the Open) /via @GlynMoody - http://cameronneylon.net/blog...
#OpenAccess - Added Value: I do not think those words mean what you think they mean - Cameron Neylon (Science in the Open) /via @GlynMoody
"There are two major strands to position of traditional publishers have taken in justifying the process by which they will make the, now inevitable, transition to a system supporting Open Access. The first of these is that the transition will cost “more money”. The exact costs are not clear but the, broadly reasonable, assumption is that there needs to be transitional funding available to support what will clearly be a mixed system over some transitional period. The argument of course is how much money and where it will come from, as well as an issue that hasn’t yet been publicly broached, how long will it last for? Expect lots of positioning on this over the coming months with statements about “average paper costs” and “reasonable time frames”, with incumbent subscription publishers targeting figures of around $2,500-5,000 and ten years respectively, and those on my side of the fence suggesting figures of around $1,500 and two years. This will be fun to watch but the key will be to see where this money comes from (and what subsequently gets cut), the mechanisms put in place to release this “extra” money and the way in which they are set up so as to wind down, and provide downwards price pressure." - Miguel Caetano from Bookmarklet