When did ReadWriteWeb start using multi-page posts? That is so disappointing. - Rob Diana

Hi Richard, Thank you for including Imindi in the watching list. I am sorry that the last comment was not complete due to some reasons I am not sure. I was in hurry to a meeting before posting the comment. Imindi is certainly a unique one. To me, Imindi points out a better and probably more natural path how the Web may gradually approach the Semantic Web from Web 2.0. "Semantics", the term itself represents certain subjective judgment by individuals. Many of the mainstream Semantic Web approaches try to avoid this issue since it is too hard for machines to handle. By contrast, Imindi believes that this issue is inevitable. At the same time, Imindi also agrees that by the current technology machines truly cannot solve the problem well. Therefore, Imindi suggests much more human intervention into the construction of Semantic Web than many other Semantic Web researchers have suggested. From the research point of view, it is less machine-automated. From the practice point of view, however, we believe it is m - Yihong Ding from FriendFeed MT Plugin

Rob, why is it disappointing? It makes total sense to put long articles over 2 or more pages. Jeez, give us a break. Sometimes I get tired of whining from people about little things like that. It seems to be cool to dislike pagination, like the Friendfeed crowd gets brownie points for saying "ohhh, pagination is evil". But if you think about it logically, pagination splits up long content so that it becomes more readible. So you have to make an extra click, so what?! - Richard from FriendFeed MT Plugin

Richard, please don't get me wrong, I love ReadWriteWeb. I have always disliked multi-page articles because it breaks the flow of reading. Nothing more than that. I just like reading on one page. It won't matter to me long term because I will continue to read it regardless. Just personal preference really. - Rob Diana

Bring back anchor tags! :P - Aram Zucker-Scharff