i love foxmarks. been using for over a year now. no issues! - David Kanter
but they are also bringing it back and putting it on the Google Code page, essentially making it open source - http://tinyurl.com/5topzn - Mark O'Neill
What we need is Nuremberg part II. W et al need to be imprisoned for war crimes. - Victor Ganata via Alert Thingy
Impeachment is one thing, but I think we'd be legitimizing an undeclared war by prosecuting for "war crimes." (By "undeclared" I mean that it was never *legally* declared.) - Kenneth LeFebvre
It doesn't matter if a war is declared or undeclared - war crimes are war crimes. (Although I don't think that Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes. He started an unnecessary war and managed it poorly, but that's basically it.) - sebmos
Wouldn't happen. Obama is about "turning the page:" he can easily accomplish what he wants to do by simply saying "that was then, this is now." - Mark Trapp
If there is no war, then there is no "war crime." There may be crimes, but calling them "war crimes" means you are acknowledging a war that was never legally declared. And, IMO, Congress is more to blame for the "war" than Bush. They abdicated their Constitutional authority to declare war and gave the executive branch a blank check. - Kenneth LeFebvre
I'm sorry, but this is a war, and every organization will recognize that. Nobody cares that Congress didn't declare the war. The Vietnam war was a war, too, even though it wasn't declared. :: You can blame Congress for war, sure. But war itself isn't unlawful (weird, I know), and they didn't abdicate anything. Not Congress is the Commander in Chief, it's the president. It's not like this was different before the war on Iraq. - sebmos
If Bush is fair game for impeachment, so is just about every Senator and Represntative, because they all--nearly every one of them--bought the intelligence that numerous heads of state believed. The failure for going to war does not lie at Bush's feet. The failure of management is a different story; however, he's done nothing impeachable there. Yes, he's mismanaged it, but not any worse than LBJ did Viet Nam. Well, actually, the proof is in the pudding; LBJ did far worse at managing Viet Nam than Bush has Iraq. - Gregory Pittman via twhirl
I think we missed the boat on this one don't you think? I mean, he did what he did and you RE-ELECTED for crying out loud! So I don't think you can now sit here and talk about impeachment for war crimes! - Mark O'Neill
War crimes trials for all the key ringleaders of the Iraq War are in order, as well as the repeal of all neocon-engineered police state legislation enacted during the last eight years. We need to restore American democracy and fundamental constitutional principles. We also need a radical reorientation of American foreign policy around the American interest. - Sean McBride
Sean, and what candidate in the current race proposes to do that? BHO is nothing short of socialist (on the domestic policy front), and is far more interested in making friends out of enemies and making enemies out of friends on the international front. Not exactly centered "around the American interest" I'd say. McCain isn't much better, except on national security issues. At least we would be safe with JSM as President. - Gregory Pittman via twhirl
Sebmos: Congress is the ONLY authority legally allowed to declare war. The President is not allowed to do so, not withstanding his position as CINC once the war has been declared. Yes, they did abdicate their authority by delegating the authority to go to war to Bush. - Kenneth LeFebvre
Gregory: I can't imagine a policy more destructive to the American interest than getting bogged down in a holy war with the world's one billion plus Muslims -- our economic competitors in Europe, China and India would rejoice. But this is precisely the policy which John McCain's neoconservative advisers are pushing. - Sean McBride
Sean, I'm not disagreeing that war--in hindsight--was a bad idea. And, yes, it has been mismanaged. But, now that we're there, anything other than outright victory will leave us vulnerable for decades, even centuries, to come. I also find a lot of hypocrisy in tthe argument against the Iraq war. Countries were skewered for remaining silent on Darfur. But we intervene in a very similar circumstance (mass genocide by the country's leaders) in Iraq and we still get skewered. All of this has far more to do that an (R) gets appended to Bush's name than anything else. Had Clinton started this, there would be an eery silence. - Gregory Pittman via twhirl
Gregory: smart actors on the world stage know when to cut their losses -- they don't drive on further into the drink, like Hitler in Russia. We've dumped several trillions of dollars down the drain in Iraq with the result of greatly worsening our strategic situation in the Middle East. McCain's neoconservative advisers are prodding and goading him to escalate a ruinous policy, one which may well lead to the economic destruction of the United States. Are you prepared to live with $10 a gallon gas or worse? Can you imagine the effects of that development on the quality of life of most Americans? - Sean McBride
Sean: I doubt if your european economic competitors would rejoice about a holy war - we would probably get dragged into it. The world is unstable enough as it is without furthering this economic/idealogical war...I think most of europe is hoping for an obama win - I think that will be in all our interest - David W
US Presidents who have fought wars without a declaration of war? EVERY president since Truman, with the possible exception of Carter. Speakers of the House who have allowed this? All of 'em. - Ontario Emperor via fftogo
Ontario: true... but isn't "change" what everyone's asking for? - Kenneth LeFebvre
Sean, the price of gas has nothing--nothing whatsoever--to do with the war in Iraq. To argue that point is naive at best. The price of gasoline is due to failed energy restrictions on the homefront. Who has espoused such policies? Obama and those who think like him. They're wrong on the issue. They've always been wrong. I would much rather pay $10/gallon (won't happen though) than worry that at any moment I may be faced with a car bomb as I walk into a store. We will be fighting this war for the foreseeable future; I would much rather fight it over there than here. - Gregory Pittman via twhirl
I find American politics hysterical at times. Both sides using fear to intimidate the other and both sides overreacting and blowing things out of proportion. Makes it far more exciting than Canadian politics, that's for sure. - Shey
For the impact of the Iraq War on oil prices, simply do a Google search on [iraq war oil prices] and browse the top few dozen results among 14,000,000. Every time an Israeli government official or American neoconservative threatens to attack Iran, oil prices skyrocket again -- full details available with a Google search or two. Latest news today: a large number of oil contracts are being issued by the new Iraqi government to non-American companies -- some of them our most powerful economic competitors. Our current Mideast policies can most charitably be described as self-destructive -- we are making enemies of key oil-producing states. - Sean McBride
QUOTE Oil prices rose more than $3 yesterday amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran.... “The petroleum markets rebounded ... on worries that Israeli military exercises held in the first week of June might have been preparation for a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities,” said Tim Evans, energy analyst for Citi Futures Perspective in New York. Energy experts are concerned any conflict in Iran could lead to a shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway separating Iran from the Arabian Peninsula, through which roughly 40% of the world’s traded oil is shipped. - Sean McBride
Sean, I've no one in the States threaten to attack Iran. In fact, the Bush Administration has said it has no plans to do so. So your argument that such threats cause the cost of oil to skyrocket is nothing more than a straw man. Try again. Other countries (namely China) are surging in their demand for oil. Supply doesn't match demand. This is where the Democrats' energy policies fail. We're sitting on top of our own energy future. It's like telling a bucnh of hungry kids, "There's food in the pantry but we can't eat it so you have to stay hungry." Inexcusable. - Gregory Pittman via twhirl
Did we REALLY start a comment thread based on the pontifications of a JOURNALIST? So if Susan Estridge gets on Fox News tomorrow and says "If Obama wins he is going to nuke Idaho" you will all join me in denouncing Obama's "new position" on wiping Idaho off of the map even though he never articulated it himself? from the articles comment section: "Code to nation: Elect John McCain or I’ll start another freaking war!" and yet NO WHERE in the article Was Bush or any of his staff ever quoted affirming this. - Marco
The best way to deal with Bush is by letting him fade into history. Anything like impeachment will make him a martyr among the fundamentalist fools. - Krish
@Gregory: well, well, said. I like the statement of Rep. Markey (D) who said that it's a sad day in American history when we have to go begging Saudi Arabia to increase their production. As if, somehow, his party is not culpable in turning the US into an energy beggar. - Craig Eddy
"I would much rather fight it over there than here." Why do people keep repeating this nonsense? What is it about "fighting them over there" that makes them unable to fight us "over here?" - David Worrell
Gregory: there has been relentless and conspicuous pressure coming from neoconservatives closely associated with the Bush 43 administration to expand the Iraq War to Iran. See most recently remarks by Daniel Pipes and William Kristol on the subject, as well as by Norman Podhoretz and many other neocons. Whenever they imply that they they have inside information about a coming attack, and speak in the mainstream media, they are pushing the price of oil upwards. This has all been well-documented -- Google it. Financial speculators are betting on them being right. If the war actually happens (even if only Israel attacks), the price of oil will go through the roof. - Sean McBride
As @Marco pointed out, I can't believe that this thread was started by the posting about the SPECULATION of a single journalist about what President Bush MIGHT do! Give me a break! - Thomas Ho via fftogo
Pushing the price of oil ever upward: More War Drums by Neo-Cons for War with Iran http://tinyurl.com/6ptfhg "Think Progress alerted me to statements today made on Sunday TV shows by those neo-cons Bill Kristol and John Bolton to the likelihood that George Bush will attack Iran before the end of this year.
Both of them mention the greater probability of a Bush attack if it is clear that Barack Obama will win the presidency.
Bush and his group are dangerous madmen. They would just as soon start a perpetual war in the Middle East with Iran than ever use negotiation and diplomacy to resolve disputes." - Sean McBride
What would you impeach Bush on? Oh I know your pure anger at him. Yeah well that's not enough so give up! - Colide81
Great pictures, very sexy and tasteful. - Mike Fruchter
yeah, i have some mixed feelings about the topless women. we had a discussion a couple of weeks ago about nudity appearing in flickr favorites. no one liked it when it was male nudity. I don't object to this. i just have mixed feelings about it. (yes, i know i can hide it. ;) ) - edythe
Gorgeous shots of people and places. I'll take nudity over violence any day of the week. Quick story: worked at Blockbuster one summer. Mom comes in irate over 10 year old seeing Mel Gibson's butt in Bird on a Wire. Demands freebie and selects shoot 'em up Tango & Cash with Sly Stallone. *sigh* - AJ Kohn
Very nice indeed. I like the way some of it highlighted the beauty of the human anatomy - Jason
I photograph nudes, so I tend to favorite nudes on Flickr. A lot of them don't show up here because most of us nude photographers mark our photos Moderate or Restricted. But sometimes when the photographer doesn't do that, they end up here. I'm sure the majority of people who subscribe to my feed are aware of it and don't mind, but the friend-of-a-friend feature is problematic. - Michael Hocter
I don't photograph nudes (obvious to anyone who follows my photography), but I really appreciate great nude photography, male or female. The contours of the human body are just as beautiful as any other shapes we photograph. - Dawn M. Armfield
@Dawn M. Armfield - I think you summed it best; wholly agree. - JA Castillo
This is all very nice, and I read Hutch Carpenter's reasonably worded post about nudity on FriendFeed. But judging from the response to my accidentally shared male nude (how coy that sounds) in which a few people attributed to me, if not malice, then dastardly mischief, I'm guessing that most would not welcome sharing pix by Robert Mapplethorpe, or someone like him. His work straddles a line, doesn't it? Not so simple. - Rick Powell
Do what you do man, if people don;t want it they can not follow you. Seems simple to me. - Soulhuntre via twhirl
@Rick - if you wanted to originate Mapplethorpe, I'd say do it all you want. People can decide whether to subscribe to you or not. It's the Likes and Comments where it gets complicated. I personally would refrain from Likes/Comments on Mapplethorpe pix. But there is a chaotic aspect to FriendFeed that frankly is part of what makes it interesting. - Hutch Carpenter
Here's my take on it. Thumbnails like this aren't obvious even if my kids are hanging over me. Rick, I honestly didn't see your image until I heard the flap over it. I'm on a MBP 15", so they are small enough that I can tell they are nudes if I pay attention, but I'd have to click to see anything. In contrast, the one that Igor the Troll posted was VERY obvious, even at a relative distance. I'd like the option to hide ALL images for those of us with SFW/SFK issues and that would solve the whole thing. - Cyndy
Hutch, I agree, and it seems intentional, judging from the broad TOS. Cyndy: an all-hide option seems reasonable. To all: I'm not wringing my hands over it or anything, I just don't think the line between porn and art is all that clear and it's a bit naive to think everyone's going to agree where that line is. For my part, I object to the whole concept of a line at all. But then, I would. ;-) - Rick Powell
keep doing your thing michael! . it's not a matter of "taste." taste is subjective anyway. it's a matter or having the freedom to do it provided you're not exploiting or harming anyone, which michael hocter obviously isn't. - Cee Bee
Great pictures Michael. I always find it amusing when people get in a flap over pictures of the human body. It's BREASTS people - get over it! Your children are not going to be mentally traumatised for life after seeing women's breasts!! Man oh man. - Mark O'Neill
Great photos. It's a shame people are getting their panties in a twist over someone favoriting nudes. Great photos and thanks for sharing them. - Jim Goldstein
@Jim Goldstein, Mark O'Neill: no one got their panties in a twist over this post. there was no flap. - edythe
Agree that the line between art and porn is incredibly vague, but there's no porn here. Great shots. - Anthony Citrano
I hate Facebook because of this. Who are THEY to tell me you have too many friends? - Robert Scoble
They have good reason for that but still... there are power users like you and Scoble (and whole bunch of others) that would like to have more connections than what is possible. - Daniel Schildt
I guess guys like you and Scoble should not have user profiles but be groups, to be honest. I'm sure the groups have larger limits. - Gerard van Schip
Gerard: the problem with groups is that they don't have things like apps. - Robert Scoble
You can never have too many friends... facebook must be wrong! :) - Lucretia Pruitt
Loic, Robert: Is Facebook slow for you guys? - i.e. is there any truth to Facebook's claim that the 5,000 friend limit is there for performance reasons? - Mike Doeff
Mike: it's sometimes slow, yes, but never as bad as Twitter's direct messaging capabilities are for me. - Robert Scoble
Mike, yes it is sometimes slow but they fixed the add a friend now much faster. However I can't add any anymore but you know that already! - Loic Le Meur
Igor: the bans are only if WE add more people, not if people add us. I haven't added someone myself to Facebook in a very long time. In fact, I really don't use Facebook much at all. - Robert Scoble
Loic, try to add yourself as a friend to yourself and check what happens ! - Ron Shoshani
why the hell would I want to add myself as a friend to myself !? - Loic Le Meur
@Ron S -- Shhhh!! Doing this will open up a Scrabuloous paradox and rip the fabric of space and time and release the Zuck demon to reign over the universe for four Quatoon-epochs. (That's pretty much what's happening anyway, but we don't want to accelerate te process.) - john conroy
Lucky you!! Think of all the poking you're going to get!! - Mark O'Neill
that's hillarious & 1 of the reasons I hate facebook! Who r they 2 tell Anyone they've got TOO many friends! Wth?! Is there such a thing?! Shheeeesh! (shakes head) - Deborah Micek
In Soviet Russia, you do not have too many friends. Too many friends..have..you? - Mike Lewis
I'm definitely becoming a huge FriendFeed fan, but not everyone is here, so I think Twitter will remain essential. Plus, how complex would FriendFeed have to get to be configurable to the point where I could get chat or IM updates for only certain kinds of feeds for only certain users (and be able to reply appropriately) and have that tie in with my hiding filters? - Logical Extremes
Interesting, so you want to get friendfeed through IM and be able to interact with the posts (replies or comments) with IM as well? You can already configure things so you're only getting posts you want from each user, the api respects those choices (afik). So building an IM bot for friendfeed is what you want to do, Jabber based IM probably wouldn't be too hard to get the feed. Difficult part would be posting a comment to a friendfeed post. Very cool idea. - John
@John -- there already is a bot to do most of this, the Mojipage bot. - Trent Olson
And then of course SMS is the next step (but as we dumb down to more compact protocols, usability decreases). Or maybe SMS will be so 2007 when the iPhone supports chat native ;-) - Logical Extremes
I'm not into FF nor Plurk, yet, but it seems like they offer an easier way to thread conversations that twitter doesn't have. - Mario Sundar
@Mario...I'd recommend spending some time with ff, but steering clear of Plurk - Trent Olson
I am liking the comments threading on Friend Feed, but it feels like conversations get lost somehow too. - John F Morton
I've noticed that, despite having 500 followers on Twitter, no-one responds to anything I say!! But here on Friendfeed, I get instant replies - and quality replies (which is important). Twitter has too much noise. - Mark O'Neill
I think that FriendFeed and Twitter were both built for different purposes. A lot of people use Twitter so they can keep in touch with friends. On FriendFeed, I think it's more of a website where you share and discuss content. - possible248
I think yesterdays coverage of WWDC here on FF pretty much rubber stamped FF's position, no? - Roberto Bonini
ff feels like a mashup of pownce functionality with the benefit of aggregating lots of other streams. I think it misses some of the conversation with the cloud aspects of twitter. As for everyone not being here - that's part of the reason there is more response, you can actually notice when someone says something not just watch the stream go by in a blur. - Phillip J. Zannini via twhirl
friend feed has design quality plus delivers content that is also visually pleasant ! - marshal sandler via Alert Thingy
I would rather not use FF messages for Twitter-like statuses. If I stick to Twitter for status messages, then other FF users can choose to block those if they want. - Morton Fox
@John - The Mojipage Bot allows you to select noise level, enter different discuss rooms and posting to FF.The Mojipage widget also have the 'like' and 'comment' feature for posting FF too! For more informations you can go to http://mojipage.com/pages/bot/ - Aelvin Han
Steve - discussions are much easier to follow and come back to later on on FF; its one major reason why I'm becoming a more dedicated FF user - Ron Emrick via Alert Thingy
100% agree. Twitter represents a great initial idea that resulted in an effective one-way loop. FriendFeed is poised to be the fruition of the RESPONSE to all those posted thoughts. An actual discussion. A true loop. Potentially also FF might just be a service to corner the market on all web discussion. Jus' sayin. - (steve isaacs)
I was a late joiner to twitter- fellow marketer turned me onto it, and I enjoyed it, but never got the large discussions that happened here *immediately*- and realy enjoy the filtering and weighting that goes on. - anna
FF definitely has more info and less extraneous stuff. Information content vs chatter. - Robin Whitson
I'm pulling for FF to do well, but I've spent time on twitter and I know the people there. hard to leave it. - Rob Williams
Like Morton, I'm still inclined to post status messages to ff from another source so they can be parsed/blocked, but I'm trying out gTalk to replace tweets. Thinking the only con to doing that is twitter habits I can quickly get over. - Dan Covington
The signal-to-noise ratio at FF is heaps higher than Twitter, and it is a good balance between having temporal conversations (late-breaking news, etc.) vs. information worth archiving.. - Wil
We need to start FriendFeed meetups now to take the place of TUB meetups :-) - Duncan Riley
Yesterday during the keynote was a lot of fun. Hopefully more events (big and small) will be spread via FriendFeed Rooms. - Scott Cropper
agree - and it's the threading, searching, flexibility that makes FF a winner for me - Anthony Citrano
out of interest steve, what client do you use for FF? still finding alertthingy too chatty on the UI side - steve clayton via twhirl
So what kind of luck have you had motivating your Twitter followers to come to FF Steve? Not that I have that many, but around 4000 people follow me on Twitter. I have a whopping 227 following me on FF. - ScottBourne
@Scott I have 3200 following me here and another 1500 via RSS. On Twitter I have north of 7000 followers. So you are right this is an issue. One possible idea is to run the whole lifestream or just the FF portion (http://friendfeed.com/steverub...) through Twitterfeed. That way people can follow my stuff there if they want to. - Steve Rubel
I understand what you're saying, Steve, but I still think FF needs an easier interface. Checking the website all the time is a drag. - Ed Healy
That's interesting. The comment threads are definitely easier to read on FriendFeed though. - GerryBot
@Steve, I'm with you, but even RSS can't compensate for Twitter's ease of use. There is something to be said for the ability to get short IM-like messages in a timeline, rather than threaded vis-a-vis FF. If FF had a twhirl-like client interface it would be an easy substitution. Right now, it's not. - Ed Healy
Twitter seems to be more a right now kind of service, where FF brings all recent content into view. I guess they both have their uses, but which is more ideal is anyone's guess - Derek Schauland via twhirl
I like that I can look here & see what all the comments are at once. It makes it much easier to meet new people or find out a general 'take' on the topic. - Sheryl Loch
What irony that Jessica used the very same media to track them down. - Ro (Lilyhill)
As long as it's a genuine apology and not an apology and a wink, then good. - Mark O'Neill
In Turkey we have judges giving sentences of reading classic novels or not going to bars etc. But this is a mile stone for internet... - Doruk via twhirl
Ah, a SUIT. I figured you meant "lawsuit." Couldn't decide which one would be more frustrating for you :) - Erik Dafforn
Enough of that already. The whole 7-days-a-week/365-days-a-year blogging gig is only made bearable by the fact that the work uniform is PAJAMAS. If everyone starts wearing suits... - Cyndy
You asking what we think of the suit or the video? - Gerard van Schip
It's a shame that you can't turn it on and off as you want., This means I will use FB even less, only when I want to chat, and use FF even more! - Arnaud Fischer
do we know which networks they are switching it on? - Nicole Simon
I've been playing with it... I'm in a few school networks and Chicago, IL - greg brown
I think this is the origin of story!! March 26 was when I added the bot to my gTalk..!! - Jigar Mehta
I like having each service as an individual contact. Much easier. Can we see the same for Pownce? - Chris Nixon
Well, IMified has taken bot to a next level.. I even created a customized option to check my google calendar appointments for today (a quick schedule for today) by interacting with bot! Not sure, if they have one for Pownce.. - Jigar Mehta via bTT