Hi guys. Now this is power. Interfering with a presentation from across the Atlantic via FriendFeed. Carry on, Cameron. LOL
- Ricardo Vidal
Jason Hoyt: Bending the Internet to Scientists or maximizing efficiency.
- Martin Fenner
Most social networks for scientists are a failure.
- Martin Fenner
The problem: research is inherently social, but the tools we are using are not.
- Martin Fenner
If you build it, they will not come... build projects for communities that already exist (Sean Mooney from yesterday)
- Kirsten Sanford
Many social tools need a critical mass, maybe that is not the right way to go.
- Martin Fenner
Tools should work with a userbase of 1.
- Martin Fenner
The internet needs to bend over for scientists.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
Seems like a good place to plug an article I wrote recently about the barriers that prevent scientists from adopting social tools: http://dx.doi.org/10...
- Chris Patil
Shared annotated documents collection - will people use this feature?
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
Duncan Hull: Digital Identity on the Web
- Martin Fenner
annotation of documents will increase interaction and usability of information contained within papers. I totally see people using that feature...
- Kirsten Sanford
I love the idea of having an embed code for a collection. I can share bib-lets.
- Mr. Gunn
Duncan Hull - who am I, digitally speakin?
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
All the social tools for sharing data on the web rely on some kind of digital identity.
- Martin Fenner
Traditional way to gain identity as scientists: publish a journal article.
- Martin Fenner
Julian Gough is digitally schizophrenic.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
scientist identity has changed. Much more complicated than traditional list of publications. Now includes, social alignments (research groups), work (research projects), friends (social web)...
- Kirsten Sanford
Many papers by "forgotten password", "already registered", etc. in Google Scholar.
- Martin Fenner
A popular user on google scholar: Mr F. Password.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
machines are too stupid to tell the difference between real authors and random words... is this something that could be solved by better AI? artificial learning algorithms>
- Kirsten Sanford
Author disambugation in article is hard comp sci problem.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
this paper talks about "page rank for people" not nec. a new idea, but could be important for research reputation / attribution
- Kirsten Sanford
MyExperiment allows OpenID, but only 16% of users use it.
- Martin Fenner
OpenID is prohibitively complicated to start using... anti-intuitive... barrier to entry.
- Kirsten Sanford
Openid seems to be pretty hard to use for most scientists.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
OpenID is probably not secure enough for some scientific applications.
- Martin Fenner
Some universities are requiring ResearcherID for admin.
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
Researcher identifiers would make life for journal publishers such as PLoS easier.
- Martin Fenner
Will there be a tipping point from NIH or NSF or PLoS in the use of a unique identifier?
- Bosco Ho
from iPhone
What will change if we had the perfect researcher identifier?
- Martin Fenner
Unique researcher ID would level the publication playing field between men and women. Women often struggle with name changes and loss of recognizability due to name changes at marriage.
- Kirsten Sanford
Long discussion about potential benefits of researcher identifiers.
- Martin Fenner
I do wonder about the pitfall of the identifier in non-democratic states... could make scientists easier government targets?
- Kirsten Sanford
Thank you all for the comments. This plus Cameron's video stream was as is if I were there.
- Ricardo Vidal
16% is actually pretty good for such a new technology. there are also some user interface designs which would help such as http://drupal.org/project...
- Mike Chelen