Interesting, although I am not sure how it relates to the "Science 2.0" topic. More importantly, I don't understand why Etienne Joly was Editor for this article — PLoS ONE's own data http://www.plosone.org/edboard... indicate that his area of expertise is Biochemistry/Membrane Proteins and Energy Transduction ?! I am confused... - Enro

Hey Bora, could you find out about the above? I am really curious... - Enro

Relationship to Science 2.0 is clear: new ways of doing science will involve new ways to measure scientific output, impact etc. I don't understand the question about the editor. - Bill Hooker

Thank you, Bill. Your point could be discussed (precisely, there is nothing but good old bibliometrics and impact measure using good old Thomson SCI in this paper) but I am more interest to understand why a bibliometrics article, which is a discipline per se, gets a biochemist as its Academic Editor. AEs play an important part in the editorial process http://www.plosone.org/static... and PLoS ONE boasts itself to "seek appropriate Academic Editors to handle the submission" http://www.plosone.org/edboard... - Enro