A possible way to go global (>7 countries) with some Open Science projects (be this blog 3 descendants or a reform of the peer review system)? Source: European Science Foundation. Largest drawback: They foresee 15 months for the review process, not really the time frame for _supporting_ innovation. Deadline for proposals: Oct 22, 2009. - http://www.esf.org/activit...
"An ESF Research Networking Programme is a networking activity bringing together nationally funded research activities for four to five years, to address a major scientific issue or a science-driven topic of research infrastructure, at the European level with the aim of advancing the frontiers of science."
- Daniel Mietchen
from Bookmarklet
Good grief, 15 months of review. This sounds like a possible way for a big open science consortium to be funded - if one can strip away the typical EU verbiage. I could represent Australia (where we have our own funding), but we'd just then need "Canada, China, Israel, Japan, Korea, Russia, USA and others".
- Matthew Todd
in 15 months we could be past the singularity already :)
- Jean-Claude Bradley
I'm all for it! Let's do some brainstorming!
- Björn Brembs
Additional development of interdisciplinary research methods would be useful, particularly if there is a focus on the learning and sharing aspects.
- Mike Chelen
made a few comments and quickly skimmed the call. No harm in working something up though - we could use some of the old network proposal we wrote a year or ago...http://docs.google.com/View...
- Cameron Neylon
Bah, I meant to say - it would be a good thing to start putting together some of these - if nothing else we can re-use the text until some of them get funded. Wasn't meaning to be negative.
- Cameron Neylon
Cameron: advocacy for data repository, semantic publication, and community commenting could be influential and interesting
- Mike Chelen
It might be interesting to see if writing this in public would get the attraction of funders with shorter review periods.
- Daniel Mietchen